Write 2 different pages one due in 3 days other in 7 days

Write 2 different pages one due in 3 days other in 7 days
NR449 Evidence-Based Practice RUA: Topic Search Strategy Guidelines Purpose The Topic Search Strategy paper is the first of three related assignments. The purpose of this initial paper is to briefly describe your search strategies when identifying two articles that pertain to an evidence-based practice topic of interest. Course outcomes: This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes. CO 1: Examine the sources of knowledge that contribute to professional nursing practice. (PO 7) CO 2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (POs 4 and 8) Due date: Your faculty member will inform you when this assignment is due. The Late Assignment Policy applies to this assignment. Total points possible: 160 points Preparing the assignment: Follow these guidelines when completing this assignment. Speak with your faculty member if you have questions. Students will be placed into groups by the end of the second week of the session. The groups will work together to select a practice problem of interest as the focus for the three RUA assignments in this course. The practice topic of interest will also be used to complete week 3 and week 5 independent student assignments, as well as a group PowerPoint presentation in week 7. Individuals will complete this assignment independently for weeks 3 and 5. Teams must assure that members do not use the same articles when completing this assignment. Please make sure you do not duplicate articles within your group. Paper should be 3-4 content pages in length. Title and reference pages are required but are excluded from 3-4 -page length. The paper will include the following sections: Clinical Question (45 points/28%) Describe the problem. What is the focus of your group’s work? Explain the significance of the problem in terms of patient outcomes. What health outcomes result from your problem? Or what statistics document this is a problem? You may find support on websites for government or professional organizations. PICOT question in support of the group topic. State the purpose of your paper. What will your paper do or describe? This is like a problem statement. “The purpose of this paper is to . . .” Levels of Evidence (20 points/13%) Identify the type of question being asked (therapy, prognosis, meaning, etc.). What is the best type of evidence to answer that question (e.g., RCT, cohort study, qualitative study, etc.)? Search Strategy (65 points/41%) List search terms and results. Databases used (start with the CU library). Link your search with the PICOT question described above. Refinement decisions. As you did your search, what decisions did you make in refinement to get your required articles down to a reasonable number for review? Were any limits used? If so, what? Identification of two (2) most relevant articles (primary sources published within the last 5 years). Format (30 points/18%) Correct grammar and spelling. Include a title page. Use of headings for each section. Clinical Question, Levels of Evidence, Search Strategy, and Conclusion Adheres to current APA formatting and guidelines. 3-4 pages in length, excluding title and reference pages. For writing assistance, visit the Writing Center. Please note that your instructor may provide you with additional assessments in any form to determine that you fully understand the concepts learned. Grading Rubric Criteria are met when the student’s application of knowledge demonstrates achievement of the outcomes for this assignment. Assignment Section and Required Criteria (Points possible/% of total points available) Highest Level of Performance High Level of Performance Satisfactory Level of Performance Unsatisfactory Level of Performance Section not present Clinical Question (45 points/28%) 45 points 40 points 37 points 33 points 0 points Required criteria Describe the problem. What is the focus of your group’s work? Explain the significance of the problem in terms of patient outcomes. What health outcomes result from your problem? Or what statistics document this is a problem? You may find support on websites for government or professional organizations. PICOT question in support of the group topic. State the purpose of your paper. What will your paper do or describe? This is similar to a problem statement. “The purpose of this paper is to . . .” Includes 4 requirements. Includes 3 requirements. Includes 2 requirements. Includes 1 requirement. No requirements for this section presented. Levels of Evidence (20 points/13%) 20 points 16 points 10 points 0 points Required criteria Identify the type of question being asked (therapy, prognosis, meaning, etc.). What is the best type of evidence to answer that question (e.g., RCT, cohort study, qualitative study, etc.)? Includes 2 requirements. Includes 1 requirement. Incomplete or inaccurate information presented. No requirements for this section presented. Search Strategy (65 points/41%) 65 points 58 points 54 points 48 points 0 points Required criteria List search terms and results. Databases used (start with the CU library). Link your search with the PICOT question described above. Refinement decisions. As you did your search, what decisions did you make in refinement to get your required articles down to a reasonable number for review? Were any limits used? If so, what? Identification of two (2) most relevant articles (primary sources published within the last 5 years). Includes 4 requirements. Includes 3 requirements. Includes 2 requirements. Includes 1 requirement. No requirements for this section presented. Organization and APA Style (30 points/18%) 30 points 27 points 25 points 15 points 0 points Required criteria Correct grammar and spelling. Include a title page. Use of headings for each section. Clinical Question, Levels of Evidence, Search Strategy, and Conclusion Adheres to current APA formatting and guidelines. 3-4 pages in length, excluding title and reference pages. Includes 6 requirements. Includes 5 requirements. Includes 3-4 requirements. Includes 1-2 requirements. No requirements for this section presented. Total Points Possible = 160 points © 2021 Chamberlain University. All Rights Reserved NR449_RUA_Topic_Search_Strategy_V2_JUL22 0
Write 2 different pages one due in 3 days other in 7 days
NR449 Evidence-Based Practice RUA: Analyzing Published Research Guidelines Purpose The purpose of this paper is to interpret the two articles identified as most important to the group topic. Course outcomes: This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes. CO 2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (POs 4 and 8) CO 4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and clinical significance related to evidence-based practice. (POs 4 and 8) Due date: Your faculty member will inform you when this assignment is due. The Late Assignment Policy applies to this assignment. Total points possible: 200 points Preparing the assignment Follow these guidelines when completing this assignment. Speak with your faculty member if you have questions. Please make sure you do not duplicate articles within your group. The paper will include the following: Clinical Question (30 points/15%) Describe the problem: What is the focus of your group’s work? Significance of problem: What health outcomes result from your problem? Or what statistics document this is a problem? You may find support on websites for government or professional organizations. Purpose of the paper: What will your paper do or describe? ***Please note that although most of these questions are the same as you addressed in paper 1, the purpose of this paper is different. You can use your paper 1 for items 1 & 2 above, including any faculty suggestions for improvement provided as feedback. Use Evidence Matrix Table Template: Data Summary – (60 points/30%) Categorize items in the Evidence Matrix Table, including proper intext citations and reference list entries for each article. References (recent publication within the last 5 years) Purpose/Hypothesis/Study Question(s) Variables: Independent (I) and Dependent (D) Study Design Sample Size and Selection Data Collection Methods Major Findings (Evidence) Description of Findings (60 points/30%) Describe the data in the Evidence Matrix Table, including proper intext citations and reference list entries for each article. Compare and contrast variables within each study. What are the study design and procedures used in each study; qualitative, quantitative, or mixed method study, levels of confidence in each study, etc.? Participant demographics and information. Instruments used, including reliability and validity. How do the research findings provide evidence to support your clinical problem, or what further evidence is needed to answer your question? Next steps: Identify two questions that can help guide the group’s work. Conclusion (20 points/10%) Review major findings in a summary paragraph. Evidence to address your clinical problem. Make a connection back to all the included sections. Wrap up the assignment and give the reader something to think about. Format (30 points/15%) Correct grammar and spelling Include a title and reference page Use of headings for each section: Problem Synthesis of the Literature Variables Methods Participants Instruments Implications for Future Work Conclusion Adheres to current APA formatting and guidelines Include at least two (2) scholarly, current (within 5 years) primary sources other than the textbook 3-4 pages in length, excluding appendices, title, and reference pages For writing assistance, visit the Writing Center. Please note that your instructor may provide you with additional assessments in any form to determine that you fully understand the concepts learned. 2 Grading Rubric Criteria are met when the student’s application of knowledge demonstrates achievement of the outcomes for this assignment. Assignment Section and Required Criteria (Points possible/% of total points available) Highest Level of Performance High Level of Performance Satisfactory Level of Performance Unsatisfactory Level of Performance Section not present in paper Clinical Question (30 points/15%) 30 points 26 points 24 points 11 points 0 points Required criteria Describe the problem: What is the focus of your group’s work? Significance of problem: What health outcomes result from your problem? Or what statistics document this is a problem? You may find support on websites for government or professional organizations. Purpose of the paper: What will your paper do or describe? Includes 3 requirements for section. Includes 2 requirements for section. Includes 1 requirement for section. Present, yet includes no required criteria. No requirements for this section presented. Evidence Matrix Table: Data Summary (Appendix A) (60 points/30%) 60 points 56 points 47 points 25 points 0 points Required criteria Categorize items in the Matrix Table, including proper intext citations and reference list entries for each article. References (recent publication within the last 5 years) Purpose/Hypothesis/Study Question(s) Variables: Independent (I) and Dependent (D) Study Design Sample Size and Selection Data Collection Methods Major Findings (Evidence) Includes 7 requirements for section. Includes 6 requirements for section. Includes 5 requirements for section. Includes 4 or less requirements for section. No requirements for this section presented. Description of Findings (60 points/30%) 60 points 53 points 47 points 23 points 0 points Required criteria Describe the data in the Matrix Table, including proper intext citations and reference list entries for each article. Compare and contrast variables within each study. What are the study design and procedures used in each study; qualitative, quantitative, or mixed method study, levels of confidence in each study, etc.? Participant demographics and information. Includes 6 requirements for section. Includes 5 requirements for section. Includes 4 requirements for section. Includes 3 or less requirements for section. No requirements for this section presented. Assignment Section and Required Criteria (Points possible/% of total points available) Highest Level of Performance High Level of Performance Satisfactory Level of Performance Unsatisfactory Level of Performance Section not present in paper Instruments used, including reliability and validity. How do the research findings provide evidence to support your clinical problem, or what further evidence is needed to answer your question? Next steps: Identify two questions that can help guide the group’s work. Conclusion (20 points/10%) 20 points 18 points 15 points 8 points 0 points Required criteria Review major findings in a summary paragraph. Evidence to address your clinical problem. Make a connection back to all the included sections. Wrap up the assignment and give the reader something to think about. Includes 3 requirements for section. Includes 2 requirements for section. Includes 1 requirement for section. Present, yet includes no required criteria. No requirements for this section presented. Format (30 points/15%) 30 points 26 points 23 points 11 points 0 points Required criteria Correct grammar and spelling Include a title and reference page Use of headings for each section: Problem Synthesis of the Literature Variables Methods Participants Instruments Implications for Future Work Conclusion Adheres to current APA formatting and guidelines Includes at least two (2) scholarly, current (within 5 years) primary sources other than the textbook 3-4 pages in length excluding appendices, title, and reference pages Includes 7 requirements for section. Includes 6 requirements for section. Includes 5 requirements for section. Includes 4 or less requirements for section. No requirements for this section presented. Total Points Possible = 200 points Appendix A EVIDENCE MATRIX TABLE Article References Purpose Hypothesis Study Question(s) Variables Independent(I) Dependent(D) Study Design Sample Size & Selection Data Collection Methods Major Finding(s) 1 Smith, L. (2013). What How do educational support D-Dietary Quantitative N- 18 Focus Groups Support and education (SAMPLE should I eat? A focus for groups effect dietary modifications modifications Convenience improved compliance with ARTICLE) those living with diabetes. in patients with diabetes? I-Education sample-selected dietary modifications. Journal of Nursing from local support Education, 1(4), 111-112. group in Pittsburgh, PA 1 2 3 4 5 © 2022 Chamberlain University. All Rights Reserved NR449_RUA_Analyzing_Published_Research_v4_JUL22 3
Write 2 different pages one due in 3 days other in 7 days
NR449 Evidence-Based Practice RUA: Analyzing Published Research Evidence Matrix Table Article References Purpose Hypothesis Study Question(s) Variables Independent(I) Dependent(D) Study Design Sample Size & Selection Data Collection Methods Major Finding(s) 1 (SAMPLE ARTICLE) Smith, L. (2013). What should I eat? A focus for those living with diabetes. Journal of Nursing Education, 1 (4) 111-112. How do educational support groups effect dietary modifications in patients with diabetes? D-Dietary modifications I-Education Qualitative N- 18 Convenience sample-selected from local support group in Pittsburgh, PA Focus Groups Support and education improved compliance with dietary modifications. 1 2 3 4 5 © 2021 Chamberlain University. All Rights Reserved NR449_Matrix_Table_V4_JUL22 1