Lesson 3 Communication Assignment Read each case scenario below, and generate a response using NVC format to each scenario. Case Scenario 1: You are the Chief Sustainability Officer for a medium-siz

Lesson 3 Communication Assignment Read each case scenario below, and generate a response using NVC format to each scenario. Case Scenario 1: You are the Chief Sustainability Officer for a medium-siz
Elements of Nonviolent Communication Name Institutional Affiliations Elements of Nonviolent Communication Question 1 In Chapter 4 of “Nonviolent Communication,” the section on “Building a Vocabulary for Feelings” was the most useful to me. The author emphasizes the importance of clearly identifying and expressing our feelings, which can lead to greater self-awareness and understanding in our relationships with others. The text suggests that we often confuse feelings with thoughts and judgments and provides a list of feeling words that can help us accurately name our emotions. For example, instead of saying, “I’m upset that you didn’t call me back,” we can say, “I feel disappointed and worried when I don’t hear back from you.” This can help us communicate more effectively and avoid misunderstandings (He et al., 2020). I think this information will be useful in my everyday life, as I sometimes struggle to express my feelings to others accurately. By using specific feeling words, I can be clearer and more concise in my communication and hopefully avoid conflicts or misunderstandings. Question 2 I found the section on “Distinguishing Observations From Evaluations” in Chapter 3 to be challenging. The author emphasizes the importance of separating our observations from our evaluations or judgments, as this can help prevent others from feeling criticized or defensive. While I understand the importance of this concept, I found it challenging to put it into practice. In my everyday life, I often find myself making evaluations or judgments without even realizing it (Rosenberg & Chopra, 2015). For example, instead of saying, “The room is messy,” I might say, “You’re so messy.” The text suggests that we should focus on specific observations that are free of judgments, such as “There are clothes on the floor.” This can be challenging, as it requires us to be more mindful of our language and thought patterns. However, I believe this is an important concept to understand and practice, as it can help us communicate more effectively and compassionately with others. Question 3 By becoming more aware of our own feelings and needs, we can better understand and relate to the feelings and needs of those around us. This reinforces the importance of self-awareness and emotional intelligence in effective communication. Generally, I found the assigned reading in “Nonviolent Communication” to be informative and thought-provoking. The author provides practical tools and strategies for improving our communication and relationships with others. I appreciated the emphasis on separating observations from evaluations and the importance of being able to identify and express our feelings clearly. One passage that stood out to me was when the author writes, “NVC is a process language that discourages static generalizations” (Rosenberg & Chopra, 2015). I found this to be an interesting concept, as it suggests that our language and communication style can significantly impact our relationships and interactions with others. Using more process-oriented language and avoiding generalizations can improve our ability to communicate effectively and empathetically. Overall, I think the concepts presented in this book have the potential to be very useful in both personal and professional contexts. References He, H. A., Greenberg, S., & Huang, E. M. (2010, April). One size does not fit all: applying the transtheoretical model to energy feedback technology design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 927-936). Rosenberg, M. B., & Chopra, D. (2015). Nonviolent communication: A language of life: Life-changing tools for healthy relationships. PuddleDancer Press.
Lesson 3 Communication Assignment Read each case scenario below, and generate a response using NVC format to each scenario. Case Scenario 1: You are the Chief Sustainability Officer for a medium-siz
Non vio le n t C om mun ic atio n : A L an gu ag e o f L if e © 2 015 P udd le D an ce r P re ss A P udd le D an ce r P re ss B ook All r ig h ts r e se rv ed . N o p art o f t h is p u bli c atio n m ay b e r e p ro du ce d , d is tr ib u te d , o r t r a n sm it t e d i n a n y fo rm o r b y a n y m ean s, i n clu din g p h oto co p yin g, r e co rd in g, o r o th er m ech an ic a l o r e le ctr o n ic m eth od s, w it h ou t t h e p rio r w rit t e n p erm is s io n o f t h e p u bli s h er, e x ce p t f o r u se a s b rie f q u ota tio n s em bo d ie d i n c rit ic a l r e v ie w s a n d c e rta in o th er n on co m merc ia l u se s a s p erm it t e d b y c o p yrig h t l a w . T o re q u est p erm is s io n , c o n ta ct t h e p u bli s h er a t t h e f o llo w in g a d dre ss , “ A tt e n tio n : P erm is s io n s C oord in ato r.” P udd le D an ce r P re ss , P erm is s io n s D ep t. 2 240 E ncin it a s B lv d ., S te . D -9 11, E ncin it a s, C A 9 2024 T el: 1 -7 60-6 52-5 754 F ax : 1 -7 60-2 74-6 400 w ww.N on vio le n tC om mun ic atio n .c o m E m [email protected] Pudd le D an ce r.c o m O rd erin g I n fo rm atio n P le a se c o n ta ct I n dep en den t P ubli s h ers G ro u p, T el: 3 12-3 37-0 747; F ax : 3 12-3 37-5 985; E m ail: f r o n td esk @ ip gb o ok.c o m o r v is it w ww.I P G bo ok.c o m f o r o th er c o n ta ct i n fo rm atio n a n d d eta ils a b ou t o rd erin g o n li n e A uth or: M arsh all B . R ose n berg , P hD E dit o r: L u cy L eu C op yed it o r: K yra F re esta r P ro je ct d ir e cto r: J e an ne I le r C over a n d i n te rio r d esig n : L ig h tb ou rn e (w ww.l i g h tb ou rn e.c o m ) P hylli s L in n, I N DEX PR ESS a n d K ath le en S tr a tt a n , E D IT O RIA L SU PP O RT S E R V IC ES M an u fa ctu re d i n t h e U nit e d S ta te s o f A m eric a 3rd E dit io n , 1 st P rin tin g, S ep te m ber 2 015 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 I S B N : 9 78-1 -8 92005-2 8-1 L ib ra ry o f C on gre ss C ata lo gin g-in -P ubli c a tio n D ata R ose n berg , M arsh all B . N on vio le n t c o m mun ic atio n : a l a n gu ag e o f l i f e / M arsh all B . R ose n berg , P hD . — 3 rd e d it io n . pag es c m IS B N 9 78-1 -8 92005-2 8-1 ( tr a d e p ap er : a lk . p ap er) 1 . I n te rp ers o n al c o m mun ic atio n . 2 . I n te rp ers o n al re la tio n s. 3 . N on vio le n ce. I . T it le . B F637.C 45R 645 2 015 153.6 — dc2 3 2015011660 What P eo p le A re S ay in g A bou t N on vio le n t C om mun ic a tio n ™ R ela tio n sh ip s: “M arsh all Rose n berg ’s dyn am ic co m mun ic atio n te ch n iq u es tr a n sfo rm p ote n tia l c o n ic ts i n to p ea ce fu l d ia lo gu es . Y ou ’l l l e arn s im ple to ols t o d ef use a rg u m en ts a n d c re ate c o m pass io n ate co n nectio n s w it h y o u r f a m ily , f r ien ds, a n d o th er a cq u ain ta n ce s.” — JO H N G RAY, a u th or, M en A re F ro m M ars, W om en A re F ro m V en u s “N on vio le n t C om munic a tio n c a n c h an ge t h e w orld . M ore im porta n tly , it c a n ch an ge y o u r l i f e . I c a n not r e co m men d i t h ig h ly en ou gh .” — JA C K C A N FIE LD , a u th or, C hic k en S ou p f o r t h e S ou l S erie s “ M arsh all R ose n berg p ro vid es u s w it h th e most eff ectiv e to ols to fo ster h ea lt h a n d r e la tio n sh ip s. N on vio le n t C om munic a tio n c o n nec ts s o u l to s o u l, c re atin g a l o t o f h ea li n g. I t i s t h e m is s in g e lem ent i n w hat w e do.” — DEEPA K C H OPR A , a u th or, H ow t o K now G od a n d A gele ss B od y a n d T im ele ss M in d “I h av e t a k en c o n vers a tio n s t h at w ere hea d ed fo r t h e du m ps, s ta rtin g u sin g th ese t e ch n iq u es, a n d e n ded u p w it h a v er y u sef ul b on din g ex per ien ce.” — An o n li n e r e v ie w er “ If y o u w an t t o b e h eard , a n d t o h ear w hat y o u r lo ved o n es a re tr u ly s a y in g beh in d w hat t h ere s a y in g, r e a d t h is b o ok! I t w ill c h an ge y o u r l i f e .” — An o n li n e r e v ie w er “ R ose n berg h as d ev elo p ed a s im ple m ethod o f c o m mun ic atin g t h at h elp s t o a v o id tr ig gerin g a d efe n siv e r e a ctio n , a n d in ste a d s tim ula te u n der sta n din g an d ag re em en t. It is in valu ab le in all yo u r re la tio n sh ip s, an d d e nit e ly s h ou ld b e r e q u ir e d r e a d in g f o r e v er yo n e.” — An o n li n e r e v ie w er C on fl ic t T ra n sfo rm atio n : “N on vio le n t C om munic a tio n i s o n e o f t h e m ost u se fu l p ro ce ss es y o u w ill e v er le arn .” — W IL LIA M U RY, c o au th or, G ettin g t o Y es “In t h is b o ok, y o u w ill n d a n a m azin gly eff ectiv e la n gu ag e f o r s a y in g w hat’s o n y o u r m in d a n d i n y o u r h eart. L ik e s o m an y es sen tia l a n d e leg an t s y stem s, it ’s s im ple o n t h e s u rfa ce, c h alle n gin g t o u se in t h e heat o f t h e m om en t a n d pow erfu l i n i t s r e su lt s .” — VIC K I R O BIN , c o au th or, Y ou r M on ey o r Y ou r L if e “ A s fa r as n on vio le n ce an d sp ir it u al activ is m , M arsh all R osen ber g is it ! A pp ly in g th e co n ce p ts w it h in th es e bo oks w ill g u id e th e re a d er to w ard s fo ste rin g m ore c o m pass io n i n t h e w orld .” — MARIA N NE W IL LIA M SO N, a u th or, E very d ay G ra ce a n d h on ora ry c h air p ers o n , P ea ce A lli a n ce “ L ik e N oam C hom sk y, R ose n berg ’s w ork is in tr in sic a lly r a d ic a l, it s u bver ts o u r w hole sta tu s-q u o sy ste m o f p ow er : b et ween ch ild ren a n d a d u lt s , th e sa n e a n d th e p sy ch otic , th e c rim in al a n d th e la w . R osen ber g’s d is tin ctio n b etw een p u n it iv e a n d p ro te c tiv e f o rc e s h ou ld b e re q u ir e d r e a d in g f o r a n yo n e m ak in g f o re ig n p oli c y o r p oli c in g o u r s tr e et s.” — D. K IL LIA N , r e p orte r, O n  e F ro n t L in e, C le v ela n d F re e T im es “ W e h av e li v ed tr a u m atic m om en ts o ver a n d o ver a g ain — mom en ts o f fe ar a n d p an ic , in co m pre h en sio n , fr u str a tio n s, d is a p p oin tm en t, a n d in ju stic e of all so rts , w it h n o h op e o f e sc ap e— whic h m ad e it e v en w ors e . N on vio le n t C om munic a tio n o ff ers u s a p ea ce fu l a lt e rn ativ e f o r e n din g t h is in ter m in ab le R w an dan c o n ic t.” — TH EO D ORE N YIL ID AN D I, R w an dan D ep artm en t o f F ore ig n A ffair s ; K ig ali , R w an da “In o u r p re se n t a g e o f u n civ il d is c o u rs e an d m ean -s p ir it e d d em ag o gu er y, t h e prin cip le s a n d p ra ctic e s o f N on vio le n t C om munic a tio n a re a s t im ely a s t h ey are n ece ss a ry to th e p ea ce fu l res olu tio n o f co n ic ts , p er so n al o r p u bli c , d om estic o r i n te rn atio n al.” — MID W EST B O OK R EV IE W , T aylo r’s S h elf “ R ose n berg d esc rib es h ow , in n u m erou s c o n ic ts , o n ce ‘en em ies ’ h av e been a b le t o h ear e a ch o th er’s n eed s, t h ey a re ab le to c o n nect c o m pass io n ate ly a n d n d n ew s o lu tio n s to p re v io u sly ‘i m poss ib le ’ im pass es . I f y o u w an t to le arn w ay s o f m ore sk illf u l sp eech I h ig h ly re co m men d th is c le ar, e a sy -to -r e a d b o ok.” — DIA NA L IO N, B udd h is t P ea ce F ello w sh ip , T urn in g W heel M aga zin e “A sim ple co m mun ic atio n pro ce ss th at eli m in ates th e co m pet it iv e, a d vers a ria l, an d vio le n ce pro vo cativ e sty le of co m mun ic atio n th at has in fe c te d m ost o f o u r l i v es.  is i s n ot a b ou t t h e m eek i n her it in g t h e w orld o r b ein g n ic e d ocile c o gs i n o u r p ow er -o ver , h ier arc h ic a l s y ste m . I t i s a b ou t t h e ‘p ro te c tiv e u se o f fo rc e,’ v u ln era b ili t y , h eart- to -h eart d ia lo gu e, a n d g et tin g ou r n eed s m eet i n a w ay w e w ill l es s l i k ely r eg ret .” — An o n li n e r e v ie w er “A s a p ro fe ss io n al in th e eld , I c a n sa y th at th is b o ok p ra ctic es w hat it p re a ch es, a n d I f o u n d t h e s te p -b y-s tep a p pro ach , ex ercis es , a n d ex am ples t o b e c le ar a n d e a sy t o p ra ctic e.” — A r e a d er i n M ary la n d “I h av e n ev er re a d a cle are r, m ore str a ig h tfo rw ard , in sig h tfu l bo ok on co m mun ic atio n . A m azin gly e a sy t o r e a d , g re at e x am ples , a n d c h allen gin g t o p u t i n to p ra ctic e — th is b o ok i s a t r u e gi t o a ll o f u s.” — A r e a d er i n W ash in gto n P erso n al G ro w th : “N on vio le n t C om munic a tio n b y M arsh all R ose n berg i s a g re at b o ok t e a ch in g a c o m pass io n ate w ay t o t a lk t o p eo p le— ev en i f y o u ( o r t h ey ) a re an gry.” — JO E V IT A LE , a u th or, S p ir it u al M ark etin g,  e P ow er o f O utr a geo u s M ark etin g “C han gin g th e w ay th e w orld h as w ork ed fo r 5 ,0 00 y ears s o u n ds d au ntin g, b u t N on vio le n t C om munic a tio n h elp s li b era te u s fr o m a n cie n t p att er ns o f vio le n ce.” — FR A N CIS L E FK O W IT Z, r e p orte r, B od y & S ou l “A r e v o lu tio n ary w ay o f l o okin g a t l a n gu ag e. I f en ou gh p eo p le actu ally m ak e u se o f th e m ate ria l in N on vio le n t C om munic a tio n w e m ay so on li v e in a m ore p ea ce fu l a n d c o m pass io n ate w orld .” — W ES T A Y LO R, P ro gre ssiv e H ea lt h “  e s in gle t o u gh est, m ost d an ger ou s o p p on en t I ’d e v er f a ce d — th e on e th at tr u ly h u rt m e t h e m ost, c au sin g m e t o s p en d 3 0 y ears o f m y li f e beh in d b ars — was m y o w n a n ger a n d fe ar. I w rit e th es e word s n ow , a g ra y -h air e d o ld m an , h op in g t o G od — befo re y o u s u ff er w hat I ’v e su ff er ed — th at i t w ill c au se y o u t o li s te n a n d le arn N on vio le n t C om munic a tio n . I t w ill t e a ch y o u h ow t o re co gn iz e a n ger b efo re it b eco m es v io len ce, a n d h ow to u n der sta n d, d ea l w it h , a n d t a k e c o n tr o l o f t h e r a g e y o u m ay f e el.” — A p ris o n er w rit in g t o f e llo w i n m ate s “  is is th e m ost co n cis e , m ost cle arly w rit t en m an u al o n in ter per so n al co m mun ic atio n I ’v e e v er c o m e a cro ss . I ’v e been c h allen ged b y t h is b o ok to b e t h e c h an ge I w an t t o s e e i n m y w orld .” — An o n li n e r e v ie w er “ L it e ra lly , a n yo n e w ho s p ea k s c o u ld b en et f r o m r e a d in g t h is b o ok! I t h elp s u s to re a li z e n ot o n ly th e p ow er o f w ord s, b u t h ow to c h oose ou r w ord s bett e r an d ult im ate ly en han ce both co m mun ic atio n an d re la tio n sh ip s! H ig h ly r e co m men ded !” — An o n li n e r e v ie w er “ B y ta k in g a ste p back fr o m daily fr u str a tio n s, dis a p p oin tm en ts , an d str e ss o rs , a n d r e -e x am in in g th e p u rp ose of m y o w n a n d o th er s’ n eed s, th is b o ok h as h elp ed m e li s te n m ore deep ly , act m ore gen u in ely , an d n d acce p ta n ce i n d iffi cu lt s it u atio n s. W ell d on e!” — An o n li n e r e v ie w er “ I a m o n e o f th ose p eo p le w ho is h ig h ly c rit ic a l o f m yse lf .  is b o ok is t e a ch in g m e t o lo ve m yse lf s o I c a n t r u ly c a re fo r o th er s. I t c a n p av e th e w ay fo r p ea ce b etw een p eo p le , d iff er en t et hn ic g ro u p s, co u ntr ies , et c., an d I b eli e v e o u r w orld r e a lly n eed s t h is .” P are n tin g a n d F am ily C om mun ic a tio n : “W it h th e gro w th in to d ay ’s d ysfu n ctio n al fa m ili es an d th e in cre a se of vio le n ce i n o u r s c h ools , N on vio le n t C om munic a tio n i s a g o d se n d.” — LIN DA C . S T O EH R, L os C oli n as B usin ess N ew s “ is b o ok is e ss e n tia l re a d in g fo r a n yo n e se ek in g to e n d th e un fu l lli n g cy cle s of arg u m en t in th eir re la tio n sh ip , an d fo r paren ts w ho w is h to in u en ce th eir c h ild re n ’s ’ b eh av io r b y en gen der in g c o m pass io n r a th er th an sim ply a ch ie v in g o b ed ie n ce.” — An o n li n e r e v ie w er “In a d dit io n to s a v in g o u r m arria g e, N on vio le n t C om munic a tio n is h elp in g us re p air o u r re la tio n sh ip s w it h o u r g ro w n ch ild ren an d to re la te more d eep ly w it h o u r p are n ts a n d s ib li n gs. I f a n gels d o m an if es t in p hysic a l f o rm h ere o n t h is e arth , t h en M arsh all R osen ber g m ust b e on e.” — A r e a d er i n A riz o n a “M y re la tio n sh ip w it h m y h u sb an d, w hic h w as g o o d a lr e a d y, h as b eco m e ev en b ett e r. I’v e ta u gh t N VC to m an y p aren ts w ho h av e sin ce gain ed a d eep er u n dersta n din g o f th eir c h ild ren , th u s en han cin g th ei r re la tio n sh ip a n d d ecre a sin g t e n sio n a n d c o n ic t.” — A r e a d er i n I lli n ois “ N on vio le n t C om munic a tio n a llo w ed m e t o o verc o m e m y t o xic c o n dit io n in g an d n d t h e l o vin g p are n t a n d p er so n t h at w as l o ck ed i n sid e. D r. R osen ber g has c re ate d a w ay t o t r a n sfo rm t h e vio len ce i n t h e w orld .” — A n u rs e i n C ali f o rn ia “ U sin g N on vio le n t C om munic a tio n w as v it a l t o h ea li n g m y r e la tio n sh ip w it h m y s is te r; a n d fo r m e, it s e rv es a s a g u id e fo r a p p ly in g B udd h is t p ra ctic e to c o m mun ic atio n .” — JA N E L A ZA R, Z en S tu den t i n R esid en ce / N VC T ra in er “ W hat b eg an a s a s e arc h fo r a b et ter d is c ip li n e sy ste m fo r o u r s ix -y ear- o ld h as t u rn ed o u t t o b e a p h ilo so p h ic a l a p pro ach a n d c o m mun ic atio n t o ol t h at is t r a n sfo rm in g h ow w e r e la te t o e a ch o th er a n d o u rs e lv es .” — An o n li n e r e v ie w er “ In cre d ib le b o ok t h at h as t r a n sfo rm ed m y w ay o f b ei ng a n d c o m mun ic atin g. I h av e e v ery o n e i n m y f a m ily r e a d in g i t n ow !” — An o n li n e r e v ie w er “ I s p en t 4 0 y ears o f m y li f e tr y in g to r e ce iv e em path y fr o m m y d ad . A er on ly r e a d in g h alf o f t h is b o ok, I w as a b le to ex pres s m yse lf in a w ay t h at h e w as a b le t o n ally h ear m e a n d g iv e m e what I n eed ed . I t w as a g i b ey o n d w ord s.” — An o n li n e r e v ie w er S p ir it u ali t y : “In m y estim atio n , N on vio le n t C om munic a tio n is as ra d ic a l an d ch an ge- m ak in g a s th e E ig h t- F old P ath . I p re d ic t th at a ctiv e use of N VC in o u r sa n gh as w ou ld s ig n i ca n tly c u t t h ro u gh f r u str a tio n s a n d g ro w in g p ain s.” — JO AN S T A RR W ARD , m em ber, S p ir it R ock C en te r, C ali f o rn ia , a n d t h e B udd h is t P ea ce F ello w sh ip “ B udd h is m a n d N on vio le n t C om munic a tio n a re r o om s in t h e s a m e h ou se . I s tr o n gly re co m men d N VC as a h ig h ly eff ectiv e pra ctic e fo r d ev elo p in g cla rit y a n d g en u in e c o m pass io n .” — LE W IS R H AM ES, V ip ass a n a I n sig h t M ed it a tio n , M in im al S ecu rit y U nit , M on ro e C orre ctio n al C om ple x “ F or c o n vic ts im mers e d in a n e n vir o n m en t w hic h in ten si es a n d r ei nfo rc es co n ic t, d is c o verin g t h is s te p -b y-s tep m ethod olo gy a d vo catin g c o m pass io n th ro u gh c o m mun ic atio n i s e n orm ou sly l i b er atin g.” — DOW G O RD ON , F re ed om P ris o n P ro je ct, S eatt le , W ash in gto n “ N VC is th e la n gu ag e o f e n li g h ten men t. S o sim ple yet so d iffi cu lt . U sin g N VC c a n c h an ge y o u r li f e , b rin g c la rit y to y o u r th in kin g, a n d tr a n sfo rm re la tio n sh ip s.” — An o n li n e r e v ie w er E du ca tio n : “M arsh all’s s tr a te g ie s fo r a ctiv e li s te n in g r e a lly w ork . I t e a ch m id d le sc h ool, a n d it h as w ork ed b oth a t w ork a n d w it h m y fa m ily . A g o o d s tep a lo n g t h e w ay t o t r a n sfo rm atio n .” — An o n li n e r e v ie w er “  ro u gh c o m pelli n g, r e a l l i f e e x am ples , R osen ber g b rin gs t h e N VC p ro ces s to li f e . M y c o lle g e stu den ts , e sp ecia lly th e old er o n es, sh are wit h m e th at re a d in g t h is b o ok h as c h an ged t h ei r li f e . T ry in g t o p ra ctic e t h e step s m yse lf i n d aily in te ra ctio n s, at m eetin gs, an d in th e cla ss ro om , h as als o h ad a p ow erfu l e ff ec t o n m e.” — An o n li n e r e v ie w er “ N VC h as m ad e a h u ge d iff eren ce in m y li f e wit h m y c h ild ren , re la tiv es , te a ch ers o f s c h ools , w ork , a n d t h e li s t g o es o n . W hen I d is c o ver ed t h is b o ok, I w as r e a lly d ou btfu l th at a n yth in g c o u ld h elp m e ch an ge th e natu re of m y re la tio n sh ip s w it h o th ers a n d I a m a sto n is h ed a t t h e dep th a n d s im pli c it y o f N on vio le n t C om munic a tio n .” — An o n li n e r e v ie w er P ro fe ssio n al  era p y a n d M ed ia tio n : “ e q u ali t y o f e m path y I n ow a m a b le to p ro vid e has en li v en ed m y t h er ap y p ra ctic e.  is b o ok g iv es m e h op e th at I c a n c o n tr ib u te to t h e well b ei ng o f m y c li e n ts , a n d a ls o c o n nec t d eep ly w it h m y f r ien ds a n d f a m ily .  e step -b y- ste p e m path y s k ills i n t h is b o ok a re le arn ab le by a n yo n e.” — An o n li n e r e v ie w er “A s a th era p is t, I h av e fo u n d th is b o ok to b e help fu l to c li en ts w it h a n ger m an ag em en t d iffi cu lt ie s, a n d p ro blem s w it h c o n ic t i n r e la tio n sh ip s b ecau se it p ro m ote s se lf – a w are n ess an d se lf – a cce p ta n ce. N VC ta k es p ra ctic e, b u t on ce y o u u n dersta n d a n d in te rn ali z e th e gen eral a tt it u de pro m ote d in th is b o ok, i t s tic k s. A nd t h en i t s e ep s i n to y o u r l i f e li k e a s o oth in g b alm .” — An o n li n e r e v ie w er “ I h av e n ev er re a d a cle are r, m ore str a ig h tfo rw ard , in sig h tfu l bo ok on co m mun ic atio n . A er s tu dyin g a n d t e a ch in g a ss er tiv en ess s in ce t h e 70s, t h is b o ok is a b re ath o f fr e sh a ir . R osen ber g a d ds th e brilli a n t in sig h t in to th e li n kag e o f fe eli n gs a n d n eed s a n d ta k in g res pon sib ili t y a n d c re ates a tr u e to ol.” — An o n li n e r e v ie w er B usin ess: “ e p rin cip le s o f N on vio le n t C om mun ic atio n t a u gh t b y D r. R osen ber g a re in str u m en ta l in c re atin g a n e x tr a o rd in ary a n d fu l lli n g q u ali t y o f li f e . H is c o m pass io n ate a n d in sp ir in g m essa g e cu ts rig h t to th e heart o f su cces sfu l co m mun ic atio n , h is h eartfe lt m essa g e an d g en u in e lo ve fo r h u m an k in d is i n sp ir in g, a n d h is str a te g ie s h old th e pow er , n ot o n ly c h an ge li v es , b u t to t r a n sfo rm y o u r w orld . “D r. R ose n berg h as b ro u gh t t h e s im pli c it y o f s u cce ss fu l c o m mun ic atio n i n to t h e fo re g ro u n d. N o m att e r w hat is su e yo u ’r e fa cin g, his str a teg ies fo r co m mun ic atin g w it h o th ers w ill s et y o u u p t o w in e v er y t im e.” — TO N Y R O BBIN S, a u th or, A w aken t h e G ia n t W it h in a n d U nli m it e d P ow er “I g o t to th is b o ok th an ks to a r e co m men datio n b y S aty a N ad ella ( C EO o f M ic ro so  ).  e bo ok pre se n ts a sim ple te ch n iq u e an d ex am ples to e m path iz e a n d c o n nec t w it h p eo p le ’s fe eli n gs. I n ste a d o f ju dgin g p eo p le by th e m ess a g e, th e b o ok h elp s y o u u n dersta n d th e need s b eh in d a n d w hat fe eli n gs a n d e m otio n s a re d riv in g t h em . H ig h ly r e co m men ded .” — An o n li n e r e v ie w er Con te n ts Fore w ord b y D eep ak C hop ra , M D Ack n ow le d gm en ts 1 G iv in g F ro m t h e H ea rt In tr o du ctio n A W ay t o F o cu s A tt e n tio n  e N VC P ro ce ss A pp ly in g N VC i n O ur L iv es a n d t h e W orld N VC i n A ctio n : “ M urd ere r, A ss a ss in , C hild -K iller !” 2 C om mun ic a tio n  at B lo ck s C om passio n M ora li s tic J u dgm en ts M ak in g C om paris o n s D en ia l o f R esp on sib ili t y O th er F orm s o f L if e -A li e n atin g C om mun ic atio n 3 O bse r v in g W it h ou t E va lu atin g  e H ig h est F orm o f H um an I n te lli g en ce D is tin gu is h in g O bse rv atio n s F ro m E valu atio n s N VC i n A ctio n : “  e M ost A rro gan t S p ea k er W e’v e Ever H ad !” E xerc is e 1 : O bse rv atio n o r E valu atio n ? 4 Id en tif y in g a n d E xp re ssin g F eeli n gs  e H eav y C ost o f U nex p re ss e d F eeli n gs F eeli n gs v ersu s N on -F eeli n gs B uild in g a V oca b u la ry f o r F eeli n gs E xerc is e 2 : E xp re ss in g F eeli n gs 5 T ak in g R esp on sib ili t y f o r O ur F eeli n gs H earin g a N eg ativ e M ess a g e: F ou r O ptio n s  e N eed s a t t h e R oots o f F eeli n gs  e P ain o f E xp re ss in g O ur N eed s v er su s t h e Pain o f N ot E xp res sin g O ur N eed s Fro m E m otio n al S la v ery t o E m otio n al L ib er atio n N VC i n A ctio n : “ B rin g B ack t h e S tig m a o f I lleg it im acy !” E xerc is e 3 : A ck n ow le d gin g N eed s 6 R eq u estin g  at W hic h W ou ld E nric h Lif e U sin g P osit iv e A ctio n L an gu ag e M ak in g R eq u ests C on sc io u sly A sk in g f o r a R e ec tio n R eq u estin g H on esty M ak in g R eq u ests o f a G ro u p R eq u ests v ersu s D em an ds D e n in g O ur O bje c tiv e W hen M ak in g R eq u es ts N VC i n A ctio n : S h arin g F ears A bou t a B es t F rien d’s S m okin g E xerc is e 4 : E xp re ss in g R eq u ests 7 R ece iv in g E m path ic a lly P re se n ce : D on’t J u st D o S o m eth in g, S ta n d  ere Lis te n in g f o r F eeli n gs a n d N eed s P ara p h ra sin g Su sta in in g E m path y W hen P ain B lo ck s O ur A bili t y t o E m path iz e N VC i n A ctio n : A W if e C on nec ts W it h H er D yin g H usb an d E xerc is e 5 : R ece iv in g E m path ic a lly v er su s N on -E m path ic a lly 8  e P ow er o f E m path y E m path y  at H ea ls E m path y a n d t h e A bili t y t o B e V uln er ab le U sin g E m path y t o D efu se D an ger E m path y i n H earin g S o m eo n e’s “ N o!” E m path y t o R ev iv e a L if e le ss C on ver sa tio n Em path y f o r S ile n ce 9 C on nectin g C om passio n ate ly W it h O urse lv es R em em berin g t h e S p ecia ln ess o f W hat W e A re E valu atin g O urs e lv es W hen W e’v e B een L es s  an P er fe ct T ra n sla tin g S elf – Ju dgm en ts a n d I n ner D em an ds N VC M ou rn in g Self – F org iv en ess  e L ess o n o f t h e P olk a-D ott e d S u it D on’t D o A nyth in g  at I s n ’t P la y ! T ra n sla tin g “ H av e t o ” t o “ C hoose t o ” C ult iv atin g A w are n ess o f t h e E nerg y B eh in d O ur A ctio n s 10 E xp re ssin g A nger F u lly D is tin gu is h in g S tim ulu s F ro m C au se A ll A nger H as a L if e -S erv in g C ore S tim ulu s v ersu s C au se : P ra ctic a l I m pli c atio n s Fou r S te p s t o E xp re ss in g A nger O fferin g E m path y F ir st T ak in g O ur T im e NVC i n A ctio n : P are n t a n d T een D ia lo gu e A L if e-  re ate n in g I s su e 11 C on fl ic t R eso lu tio n a n d M ed ia tio n H um an C on nec tio n N VC C on ic t R eso lu tio n v ersu s T ra d it io n al M ed ia tio n N VC C on ic t R eso lu tio n S te p s— A Q uic k O ver vie w O n N eed s, S tr a te g ie s, a n d A naly sis E m path y t o E ase t h e P ain  at P re v en ts H earin g U sin g P re se n t a n d P osit iv e A ctio n L an gu ag e t o R es olv e C on ic t U sin g A ctio n V erb s T ra n sla tin g “ N o” N VC a n d t h e M ed ia to r R ole W hen P eo p le S ay “ N o” t o M eetin g F ace to F ace In fo rm al M ed ia tio n : S tic k in g O ur N ose in O th er P eo p le ’s B usin es s 12  e P ro te ctiv e U se o f F orc e W hen t h e U se o f F orc e I s U nav o id ab le  e  in kin g B eh in d t h e U se o f F orc e T yp es o f P un it iv e F orc e  e C osts o f P un is h m en t T w o Q uestio n s  at R ev ea l t h e L im it a tio n s o f P un is h m en t  e P ro te c tiv e U se o f F orc e i n S ch ools 1 3 L ib era tin g O urse lv es a n d C ou n se li n g O th ers F re ein g O urs e lv es F ro m O ld P ro gra m min g R eso lv in g I n te rn al C on ic ts C arin g f o r O ur I n ner E nvir o n m en t Rep la cin g D ia g n osis W it h N VC N VC i n A ctio n : D ea li n g W it h R esen tm en t a n d S elf – Ju dgm en t 14 E xp re ssin g A ppre cia tio n i n N on vio le n t C om mun ic a tio n  e I n te n tio n B eh in d t h e A ppre cia tio n  e  re e C om pon en ts o f A ppre cia tio n R ece iv in g A ppre cia tio n  e H un ger f o r A ppre cia tio n O verc o m in g t h e R elu cta n ce t o E xp res s A ppre cia tio n E pilo gu e B ib li o gra p hy In dex  e F ou r- P art N on vio le n t C om mun ic atio n P ro ce ss S o m e B asic F eeli n gs a n d N eed s W e A ll H av e A bou t N on vio le n t C om mun ic atio n A bou t P udd le D an ce r P re ss A bou t t h e C en te r f o r N on vio le n t C om mun ic atio n T ra d e B ooks F ro m P udd le D an ce r P res s Tra d e B ook le ts F ro m P udd le D an ce r P res s Abou t t h e A uth or N Fore w ord D eep ak C hop ra , M D Fou n der o f th e C hop ra C en te r fo r W ellb ein g a n d a u th or o f m ore th an e ig h ty b o oks tr a n sla te d in o ver f o rty -th re e l a n gu ag es, i n clu din g t w en ty -tw o N ew Y ork T im es b ests e lle rs o o n e d ese rv es o u r g ra tit u de m ore th an th e la te M arsh all R osen ber g, w ho l i v ed h is l i f e j u st a s t h e t it le o f o n e o f h is b o oks s ta te s: S p ea k P ea ce in a W orld o f C on flic t. H e w as k een ly a w are o f t h e m ax im ( o r w arn in g) t h at’s c o n ta in ed i n t h e s u btit le o f t h at b o ok: W hat Y ou S ay N ex t W ill C han ge You r W orld . P ers o n al re a li t y alw ay s co n ta in s a sto ry, an d th e sto ry w e li v e, b eg in nin g fr o m in fa n cy, is b ase d o n la n gu ag e.  is b eca m e th e fo u n datio n o f M arsh all’s ap pro ach to co n ic t res olu tio n , g et tin g p eo p le to ex ch an ge w ord s i n a w ay t h at e x clu des j u dgm en ts , b la m e, a n d v io len ce.  e co n to rte d fa ce s of pro te sto rs on th e str e et s th at m ak e su ch d is tu rb in g im ag es o n th e e v en in g n ew s a re m ore th an im ag es . E ach fa ce, e a ch s h ou t, e a ch g estu re h as a h is to ry. E ver yo n e cli n gs t o t h ei r h is to ry w it h a v en gean ce, b ecau se it a n ch ors th ei r id en tit y . S o w hen M arsh all a d vo cate d p ea ce fu l ta lk , h e w as a d vo catin g a n ew id en tit y a t th e sa m e tim e. H e fu lly r e a li z e d th is fa ct. A s h e sta te s a b ou t N on vio len t C om mun ic atio n a n d th e ro le o f t h e m ed ia to r i n t h is n ew t h ir d e d it io n , “ W e’r e tr y in g t o l i v e a d iff er en t valu e s y ste m w hile w e a re a sk in g f o r t h in gs t o c h an ge.” I n h is v is io n o f a n ew v alu e s y stem , c o n ic ts a re res olv ed w it h ou t th e usu al fr u str a tin g co m pro m is e s. In ste a d , th e co n ten din g p arties ap pro ach e a ch o th er w it h re sp ec t.  ey ask ab ou t ea ch o th er ’s n eed s, an d in an atm osp h ere f r e e o f p ass io n s a n d p rej udic e s, t h ey r e a ch a c o n nectio n . G azin g on a w orld r if e w it h w ar a n d v io le n ce, w here u s-v ersu s-th em t h in kin g i s t h e n orm , an d w here co u ntr ie s ca n b re a k a ll b on ds o f civ ili z e d ex is ten ce to c o m mit u n beara b le a tr o cit ie s, a n ew v alu e sy ste m s e em s fa r a w ay. A t o n e E uro p ean c o n fe re n ce f o r m ed ia to rs , a s k ep tic c rit ic iz e d M arsh all’s a p pro ach a s p sy ch oth era p y. I n p op u la r l a n gu ag e, i s n ’t h e ask in g u s t o s im ply f o rg et t h e past a n d ju st b e f r ie n ds, a r e m ote pro sp ect n ot ju st i n t h e w ar- to rn a re a s b u t in a n y d iv o rc e c a se ? V alu e s y ste m s a re p ack ed i n t h e l u ggag e o f e v er y w orld vie w . N ot o n ly a re th ey in esc ap ab le , b u t p eo p le are pro u d o f th em —th er e’s a lo n g tr a d it io n aro u n d t h e w orld o f p riz in g a n d f e arin g w arrio rs a t t h e sa m e tim e. J u n gia n s te ll u s th at th e a rc h ety p e o f M ars , th e vo la tile g o d o f w ar, is im bed ded in e v ery o n e’s u n co n sc io u s, m ak in g c o n ic t a n d a g gres sio n i n ev it a b le , a k in d o f in here n t v ic e. B ut t h ere ’s a n a lt e rn ativ e v ie w o f h u m an n atu re , e lo qu en tly ex pres se d in t h is b o ok th at m ust b e c o n sid ere d , b ecau se it ’s o u r o n ly r e a l h op e. In th is v ie w , w e are n ot o u r sto rie s.  ese sto ries are se lf – c re ate d ctio n s th at re m ain in ta ct th ro u gh h ab it , g ro u p c o er cio n , o ld c o n dit io n in g, a n d la ck o f se lf – a w are n ess . E ven th e b est s to ries c o lla b ora te in v io len ce. I f y o u w an t to u se fo rc e to p ro te c t y o u r fa m ily , g u ard y o u rs e lf fr o m a tt a ck , gh t a g ain st w ro n gd oin g, p re v en t c rim e, a n d en gag e in a s o -c a lle d “ g o o d w ar,” y o u h av e b een c o -o p te d b y t h e s ir e n s o n g o f v io len ce. I f y o u d ecid e to o p t o u t, t h er e’s a s iz a b le c h an ce t h at s o cie ty w ill t u rn o n y o u a n d ex act r et rib u tio n . I n s h ort, n din g a w ay o u t i s n ’t e a sy . In In dia th ere ’s an an cie n t m od el fo r non vio len t li v in g kn ow n as A him sa , w hic h i s c e n tr a l t o t h e n on vio len t li f e . A him sa i s u su ally d e ned a s n on vio le n ce, alt h ou gh it s m ean in g ex ten ds fr o m M ah atm a Gan dh i’s p ea ce fu l p ro te sts to A lb ert S ch w eit z e r’s re v er en ce fo r li f e . “D o n o h arm ” wou ld b e t h e rst a x io m o f A him sa . W hat s o im pres se d m e ab ou t M arsh all R ose n berg , w ho p ass e d a w ay a t e ig h ty , ju st s ix w eek s b ef ore I w rit e th is , is t h at h e g ra sp ed b oth l e v els o f A him sa , a ctio n a n d c o n sc io u sn ess .  e a ctio n s a re w ell d esc rib ed in th e fo llo w in g p ag es a s p rin cip les o f N on vio le n t C om mun ic atio n , s o I w on’t r ep eat t h em h er e. T o b e in A him sa c o n sc io u sn ess is m uch m ore p ow er fu l, a n d M arsh all p oss es se d t h at t r a it . I n a n y c o n ic t, h e d id n’t c h oose sid es o r e v en c a re p rim arily w hat t h ei r s to ries w ere . R eco gn iz in g t h at a ll s to rie s le a d to c o n ic t, e it h er o ver tly o r c o ver tly , h e f o cu se d o n c o n nec tio n s a s a p sy ch olo gic a l b rid ge.  is i s i n k eep in g w it h a n oth er a x io m o f A him sa : I t’s n ot w hat y o u d o t h at c o u nts , i t ’s t h e qu ali t y o f yo u r a tt e n tio n . A s f a r a s t h e l e g al s y ste m i s c o n cer ned , a d iv o rc e i s o ver o n ce th e tw o p artie s s e tt le o n h ow to sp li t th ei r a ss et s. B ut th is is fa r fr o m th e re su lt th at’s re a ch ed em otio n ally b et ween th e tw o d iv o rc e d p arties . T oo m uch h as b een s a id , t o u se M arsh all’s w ord in g, t h at c h an ged t h ei r w orld . Aggre ss io n is b u ilt in to t h e e g o s y ste m , w hic h t o ta lly fo cu ses o n “ I, m e, a n d m in e” w hen ev er c o n ic t a ris es . S o ciet y p ay s li p ser vic e to sa in ts a n d th eir v o w t o s e rv e G od i n ste a d o f t h em se lv es , b u t t h er e’s a h u ge g ap b et ween th e v alu es w e e sp ou se a n d t h e w ay w e a ctu ally li v e. A him sa c lo ses t h is g ap o n ly b y e x p an din g a p ers o n’s a w aren ess.  e on ly w ay t o r es olv e all v io len ce is t o g iv e u p y o u r s to ry. N o o n e c a n b e en li g h ten ed w ho s till h as a p er so n al sta k e i n t h e w orld — th at c o u ld b e th e th ir d a x io m o f A him sa . B ut t h is s e em s li k e a te a ch in g a s ra d ic a l a s Je su s in th e Ser m on o n th e M ou nt w hen h e pro m is e s t h at t h e m eek s h all i n her it t h e earth . In b oth c a se s, t h e p oin t is n ’t to c h an ge y o u r a ctio n s b u t to c h an ge yo u r co n sc io u sn ess . T o d o t h at, y o u m ust w alk a p ath f r o m A t o B , w her e A is a li f e b ase d o n t h e i n ce ss a n t d em an ds o f t h e eg o a n d B i s s e l es s a w aren ess. T o be fr a n k, n ob o d y re a lly d esir e s se l es s a w aren ess; fr o m th e vie w poin t o f lo okin g o u t f o r n u m ber o n e, it s o u n ds a t o n ce sc a ry a n d im poss ib le . W hat’s t h e p ay o ff if y o u d ep ose t h e e g o , w hic h is a ll a b ou t p ay o ff s? O nce th e eg o is g o n e, d o y o u s it a ro u n d p ass iv ely l i k e a s p ir it u al b ean bag ?  e an sw er li e s in th ose m om en ts w hen th e per so n al se lf fa lls aw ay n atu ra lly an d sp on ta n eo u sly .  ese occ u r in m om en ts o f m ed it a tio n o r sim ply d eep co n te n tm en t. Sel es s aw aren ess is th e sta te w e’r e in w hen N atu re or art or m usic cre ates a sen se of w on der.  e on ly d iff er en ce b etw een t h ose m om en ts — to w hic h w e c a n a d d a ll e x p er ien ce s o f c re ativ it y , lo ve, a n d p la y — an d A him sa i s t h at t h ey ic k er i n a n d o u t w hile A him sa i s a s e tt le d s ta te . I t r e v ea ls t h at s to ries a n d t h e eg os t h at f u el t h em a re illu sio n s, s e lf – c re ate d m od els fo r s u rv iv al a n d s e l sh n es s.  e pay o ff fo r A him sa is n ’t t h at y o u u p gra d e t h e illu sio n , w hic h is w hat t h e eg o is a lw ay s s tr iv in g t o d o w it h m ore m on ey, p oss e ss io n s, a n d p ow er .  e pay o ff is th at y o u g et to b e w ho y o u r e a lly a re . H ig h er co n sc io u sn ess is to o lo  y as th e ter m fo r A him sa . N orm al co n sc io u sn ess is m ore a cc u ra te in a w orld w her e th e norm is s o a b n orm al th at it a m ou nts t o p sy ch op ath olo gy. I t’s n ot n orm al t o li v e in a w orld w her e th ou sa n ds o f n u cle ar w arh ea d s a re aim ed a t t h e en em y a n d te rro ris m is a n a cce p ta b le r e li g io u s a ct— th ey a re m erely t h e norm . For m e, th e le g acy o f M arsh all’s li f e lo n g w ork d oes n’t li e in h ow h e re v o lu tio n iz e d th e ro le o f th e m ed ia to r, v alu ab le as th at w as. It li es in th e n ew v alu e s y ste m h e li v ed b y, w hic h i n t r u th i s q u it e an cien t. A him sa h as t o b e r e v iv ed i n e v ery g en era tio n , b ecau se hu m an n atu re is t o rn b et ween p ea ce an d vio le n ce. M arsh all R ose n ber g gav e pro of th at en ter in g th is sta te of ex p an ded a w are n ess w as re a l a n d, w hen it c a m e to s et tli n g d is p u tes , v er y pra ctic a l. H e le av es fo otp rin ts t h at t h e res t o f u s c a n fo llo w . I f w e hav e tr u e se lf – in te re st at h eart, w e w ill fo llo w . It’s th e on ly alt er nativ e in a w orld d esp era te ly s e ek in g w is d om a n d t h e en d o f s tr if e . — Deep ak C hop ra I Ack n ow le d gm en ts ’m g ra te fu l t h at I w as a b le t o s tu dy a n d w ork w it h P ro fe ss o r C arl R oger s at a tim e w hen he w as re se arc h in g th e co m pon en ts of a help in g re la tio n sh ip .  e r e su lt s o f t h is r es earc h p la y ed a k ey r o le in t h e ev o lu tio n o f th e p ro ce ss o f c o m mun ic atio n t h at I w ill b e des crib in g i n t h is b o ok. I w ill b e fo re v er g ra te fu l th at P ro fe ss o r M ic h ael H ak eem h elp ed m e to s e e th e sc ie n ti c li m it a tio n s an d th e so cia l an d poli t ic a l dan ger s of p ra ctic in g p sy ch olo gy in t h e w ay t h at I h ad b een t r a in ed : w it h a p ath olo gy- b ase d u n dersta n din g o f h u m an b ei ngs. S eei ng t h e li m it a tio n s o f t h is m od el stim ula te d m e to s e arc h fo r w ay s o f p ra ctic in g a d iff er en t p sy ch olo gy, o n e base d o n a g ro w in g c la rit y a b ou t h ow w e hu m an b ei ngs w er e m ean t t o l i v e. I’m g ra te fu l, to o, fo r G eo rg e M iller ’s a n d G eo rg e A lb ee’s e ff orts to a ler t psy ch olo gis ts to th e n eed to n d b et ter w ay s fo r “g iv in g p sy ch olo gy a w ay.”  ey h elp ed m e s e e th at th e e n orm it y o f su ff erin g o n o u r p la n et re q u ir es m ore e ff ec tiv e w ay s o f d is tr ib u tin g m uch -n eed ed s k ills th an c a n b e off er ed b y a c li n ic a l a p pro ach . I w ou ld li k e to th an k L u cy L eu fo r e d it in g th is b o ok a n d c re atin g th e n al m an usc rip t; R it a H erz o g a n d K ath y S m it h fo r th ei r e d it in g a ss is ta n ce; a n d, fo r th eir a d dit io n al h elp , D aro ld M illi g an , S o n ia N ord en so n , M ela n ie S ears , B rid get B elg ra v e, M aria n M oore , K it t r e ll M cC ord , V ir g in ia H oyte , a n d P ete r W eis m ille r. F in ally , I w ou ld li k e t o e x p re ss g ra tit u de to m y f r ien d A nn ie M uller . H er en co u ra g em en t t o b e c le are r a b ou t t h e sp ir it u al fo u n datio n o f m y w ork h as str e n gth en ed t h at w ork a n d e n ric h ed m y l i f e . Word s A re W in dow s (o r  ey ’r e W alls ) I f e el s o s e n te n ce d b y y o u r w ord s, I f e el s o j u dged a n d s e n t a w ay, B efo re I g o I ’v e go t t o k n ow , Is t h at w hat y o u m ea n t o s a y? B efo re I r is e to m y d efe n se , B efo re I s p ea k i n h u rt o r f e a r, B efo re I b u ild t h at w all o f w ord s, T ell m e, d id I r e a lly h ea r? W ord s a re w in dow s, o r t h ey’r e w all s ,  ey s e n te n ce us, o r s e t u s f r e e . W hen I s p ea k a n d w hen I h ea r, L et t h e lo ve li g h t s h in e th ro u gh m e.  ere are th in gs I n eed t o s a y,  in gs t h at m ea n s o m uch t o m e, If m y w ord s d on’t m ake m e cle a r, W ill y o u h elp m e to b e fr e e? If I s e e m ed t o p u t y o u d ow n, If y o u f e lt I d id n’t c a re , T ry t o l i s te n t h ro u gh m y w ord s, T o t h e fe eli n gs t h at w e sh are . — Ruth B eb erm ey er 1 Giv in g F ro m t h e H ea rt e H ea rt o f N on vio le n t C om mun ic a tio n W hat I w an t i n m y l i f e is c o m pa ss io n , a fl ow b etw ee n m yse lf a n d o th ers b a se d o n a m utu al g iv in g f r o m t h e hea rt. — Marsh all B . R ose n berg , P hD B I In tr o d u ctio n eli e v in g th at it is ou r natu re to en jo y giv in g an d re ce iv in g in a co m pass io n ate m an ner, I h av e b een p re o cc u pie d m ost o f m y li f e wit h tw o q u estio n s: W hat h ap p en s to d is c o n nect u s fr o m o u r co m pass io n ate n atu re , le a d in g u s to b eh av e v io len tly a n d e x p lo it a tiv ely ? A nd c o n ver se ly , w hat a llo w s s o m e p eo p le to sta y c o n necte d to th ei r c o m pass io n ate natu re u n der e v en t h e m ost t r y in g c ir c u m sta n ce s? M y p re o cc u p atio n w it h t h ese q u es tio n s b eg an in c h ild hood , a ro u n d t h e su m mer o f 1 943, w hen o u r f a m ily m oved t o D etr o it , M ic h ig an .  e se co n d w eek a  er w e a rriv ed , a r a ce w ar e ru pte d o ver a n in cid en t a t a p u bli c p ark . M ore t h an f o rty p eo p le w ere k ille d in t h e nex t f e w d ay s. O ur n eig h borh ood w as s it u ate d i n t h e c e n te r o f t h e v io len ce, a n d w e s p en t t h re e day s lo ck ed i n t h e h ou se . W hen th e r a ce r io t e n ded a n d s c h ool b eg an , I d is c o ver ed th at a n am e co u ld b e a s d an gero u s a s a n y s k in c o lo r. W hen t h e te a ch er c a lle d m y n am e du rin g a tt e n dan ce, t w o b oys g la re d a t m e an d h is s e d , “ A re yo u a k ik e? ” I h ad n ev er h eard th e w ord b efo re an d did n’t k n ow so m e p eo p le u se d it in a d ero gato ry w ay to re fe r to Je w s. A er sc h ool, th e sa m e tw o b oys w er e wait in g f o r m e: t h ey t h re w m e t o t h e gro u n d a n d k ic k ed a n d b eat m e. S in ce th at s u m mer in 1 943, I h av e been e x am in in g th e tw o q u es tio n s I m en tio n ed . W hat em pow ers u s, fo r ex am ple , to sta y co n necte d to ou r co m pass io n ate n atu re e v en u n der t h e w orst c ir c u m sta n ce s? I a m t h in kin g o f p eo p le li k e Ett y H ille su m , w ho rem ain ed co m pass io n ate ev en w hile s u bje c te d to t h e g ro te sq u e c o n dit io n s o f a G er m an c o n ce n tr a tio n c a m p. A s sh e w ro te i n h er j o u rn al a t t h e t im e, a m n ot e a sily f r ig h te n ed . N ot b ecau se I a m b ra v e bu t b ecau se I k n ow th at I a m d ea li n g w it h h u m an b ein gs, a n d t h at I m ust t r y a s h ard a s I c a n t o u n dersta n d e v ery th in g t h at a n yo n e ev er d oes . A nd t h at w as t h e re a l im port o f th is m orn in g: n ot th at a d is g ru ntle d yo u n g G es ta p o offi ce r yelle d at m e, bu t th at I fe lt no in dig n atio n , ra th er a re a l co m pass io n , an d w ou ld hav e li k ed to ask , ‘D id yo u hav e a ver y un hap py c h ild hood , h as y o u r g ir lf r ien d let y o u d ow n?’ Y es , h e lo oked h ara ss e d an d d riv en , su lle n an d w ea k . I sh ou ld h av e li k ed to sta rt tr e atin g h im t h ere a n d t h en , f o r I k n ow t h at p it if u l y o u n g m en l i k e th at a re d an gero u s a s s o on a s t h ey a re l et l o ose on m an kin d. — Ett y H ille su m i n Ett y : A D ia ry 1 941– 1943 W hile s tu dyin g t h e f a cto rs t h at a ff ect o u r a b ili t y t o s ta y c o m pass io n ate , I w as s tr u ck b y t h e c ru cia l r o le o f l a n gu ag e a n d o u r u se of w ord s. I h av e sin ce id en ti ed a sp eci c ap pro ach to co m mun ic atin g— both sp ea k in g an d li s te n in g— th at le a d s u s t o g iv e f r o m t h e heart, c o n nectin g u s w it h o u rs e lv es an d w it h e a ch o th er i n a w ay t h at a llo w s o u r n atu ra l c o m pass io n t o ou ris h . I c a ll t h is a p pro ach N on vio le n t C om mun ic atio n , u sin g t h e te rm non vio le n ce a s G an dh i u se d i t — to r e fe r t o o u r n atu ra l s ta te o f c o m pass io n w hen v io len ce h as s u bsid ed f r o m t h e h eart. W hile w e m ay n ot c o n sid er th e w ay w e t a lk t o b e “v io le n t,” w ord s o  en le a d to h u rt an d p ain , w het her fo r o th er s o r o u rs e lv es. In s o m e c o m mun it ie s, th e pro ce ss I a m d esc rib in g is k n ow n a s C om pass io n ate C om mun ic atio n ; th e ab bre v ia tio n N VC is u se d th ro u gh ou t th is b o ok t o r e fe r t o N on vio le n t o r C om pass io n ate C om mun ic atio n . N VC : a w ay o f c o m mun ic a tin g t h at l e a d s u s t o g iv e f r o m th e h ea rt. A W ay t o F ocu s A tt e n tio n N VC is f o u n ded o n la n gu ag e a n d c o m mun ic atio n s k ills t h at s tr en gth en o u r ab ili t y to r e m ain h u m an , e v en u n der t r y in g c o n dit io n s. It c o n ta in s n oth in g n ew ; a ll th at h as b een in te g ra te d in to N VC h as b een k n ow n fo r c en tu ries .  e in te n t is to re m in d u s a b ou t w hat w e alr e a d y k n ow — ab ou t h ow w e hu m an s w ere m ean t t o r e la te t o o n e an oth er — an d t o a ss is t u s in li v in g in a w ay t h at c o n cre te ly m an if e sts t h is k n ow le d ge. N VC g u id es u s in r e fr a m in g h ow w e ex pres s o u rs e lv es a n d h ear o th er s. In ste a d of hab it u al, au to m atic re a ctio n s, ou r w ord s beco m e co n sc io u s re sp on se s b ase d rm ly o n a w aren ess o f w hat w e are per ce iv in g, f e eli n g, a n d w an tin g. W e a re le d to e x p re ss o u rs e lv es w it h h on esty a n d cla rit y , w hile s im ult a n eo u sly p ay in g o th ers a res pectfu l a n d em path ic a tt en tio n . In a n y ex ch an ge, w e c o m e t o h ear o u r o w n d eep er n eed s a n d t h ose of o th er s. N VC tr a in s u s to o b se rv e ca re fu lly , an d to b e ab le to sp ecif y b eh av io rs an d co n dit io n s th at a re a ff ec tin g u s. W e le arn to id en tif y a n d c le arly a rtic u la te w hat w e a re c o n cre te ly w an tin g in a n y g iv en s it u atio n .  e fo rm is s im ple , y et p ow erfu lly t r a n sfo rm ativ e. A s N VC re p la ce s ou r old patt er ns of defen din g, w it h dra w in g, or att a ck in g in th e fa ce of ju dgm en t an d crit ic is m , w e co m e to per cei ve o u rs e lv es a n d o th ers , a s w ell a s o u r in ten tio n s a n d r e la tio n sh ip s, in a n ew li g h t. R esis ta n ce, d efe n siv en ess , a n d v io len t r e a ctio n s a re m in im iz e d . W hen w e fo cu s o n c la rif y in g w hat is b ein g o b se rv ed , fe lt , a n d n eed ed r a th er t h an o n d ia g n osin g a n d ju dgin g, w e d is c o ver t h e dep th o f o u r o w n c o m pass io n .  ro u gh it s e m ph asis o n d eep li s ten in g— to o u rs e lv es a s w ell a s t o o th er s— N VC fo ste rs re sp ec t, a tt e n tiv en es s, a n d em path y a n d en gen der s a m utu al d esir e t o g iv e f r o m t h e h eart. W e p erc e iv e r e la tio n sh ip s in a n ew li g h t w hen w e u se N VC t o h ea r o u r o w n d eep er n eed s a n d t h os e o f o th ers. A lt h ou gh I r e fe r t o it a s “ a p ro ce ss o f c o m mun ic atio n” o r “ a la n gu ag e of co m pass io n ,” N VC is m ore t h an a p ro ce ss o r a la n gu ag e. O n a d eep er le v el, it i s a n o n go in g r e m in der t o k eep o u r a tt en tio n f o cu se d o n a p la ce w her e w e are m ore l i k ely t o g et w hat w e a re se ek in g.  ere is a s to ry o f a m an o n a ll fo u rs u n der a s tr e et la m p, s e arc h in g fo r so m eth in g. A p oli c e m an p ass in g b y a sk ed w hat h e was d oin g. “ L ookin g fo r m y c a r k ey s,” r e p li e d t h e m an , w ho a p p eare d s li g h tly d ru n k. “ D id y o u d ro p th em h ere ?” in qu ir e d t h e o ffi ce r. “ N o,” a n sw ere d t h e m an , “ I d ro p p ed t h em in t h e a lle y.” S eein g t h e p oli c e m an ’s b affl ed ex pres sio n , t h e m an h asten ed t o e x p la in , “ B ut t h e l i g h t i s m uch b et ter h er e.” I n d t h at m y c u lt u ra l c o n dit io n in g l e a d s m e to f o cu s a tt en tio n o n p la ces w here I a m u n li k ely t o g et w hat I w an t. I d ev elo p ed N VC a s a w ay t o t r a in m y a tt e n tio n — to s h in e th e li g h t o f c o n sc io u sn ess — on p la ces th at h av e th e p ote n tia l t o y ie ld w hat I a m s e ek in g. W hat I w an t i n m y l i f e is c o m pass io n , a ow b etw een m yse lf a n d o th ers b ase d o n a m utu al g iv in g f r o m t h e heart. L et’s s h in e t h e l i g h t o f c o n sc io u sn ess o n p la ce s w here w e ca n h op e t o fi nd w hat w e a re s e ek in g.  is q u ali t y o f c o m pass io n , w hic h I r ef er t o a s “ g iv in g f r o m t h e heart,” i s e x p re ss e d i n t h e f o llo w in g l y ric s b y m y f r ien d R uth B eb er m ey er: I n ev er f e el m ore giv en t o t h an w hen y o u t a ke fr o m m e— when y o u u n dersta n d t h e jo y I f e el g iv in g t o y o u . A nd y o u k n ow m y g iv in g i s n ’t d on e to p u t y o u i n m y d eb t, b u t b eca u se I w an t t o l i v e th e lo ve I f e el f o r y o u . To r e ce iv e w it h g ra ce m ay b e th e gre a te st g iv in g.  ere’s n o w ay I c a n s e p ara te th e tw o. W hen y o u g iv e to m e, I g iv e yo u m y r e ce iv in g. W hen y o u t a ke fr o m m e, I f e el s o g iv en t o . — “G iv en T o” ( 1 978) b y R uth B eb erm ey er f r o m t h e a lb u m Giv en T o W hen w e g iv e f r o m t h e h eart, w e do s o o u t o f t h e jo y t h at s p rin gs f o rth w hen ev er w e w illi n gly en ric h an oth er p er so n’s li f e .  is k in d o f giv in g ben e ts b oth t h e g iv er a n d t h e r e ce iv er .  e re ce iv er en jo ys t h e gi w it h ou t w orr y in g a b ou t th e c o n se q u en ces th at a cco m pan y g i s g iv en o u t o f fe ar, g u ilt , s h am e, o r d esir e fo r g ain .  e giv er b en ets fr o m th e en han ce d s e lf – e ste em t h at r e su lt s w hen w e s e e o u r eff orts c o n tr ib u tin g to s o m eo n e’s w ell- b ein g.  e u se o f N VC d oes n ot re q u ir e th at th e per so n s w it h w hom w e are c o m mun ic atin g be li t e ra te in N VC or ev en m otiv ate d to re la te to us co m pass io n ate ly . I f w e s ta y w it h t h e prin cip les o f N VC, s ta y m otiv ate d s o le ly t o g iv e a n d r e ce iv e c o m pass io n ate ly , a n d d o e v er yth in g w e ca n t o let o th er s kn ow t h is i s o u r o n ly m otiv e, t h ey w ill j o in u s i n t h e pro ce ss , a n d e v en tu ally w e w ill b e a b le to r e sp on d c o m pass io n ate ly to o n e a n oth er . I’m n ot s a y in g th at th is a lw ay s h ap p en s q u ic k ly . I d o m ain ta in , h ow ev er , th at c o m pass io n in ev it a b ly b lo ss o m s w hen w e s ta y t r u e t o t h e prin cip les a n d p ro ces s o f N VC. e N VC P ro ce ss T o a rriv e a t a m utu al d esir e to g iv e fr o m th e heart, w e fo cu s th e li g h t o f co n sc io u sn ess o n fo u r are a s— ref er re d to as th e fo u r co m pon en ts o f th e N VC m od el. F ir st, w e o b se rv e w hat is a ctu ally h ap p en in g in a s it u atio n : w hat a re we ob se rv in g o th ers s a y in g o r d oin g th at is e it h er e n ric h in g o r n ot en ric h in g ou r li f e ?  e tr ic k is to be ab le to artic u la te th is ob ser vatio n w it h ou t in tr o du cin g an y ju dgm en t o r ev alu atio n — to sim ply sa y w hat p eo p le are d oin g th at w e e it h er li k e o r d on’t li k e. N ex t, w e sta te h ow w e fe el w hen w e ob se rv e th is actio n : are w e h u rt, sc a re d , jo yfu l, am use d , ir rit a te d ? A nd th ir d ly , w e sa y w hat n eed s o f o u rs a re co n necte d to th e fe eli n gs w e hav e id en ti ed . A n a w are n ess o f t h ese t h re e co m pon en ts is p res en t w hen w e use N VC t o c le arly a n d h on estly e x p res s h ow w e are . F ou r c o m pon en ts o f N VC : 1. o b se r v atio n s 2. f e eli n gs 3 . n eed s 4. r e q u ests F or e x am ple , a m oth er m ig h t e x p res s th es e th re e pie ce s to h er te en ag e so n b y s a y in g, “ F eli x , w hen I s e e tw o b alls o f s o ile d s o ck s u n der th e co ff ee ta b le a n d a n oth er t h re e n ex t t o t h e TV, I f e el ir rit a te d b ecau se I a m n eed in g m ore o rd er i n t h e r o om s t h at w e sh are in c o m mon .” S h e w ou ld fo llo w im med ia te ly w it h th e fo u rth co m pon en t— a ver y sp eci c r e q u est: “ W ou ld y o u b e w illi n g t o p u t y o u r s o ck s i n y o u r r o om o r i n t h e w ash in g m ach in e?”  is fo u rth co m pon en t ad dres ses w hat w e are w an tin g f r o m t h e o th er p ers o n t h at w ou ld e n ric h o u r l i v es o r m ak e li f e m ore w on derfu l f o r u s.  us, p art o f N VC is to e x p re ss th es e fo u r p ie ce s o f in fo rm atio n v er y cle arly , w heth er verb ally or by oth er m ean s.  e oth er part of th is c o m mun ic atio n c o n sis ts o f re cei vin g th e sa m e fo u r p ie ce s o f in fo rm atio n fr o m o th ers . W e c o n nec t w it h t h em b y rst s en sin g w hat t h ey a re ob ser vin g, fe eli n g, a n d n eed in g; th en w e d is c o ver w hat w ou ld en ric h th ei r li v es b y re ce iv in g t h e f o u rth p ie ce — th eir r e q u es t. A s w e k eep o u r att e n tio n fo cu se d o n th e are a s m en tio n ed , an d h elp o th ers d o li k ew is e , w e e sta b li s h a ow o f c o m mun ic atio n , b ack a n d fo rth , until co m pass io n m an if e sts n atu ra lly : w hat I am o b ser vin g, fe eli n g, an d need in g; w hat I a m re q u estin g to e n ric h m y li f e; w hat y o u a re ob ser vin g, fe eli n g, a n d n eed in g; w hat y o u a re re q u es tin g t o en ric h y o u r l i f e … N VC P ro ce ss  e c o n cre te a ctio n s w e o b se rv e t h at a ff ect o u r w ell- b ein g H ow w e fe el i n r e la tio n t o w hat w e o b se r v e  e n eed s, v a lu es, d esir e s, e tc . t h at c re a te o u r f e eli n gs  e c o n cre te a ctio n s w e re q u est i n o rd er t o e n ric h o u r l i v es W hen w e u se t h is p ro ce ss , w e m ay b eg in ei th er b y ex pres sin g o u rs e lv es o r b y em path ic a lly re ce iv in g th ese fo u r pie ce s of in fo rm atio n fr o m oth er s. A lt h ou gh w e w ill le arn to li s te n fo r an d ver bally ex pres s ea ch o f th es e co m pon en ts in C hap te rs 3 – 6, it is im porta n t to k eep in m in d th at N VC is n ot a s e t f o rm ula , b u t s o m eth in g t h at a d ap ts t o v ario u s s it u atio n s a s w ell a s p ers o n al an d cu lt u ra l sty le s. W hile I co n ven ien tly ref er to N VC as a “p ro ce ss” o r “la n gu ag e,” it is p oss ib le to e x p er ien ce a ll fo u r p ie ces o f th e pro ce ss w it h ou t u tt e rin g a sin gle word .  e ess e n ce of N VC is in ou r co n sc io u sn ess o f th e fo u r co m pon en ts , n ot in th e actu al w ord s th at are e x ch an ged . T w o p arts o f N VC : 1. e x p re ssin g h on estly t h ro u gh t he f o u r c o m pon en ts 2. r e ce iv in g e m path ic a lly t h ro u gh t h e f o u r c o m pon en ts W App ly in g N VC i n O ur L iv es a n d t h e W orld W hen w e use N VC in ou r in ter actio n s— wit h ou rs e lv es , w it h an oth er p ers o n , or in a gro u p — we beco m e gro u n ded in ou r natu ra l sta te of co m pass io n . I t is t h ere fo re a n a p pro ach t h at c a n b e eff ectiv ely a p p li e d a t a ll le v els o f c o m mun ic atio n a n d i n d iv er se sit u atio n s: in tim ate r e la tio n sh ip s fa m ili e s sc h ools o rg an iz atio n s a n d i n stit u tio n s th era p y a n d c o u n se li n g r e la tio n sh ip s d ip lo m atic a n d b u sin ess n eg o tia tio n s dis p u te s a n d c o n ic ts o f a n y n atu re S o m e p eo p le u se N VC to cre ate gre ate r d ep th an d ca rin g in th ei r in tim ate r e la tio n sh ip s: h en I l e arn ed h ow I c a n r e ce iv e ( h ear), a s w ell a s g iv e (ex pres s), th ro u gh usin g N VC, I w en t bey o n d fe eli n g att a ck ed an d ‘d oorm att is h ’ to re a lly li s te n in g to word s an d ex tr a ctin g th ei r un derly in g fe eli n gs. I d is c o vere d a v er y h u rtin g m an to w hom I h ad b een m arrie d f o r t w en ty -e ig h t y ears . H e had a sk ed m e f o r a d iv o rc e th e w eek en d b efo re th e [ N VC] w ork sh op. T o m ak e a lo n g s to ry s h ort, w e are h ere t o d ay — to geth er, a n d I a p pre cia te t h e co n tr ib u tio n [ N VC h as] m ad e t o o u r h ap py e n din g… . I le arn ed t o li s ten f o r f e eli n gs, t o ex pres s m y n eed s, t o a cce p t a n sw ers t h at I d id n’t a lw ay s w an t t o h ear. H e is n ot h ere t o m ak e m e h ap py, n or a m I h er e to c re ate h ap pin es s f o r h im . W e hav e b oth l e arn ed t o g ro w , t o a cce p t, a n d t o l o ve, s o t h at w e ca n e a ch b e fu l lle d . — a w ork sh op p artic ip an t i n S an D ie g o , C ali f o rn ia O th ers u se i t t o b u ild m ore e ff ectiv e re la tio n sh ip s a t w ork : I h av e b een u sin g N VC in m y sp ecia l e d u catio n c la ss ro om fo r a b ou t on e y ear. It c a n w ork e v en w it h c h ild ren w ho h av e la n gu ag e d ela y s, I le arn in g diffi cu lt ie s, an d beh av io r pro blem s. O ne stu den t in ou r cla ss ro om s p it s , s w ears , s c re am s, a n d s ta b s o th er s tu den ts w it h p en cils w hen th ey g et n ear h is d esk . I c u e him w it h , ‘P le a se sa y th at a n oth er w ay. U se y o u r g ir a ff e t a lk .’ [ G ir a ff e pu pp et s a re use d i n s o m e w ork sh op s as a te a ch in g aid to d em on str a te NVC.] H e im med ia te ly sta n ds u p str a ig h t, lo oks a t th e p ers o n to w ard w hom h is a n ger is d ir e cte d , a n d sa y s c a lm ly , ‘W ou ld y o u p le a se m ove aw ay f r o m m y d es k? I fe el a n gry w hen y o u s ta n d s o c lo se t o m e.’  e oth er s tu den ts m ig h t r es pon d w it h s o m eth in g l i k e, ‘S o rr y ! I f o rg o t i t b oth er s y o u .’ I b eg an to th in k a b ou t m y fr u str a tio n w it h th is c h ild a n d to tr y to d is c o ver w hat I n eed ed fr o m h im (b es id es h arm on y an d o rd er ). I re a li z e d h ow m uch tim e I h ad p u t in to le ss o n p la n nin g a n d h ow m y need s fo r cre ativ it y an d co n tr ib u tio n w er e bei ng sh ort- c ir c u it e d in o rd er t o m an ag e b eh av io r. A ls o , I f e lt I w as n ot m eetin g t h e ed u catio n al n eed s o f t h e o th er s tu den ts . W hen h e w as a ctin g o u t i n c la ss , I b eg an t o s a y, ‘I n eed y o u to s h are m y a tt e n tio n .’ It m ig h t t a k e a h u n dre d c u es a d ay, b u t h e g o t th e m ess a g e an d w ou ld u su ally g et in vo lv ed in th e le ss o n . — a t e a ch er i n C hic a g o , I lli n ois A d octo r w rit e s: u se N VC m ore a n d m ore in m y m ed ic a l p ra ctic e. S o m e p atien ts a sk m e w heth er I a m a p sy ch olo gis t, s a y in g t h at u su ally t h ei r d octo rs a re n ot i n te re ste d i n t h e w ay t h ey l i v e th ei r l i v es o r d ea l w it h t h ei r d is e a ses . NVC h elp s m e u n dersta n d w hat p atien ts ’ n eed s a re an d w hat t h ey n eed to h ear a t a g iv en m om en t. I n d t h is p artic u la rly h elp fu l i n r e la tin g t o p atie n ts w it h h em op h ili a a n d A ID S b ecau se th er e is s o m uch a n ger a n d pain t h at t h e p atie n t/ h ea lt h c a re- pro vid er r e la tio n sh ip i s o  en s er io u sly i m pair e d . R ece n tly a w om an w it h A ID S, w hom I h av e been t r e atin g f o r th e p ast ve y ears , t o ld m e t h at w hat h as h elp ed h er t h e m ost h av e been m y a tt e m pts t o n d w ay s f o r h er t o e n jo y h er d aily li f e . M y u se of N VC help s m e a lo t in th is re sp ec t. O en in th e past, w hen I k n ew th at a p atie n t h ad a f a ta l d is e a se , I m yse lf w ou ld g et c au gh t in t h e pro gn osis , a n d it w as h ard fo r m e to s in ce re ly e n co u ra g e th em to li v e th ei r li v es . W it h N VC, I h av e d ev elo p ed a n ew c o n sc io u sn ess a s w ell a s a n ew la n gu ag e. I a m a m aze d to se e h ow m uch it ts in w it h m y m ed ic a l p ra ctic e. I fe el m ore en erg y an d jo y in m y w ork as I beco m e in cre a sin gly e n gag ed i n t h e d an ce of N VC. — a p hysic ia n i n P aris , F ra n ce S till o th ers u se th is p ro ce ss in th e poli t ic a l aren a. A F ren ch ca b in et m em ber vis it in g h er sis te r re m ark ed h ow d iff er en tly th e sis ter an d h er hu sb an d w ere c o m mun ic atin g a n d r es pon din g t o e a ch o th er . E nco u ra g ed b y th eir desc rip tio n s of N VC, sh e men tio n ed th at sh e was sc h ed u le d th e fo llo w in g w eek to neg o tia te so m e sen sit iv e is su es bet ween Fra n ce an d A lg eria re g ard in g ad op tio n pro ce d u res .  ou gh tim e was li m it e d , w e dis p atc h ed a F re n ch -s p ea k in g tr a in er to P aris to w ork w it h th e ca b in et m in is te r.  e m in is te r la te r att r ib u te d m uch of th e su cces s of her n eg o tia tio n s i n A lg eria t o h er n ew ly a cq u ir e d c o m mun ic atio n t e ch n iq u es . In J e ru sa le m , d u rin g a w ork sh op a tt en ded b y I s r a eli s o f v ary in g p oli t ic a l p ersu asio n s, p artic ip an ts u se d N VC to ex pres s th em se lv es reg ard in g th e h ig h ly c o n te ste d is su e o f th e W est B an k. M an y o f th e Is r a eli set tler s w ho h av e e sta b li s h ed t h em se lv es o n t h e W est B an k b eli e v e th at t h ey a re fu l lli n g a re li g io u s m an date b y d oin g s o , a n d th ey a re lo ck ed in c o n ic t n ot o n ly w it h P ale stin ia n s b u t a ls o w it h o th er I s r a eli s w ho r e co gn iz e t h e Pales tin ia n h op e fo r n atio n al so vere ig n ty in th e reg io n . D urin g a ses sio n , o n e of m y tr a in ers a n d I m od ele d e m path ic h earin g th ro u gh N VC a n d th en in vit e d p artic ip an ts to ta k e tu rn s ro le -p la y in g e a ch o th er ’s p osit io n . A er tw en ty m in ute s, a se tt le r an nou n ce d th at sh e wou ld be willi n g to co n sid er re li n qu is h in g her la n d cla im s an d m ovin g ou t of th e West B an k in to in te rn atio n ally r e co gn iz e d Is r a eli ter rit o ry if h er p oli t ic a l o p p on en ts c o u ld li s te n t o h er i n t h e w ay s h e h ad j u st b een l i s ten ed t o . W orld w id e, N VC n ow se rv es a s a v alu ab le res ou rc e fo r c o m mun it ies f a cin g v io le n t c o n ic ts a n d s e v ere et hn ic , r e li g io u s, o r p oli t ic a l t en sio n s.  e sp re a d o f N VC tr a in in g a n d it s u se in m ed ia tio n b y p eo p le in c o n ic t in I s r a el, th e Pale stin ia n Auth orit y , N ig eria , Rw an da, Sier ra Leo n e, an d els e w here hav e been a so u rc e of partic u la r gra ti catio n fo r m e. M y ass o cia te s a n d I w ere o n ce i n B elg ra d e f o r t h re e hig h ly c h arg ed d ay s t r a in in g cit iz e n s w ork in g fo r p ea ce. W hen w e rst a rriv ed , e x p res sio n s o f d es pair w ere vis ib ly etc h ed on th e tr a in ees ’ fa ces , fo r th ei r co u ntr y w as th en en m esh ed i n a b ru ta l w ar i n B osn ia a n d C ro atia . A s t h e tr a in in g p ro gres se d , we h eard th e r in g o f la u gh te r in th ei r v o ic e s a s th ey s h are d th ei r p ro fo u n d gra tit u de a n d jo y fo r h av in g fo u n d th e em pow er m en t th ey w er e se ek in g. O ver t h e n ex t tw o w eek s, d u rin g t r a in in gs in C ro atia , I s r a el, a n d P ales tin e, w e a g ain s a w d esp era te c it iz e n s in w ar- to rn c o u ntr ies r eg ain in g t h ei r s p ir it s a n d c o n den ce f r o m t h e N VC t r a in in g t h ey r e ce iv ed . I f e el b le ss e d t o b e a b le t o t r a v el t h ro u gh ou t t h e world t e a ch in g p eo p le a pro ce ss o f c o m mun ic atio n th at g iv es th em p ow er a n d jo y. N ow , w it h th is b o ok, I a m p le a se d a n d e x cit e d t o b e ab le to s h are th e ric h n es s o f N on vio len t Com mun ic atio n w it h y o u . Su m mary N VC h elp s u s c o n nec t w it h e a ch o th er a n d o u rs e lv es in a w ay th at a llo w s ou r n atu ra l co m pass io n to ou ris h . It g u id es u s to ref ra m e th e way w e ex p re ss o u rs e lv es a n d li s te n t o o th er s b y f o cu sin g o u r c o n sc io u sn es s o n f o u r are a s: w hat w e are ob se rv in g, fe eli n g, an d need in g, an d w hat w e are r e q u estin g to en ric h o u r li v es. N VC fo ster s d eep li s ten in g, res pect, an d em path y a n d e n gen ders a m utu al d esir e to g iv e fr o m t h e heart. S o m e peo p le u se N VC to r e sp on d c o m pass io n ate ly to t h em se lv es , s o m e to c re ate gre ater d ep th in th eir p ers o n al re la tio n sh ip s, an d still oth er s to bu ild eff ectiv e re la tio n sh ip s a t w ork o r in th e p oli t ic a l a ren a. W orld w id e, N VC is u se d to m ed ia te d is p u te s a n d c o n ic ts a t a ll l e v els . N VC i n A ctio n In te rsp erse d th ro u gh ou t th e book a re dia lo gu es e n tit le d N VC in A ctio n .  ese dia lo gu es in te n d to im part th e flavo r o f a n a ctu al ex ch an ge in w hic h a s p ea ker i s a pp ly in g t h e prin cip le s o f N on vio le n t C om munic a tio n . H ow ev er, N VC is n ot s im ply a la n gu age or a s e t o f te ch n iq u es fo r u sin g w ord s; th e co n sc io u sn ess a n d in te n t th at it e m bra ce s m ay b e ex p re ss e d th ro u gh sile n ce , a qu ali t y of pre se n ce , as well as th ro u gh fa cia l ex p re ssio n s a n d b od y la n gu age.  e N VC i n A ctio n d ia lo gu es y o u w ill b e re a d in g are nece ss a rily dis tille d an d ab rid ged versio n s of re a l- li f e e x ch an ges, w here mom en ts o f sile n t em path y, sto rie s, h u m or, g estu re s, a n d m ore wou ld a ll co n tr ib u te to a m ore natu ra l fl ow o f co n n ectio n b etw ee n th e tw o p artie s th an m ig h t b e app are n t w hen d ia lo gu es a re c o n den se d i n p rin t. “ M urd ere r, A ss a ssin , C hild -K ille r!” I w as p re se n tin g N on vio le n t C om mun ic atio n t o a b ou t 1 70 P ales tin ia n M usli m m en in a m osq u e a t D hei sh eh R ef ugee C am p in B et hle h em . Att it u des to w ard A m eric a n s a t th at tim e wer e not fa v o ra b le . A s I w as sp ea k in g, I s u dden ly n otic e d a w av e of m uffl ed c o m motio n utt er in g th ro u gh t h e a u die n ce. “  ey ’r e w his p er in g t h at y o u a re A m eric a n !” m y tr a n sla to r a le rte d m e, ju st a s a g en tlem an in th e au dien ce le ap t to h is f e et. Facin g m e sq u are ly , he holler ed at th e to p of his lu n gs, “ M urd ere r!” Im med ia te ly a d ozen o th er v o ic e s jo in ed h im in c h oru s: “A ss a ss in !” “ C hild -k ille r!” “ M urd er er !” F ortu n ate ly , I w as a b le to fo cu s m y a tt en tio n o n w hat th e m an w as fe eli n g a n d n eed in g. I n t h is c a se , I h ad s o m e c u es . O n t h e w ay i n to t h e re fu gee c a m p, I h ad s e en s e v era l em pty t e ar g as c a n is ter s t h at h ad b een sh ot in to th e c a m p th e n ig h t b efo re . C le arly m ark ed o n e a ch c a n is ter w ere t h e w ord s M ad e in U .S .A . I k n ew t h at t h e r e fu gees h arb ore d a lo t of an ger to w ard th e U nit e d S ta tes fo r su pp ly in g te ar g as an d o th er w eap on s t o I s r a el. I a d dre ss e d t h e m an w ho h ad c a lle d m e a m urd er er : M BR : A re y o u a n gry b ecau se y o u w ou ld li k e m y g o ver nm en t t o u se it s r e so u rc e s d iff ere n tly ? (I d id n’t k n ow w heth er m y g u ess w as c o rre ct — what w as crit ic a l w as m y sin ce re eff ort to co n n ect w it h h is fe eli n g a n d n eed .) M an : D am n rig h t I’m a n gry ! Y ou th in k w e need te ar g as? W e need se w ers , n ot y o u r t e ar g as! W e n eed h ou sin g! W e need t o h av e ou r ow n c o u ntr y ! M BR : So yo u ’r e fu rio u s an d w ou ld ap pre cia te so m e su pp ort in i m pro vin g yo u r li v in g co n dit io n s an d gain in g poli t ic a l in dep en den ce ? M an : D o y o u k n ow w hat i t ’s l i k e t o l i v e her e fo r t w en ty -s e v en y ears t h e w ay I h av e w it h m y fa m ily — ch ild ren a n d a ll? H av e yo u g o t th e fa in te st i d ea w hat t h at’s b een l i k e f o r u s? M BR : S o u n ds li k e y o u ’r e fe eli n g v er y d esp er ate a n d y o u ’r e won der in g w heth er I o r a n yb o d y e ls e c a n r e a lly u n dersta n d w hat it ’s li k e t o b e l i v in g u n der t h ese c o n dit io n s. A m I h earin g y o u r ig h t? M an : Y ou w an t t o u n dersta n d? T ell m e, d o y o u h av e ch ild ren ? D o t h ey g o to sc h ool? D o th ey h av e p la y g ro u n ds? M y so n is sic k ! H e pla y s in o p en se w ag e! H is c la ss ro om h as n o b o oks! H av e yo u se en a s c h ool t h at h as n o b o oks? M BR : I h ear h ow p ain fu l it i s f o r y o u t o r a is e yo u r c h ild ren h er e; y o u ’d l i k e m e t o k n ow t h at w hat y o u w an t is w hat a ll p aren ts w an t f o r th eir c h ild re n — a g o od e d u catio n , o p p ortu n it y t o p la y a n d g ro w in a h ea lt h y e n vir o n m en t … M an :  at’s rig h t, th e basic s! H um an rig h ts — is n ’t th at w hat yo u A m eric a n s c a ll it ? W hy d on’t m ore of y o u c o m e her e an d se e w hat k in d o f h u m an r ig h ts y o u ’r e brin gin g h er e! M BR : Y ou ’d li k e m ore A m eric a n s to b e aw are of th e en orm it y o f th e su ff erin g h ere a n d to lo ok m ore deep ly a t th e co n se q u en ce s o f o u r p oli t ic a l a ctio n s? O ur d ia lo gu e co n tin u ed , w it h h im ex p res sin g h is p ain fo r n early t w en ty m ore m in ute s, a n d m e l i s ten in g f o r t h e fe eli n g a n d n eed b eh in d ea ch s ta te m en t. I d id n’t a g re e o r d is a g re e. I r e ce iv ed h is w ord s, n ot a s att a ck s, b u t a s g i s f r o m a fe llo w h u m an w illi n g to s h are his s o u l a n d deep v u ln era b ili t ie s w it h m e. O nce t h e g en tle m an f e lt u n dersto od , h e was a b le to h ear m e e x p la in m y p u rp ose fo r b ein g a t th e c a m p. A n h ou r la te r, th e sa m e m an w ho h ad c a lle d m e a m urd ere r w as in vit in g m e to h is h om e f o r a R am ad an d in ner. I 2 Com munic a tio n  at B lo ck s C om pa ssio n D o n ot j u dge, a n d y o u w ill n ot b e j u dged . F or a s y o u j u dge oth ers, s o y o u w ill y o u rse lv es b e ju dged … — Holy B ib le , M att h ew 7 :1 n s tu dyin g th e q u estio n o f w hat a li en ates u s fr o m o u r n atu ra l I s ta te of co m pass io n , I hav e id en ti ed sp eci c fo rm s of la n gu ag e an d co m mun ic atio n th at I b eli e v e c o n tr ib u te to o u r b eh av in g v io len tly to w ard e a ch o th er a n d o u rs e lv es. I u se th e ter m li f e- ali e n atin g co m munic a tio n to r e fe r t o t h ese f o rm s o f c o m mun ic atio n . C erta in w ay s o f co m mun ic a tin g a li e n ate u s fr o m o u r n atu ra l s ta te o f c o m passio n . Mora li s tic J u dgm en ts O ne k in d o f l i f e -a li e n atin g c o m mun ic atio n i s t h e use of m ora li s tic j u dgm en ts t h at im ply w ro n gn ess o r b ad n ess o n th e part o f p eo p le who d on’t a ct in h arm on y w it h o u r v alu es. S u ch ju dgm en ts a re re ecte d in la n gu ag e: “  e pro ble m w it h y o u i s t h at y o u ’r e t o o s e l sh .” “ S h e’s l a zy.” “  ey ’r e prej udic e d .” “ It’s in ap pro p ria te .” Bla m e, in su lt s , pu t- d ow ns, la b els , crit ic is m , co m paris o n s, a n d d ia g n ose s a re a ll f o rm s o f j u dgm en t.  e S u p oet R um i o n ce w ro te , “ O ut b ey o n d id ea s o f w ro n gd oin g a n d rig h t- d oin g, th ere is a eld . I’l l meet yo u th er e.” Lif e- ali en atin g co m mun ic atio n , h ow ev er, tr a p s u s in a w orld o f id ea s a b ou t r ig h tn es s a n d w ro n gn ess — a w orld o f ju dgm en ts . It is a la n gu ag e ric h w it h w ord s th at cla ss if y an d d ic h oto m iz e p eo p le an d th ei r actio n s. W hen w e sp ea k th is la n gu ag e, w e ju dge o th ers a n d t h ei r b eh av io r w hile p re o cc u pyin g o u rs e lv es w it h w ho’s g o od , b ad , n orm al, a b n orm al, r es pon sib le , ir res pon sib le , s m art, ig n ora n t, e tc . In t h e w orld o f j u dgm en ts , o u r c o n ce rn c e n te rs o n “ w ho is w hat.” L on g befo re I re a ch ed ad u lt h ood , I le arn ed to co m mun ic ate in an im pers o n al w ay t h at d id n ot r e q u ir e m e t o r e v ea l w hat w as g o in g o n in sid e m yse lf . W hen I e n co u nte re d p eo p le or b eh av io rs I ei th er d id n’t l i k e or d id n’t u n dersta n d, I w ou ld re a ct in ter m s of th ei r w ro n gn es s. If m y te a ch er s ass ig n ed a ta sk I d id n’t w an t to d o, th ey w er e “m ean ” o r “ u n re a so n ab le .” If s o m eo n e p u lle d o u t in fr o n t o f m e in tr a ffi c, m y re a ctio n w ou ld b e, “ Y ou id io t!” W hen w e s p ea k t h is l a n gu ag e, w e t h in k a n d c o m mun ic ate in t er m s o f w hat’s w ro n g w it h o th ers fo r b eh av in g in ce rta in w ay s o r, o cc a sio n ally , w hat’s w ro n g w it h o u rs e lv es fo r n ot u n dersta n din g o r res pon din g as w e wou ld li k e. O ur att e n tio n is fo cu se d on cla ss if y in g, an aly zin g, an d dete rm in in g le v els o f w ro n gn ess r a th er th an o n w hat w e a n d o th er s n eed a n d a re n ot g ett in g.  us i f m y p artn er w an ts m ore aff ectio n t h an I ’m g iv in g her, s h e is “ n eed y a n d d ep en den t.” B ut if I w an t m ore aff ectio n th an s h e is g iv in g m e, th en sh e is “a lo of an d in sen sit iv e.” If m y co lle a g u e is m ore co n ce rn ed a b ou t d eta ils th an I a m , h e is “p ic k y a n d c o m pu ls iv e.” O n th e oth er h an d, if I a m m ore c o n ce rn ed a b ou t d et ails th an h e is , h e is “ s lo p py an d d is o rg an iz e d .” A naly se s o f o th ers a re a ctu ally e x p re ssio n s o f o u r o w n need s a n d v a lu es. It is m y b eli e f th at a ll su ch a n aly ses o f o th er h u m an b ei ngs a re tr a g ic e x p re ss io n s o f o u r o w n v alu es a n d n eed s.  ey a re tr a g ic b ecau se when w e ex p re ss o u r v alu es a n d n eed s in th is fo rm , w e in cre a se def en siv en ess a n d re sis ta n ce a m on g t h e v ery p eo p le whose beh av io rs a re of c o n ce rn t o u s. O r, if p eo p le d o a g re e to a ct in h arm on y w it h o u r v alu es , t h ey w ill li k ely d o s o o u t o f fe ar, g u ilt , o r s h am e b ecau se th ey c o n cu r w it h o u r a n aly sis o f th ei r wro n gn ess . W e a ll p ay d early w hen p eo p le r es pon d t o o u r v alu es a n d n eed s n ot o u t of a d esir e t o g iv e f r o m t h e h eart, b u t o u t o f f e ar, g u ilt , o r s h am e. S o on er o r la te r, w e w ill e x p erie n ce th e c o n se q u en ce s o f d im in is h ed g o od w ill o n th e part o f t h ose w ho c o m ply w it h o u r v alu es o u t o f a s en se of e it h er ex ter nal o r in te rn al co erc io n .  ey, to o, p ay em otio n ally , fo r th ey are li k ely to fe el re se n tm en t a n d d ecre a se d s e lf – es te em w hen th ey r es pon d to u s o u t o f fe ar, g u ilt , o r s h am e. F u rth erm ore , e a ch tim e oth er s a ss o cia te u s in th ei r m in ds w it h an y of th ose fe eli n gs, th e li k eli h ood of th ei r res pon din g co m pass io n ate ly t o o u r n eed s a n d v alu es i n t h e fu tu re decre a ses . It is im porta n t h ere n ot to co n fu se v a lu e ju dgm en ts an d m ora li s tic ju dgm en ts . A ll o f u s m ak e v a lu e ju dgm en ts a s t o t h e q u ali t ie s w e v alu e i n l i f e; fo r e x am ple , w e m ig h t v alu e h on es ty , fr e ed om , o r p ea ce. V alu e ju dgm en ts r e ec t ou r beli e fs of h ow li f e ca n bes t be ser ved . W e m ak e m ora li s tic ju dgm en ts o f p eo p le a n d b eh av io rs t h at f a il t o s u pp ort o u r v alu e ju dgm en ts ; fo r e x am ple , “ V io le n ce is b ad . P eo p le who k ill o th er s a re ev il.” H ad w e been ra is e d s p ea k in g a la n gu ag e t h at f a cili t a te d t h e ex pres sio n o f c o m pass io n , w e wou ld h av e l e arn ed t o a rtic u la te o u r n eed s a n d v alu es d ir e ctly , r a th er t h an t o in sin u ate w ro n gn ess w hen t h ey h av e not b een m et. F or ex am ple , in ste a d o f “V io le n ce is b ad ,” w e m ig h t s a y in ste a d , “ I a m fe arfu l o f t h e use of v io len ce to r e so lv e c o n ic ts ; I v alu e t h e r es olu tio n o f h u m an c o n ic ts t h ro u gh o th er m ean s.” e re la tio n sh ip betw een la n gu ag e an d vio len ce is th e su bje ct of p sy ch olo gy p ro fe ss o r O .J . H arv ey ’s res earc h a t th e Univ er sit y o f C olo ra d o. H e t o ok r a n dom s a m ple s o f p ie ce s o f l i t er atu re fr o m m an y c o u ntr ies a ro u n d th e w orld an d ta b u la te d th e fr e q u en cy o f w ord s th at cla ss if y an d ju dge p eo p le . H is stu dy sh ow s a h ig h c o rre la tio n b et ween fr e q u en t u se of su ch w ord s a n d f r e q u en cy o f i n cid en ts . I t d oes n ot s u rp ris e m e t o h ear t h at t h er e is co n sid era b ly le ss v io le n ce in cu lt u res w her e peo p le th in k in ter m s o f h u m an n eed s t h an in c u lt u re s w her e peo p le la b el o n e a n oth er a s “ g o od” o r “b ad ” a n d b eli e v e t h at t h e “ b ad ” o n es d es er ve to b e pu n is h ed . I n 7 5 p er cen t of t h e t e le v is io n p ro gra m s s h ow n d u rin g h ou rs w hen A m eric a n c h ild ren a re m ost li k ely to b e w atc h in g, th e her o eit h er k ills p eo p le o r b eats th em u p.  is v io le n ce t y p ic a lly c o n stit u te s t h e “c li m ax ” o f t h e sh ow . V ie w er s, h av in g been t a u gh t t h at b ad g u ys d ese rv e to b e pu n is h ed , t a k e ple a su re in w atc h in g th is v io le n ce. C la ssif y in g a n d j u dgin g p eo p le p ro m ote s v io le n ce . A t t h e r o ot o f m uch , if n ot a ll, v io len ce — whet her v er bal, p sy ch olo gic a l, o r p hysic a l, w heth er a m on g f a m ily m em ber s, t r ib es , o r n atio n s— is a k in d o f th in kin g th at att r ib u te s th e cau se of co n ic t to w ro n gn es s in on e’s a d vers a rie s, a n d a c o rre sp on din g in ab ili t y to th in k o f o n es elf o r o th er s in t e rm s o f v u ln era b ili t y — th at is , w hat o n e m ig h t b e fe eli n g, f e arin g, y earn in g fo r, m is s in g, e tc . W e s a w th is d an gero u s w ay o f th in kin g d u rin g th e Cold W ar. O ur le a d ers v ie w ed t h e U .S .S .R . a s a n “ e v il em pir e ” b en t o n d es tr o yin g th e A m eric a n w ay o f li f e . S o vie t le a d ers r ef er re d t o t h e peo p le of t h e U nit e d S ta te s as “im peria li s t op pre ss o rs” w ho w er e tr y in g to su bju gate th em . Neit h er s id e a ck n ow le d ged t h e f e ar l u rk in g b eh in d s u ch l a b els . Mak in g C om paris o n s A noth er fo rm o f ju dgm en t is th e use of c o m paris o n s. In h is b o ok H ow to M ake You rse lf M is e ra b le , D an G re en bu rg d em on str a te s th ro u gh h u m or th e in sid io u s p ow er th at c o m para tiv e th in kin g c a n ex ert o ver u s. H e su gges ts t h at if r e a d ers h av e a s in ce re d esir e to m ak e li f e m is er ab le fo r th em se lv es , th ey m ig h t le arn to co m pare th em se lv es to oth er peo p le . For th ose u n fa m ili a r w it h th is p ra ctic e, h e pro vid es a fe w ex ercis es .  e rst o n e dis p la y s fu ll- le n gth p ic tu re s o f a m an an d a w om an w ho em bo d y id ea l p hysic a l b eau ty b y c o n te m pora ry m ed ia s ta n dard s. R ea d ers a re in str u cte d t o t a k e th eir o w n b o d y m ea su re m en ts , c o m pare th em to th ose su p er im pose d o n t h e p ic tu re s o f t h e a tt r a ctiv e s p ecim en s, a n d d w ell o n t h e diff er en ces . Com paris o n s a re a f o rm o f j u dgm en t.  is e x erc is e p ro du ce s w hat it p ro m is es : w e s ta rt t o f e el m is er ab le as w e en gag e in th ese c o m paris o n s. B y th e tim e we’r e as d ep res se d a s w e th in k poss ib le , w e tu rn th e p ag e to d is c o ver th at th e rst e x er cis e was a m ere warm -u p. Sin ce p hysic a l b eau ty is re la tiv ely su p er cia l, G re en bu rg n ex t pro vid es a n o p p ortu n it y to c o m pare ou rs e lv es o n s o m eth in g th at m att er s: a ch ie v em en t. H e tu rn s to th e p h on e b o ok to g iv e re a d ers a fe w ra n dom in div id u als to c o m pare th em se lv es w it h .  e rst n am e he cla im s to h av e p u lle d o u t o f t h e p h on e b o ok i s W olf g an g A m ad eu s M oza rt. G re en bu rg li s ts t h e la n gu ag es M oza rt s p oke a n d th e m ajo r p ie ce s h e had c o m pose d b y th e tim e h e w as a t e en ag er.  e e x erc is e th en i n str u cts r e a d ers t o r e ect o n t h ei r ow n a ch ie v em en ts a t t h eir c u rre n t s ta g e o f li f e , t o c o m pare th em w it h w hat M oza rt h ad a cco m pli s h ed b y a g e t w elv e, a n d t o d w ell o n t h e diff er en ces . Even re a d ers w ho n ev er e m erg e fr o m th e se lf – in du ce d m is er y o f th is e x erc is e m ig h t s e e h ow p ow erfu lly t h is t y p e of t h in kin g b lo ck s c o m pass io n , both f o r o n ese lf a n d f o r o th ers . Den ia l o f R esp on sib ili t y A noth er k in d o f li f e -a li e n atin g c o m mun ic atio n is d en ia l o f res pon sib ili t y . C om mun ic atio n is li f e -a li e n atin g w hen it c lo u ds o u r a w aren ess t h at w e are e a ch r e sp on sib le f o r o u r o w n t h ou gh ts , f e eli n gs, a n d a ctio n s.  e use of t h e co m mon e x p re ss io n have to , a s in “  ere a re s o m e th in gs y o u h av e to d o, w heth er y o u li k e it o r n ot,” illu str a te s h ow p er so n al res pon sib ili t y fo r o u r actio n s c a n b e o b sc u re d in sp eech .  e ph ra se m akes o n e fe el, a s in “ Y ou m ak e m e f e el g u ilt y ,” i s a n oth er ex am ple of h ow l a n gu ag e f a cili t a tes d en ia l o f p ers o n al r e sp on sib ili t y f o r o u r o w n f e eli n gs a n d t h ou gh ts . O ur la n gu ag e ob sc u re s aw are n ess of perso n al re sp on sib ili t y . In h er b o ok E ic h m an n in Je ru sa le m , w hic h d ocu m en ts th e w ar c rim es tr ia l o f N azi o ffi ce r A dolf E ic h m an n, H an nah A ren dt q u otes E ic h m an n sa y in g th at he an d his fe llo w offi cer s had th ei r ow n nam e fo r th e re sp on sib ili t y -d en yin g la n gu ag e th ey use d .  ey ca lle d it A m ts sp ra ch e, lo ose ly tr a n sla te d in to Engli s h as “o ffi ce ta lk ” or “b u re au cra tes e.” For ex am ple , if a sk ed w hy t h ey t o ok a c er ta in a ctio n , t h e res pon se wou ld b e, “ I h ad t o .” I f a sk ed w hy t h ey “ h ad t o ,” t h e an sw er w ou ld b e, “ S u p er io rs’ o rd er s.” “ C om pan y p oli c y.” “ It w as t h e l a w .” W e d en y r e sp on sib ili t y fo r o u r a ctio n s w hen w e a tt r ib u te th ei r c au se to fa cto rs o u ts id e o u rs e lv es: V ag u e, i m pers o n al f o rc e s— “ I c le a n ed m y r o om b eca u se I h ad t o .” O ur co n dit io n , dia g n osis , or pers o n al or psy ch olo gic a l his to ry — “I d rin k b eca u se I a m a n a lc o h oli c .”  e a ctio n s o f o th ers — “ I h it m y c h ild b eca u se he ra n i n to t h e str e et.”  e d ic ta te s o f a u th orit y — “ I li e d to th e cli e n t b eca u se th e boss to ld m e to .” G ro u p p re ssu re — “ I s ta rte d s m okin g b eca u se all m y f r ie n ds d id .” I n stit u tio n al p oli c ie s, r u le s, a n d r eg ula tio n s— “ I h ave to s u sp en d y o u fo r th is i n fr a ctio n b eca u se it ’s t h e sc h ool p oli c y.” Gen der r o le s, s o cia l r o le s, o r a g e r o les — ”I h ate go in g t o w ork , b u t I d o i t b eca u se I a m a h u sb an d a n d a f a th er.” U nco n tr o lla b le im pu ls e s— “ I w as o verc o m e by m y u rg e to e a t t h e ca n dy bar.” O nce, d u rin g a d is c u ss io n a m on g p aren ts a n d t e a ch er s o n t h e dan ger s o f a la n gu ag e th at im pli e s a b se n ce of c h oic e, a w om an o bje cte d a n grily , “ B ut th ere a re s o m e t h in gs y o u h av e to d o w het her y o u li k e it o r n ot! A nd I s e e n oth in g w ro n g w it h t e lli n g m y c h ild ren t h at t h er e are th in gs t h ey h av e to d o, to o.” A sk ed fo r an ex am ple o f so m eth in g sh e “h ad to d o,” sh e ret orte d , “ at’s e a sy ! W hen I le av e h ere t o n ig h t, I h av e to g o h om e a n d c o ok. I h ate c o okin g! I h ate it w it h a p ass io n , b u t I h av e been d oin g it e v er y d ay fo r tw en ty y ears , e v en w hen I ’v e b een a s s ic k a s a d og, b ecau se it ’s o n e of t h ose th in gs y o u ju st h av e to d o.” I to ld h er I w as sa d to h ear h er sp en din g so m uch o f h er li f e d oin g s o m eth in g s h e hate d , b ecau se sh e fe lt c o m pelle d to , an d I ju st h op ed th at sh e m ig h t n d h ap pier p oss ib ili t ies b y le arn in g th e la n gu ag e o f N VC. I a m p le a se d to re p ort th at sh e was a fa st le arn er . A t th e en d o f th e w ork sh op, s h e a ctu ally w en t h om e an d a n nou n ce d t o h er f a m ily t h at s h e no lo n ger w an te d t o c o ok.  e o p p ortu n it y f o r s o m e f e ed back f r o m h er f a m ily c a m e th re e w eek s la te r w hen h er tw o so n s a rriv ed a t a w ork sh op. I w as cu rio u s t o k n ow h ow th ey h ad r e a cte d t o t h eir m oth er’s a n nou n ce m en t.  e eld er s o n s ig h ed , “ M arsh all, I ju st s a id to m yse lf , ‘ an k G od !’” S eei ng m y pu zzle d lo ok, h e e x p la in ed , “ I t h ou gh t t o m yse lf , m ay b e n ally s h e won’t b e co m pla in in g a t e v ery m ea l! ” W e c a n r e p la ce l a n gu ag e t h at i m pli e s l a ck o f c h oic e w it h la n gu ag e t h at a ck n ow le d ges c h oic e . A noth er tim e, w hen I w as co n su lt in g fo r a sc h ool d is tr ic t, a te a ch er re m ark ed , “I h ate g iv in g g ra d es. I d on’t th in k th ey are help fu l an d th ey cre ate a lo t o f a n xie ty o n t h e p art o f s tu den ts . B ut I h av e to g iv e gra d es : it ’s t h e d is tr ic t p oli c y.” W e h ad ju st b een p ra ctic in g h ow to in tr o du ce la n gu ag e in th e cla ss ro om th at h eig h te n s co n sc io u sn ess o f res pon sib ili t y fo r o n e’s a ctio n s. I s u ggeste d th at th e te a ch er tr a n sla te th e sta te m en t “ I h av e to g iv e I gra d es b ecau se i t ’s d is tr ic t p oli c y ” t o “ I c h oose to g iv e gra d es b ecau se I w an t … ” S h e a n sw ere d w it h ou t h esit a tio n , “I c h oose to g iv e gra d es b ecau se I wan t t o k eep m y jo b,” w hile h aste n in g t o a d d, “ B ut I d on’t li k e s a y in g it t h at w ay. I t m ak es m e f e el s o r e sp on sib le fo r w hat I ’m d oin g.” W e a re d an gero u s w hen w e a re n ot co n sc io u s o f o u r re sp on sib ili t y f o r h ow w e b eh av e, t h in k, a n d f e el. “  at’s w hy I w an t y o u t o d o i t t h at w ay,” I r ep li e d . I sh are th e se n tim en ts of Fre n ch noveli s t an d jo u rn ali s t G eo rg e B ern an os w hen h e s a y s, h av e th ou gh t fo r a lo n g tim e n ow th at if , s o m e d ay, th e in cre a sin g effi cie n cy fo r t h e t e ch n iq u e o f d es tr u ctio n n ally c au ses o u r s p ecies t o dis a p p ear fr o m th e earth , it w ill not be cru elt y th at w ill be re sp on sib le fo r o u r e x tin ctio n a n d s till les s, o f c o u rs e , th e in dig n atio n th at cru elt y aw ak en s an d th e re p ris a ls an d v en gean ce th at it b rin gs u p on it s e lf … b u t t h e d ocili t y , t h e la ck o f r es pon sib ili t y o f t h e m od er n m an , h is b ase su bse rv ie n t a cce p ta n ce o f e v er y c o m mon d ecre e.  e horro rs th at w e h av e s e en , th e s till g re ate r h orro rs w e s h all p res en tly s e e, a re not sig n s th at re b els , in su bord in ate , unta m ab le men are in cre a sin g in n u m ber th ro u gh ou t th e world , b u t r a th er th at th er e is a c o n sta n t i n cre a se i n t h e n u m ber o f o b ed ien t, d ocile m en . —Geo rg e B ern an os Oth er F orm s o f L if e -A li e n atin g C om mun ic a tio n C om mun ic atin g o u r d esir e s a s d em an ds i s y et a n oth er f o rm o f l a n gu ag e th at b lo ck s co m pass io n . A d em an d ex pli c it ly o r im pli c it ly th re ate n s li s ten ers wit h b la m e o r p u n is h m en t if th ey fa il to c o m ply . It is a c o m mon fo rm o f co m mun ic atio n in o u r c u lt u re , es pecia lly a m on g th ose who h old p osit io n s of a u th orit y . M y c h ild re n g av e m e s o m e i n valu ab le le ss o n s a b ou t d em an ds. S o m eh ow I h ad g o tt e n i t i n to m y h ea d t h at, a s a p aren t, m y j o b w as t o m ak e dem an ds. I le arn ed , h ow ev er, t h at I c o u ld m ak e all t h e dem an ds in t h e world b u t s till c o u ld n’t m ak e m y c h ild re n d o a n yth in g.  is is a h u m bli n g les so n in p ow er fo r t h ose o f u s w ho b eli e v e t h at, b ecau se w e’r e a p aren t, t e a ch er , o r m an ag er , ou r jo b is to c h an ge o th er p eo p le an d m ak e th em b eh av e. H er e wer e th es e yo u n gste rs le tt in g m e k n ow th at I c o u ld n’t m ak e th em d o a n yth in g. A ll I c o u ld do w as m ak e th em w is h th ey had — th ro u gh pu n is h m en t.  en ev en tu ally t h ey t a u gh t m e t h at a n y t im e I w as f o oli s h e n ou gh t o m ak e th em w is h th ey h ad c o m pli e d b y p u n is h in g th em , th ey h ad w ay s o f m ak in g m e wis h t h at I h ad n’t ! W e c a n n ev er m ak e p eo p le d o an yth in g. W e w ill ex am in e th is su bje c t ag ain w hen w e le arn to diff er en tia te r e q u ests f r o m d em an ds— an i m porta n t p art o f N VC.  e co n ce p t th at ce rta in actio n s m erit re w ard w hile oth er s m erit p u n is h m en t is als o ass o cia te d w it h li f e- ali en atin g co m mun ic atio n .  is t h in kin g i s e x p re ss e d b y t h e w ord dese rv e a s i n “ H e d ese rv es t o b e p u n is h ed fo r w hat h e d id .” I t a ssu m es “ b ad n es s” o n t h e part o f p eo p le who b eh av e in c e rta in w ay s, a n d it c a lls fo r p u n is h m en t to m ak e th em r ep ent a n d ch an ge th eir b eh av io r. I b eli e v e it i s i n e v er yo n e’s i n ter es t t h at p eo p le ch an ge, n ot i n o rd er to a v o id p u n is h m en t, b u t b ecau se th ey s e e th e ch an ge a s b en etin g th em se lv es.  in kin g base d on “w ho dese r v es what” blo ck s co m passio n ate c o m mun ic a tio n . Most o f u s g re w u p sp ea k in g a la n gu ag e th at en co u ra g es u s to la b el, c o m pare , d em an d, a n d p ro n ou n ce ju dgm en ts ra th er th an to b e aw are of w hat w e a re fe eli n g a n d n eed in g. I b eli e v e li f e- ali en atin g c o m mun ic atio n is r o ote d i n v ie w s o f h u m an n atu re t h at h av e ex er te d t h ei r i n u en ce fo r s e v er al ce n tu rie s.  ese v ie w s s tr e ss h u m an s’ in nate ev il a n d d e cien cy, a n d a n eed fo r e d u catio n to c o n tr o l o u r in her en tly u n des ir a b le natu re . S u ch e d u catio n o  en l e av es u s q u estio n in g w heth er t h er e is s o m eth in g w ro n g w it h w hate v er fe eli n gs a n d n eed s w e m ay b e e x p er ien cin g. W e le arn e arly t o c u t o u rs e lv es o ff f r o m w hat’s g o in g o n w it h in o u rs e lv es . Lif e -a li e n atin g c o m mun ic a tio n h as d eep p h ilos op h ic a l an d p oli t ic a l r o ots . L if e -a li e n atin g co m mun ic atio n both stem s fr o m an d su pp orts h ie ra rc h ic a l o r d om in atio n s o cie ties , w her e la rg e p op u la tio n s a re co n tr o lle d b y a s m all n u m ber o f i n div id u als t o t h ose in div id u als , o w n b en et. I t w ou ld b e in th e in te re st o f k in gs, c za rs , n obles , a n d so fo rth th at th e m ass es b e ed u cate d in a w ay t h at r e n ders t h em s la v eli k e in m en ta li t y .  e la n gu ag e of w ro n gn ess , s h ou ld , a n d have to is p erfe c tly s u it e d f o r t h is p u rp ose: t h e m ore p eo p le are tr a in ed to th in k in te rm s o f m ora li s tic ju dgm en ts th at im ply w ro n gn ess a n d b ad n ess , th e m ore th ey a re bei ng tr a in ed to lo ok o u ts id e th em se lv es— to o u ts id e a u th orit ies — fo r th e de n it io n o f w hat c o n stit u tes r ig h t, w ro n g, g o od , a n d b ad . W hen w e are in c o n ta ct w it h o u r fe eli n gs a n d need s, w e h u m an s n o l o n ger m ak e go o d s la v es a n d u n der li n gs. Su m mary It is o u r n atu re to e n jo y g iv in g a n d re ce iv in g c o m pass io n ate ly . W e hav e, h ow ev er, le arn ed m an y fo rm s o f li f e- ali en atin g c o m mun ic atio n t h at le a d u s to s p ea k a n d b eh av e in w ay s th at in ju re oth er s a n d o u rs e lv es . O ne fo rm o f li f e -a li e n atin g co m mun ic atio n is t h e u se o f m ora li s tic ju dgm en ts t h at im ply w ro n gn ess o r b ad n ess o n th e p art o f th ose who d on’t a ct in h arm on y w it h o u r v alu es. A noth er is t h e u se o f c o m paris o n s, w hic h c a n b lo ck c o m pass io n b oth fo r oth ers an d fo r ou rs e lv es . Lif e- ali en atin g co m mun ic atio n als o o b sc u re s o u r a w are n ess t h at w e a re ea ch r es pon sib le fo r o u r o w n t h ou gh ts , fe eli n gs, a n d a ctio n s. C om mun ic atin g o u r d esir es i n t h e fo rm o f d em an ds i s y et a n oth er c h ara cte ris tic o f l a n gu ag e t h at b lo ck s c o m pass io n . T 3 Obse rv in g W it h ou t E va lu atin g O BSE RV E!!  ere are fe w t h in gs a s i m porta n t, a s r e li g io u s, a s t h at. — Fre d eric k B uech n er, m in is te r I c a n h an dle yo u r t e lli n g m e what I d id o r d id n’t d o. A nd I c a n h an dle yo u r i n te rp re ta tio n s, b u t p le a se don’t m ix t h e tw o. If y o u w an t t o c o n fu se an y i s su e, I c a n t e ll y o u h ow t o d o i t : M ix t o geth er w hat I d o w it h h ow y o u r e a ct t o i t . T ell m e th at y o u ’r e dis a pp oin te d w it h t h e unfinis h ed c h ore s y o u s e e , B ut c a lli n g m e “ir re sp on sib le ” is n o w ay t o m otiv a te m e. A nd t e ll m e th at y o u ’r e fe eli n g h u rt w hen I s a y “ n o” t o y o u r a d va n ce s, B ut c a lli n g m e a f r ig id m an w on’t i n cre a se yo u r f u tu re ch an ce s. Y es, I c a n h an dle yo u r t e lli n g m e what I d id o r d id n’t d o, A nd I c a n h an dle yo u r i n te rp re ta tio n s, b u t p le a se don’t m ix t h e tw o. — Marsh all B . R ose n berg , P hD h e rst c o m pon en t o f N VC e n ta ils t h e sep ara tio n o f o b ser vatio n fr o m ev alu atio n . W e n eed to c le arly o b ser ve what w e a re se ei ng, h earin g, o r to u ch in g th at is a ff ec tin g o u r se n se of w ell- b ei ng, w it h ou t m ix in g in a n y ev alu atio n . O bse rv atio n s are an im porta n t ele m en t in N VC, w her e we wis h to c le arly an d h on estly ex p re ss h ow w e are to an oth er p er so n . W hen w e co m bin e o b se rv atio n w it h e v alu atio n , w e decre a se th e li k eli h ood t h at o th er s will h ear o u r in te n ded m ess a g e. In ste a d , th ey a re ap t to h ear c rit ic is m a n d th u s r e sis t w hate v er w e a re s a y in g. N VC d oes n ot m an date t h at w e r em ain c o m plet ely o bje ctiv e an d r ef ra in f r o m e v alu atin g. I t o n ly r e q u ir e s t h at w e m ain ta in a s ep ara tio n b et ween o u r ob se rv atio n s an d ou r ev alu atio n s. N VC is a pro ce ss la n gu ag e th at d is c o u ra g es sta tic g en era li z atio n s; in ste a d , e v alu atio n s a re to b e base d o n o b se rv atio n s sp ecifi c to tim e an d co n te x t. Sem an tic is t W en dell Jo h n so n p oin te d o u t th at w e cre ate m an y p ro blem s fo r o u rs e lv es b y u sin g sta tic la n gu ag e t o e x p re ss o r c ap tu re a r e a li t y t h at i s e v er c h an gin g: “ O ur la n gu ag e is a n im perfe c t in str u m en t c re ate d b y a n cien t a n d ig n ora n t m en . It is a n a n im is tic l a n gu ag e t h at i n vit e s u s t o t a lk a b ou t s ta b ili t y a n d c o n sta n ts , a b ou t sim ila rit ie s an d n orm al an d k in ds, ab ou t m ag ic a l tr a n sfo rm atio n s, q u ic k c u re s, sim ple pro ble m s, an d n al so lu tio n s. Yet th e world w e tr y to s y m boli z e w it h th is la n gu ag e is a w orld o f p ro ce ss , ch an ge, d iff er en ces , dim en sio n s, fu n ctio n s, re la tio n sh ip s, gro w th s, in ter actio n s, dev elo p in g, le arn in g, c o p in g, c o m ple x it y . A nd t h e m is m atc h o f o u r e v er -c h an gin g w orld a n d o u r r e la tiv ely s ta tic l a n gu ag e f o rm s i s p art o f o u r p ro blem .” W hen w e c o m bin e o b se r v atio n w it h e v a lu atio n , p eo p le a re a p t t o h ea r c rit ic is m . A co lle a g u e o f m in e, R uth B eb er m ey er, co n tr a sts sta tic an d p ro ces s la n gu ag e in a so n g th at illu str a tes th e diff er en ce b et ween e v alu atio n a n d ob se rv atio n : I ’v e nev er s e e n a l a zy m an ; I’v e se e n a m an w ho n ev er r a n w hile I w atc h ed h im , a n d I ’v e se e n a m an w ho s o m etim es s le p t b etw ee n lu n ch a n d d in n er, a n d w ho’d s ta y at h om e upon a r a in y d ay, bu t h e w as n ot a l a zy m an . B efo re yo u c a ll m e cra zy, th in k, w as h e a l a zy m an o r d id h e ju st d o t h in gs w e la b el “ la zy”? I’v e nev er s e e n a s tu pid k id ; I’v e se e n a k id w ho s o m etim es d id t h in gs I d id n’t u n dersta n d or t h in gs i n w ays I h ad n’t p la n n ed ; I’v e se e n a k id w ho h ad n’t s e e n th e sa m e pla ce s w here I h ad b ee n, b u t h e w as n ot a s tu pid k id . B efo re yo u c a ll h im s tu pid , th in k, w as h e a s tu pid k id o r d id h e ju st k n ow d iff ere n t t h in gs t h an y o u d id ? I’v e lo ok ed a s h ard a s I c a n l o ok b u t n ev er e v er s e e n a c o ok ; I s a w a p erso n w ho c o m bin ed in gre d ie n ts o n w hic h w e din ed , A p erso n w ho t u rn ed o n t h e hea t a n d w atc h ed t h e sto ve th at c o ok ed t h e m ea t— I s a w t h ose th in gs b u t n ot a c o ok . T ell m e, w hen y o u ’r e lo okin g, Is i t a c o ok y o u s e e or i s i t s o m eo n e doin g t h in gs t h at w e ca ll c o okin g? W hat s o m e of u s c a ll l a zy so m e ca ll t ir e d o r e a sy -g o in g, w hat s o m e of u s c a ll s tu pid s o m e ju st c a ll a d iff ere n t k n ow in g, so I ’v e co m e to t h e co n clu sio n , it w ill s a ve us a ll c o n fu sio n if w e don’t m ix u p w hat w e ca n s e e w it h w hat i s o u r o p in io n . B eca u se yo u m ay, I w an t t o s a y a ls o ; I k n ow t h at’s o n ly m y o p in io n . — Ruth B eb erm ey er W hile th e e ff ec ts o f n eg ativ e la b els s u ch a s “ la zy ” a n d “ s tu pid ” m ay b e m ore o bvio u s, e v en a p osit iv e o r a n a p p aren tly n eu tr a l la b el s u ch a s “ c o ok” li m it s o u r p erc e p tio n o f t h e t o ta li t y o f a n oth er p er so n’s b ei ng. e H ig h est F orm o f H um an I n te lli g en ce  e In dia n ph ilo so p h er J. K ris h n am urti on ce rem ark ed th at ob ser vin g w it h ou t e v alu atin g is th e h ig h est fo rm o f h u m an in te lli g en ce. W hen I rst re a d th is s ta te m en t, th e th ou gh t, “ W hat n on sen se! ” s h ot th ro u gh m y m in d befo re I re a li z e d th at I h ad ju st m ad e a n e v alu atio n . F or m ost o f u s, it is d iffi cu lt to m ak e o b se rv atio n s, es pecia lly o f p eo p le an d th ei r b eh av io r, th at a re f r e e o f j u dgm en t, c rit ic is m , o r o th er f o rm s o f a n aly sis . I beca m e acu te ly aw are of th is diffi cu lt y w hile w ork in g w it h an ele m en ta ry sc h ool w here th e sta ff an d prin cip al had o en rep orte d co m mun ic atio n d iffi cu lt ie s.  e d is tr ic t s u p er in ten den t h ad r e q u es te d t h at I h elp t h em r e so lv e t h e c o n ic t. F ir st I w as t o c o n fer w it h t h e sta ff , a n d t h en w it h t h e s ta ff a n d p rin cip al t o geth er . I o p en ed th e m eetin g b y a sk in g th e sta ff , “ W hat is th e prin cip al d oin g th at c o n ic ts w it h y o u r n eed s? ” “H e h as a b ig m ou th !” c a m e th e s w i r es pon se . M y q u es tio n c a lle d fo r an o b se rv atio n , b u t w hile “ b ig m ou th ” g av e me in fo rm atio n o n h ow th is t e a ch er e v alu ate d t h e p rin cip al, it fa ile d to d esc rib e what t h e prin cip al s a id o r d id t h at l e d t o t h e i n te rp re ta tio n t h at h e had a “ b ig m ou th .” W hen I p oin te d th is o u t, a se co n d te a ch er o ff ere d , “I k n ow w hat h e m ean s: th e p rin cip al ta lk s to o m uch !” I n ste a d o f a c le ar o b ser vatio n of th e prin cip al’s b eh av io r, t h is w as a ls o a n e v alu atio n — of h ow m uch t h e prin cip al ta lk ed . A t h ir d t e a ch er t h en d ecla re d , “ H e th in ks o n ly h e has a n yth in g w orth s a y in g.” I e x p la in ed t h at i n fe rrin g w hat a n oth er p er so n i s t h in kin g i s n ot t h e sa m e a s o b se rv in g h is b eh av io r. F in ally a f o u rth t e a ch er v en tu re d , “ H e w an ts to b e t h e c e n te r o f a tt e n tio n a ll t h e tim e.” A er I r em ark ed t h at t h is t o o w as an in fe re n ce — of w hat a n oth er p er so n is w an tin g— tw o te a ch er s b lu rte d in u n is o n , “ W ell, y o u r q u estio n i s v er y h ard t o a n sw er!” W e su bse q u en tly w ork ed to geth er to cre ate a li s t id en tif y in g sp ecifi c beh avio rs, o n th e p art o f th e p rin cip al, th at b oth er ed th em , a n d m ad e s u re th at th e li s t w as fr e e o f e v alu atio n . F or ex am ple , th e prin cip al to ld s to ries a b ou t h is c h ild hood a n d w ar e x p er ien ce s d u rin g fa cu lt y m eet in gs, w it h t h e re su lt t h at m eetin gs s o m etim es r a n t w en ty m in utes o ver tim e. W hen I a sk ed w heth er t h ey h ad e v er c o m mun ic ate d t h ei r a n noyan ce t o t h e prin cip al, t h e sta ff re p li e d th at th ey h ad tr ie d , b u t o n ly th ro u gh ev alu ativ e co m men ts . ey had nev er m ad e re fe re n ce to sp eci c beh av io rs — su ch as his s to ry te lli n g— an d th ey a g re ed to b rin g th es e up w hen w e wer e all to m eet to geth er. A lm ost a s so on a s th e m eetin g b eg an , I sa w w hat th e sta ff h ad b een te lli n g m e. N o m att e r w hat w as bei ng dis c u ss e d , th e prin cip al w ou ld i n te rje c t, “  is r e m in ds m e o f th e tim e … ” a n d th en la u n ch in to a s to ry a b ou t h is c h ild hood o r w ar e x p erien ce. I w ait e d fo r th e sta ff to v o ic e th ei r dis c o m fo rt a ro u n d t h e p rin cip al’s b eh av io r. H ow ev er , in ste a d o f N on vio len t Com mun ic atio n , th ey a p p li e d n on ver bal c o n dem natio n . S o m e r o lle d th ei r ey es; o th ers y aw ned p oin te d ly ; o n e sta re d a t h is w atc h . I e n du re d t h is p ain fu l s c e n ario u ntil n ally I a sk ed , “ Is n ’t a n yo n e go in g to sa y so m eth in g?” A n aw kw ard silen ce en su ed .  e te a ch er w ho h ad sp oken rst a t o u r m eetin g s c re w ed u p h is c o u ra g e, lo oked d ir e ctly a t th e prin cip al, a n d s a id , “ E d, y o u h av e a b ig m ou th .” A s th is s to ry illu str a te s, it ’s n ot a lw ay s e a sy to s h ed o u r o ld h ab it s a n d m aste r th e a b ili t y to s e p ara te o b ser vatio n fr o m e v alu atio n . E ven tu ally , th e te a ch ers s u cce ed ed i n c la rif y in g f o r t h e prin cip al t h e sp eci c a ctio n s t h at l e d to th eir c o n ce rn .  e p rin cip al li s ten ed e arn es tly a n d th en p res se d , “ W hy d id n’t o n e of yo u te ll m e befo re ?” H e ad m it t e d he was aw are of his s to ry te lli n g hab it , an d th en beg an a sto ry per ta in in g to th is hab it ! I in te rr u pte d h im , o b se rv in g ( g o od -n atu re d ly ) t h at h e was d oin g it a g ain . W e en ded o u r m eetin g b y d ev elo p in g w ay s fo r th e sta ff to let th ei r p rin cip al k n ow , i n a g en tle w ay, w hen h is s to ries w er en ’t a p pre cia te d . Dis tin gu is h in g O bse r v atio n s F ro m E va lu atio n s  e fo llo w in g ta b le dis tin gu is h es ob ser vatio n s th at are sep ara te fr o m ev alu atio n f r o m t h ose t h at h av e e v alu atio n m ix ed i n . C om mun ic a tio n E xam ple o f o b se r v atio n w it h e v a lu atio n m ix ed i n E xam ple o f o b se r v atio n s e p ara te f r o m e v a lu atio n 1. U se o f v erb to b e w it h ou t in dic atio n t h at t h e e v alu ato r ta k es r e sp on sib ili t y f o r t h e ev alu atio n Y ou a re t o o gen ero u s. W hen I s e e y o u g iv e a ll y o u r l u n ch m on ey t o o th ers , I t h in k y o u a re b ein g t o o g en ero u s. 2 . U se o f v erb s w it h e v alu ativ e co n nota tio n s D ou g pro cra stin ate s. D ou g o n ly s tu die s f o r ex am s t h e n ig h t b efo re . 3 . I m pli c atio n t h at o n e’s i n fe re n ce s a b ou t a n oth er p ers o n’s t h ou gh ts , f e eli n gs, i n te n tio n s, o r d esir e s a re t h e o n ly o n es p oss ib le S h e w on’t g et h er w ork i n . I d on’t t h in k s h e’l l g et h er w ork i n . o r S h e s a id , “ I w on’t g et m y work i n .” 4 . C on fu sio n o f p re d ic tio n w it h c e rta in ty I f y o u d on’t e at b ala n ce d m ea ls , y o u r h ea lt h w ill b e i m pair e d . If y o u d on’t e at b ala n ce d m ea ls , I f e ar y o u r h ea lt h m ay b e i m pair e d . 5. F ailu re t o b e s p eci c a b ou t re fe re n ts I m mig ra n ts d on’t t a k e c a re o f t h eir p ro p erty . I h av e n ot s e en t h e im mig ra n t f a m ily l i v in g at 1 679 R oss s h ovel t h e sn ow o n t h eir s id ew alk . 6. U se o f w ord s d en otin g a b ili t y w it h ou t i n dic atin g t h at a n e v alu atio n i s b ein g m ad e H an k S m it h i s a p oor s o cce r p la y er. H an k S m it h h as n ot sc o re d a g o al i n t w en ty g am es. 7 . U se o f a d verb s a n d a d je c tiv es in w ay s t h at d o n ot i n dic ate a n e v alu atio n h as b een m ad e Jim i s u gly . Jim ’s l o oks d on’t a p p ea l to m e. Note :  e w ord s a lw ays, n ev er, e v er, w hen ev er, e tc . e x p re ss o b se rv atio n s w hen u se d i n t h e f o llo w in g w ay s: W hen ev er I h av e o b se rv ed J a ck o n t h e ph on e, h e has s p oken f o r a t l e a st th ir ty m in ute s. I c a n not r e ca ll y o u r e v er w rit in g t o m e. S o m etim es su ch w ord s are use d as ex ag gera tio n s, in w hic h ca se o b se rv atio n s a n d e v alu atio n s a re b ei ng m ix ed : You a re a lw ay s b u sy . S h e i s n ev er t h ere w hen s h e’s n eed ed . W hen th ese w ord s are use d as ex ag gera tio n s, th ey o en pro vo ke d efe n siv en ess r a th er t h an c o m pass io n . W ord s li k e fr e q u en tly an d se ld om ca n als o co n tr ib u te to co n fu sin g ob se rv atio n w it h e v alu atio n . E va lu atio n s O bse r v atio n s You s e ld om d o w hat I w an t.  e l a st t h re e t im es I i n it ia te d a n a ctiv it y , y o u s a id y o u d id n’t w an t t o d o i t . H e f r e q u en tly c o m es o ver. H e c o m es o ver a t l e a st t h re e t im es a w eek . Su m mary  e rst co m pon en t o f N VC en ta ils th e sep ara tio n o f o b ser vatio n fr o m ev alu atio n . W hen w e c o m bin e o b ser vatio n w it h e v alu atio n , o th er s a re ap t t o h ear c rit ic is m a n d r e sis t w hat w e a re sa y in g. N VC i s a p ro ce ss la n gu ag e th at d is c o u ra g es sta tic gen era li z atio n s. In ste a d , ob ser vatio n s are to b e mad e sp eci c t o t im e a n d c o n te x t, f o r ex am ple , “ H an k S m it h h as n ot s c o re d a g o al in t w en ty g am es,” r a th er t h an “ H an k S m it h i s a p oor s o ccer p la y er.” N VC i n A ctio n “ e M ost A rro gan t S p ea k er W e’v e E ver H ad !”  is d ia lo gu e o cc u rre d d u rin g a w ork sh op I w as c o n du ctin g. A bou t h alf a n h ou r i n to m y p re se n ta tio n , I p au se d t o i n vit e re a ctio n s f r o m t h e partic ip an ts . O ne o f t h em r a is e d a h an d a n d d ecla re d , “ Y ou ’r e th e m ost a rro gan t s p ea k er w e’v e e v er h ad !” I h av e s e v era l o p tio n s o p en t o m e w hen p eo p le ad dres s m e t h is w ay. O ne o p tio n is to ta k e th e m ess a g e p er so n ally ; I k n ow I’m d oin g th is w hen I h av e a str o n g u rg e to e it h er g ro vel, d efen d m yse lf , o r m ak e ex cu se s. A noth er o p tio n (fo r w hic h I a m w ell- r e h ears e d ) is to a tt a ck th e o th er p ers o n fo r w hat I p erc e iv e as th ei r a tt a ck u p on m e. O n th is o cc a sio n , I c h ose a t h ir d o p tio n b y f o cu sin g o n w hat m ig h t b e go in g o n b eh in d t h e m an ’s s ta te m en t. M BR : ( g u essin g a t t h e ob se rv a tio n s b ein g m ad e) A re y o u r e a ctin g t o m y hav in g t a k en t h ir ty s tr a ig h t m in utes to p res en t m y v ie w s b ef ore g iv in g y o u a c h an ce t o t a lk ? P hil: N o, y o u m ak e i t s o u n d s o s im ple . M BR : ( tr y in g t o o b ta in f u rth er c la rifi ca tio n ) A re y o u r e a ctin g t o m y n ot h av in g s a id a n yth in g a b ou t h ow th e pro ce ss c a n b e diffi cu lt fo r so m e p eo p le t o a p p ly ? P hil: N o, n ot s o m e p eo p le — yo u ! M BR : S o y o u ’r e r e a ctin g t o m y n ot h av in g s a id t h at t h e pro ce ss c a n b e d iffi cu lt f o r m e a t t im es? P hil:  at’s r ig h t. MBR : A re y o u fe eli n g a n noyed b ecau se yo u w ou ld h av e li k ed so m e sig n f r o m m e t h at in dic ate d t h at I h av e so m e p ro blem s w it h t h e pro ce ss m yse lf ? P hil: ( a  er a m om en t’s p au se)  at’s r ig h t. M BR : ( fe eli n g m ore re la xed n ow th at I a m in to u ch w it h th e perso n’s f e eli n g an d need , I dir e ct m y atte n tio n to w hat he mig h t be re q u estin g o f m e) W ou ld y o u l i k e m e t o a d m it r ig h t n ow t h at t h is p ro ce ss c a n b e a s tr u gg le f o r m e t o a p p ly ? P hil: Y es. M BR : ( h avin g g o tte n c le a r o n h is o b se rv a tio n , fe eli n g, n eed , a n d r e q u est, I c h eck i n sid e m yse lf t o s e e if I a m w illi n g t o d o a s h e re q u ests ) Y es, th is p ro ce ss is o  en d iffi cu lt fo r m e. A s w e c o n tin u e wit h th e w ork sh op, yo u ’l l p ro b ab ly h ear m e d esc rib e se v er al in cid en ts w here I’v e str u gg le d … o r c o m plet ely lo st to u ch … w it h th is p ro ce ss , t h is c o n sc io u sn ess , t h at I a m p res en tin g h er e to y o u . B ut w hat k eep s m e i n t h e s tr u gg le a re th e clo se co n nectio n s t o o th er p eo p le t h at h ap p en w hen I d o s ta y w it h t h e pro ce ss . Exerc is e 1 O BSE R VA T IO N O R E V A LU AT IO N? To d ete rm in e yo u r pro cie n cy at d is c e rn in g bet ween ob ser vatio n s an d ev alu atio n s, c o m ple te th e fo llo w in g ex ercis e . C ir c le th e nu m ber in fr o n t o f ea ch s ta te m en t t h at i s a n o b se rv atio n o n ly , w it h n o e v alu atio n m ix ed i n . 1. “ Jo h n w as a n gry w it h m e y este rd ay f o r n o r e a so n .” 2. “ Y este rd ay e v en in g N an cy b it h er n gern ails w hile w atc h in g t e le v is io n .” 3. “ S am d id n’t a sk f o r m y o p in io n d u rin g t h e m eet in g.” 4. “ M y f a th er i s a g o od m an .” 5. “ Ja n ic e w ork s t o o m uch .” 6. “ H en ry i s a g gre ss iv e.” 7. “ P am w as rst i n l i n e e v ery d ay t h is w eek .” 8. “ M y s o n o  en d oesn ’t b ru sh h is t e et h.” 9. “ L u ke t o ld m e I d id n’t l o ok g o od i n y ello w .” 1 0 . “ M y a u nt c o m pla in s w hen I t a lk w it h h er .” H ere are m y r e sp on se s f o r E xerc is e 1: 1. I f y o u c ir c le d th is n u m ber, w e’r e not in a g re em ent. I c o n sid er “ fo r n o re a so n” t o b e a n e v alu atio n . F u rth er m ore , I c o n sid er i t a n e v alu atio n t o in fe r t h at J o h n w as a n gry. H e m ig h t h av e been f e eli n g h u rt, s c a re d , s a d , or s o m eth in g e ls e . E xam ple s o f o b ser vatio n s w it h ou t e v alu atio n m ig h t b e: “ Jo h n t o ld m e h e w as a n gry,” o r “ Jo h n p ou n ded h is st o n t h e ta b le .” 2. I f y o u c ir c le d t h is n u m ber, w e’r e in a g re em ent t h at a n o b ser vatio n w as ex p re ss e d w it h ou t b ein g m ix ed t o geth er w it h a n e v alu atio n . 3. I f y o u c ir c le d t h is n u m ber, w e’r e in a g re em ent t h at a n o b ser vatio n w as ex p re ss e d w it h ou t b ein g m ix ed t o geth er w it h a n e v alu atio n . 4. I f y o u c ir c le d th is n u m ber, w e’r e not in a g re em ent. I c o n sid er “g o od m an ” t o b e a n e v alu atio n . A n o b ser vatio n w it h ou t e v alu atio n m ig h t b e: “F or th e la st tw en ty – ve y ears , m y fa th er h as g iv en o n e- ten th o f h is s a la ry t o c h arit y .” 5. I f y o u cir c le d th is n u m ber, w e’r e not in ag re em ent. I co n sid er “to o m uch ” to b e a n e v alu atio n . A n o b ser vatio n w it h ou t e v alu atio n m ig h t b e: “ Ja n ic e s p en t m ore t h an s ix ty h ou rs a t t h e offi ce t h is w eek .” 6. I f yo u cir c le d th is nu m ber, w e’r e not in ag re em ent. I co n sid er “a g gre ss iv e” to b e an ev alu atio n . A n o b ser vatio n w it h ou t ev alu atio n m ig h t be: “H en ry hit his sis ter w hen sh e sw it c h ed th e te le v is io n ch an nel.” 7. I f y o u c ir c le d t h is n u m ber, w e’r e in a g re em ent t h at a n o b ser vatio n w as ex p re ss e d w it h ou t b ein g m ix ed t o geth er w it h a n e v alu atio n . 8. I f y o u c ir c le d t h is n u m ber, w e’r e not i n a g re em ent. I c o n sid er “ o  en ” t o b e a n e v alu atio n . A n o b se rv atio n w it h ou t e v alu atio n m ig h t b e: “ T w ic e th is w eek m y s o n d id n’t b ru sh h is t e et h b ef ore go in g t o b ed .” 9. I f y o u c ir c le d t h is n u m ber, w e’r e in a g re em ent t h at a n o b ser vatio n w as ex p re ss e d w it h ou t b ein g m ix ed t o geth er w it h a n e v alu atio n . 10 . I f yo u cir c le d th is nu m ber, w e’r e not in ag re em ent. I co n sid er “c o m pla in s” to b e a n e v alu atio n . A n o b ser vatio n w it h ou t e v alu atio n m ig h t b e: “M y a u nt c a lle d m e th re e tim es th is w eek , a n d e a ch tim e ta lk ed a b ou t p eo p le w ho t r e ate d h er i n w ay s s h e did n’t l i k e.”   e M ask A lw ays a m ask H eld i n t h e sli m h an d w hit e ly A lw ays s h e had a m ask b efo re her fa ce— T ru ly t h e w ris t H old in g i t l i g h tly F it te d t h e ta sk : S om etim es h ow ev er W as t h ere a s h iv er, F in gertip q u iv er, E ver s o s li g h tly — H old in g t h e m ask ? F or y ea rs a n d y ea rs a n d y ea rs I w on dere d B ut d are d n ot a sk A nd t h en — I b lu n dere d , L ook ed b eh in d t h e m ask , T o fi n d N oth in g— S h e had n o f a ce . S h e had b eco m e M ere ly a h an d H old in g a m ask W it h g ra ce . — Auth or u n kn ow n T 4 Id en tif y in g a n d E xp re ssin g F eeli n gs h e rst c o m pon en t o f N VC i s t o o b ser ve w it h ou t e v alu atin g; t h e se co n d co m pon en t is to e x p re ss h ow w e a re fe eli n g. P sy ch oan aly st R ollo M ay su ggests th at “ th e m atu re p ers o n b eco m es a b le to d iff er en tia te fe eli n gs in to a s m an y nu an ce s, str o n g an d pass io n ate ex per ien ce s, or deli c ate an d se n sit iv e o n es a s i n t h e d iff ere n t p ass a g es o f m usic i n a s y m ph on y.” F or m an y of u s, h ow ev er, o u r f e eli n gs a re , a s M ay w ou ld d es crib e it , “ li m it e d l i k e notes in a b u gle c a ll.” e H ea v y C ost o f U nex p re ss e d F eeli n gs O ur re p erto ir e o f w ord s fo r c a lli n g p eo p le nam es is o  en la rg er th an o u r vo ca b u la ry o f w ord s t o c le arly d es crib e ou r e m otio n al s ta te s. I w en t t h ro u gh tw en ty -o n e y ears o f A m eric a n sc h ools a n d c a n ’t re ca ll a n yo n e in a ll th at tim e ev er ask in g m e how I fe lt . Feeli n gs w er e sim ply not co n sid er ed im porta n t. W hat w as v alu ed w as “th e rig h t w ay to th in k”— as d e ned b y th ose w ho h eld p osit io n s o f r a n k a n d a u th orit y . W e a re tr a in ed t o b e “o th er – dir e c te d ” r a th er t h an t o b e in c o n ta ct w it h o u rs e lv es . W e le arn t o b e “u p in o u r h ea d ,” w on derin g, “ W hat i s i t t h at o th er s t h in k i s r ig h t f o r m e to s a y a n d do?” A n in te ra ctio n I h ad w it h a te a ch er w hen I w as a b ou t n in e years o ld d em on str a te s h ow a li e n atio n f r o m o u r f e eli n gs c a n b eg in . I o n ce hid m yse lf i n a c la ss ro om a  er s c h ool b ecau se so m e b oys w er e wait in g o u ts id e to b eat m e u p. A te a ch er sp ott e d m e a n d a sk ed m e to le av e th e sc h ool. W hen I e x p la in ed I w as a fr a id t o g o , s h e d ecla re d , “ B ig b oys d on’t g et f r ig h ten ed .” A f e w y ears la te r I r e ce iv ed f u rth er r ei nfo rc e m en t t h ro u gh m y p artic ip atio n i n a th le tic s. I t w as t y p ic a l f o r c o ach es t o v alu e ath let es w illi n g t o “ g iv e th ei r a ll” a n d c o n tin u e p la y in g n o m att e r h ow m uch p hysic a l p ain th ey w er e in . I le arn ed th e le ss o n so w ell I o n ce co n tin u ed p la y in g b ase b all fo r a m on th w it h a n u ntr e ate d b ro ken w ris t. A t a n N VC w ork sh op, a c o lle g e s tu den t s p oke ab ou t b ei ng k ep t a w ak e by a r o om mate w ho p la y ed t h e s te re o la te at n ig h t a n d lo u d ly . W hen a sk ed to e x p re ss w hat h e fe lt w hen th is h ap p en ed , th e stu den t r ep li e d , “ I fe el th at it i s n ’t rig h t to p la y m usic so lo u d at n ig h t.” I p oin te d o u t th at w hen h e fo llo w ed t h e w ord fe el w it h t h e w ord th at, h e w as e x p re ss in g a n o p in io n b u t n ot re v ea li n g h is fe eli n gs. A sk ed to tr y ag ain to ex pres s h is fe eli n gs, h e re sp on ded , “I fe el, w hen p eo p le do so m eth in g li k e th at, it ’s a p er so n ali t y d is tu rb an ce.” I e x p la in ed t h at t h is w as s till a n o p in io n r a th er t h an a f e eli n g. H e p au se d th ou gh tfu lly , a n d th en a n nou n ce d w it h v eh em ence, “ I h av e no fe eli n gs a b ou t i t w hats o ev er!”  is stu den t obvio u sly h ad str o n g fe eli n gs. U nfo rtu n ate ly , h e did n’t k n ow h ow to b eco m e a w are o f h is fe eli n gs, let a lo n e e x p res s th em .  is d iffi cu lt y in id en tif y in g an d ex p res sin g fe eli n gs is co m mon , an d in m y ex p erie n ce, e sp ecia lly s o a m on g l a w yer s, en gin eer s, p oli c e o ffi ce rs , c o rp ora te man ag ers , a n d c a re er m ili t a ry p er so n nel— peo p le whose pro fe ss io n al c o d es dis c o u ra g e t h em f r o m m an if e stin g em otio n s. F or fa m ili es , t h e to ll is s e v er e when m em bers a re u n ab le t o c o m mun ic ate em otio n s. C ou ntr y s in ger R eb a M cE ntir e w ro te a s o n g a  er h er fa th er ’s d eath , a n d tit le d it “  e Gre ates t M an I N ev er K new .” I n s o d oin g, s h e un dou bte d ly ex pres se d t h e sen tim en ts o f m an y p eo p le w ho w ere n ev er a b le to e sta b li s h t h e em otio n al c o n nectio n th ey w ou ld h av e l i k ed w it h t h eir f a th er s. I r e g u la rly h ear s ta te m en ts li k e, “ I w ou ld n’t w an t y o u to g et th e wro n g id ea — I’m m arr ie d to a w on derfu l m an — bu t I n ev er kn ow w hat h e is f e eli n g.” O ne su ch d is s a tis ed w om an b ro u gh t h er sp ou se to a w ork sh op, d u rin g w hic h s h e to ld h im , “ I fe el li k e I ’m marrie d to a w all.”  e h u sb an d th en did an ex celle n t im it a tio n of a w all: he sa t m ute an d im mobile . E xasp era te d , s h e t u rn ed t o m e a n d e x cla im ed , “ S ee!  is i s w hat h ap p en s a ll t h e t im e. H e s it s a n d s a y s n oth in g. I t’s j u st l i k e l i v in g w it h a w all.” “ It s o u n ds t o m e l i k e y o u a re f e eli n g l o n ely a n d w an tin g m ore em otio n al co n ta ct w it h y o u r h u sb an d,” I r e sp on ded . W hen s h e ag re ed , I t r ie d t o s h ow h ow sta te m en ts su ch a s “ I fe el li k e I’m li v in g w it h a w all” a re un li k ely to b rin g h er fe eli n gs a n d d esir e s to h er h u sb an d’s a tt en tio n . In fa ct, th ey a re m ore li k ely to b e h eard a s c rit ic is m t h an a s in vit a tio n s to c o n nect w it h o u r fe eli n gs. Fu rth erm ore , su ch sta te m en ts o en le a d to se lf – fu l lli n g pro p h ecie s. A h u sb an d, fo r e x am ple , h ears h im se lf c rit ic iz e d fo r b eh av in g li k e a w all; he is hu rt an d dis c o u ra g ed an d does n’t res pon d, th er eb y co n rm in g h is w if e ’s i m ag e o f h im a s a w all.  e b en e ts o f str e n gth en in g o u r fe eli n gs v o ca b u la ry a re ev id en t n ot on ly in in tim ate r e la tio n sh ip s b u t a ls o in t h e pro fe ss io n al w orld . I w as o n ce h ir e d to co n su lt w it h m em bers o f a te ch n olo gic a l d ep artm en t o f a la rg e Sw is s c o rp ora tio n ; t h ey w ere t r o u ble d b y t h e dis c o ver y t h at w ork er s i n o th er dep artm en ts w ere av o id in g th em . W hen ask ed , em plo yees fr o m oth er dep artm en ts r e sp on ded , “ W e h ate go in g t h er e to c o n su lt w it h t h ose peo p le . It’s li k e t a lk in g to a b u n ch o f m ach in es !”  e pro blem a b ate d w hen I s p en t tim e w it h t h e m em bers o f t h e t e ch n olo gic a l d ep artm en t, e n co u ra g in g t h em to ex p re ss m ore o f th eir h u m an nes s in th ei r co m mun ic atio n s w it h co – w ork ers . In a n oth er in sta n ce, I w as w ork in g w it h h osp it a l a d m in is tr a to rs w ho w ere a n xio u s a b ou t a fo rth co m in g m eetin g w it h th e hosp it a l’s p hysic ia n s.  e a d m in is tr a to rs w ere e a g er t o h av e m e dem on str a te h ow t h ey m ig h t u se NVC w hen a p pro ach in g th e p hysic ia n s fo r su pp ort fo r a p ro je ct th at h ad o n ly r e ce n tly b een t u rn ed d ow n b y a v o te of 1 7 t o 1 . A ssu m in g th e vo ic e o f an ad m in is tr a to r in a ro le- pla y in g ses sio n , I o p en ed w it h , “ I’m f e eli n g f r ig h te n ed t o b e brin gin g u p t h is is su e.” I c h ose to s ta rt th is w ay b ecau se I s e n se d h ow fr ig h ten ed th e ad m in is tr a to rs w er e as th ey p re p are d t o c o n fr o n t t h e p hysic ia n s o n th is t o p ic a g ain . B efo re I c o u ld c o n tin u e, o n e o f th e a d m in is tr a to rs sto p p ed m e to p ro tes t, “Y ou ’r e bei ng un re a li s tic ! W e c o u ld n ev er t e ll t h e physic ia n s t h at w e w er e fr ig h ten ed .” W hen I a sk ed w hy a n a d m is s io n o f f e ar s e em ed s o i m poss ib le , h e rep li e d w it h ou t h esit a tio n , “ If w e a d m it t e d w e’r e fr ig h ten ed , th en th ey w ou ld ju st p ic k u s t o p ie ce s!” H is a n sw er d id n’t s u rp ris e m e; I h av e o en h eard p eo p le s a y th ey c a n not im ag in e e v er ex pres sin g fe eli n gs a t th ei r w ork p la ce. I w as p le a se d to le arn , h ow ev er, t h at o n e of t h e ad m in is tr a to rs d id d ecid e to r is k e x p re ss in g h is v u ln era b ili t y at th e dre a d ed m eetin g. D ep artin g fr o m h is c u sto m ary m an ner o f a p p earin g s tr ic tly lo gic a l, r a tio n al, a n d u n em otio n al, h e ch ose to sta te h is fe eli n gs to geth er w it h h is re a so n s fo r w an tin g th e physic ia n s to ch an ge th eir posit io n . H e notic e d how diff er en tly th e physic ia n s r e sp on ded t o h im . I n t h e en d h e was a m aze d a n d r e li e v ed w hen , in ste a d o f “p ic k in g h im to p ie ces ,” th e physic ia n s re v er se d th ei r p re v io u s p osit io n a n d v o te d 1 7 to 1 to su pp ort th e pro je ct in ste a d .  is d ra m atic t u rn -a ro u n d h elp ed th e a d m in is tr a to rs r e a li z e a n d a p pre cia te th e poten tia l im pact o f e x p re ss in g v u ln era b ili t y — ev en i n t h e w ork p la ce. E xp re ssin g o u r v u ln era b ili t y c a n h elp r e so lv e c o n fl ic ts . F in ally , le t m e sh are a p ers o n al in cid en t th at ta u gh t m e th e eff ects o f h id in g o u r f e eli n gs. I w as t e a ch in g a c o u rs e in N VC t o a g ro u p o f in ner c it y s tu den ts . W hen I w alk ed in to t h e ro om t h e rst d ay, t h e stu den ts , w ho h ad b een e n jo yin g a li v ely c o n vers a tio n w it h e a ch o th er , b eca m e qu iet . “G ood m orn in g!” I g re ete d . S ile n ce. I fe lt v er y u n co m fo rta b le , b u t w as a fr a id to e x p re ss it . In ste a d , I p ro ce ed ed in m y m ost p ro fe ss io n al m an ner : “ F or th is c la ss , w e w ill b e s tu dyin g a p ro ce ss o f c o m mun ic atio n th at I h op e yo u w ill n d h elp fu l i n y o u r r e la tio n sh ip s a t h om e a n d w it h y o u r f r ien ds.” I c o n tin u ed t o p re se n t i n fo rm atio n a b ou t N VC, b u t n o o n e s e em ed t o b e li s te n in g. O ne g ir l, r u m mag in g t h ro u gh h er b ag , sh ed o u t a le an d b eg an vig o ro u sly li n g h er n ails . S tu den ts n ear th e win dow s g lu ed th ei r fa ces to t h e p an es a s if fa sc in ate d b y w hat w as g o in g o n in th e str e et b elo w . I fe lt i n cre a sin gly m ore u n co m fo rta b le , y et co n tin u ed to sa y n oth in g ab ou t it . F in ally , a stu den t w ho h ad c e rta in ly m ore c o u ra g e t h an I w as d em on str a tin g, p ip ed u p, “ Y ou ju st h ate b ein g w it h b la ck p eo p le , d on’t y o u ?” I w as s tu n ned , yet im med ia te ly r e a li z e d h ow I h ad c o n tr ib u te d t o t h is s tu den t’s p er cep tio n by t r y in g t o h id e m y d is c o m fo rt. “ I a m fe eli n g n erv o u s,” I a d m it t e d , “ b u t n ot b ecau se yo u a re bla ck . M y fe eli n gs h av e to d o w it h m y n ot k n ow in g a n yo n e her e an d w an tin g to b e acce p te d w hen I c a m e in th e r o om .” M y ex pres sio n o f v u ln er ab ili t y h ad a p ro n ou n ce d e ff ec t o n t h e s tu den ts .  ey s ta rte d to a sk q u es tio n s a b ou t m e, to t e ll m e t h in gs a b ou t t h em se lv es, a n d t o ex pres s c u rio sit y a b ou t N VC. Feeli n gs v ersu s N on -F eeli n gs A c o m mon c o n fu sio n , g en era te d b y t h e Engli s h la n gu ag e, is o u r u se of t h e w ord fe el w it h ou t a ctu ally e x p re ss in g a f e eli n g. F or ex am ple , i n t h e sen ten ce, “I fe el I d id n’t g et a fa ir d ea l,” th e word s I fe el c o u ld b e m ore a cc u ra te ly r e p la ce d w it h I th in k. In g en era l, fe eli n gs a re n ot b ein g c le arly ex pres se d w hen t h e w ord fe el i s f o llo w ed b y: 1. W ord s s u ch a s th at, l i k e, a s i f : “ I f e el t h at y o u s h ou ld k n ow b ett e r.” “ I f e el li k e a f a ilu re .” “ I f e el a s i f I ’m l i v in g w it h a w all.” 2.  e p ro n ou n s I , y o u , h e, s h e, t h ey, i t : “ I f e el I a m c o n sta n tly o n c a ll.” “ I f e el i t i s u se le ss .” 3. N am es o r n ou n s r e fe rrin g t o p eo p le: “ I f e el A m y h as b een p re tt y r e sp on sib le .” “ I f e el m y b oss i s b ein g m an ip u la tiv e.” D is tin gu is h f e eli n gs f r o m t h ou gh ts . C on vers e ly , in t h e E ngli s h la n gu ag e, it is n ot n ece ss a ry to u se th e word fe el a t a ll w hen w e a re a ctu ally e x p res sin g a fe eli n g: w e c a n s a y, “ I’m fe eli n g ir rit a te d ,” o r s im ply , “ I’m i r rit a te d .” D is tin gu is h b etw een w hat w e f e el a n d w hat w e t h in k w e are . In N VC, w e d is tin gu is h b etw een w ord s th at ex pres s a ctu al fe eli n gs a n d th ose t h at d esc rib e w hat w e th in k w e are . 1. D esc rip tio n o f w hat w e th in k w e are : “I fe el i n ad eq u ate as a g u it a r p la y er.” In t h is s ta te m en t, I a m a ss e ss in g m y a b ili t y a s a g u it a r p la y er, r a th er th an c le arly e x p re ss in g m y f e eli n gs. 2. E xp re ss io n s o f a ctu al f e eli n gs: “ I f e el d is a pp oin te d i n m yse lf a s a g u it a r p la y er.” “ I f e el i m patie n t w it h m yse lf a s a g u it a r p la y er.” “ I f e el f r u str a te d w it h m yse lf a s a g u it a r p la y er.”  e actu al fe eli n g b eh in d m y ass es sm en t o f m yse lf as “in ad eq u ate ” c o u ld th ere fo re b e d is a p p oin tm en t, im patien ce, fr u str a tio n , o r so m e oth er e m otio n . Lik ew is e , it is h elp fu l to d iff ere n tia te b et ween w ord s t h at d esc rib e what w e t h in k o th ers a re d oin g a ro u n d u s, a n d w ord s t h at d es crib e actu al f e eli n gs.  e fo llo w in g are ex am ple s of sta te m en ts th at are ea sily m is ta k en as ex p re ss io n s o f fe eli n gs: in fa ct th ey re v ea l m ore h ow w e th in k o th ers a re b eh avin g t h an w hat w e a re a ctu ally f e eli n g o u rs e lv es . D is tin gu is h b etw een w hat w e fe el an d h ow w e th in k oth ers r e a ct o r b eh av e t o w ard u s. 1. “ I f e el u nim porta n t t o t h e p eo p le w it h w hom I w ork .”  e w ord unim porta n t d esc rib es h ow I t h in k o th ers a re ev alu atin g m e, ra th er th an a n a ctu al fe eli n g, w hic h in th is s it u atio n m ig h t b e “I fe el sa d” o r “ I f e el d is c o u ra ged .” 2. “ I f e el m is u n dersto od .” H ere th e w ord m is u n dersto od in dic ate s m y ass e ss m en t o f th e o th er p ers o n’s le v el o f u n dersta n din g ra th er th an a n a ctu al fe eli n g. In th is s it u atio n , I m ay b e f e eli n g a n xio u s o r a n n oyed o r s o m e o th er e m otio n . 3. 3 . “ I f e el i g n ore d .” A gain , t h is is m ore o f a n in te rp ret atio n o f t h e actio n s o f o th er s t h an a c le ar s ta te m en t o f h ow w e a re f e eli n g. N o d ou bt t h er e hav e been t im es we th ou gh t w e w ere b ein g ig n ore d a n d o u r fe eli n g w as re li e f, b ecau se w e w an te d to b e le  to o u rs e lv es. N o d ou bt th er e were oth er tim es, how ev er, w hen w e fe lt h u rt w hen w e th ou gh t w e w ere b ein g ig n ore d , becau se w e h ad w an te d t o b e i n vo lv ed . Word s li k e ig n ore d e x p re ss h ow w e in te rp re t o th ers, r a th er th an h ow w e fe el. H ere i s a s a m pli n g o f s u ch w ord s: a b an don ed a b u se d att a ck ed b etr a y ed b oxed -in b u lli e d ch eate d co erc e d co -o p te d co rn ere d d im in is h ed d is tr u ste d in te rr u pte d in tim id ate d le t d ow n m an ip u la te d m is u n dersto od n eg le c te d o verw ork ed p atr o n iz e d p re ssu re d p ro vo ked p u t d ow n re je c te d ta k en f o r g ra n te d th re ate n ed u n ap pre cia te d u n heard u n se en u n su pp orte d u nw an te d u se d Build in g a V oca b u la ry f o r F eeli n gs In ex p re ss in g ou r fe eli n gs, it help s to use word s th at ref er to sp eci c em otio n s, r a th er th an w ord s th at a re vag u e or g en er al. F or ex am ple , if w e sa y, “I fe el g o od ab ou t th at,” th e word go od co u ld m ean h ap py, ex cit e d , re li e v ed , o r a n u m ber o f o th er em otio n s. W ord s su ch as g o od an d ba d p re v en t t h e li s te n er f r o m c o n nec tin g e a sily w it h w hat w e m ig h t a ctu ally b e fe eli n g.  e f o llo w in g li s ts h av e b een c o m pile d t o h elp y o u in cre a se yo u r p ow er to a rtic u la te f e eli n gs a n d c le arly d es crib e a w hole ra n ge o f em otio n al s ta tes . How w e a re l i k ely t o f e el w hen o u r n eed s a re b ein g m et a b so rb ed a d ven tu ro u s aff ec tio n ate a le rt a li v e am aze d a m use d a n im ate d ap pre cia tiv e ard en t aro u se d a sto n is h ed b li s s fu l bre ath le ss b u oyan t ca lm c a re fr e e ch eerfu l co m fo rta b le c o m pla ce n t co m pose d co n ce rn ed co n den t co n te n te d co ol cu rio u s d azzle d d eli g h te d e a g er eb u lli e n t ecsta tic e ff erv esc e n t ela te d en ch an te d en co u ra g ed en erg etic e n gro ss e d en li v en ed en th u sia stic e x cit e d ex h ila ra te d ex p an siv e ex p ec ta n t ex u lt a n t fa sc in ate d fr e e fr ie n dly f u l lle d g la d g le efu l glo rio u s glo w in g go od -h u m ore d g ra te fu l gra ti ed h ap py h elp fu l hop efu l in qu is it iv e in sp ir e d in te n se in te re ste d in tr ig u ed in vig o ra te d in vo lv ed jo yo u s, j o yfu l ju bila n t key ed -u p lo vin g m ello w m err y m ir th fu l m oved o p tim is tic o verjo yed o verw helm ed p ea ce fu l perk y p le a sa n t ple a se d p ro u d qu ie t ra d ia n t ra p tu ro u s re fr e sh ed re la x ed re li e v ed sa tis ed se c u re s e n sit iv e se re n e sp ellb ou n d sp le n did s tim ula te d su rp ris e d te n der th an kfu l th rille d to u ch ed tr a n qu il t r u stin g upbeat w arm w id e-a w ak e w on derfu l ze stfu l H ow w e a re l i k ely t o f e el w hen o u r n eed s a re n ot b ein g m et a fr a id a g gra v ate d a g it a te d a la rm ed a lo of an gry a n gu is h ed a n noyed a n xio u s ap ath etic a p pre h en siv e aro u se d a sh am ed b eat b ew ild ere d b it t e r b la h b lu e b ore d b ro ken hearte d ch ag rin ed co ld c o n ce rn ed co n fu se d co ol cro ss deje c te d d ep re ss e d d esp air in g desp on den t d eta ch ed d is a ff ec te d d is a p p oin te d d is c o u ra g ed d is e n ch an te d d is g ru ntle d d is g u ste d d is h earte n ed d is m ay ed d is p le a se d d is q u ie te d d is tr e ss e d d is tu rb ed d ow nca st d ow nhearte d d u ll e d gy em barra ss e d em bit t e re d ex asp era te d ex h au ste d fa tig u ed fe arfu l dgety fo rlo rn fr ig h te n ed fr u str a te d fu rio u s glo om y gu ilt y h arrie d h eav y help le ss h esit a n t h orrib le h orri ed h ostile h ot h u m dru m hu rt im patie n t in diff ere n t in te n se ir a te ir k ed ir rit a te d je a lo u s jit t e ry k ey ed -u p la zy le ery le th arg ic li s tle ss lo n ely m ad m ean m is e ra b le m op ey m oro se m ou rn fu l n erv o u s n ett le d n u m b overw helm ed p an ic k y p ass iv e p erp le x ed p ess im is tic pu zzle d ra n co ro u s re lu cta n t re p elle d re se n tfu l re stle ss s a d sc a re d se n sit iv e sh ak y sh ock ed sk ep tic a l sle ep y so rro w fu l so rr y sp ir it le ss sta rtle d su rp ris e d su sp ic io u s te p id t e rri ed tir e d tr o u ble d u n co m fo rta b le u n co n ce rn ed u n ea sy u n glu ed u n hap py u n nerv ed u n ste a d y up se t u ptig h t vex ed w eary w is tfu l w it h dra w n woefu l w orrie d w re tc h ed Su m mary  e se co n d co m pon en t n ece ss a ry fo r ex pres sin g o u rs e lv es is fe eli n gs. B y dev elo p in g a v o ca b u la ry o f fe eli n gs t h at a llo w s u s t o c le arly a n d s p eci ca lly n am e or id en tif y ou r em otio n s, w e ca n co n nect m ore ea sily w it h on e an oth er. A llo w in g o u rs e lv es t o b e vu ln er ab le by ex pres sin g o u r fe eli n gs c a n h elp re so lv e c o n ic ts . N VC d is tin gu is h es th e ex pres sio n o f a ctu al fe eli n gs fr o m w ord s an d sta te m en ts th at des crib e th ou gh ts , ass es sm en ts , an d in te rp re ta tio n s. Exerc is e 2 E X PR ESSIN G F E ELIN GS If yo u w ou ld li k e to se e w heth er w e’r e in ag re em ent ab ou t th e ver bal ex p re ss io n o f fe eli n gs, c ir c le th e n u m ber in fr o n t o f e a ch o f th e fo llo w in g sta te m en ts i n w hic h f e eli n gs a re v er bally ex pres se d . 1. “ I f e el y o u d on’t l o ve m e.” 2. “ I’m s a d t h at y o u ’r e l e av in g.” 3. “ I f e el s c a re d w hen y o u s a y t h at.” 4. “ W hen y o u d on’t g re et m e, I f e el n eg le cte d .” 5. “ I’m h ap py t h at y o u c a n c o m e.” 6. “ Y ou ’r e d is g u stin g.” 7. “ I f e el l i k e h it t in g y o u .” 8. “ I f e el m is u n dersto od .” 9. “ I f e el g o od a b ou t w hat y o u d id f o r m e.” 1 0 . “ I’m w orth le ss .” H ere are m y r e sp on se s f o r E xerc is e 2: 1. I f y o u c ir c le d t h is n u m ber, w e’r e n ot i n a g re em ent. I d on’t c o n sid er “ y o u d on’t lo ve m e” to b e a fe eli n g. T o m e, it ex pres ses w hat th e sp ea k er th in ks th e o th er p ers o n is fe eli n g, ra th er th an h ow th e sp ea k er is f e eli n g. W hen ev er t h e w ord s I f e el a re f o llo w ed b y t h e w ord s I , y o u , h e, sh e, t h ey, it , th at, li k e, o r a s if, w hat fo llo w s is g en era lly n ot w hat I w ou ld c o n sid er to b e a fe eli n g. A n ex pres sio n o f fe eli n g in th is c a se m ig h t b e: “ I’m s a d ,” o r “ I’m f e eli n g a n gu is h ed .” 2. I f yo u cir c le d th is n u m ber, w e’r e in ag re em ent th at a fe eli n g w as v erb ally e x p re ss e d . 3. I f yo u cir c le d th is n u m ber, w e’r e in ag re em ent th at a fe eli n g w as v erb ally e x p re ss e d . 4. I f y o u c ir c le d th is n u m ber, w e’r e not in a g re em ent. I d on’t c o n sid er “n eg le c te d ” t o b e a f e eli n g. T o m e, it ex pres ses w hat t h e sp ea k er t h in ks th e o th er p ers o n i s d oin g t o h im o r h er . A n e x p res sio n o f f e eli n g m ig h t b e: “ W hen y o u d on’t g re et m e a t t h e door, I f e el l o n ely .” 5. I f yo u cir c le d th is n u m ber, w e’r e in ag re em ent th at a fe eli n g w as v erb ally e x p re ss e d . 6. I f y o u c ir c le d th is n u m ber, w e’r e not in a g re em ent. I d on’t c o n sid er “d is g u stin g” t o b e a f e eli n g. T o m e, it ex pres ses h ow t h e sp ea k er t h in ks ab ou t th e o th er p ers o n , ra th er th an h ow th e sp ea k er is fe eli n g. A n ex p re ss io n o f f e eli n g m ig h t b e: “ I f e el d is g u ste d .” 7. I f y o u c ir c le d t h is n u m ber, w e’r e n ot i n a g re em ent. I d on’t c o n sid er “ li k e h it t in g yo u ” to b e a fe eli n g. T o m e, it ex pres ses w hat th e sp ea k er im ag in es d oin g, r a th er th an h ow th e sp ea k er is fe eli n g. A n ex pres sio n o f f e eli n g m ig h t b e: “ I a m f u rio u s a t y o u .” 8. I f y o u c ir c le d th is n u m ber, w e’r e not in a g re em ent. I d on’t c o n sid er “m is u n dersto od” to b e a fe eli n g. T o m e, it ex pres ses w hat th e sp ea k er th in ks th e o th er p ers o n is d oin g. A n ex pres sio n o f fe eli n g in th is c a se m ig h t b e: “ I f e el f r u str a te d ,” o r “ I f e el d is c o u ra g ed .” 9. I f yo u cir c le d th is n u m ber, w e’r e in ag re em ent th at a fe eli n g w as v erb ally ex p re ss e d . H ow ev er, th e w ord go od is v ag u e w hen u se d to c o n vey a fe eli n g. W e c a n u su ally e x p res s o u r fe eli n gs m ore cle arly b y u sin g o th er w ord s, f o r e x am ple : r e li e v ed , g ra tifi ed , o r e n co u ra ged . 10 . I f y o u c ir c le d th is n u m ber, w e’r e not in a g re em ent. I d on’t c o n sid er “w orth le ss” t o b e a fe eli n g. T o m e, it e x p res ses h ow t h e sp ea k er t h in ks ab ou t h im se lf o r h ers e lf , ra th er th an h ow th e sp ea k er is fe eli n g. A n ex p re ss io n o f fe eli n g in th is c a se m ig h t b e: “ I fe el s k ep tic a l a b ou t m y ow n t a le n ts ,” o r “ I f e el w re tc h ed .” 5 Takin g R esp on sib ili t y f o r O ur F eeli n gs P eo p le are dis tu rb ed n ot b y t h in gs, b u t b y t h e vie w t h ey t a ke of t h em . —Epic te tu s T Hea rin g a N eg ativ e M ess a g e: F ou r O ptio n s he t h ir d c o m pon en t o f N VC e n ta ils t h e ack n ow le d gm en t o f t h e ro ot o f o u r f e eli n gs. N VC h eig h te n s o u r a w aren ess t h at w hat o th er s s a y a n d d o m ay b e th e stim ulu s, b u t n ev er th e ca u se , o f o u r fe eli n gs. W e s e e th at o u r fe eli n gs r e su lt f r o m h ow w e ch oose t o r e ce iv e w hat o th ers s a y a n d d o, a s w ell a s fr o m o u r p artic u la r n eed s a n d ex pecta tio n s in th at m om en t. W it h th is t h ir d co m pon en t, w e are le d to acce p t res pon sib ili t y fo r w hat w e do to g en era te o u r o w n f e eli n gs. W hat o th ers d o m ay b e t h e s tim ulu s o f o u r f e eli n gs, b u t n ot t h e c a u se . W hen so m eo n e giv es us a neg ativ e messa g e, w het her ver bally or n on verb ally , w e h av e fo u r o p tio n s a s to h ow to r e ce iv e it . O ne op tio n is to t a k e it p ers o n ally b y h earin g b la m e a n d c rit ic is m . F or ex am ple , s o m eo n e is a n gry an d sa y s, “Y ou ’r e th e m ost se lf – c e n ter ed p er so n I’v e ev er m et!” If c h oosin g to ta k e it p ers o n ally , w e m ig h t r e a ct: “ O h, I s h ou ld ’v e been m ore s e n sit iv e!” W e a cce p t t h e o th er p er so n’s ju dgm en t a n d b la m e ou rs e lv es . W e ch oose t h is o p tio n at g re at c o st to o u r s e lf – e ste em , fo r it in cli n es u s to w ard fe eli n gs o f g u ilt , s h am e, a n d d ep res sio n . F ou r o p tio n s fo r r e ce iv in g n eg ativ e m ess a g es: 1. b la m e ou rse lv es. A se co n d o p tio n is to fa u lt th e sp ea k er . F or ex am ple , in res pon se to “ Y ou ’r e t h e m ost s e lf – c e n te re d p er so n I ’v e ev er m et,” w e m ig h t p ro tes t: “ Y ou h av e n o r ig h t t o s a y t h at! I a m a lw ay s c o n sid er in g y o u r n eed s. Y ou ’r e th e on e w ho is r e a lly s e lf – c e n te re d .” W hen w e re ce iv e m essa g es t h is w ay, a n d b la m e th e s p ea k er, w e a re l i k ely t o f e el a n ger. 2 . b la m e o th ers. When r e ce iv in g n eg ativ e m ess a g es, o u r th ir d o p tio n w ou ld b e to s h in e th e li g h t o f c o n sc io u sn ess o n o u r o w n fe eli n gs a n d n eed s.  us, w e m ig h t re p ly , “ W hen I h ear y o u s a y t h at I a m t h e m ost s e lf – c e n ter ed p er so n y o u ’v e ev er m et, I fe el h u rt, b ecau se I n eed s o m e r e co gn it io n o f m y eff orts to b e co n sid era te o f y o u r p re fe re n ce s.” B y fo cu sin g a tt en tio n o n o u r o w n fe eli n gs an d n eed s, w e b eco m e c o n sc io u s th at o u r c u rren t fe eli n g o f h u rt d er iv es fr o m a n eed f o r o u r e ff orts t o b e r e co gn iz e d . 3 . s e n se o u r o w n f e eli n gs a n d n eed s. F in ally , a fo u rth o p tio n o n r e ce iv in g a n eg ativ e m essa g e is to s h in e th e li g h t o f c o n sc io u sn ess o n th e o th er p ers o n’s fe eli n gs a n d n eed s a s th ey a re c u rre n tly ex p re ss e d . W e m ig h t fo r ex am ple ask , “A re yo u fe eli n g hu rt b ecau se y o u n eed m ore c o n sid era tio n f o r y o u r p ref er en ce s? ” 4 . s e n se o th ers’ f e eli n gs a n d n eed s. W e a cce p t r e sp on sib ili t y f o r o u r f e eli n gs, r a th er t h an b la m e oth er p eo p le , b y a ck n ow le d gin g o u r o w n n eed s, d esir es , e x p ecta tio n s, v alu es , o r t h ou gh ts . N ote t h e d iff ere n ce b etw een t h e f o llo w in g ex pres sio n s o f d is a p p oin tm en t: E xam ple 1 A : “ Y ou d is a p p oin te d m e b y n ot c o m in g o ver l a st e v en in g.” B : “ I w as d is a p p oin te d w hen y o u d id n’t c o m e o ver , b ecau se I w an te d to t a lk o ver s o m e t h in gs t h at w ere b oth er in g m e.” S p ea k er A att r ib u te s re sp on sib ili t y fo r his dis a p p oin tm en t so le ly to a n oth er p ers o n’s a ctio n . S p ea k er B t r a ces h is f e eli n g o f d is a p p oin tm en t t o h is o w n u n fu l lle d d esir e . E xam ple 2 A : “  eir c a n celli n g t h e c o n tr a ct r e a lly i r rit a te d m e!” B: “ W hen t h ey c a n celle d t h e c o n tr a ct, I fe lt r e a lly ir rit a te d b ecau se I w as th in kin g t o m yse lf t h at i t w as a n a w fu lly i r res pon sib le th in g t o d o.” Sp ea k er A a tt r ib u te s h er ir rit a tio n so le ly to th e beh av io r o f th e oth er party , where a s Sp ea k er B accep ts res pon sib ili t y fo r her fe eli n g by ack n ow le d gin g t h e t h ou gh t b eh in d it . S h e re co gn iz e s t h at h er b la m in g w ay o f th in kin g h as g en era te d h er ir rit a tio n . In N VC, h ow ev er , w e w ou ld u rg e th is s p ea k er to g o a s te p fu rth er b y id en tif y in g w hat s h e is w an tin g: w hat n eed , d esir e , e x p ec ta tio n , h op e, o r v alu e of h er s h as n ot b een f u l lle d ? A s w e sh all s e e, t h e m ore w e a re a b le t o c o n nect o u r f e eli n gs t o o u r o w n n eed s, t h e ea sie r it is fo r o th ers to r e sp on d c o m pass io n ate ly . T o r e la te h er fe eli n gs to w hat s h e is w an tin g, S p ea k er B m ig h t h av e sa id : “ W hen th ey c a n celle d th e co n tr a ct, I fe lt re a lly ir rit a te d b ecau se I w as h op in g fo r a n o p p ortu n it y to r e h ir e t h e w ork ers w e l a id o ff l a st y ear.” I t i s h elp fu l t o r e co gn iz e a n u m ber o f c o m mon s p eech p att er ns t h at t en d to m ask a cco u nta b ili t y f o r o u r o w n f e eli n gs: 1. U se o f i m pers o n al p ro n ou n s s u ch a s it a n d th at: “ It re a lly in fu ria te s m e w hen sp elli n g m is ta k es a p p ear in o u r p u bli c b ro ch u re s.” “  at b u gs m e a l o t.” 2.  e u se o f t h e e x p re ss io n “ I f e el ( a n em otio n ) b ecau se … ” f o llo w ed b y a p ers o n o r p ers o n al p ro n ou n o th er t h an I: “I fe el h u rt b ecau se y o u s a id y o u d on’t lo ve m e.” “ I fe el a n gry b ecau se th e s u p erv is o r b ro ke h er p ro m is e .” 3. S ta te m en ts t h at m en tio n o n ly t h e a ctio n s o f o th er s: “ W hen y o u d on’t ca ll m e o n m y b ir th d ay, I fe el h u rt.” “M om my is d is a p p oin te d w hen y o u d on’t n is h y o u r f o od .” I n e a ch o f th ese in sta n ce s, w e c a n d eep en o u r a w aren ess o f o u r o w n re sp on sib ili t y by su bstit u tin g th e ph ra se , “I fe el … b ecau se I … ” F or ex am ple : C on nect y o u r f e eli n g w it h y o u r n eed : “ I f e el … b eca u se I n eed … ” 1. “ I fe el r e a lly in fu ria te d w hen s p elli n g m is ta k es li k e th at a p p ear in o u r pu bli c b ro ch u re s, b eca u se I w an t o u r c o m pan y t o p ro je c t a p ro fe ss io n al im ag e.” 2. “ I fe el an gry th at th e su p erv is o r b ro ke h er p ro m is e , b eca u se I w as co u ntin g o n g ett in g t h at l o n g w eek en d t o v is it m y b ro th er .” 3. “ M om my fe els d is a p p oin te d w hen y o u d on’t n is h y o u r fo od , b eca u se I w an t y o u t o g ro w u p s tr o n g a n d h ea lt h y.”  e basic m ech an is m of m otiv atin g by gu ilt is to att r ib u te th e re sp on sib ili t y fo r o n e’s o w n fe eli n gs to o th er s. W hen p aren ts s a y, “ It h u rts M om my a n d D ad dy w hen y o u g et p oor g ra d es a t s c h ool,” t h ey a re im ply in g th at th e ch ild ’s actio n s are th e cau se of th e paren ts ’ hap pin es s or u n hap pin ess . O n t h e s u rfa ce, t a k in g r es pon sib ili t y fo r t h e fe eli n gs o f o th er s ca n e a sily b e m is ta k en f o r p osit iv e ca rin g. I t m ay a p p ear t h at t h e ch ild c a res fo r th e p are n t a n d fe els b ad b ecau se th e paren t is su ff er in g. H ow ev er , if c h ild re n w ho a ssu m e th is k in d o f res pon sib ili t y c h an ge th ei r b eh av io r in a cco rd an ce w it h p are n ta l w is h es, th ey a re not a ctin g fr o m th e heart, b u t actin g t o a v o id g u ilt . D is tin gu is h b etw een g iv in g fr o m th e h ea rt a n d b ein g m otiv ate d b y g u ilt . e N eed s a t t h e R oots o f F eeli n gs Ju dgm en ts , crit ic is m s, dia g n oses , an d in ter pret atio n s of oth er s are all a li e n ate d e x p re ss io n s o f o u r n eed s. I f s o m eo n e sa y s, “ Y ou n ev er u n der sta n d m e,” t h ey a re r e a lly te lli n g u s t h at t h ei r n eed to b e un dersto od is n ot b ei ng fu l lle d . I f a w if e s a y s, “ Y ou ’v e b een w ork in g la te ev er y n ig h t t h is w eek ; y o u lo ve y o u r w ork m ore th an y o u lo ve m e,” sh e is sa y in g th at h er n ee d fo r in tim acy i s n ot b ein g m et. J u dgm en ts o f o th ers are a li e n ate d ex p re ssio n s o f o u r ow n u n m et n eed s. W hen w e e x p re ss o u r n eed s in dir e ctly th ro u gh th e use of e v alu atio n s, in te rp re ta tio n s, a n d im ag es, o th er s a re li k ely to h ear c rit ic is m . A nd w hen p eo p le h ear a n yth in g th at so u n ds li k e c rit ic is m , th ey te n d to in ves t th ei r en erg y in se lf – d efe n se o r co u nter att a ck . If w e wis h fo r a co m pass io n ate r e sp on se f r o m o th ers , i t i s s e lf – d efe atin g t o e x p res s o u r n eed s b y i n ter pret in g or d ia g n osin g t h eir b eh av io r. I n ste a d , t h e m ore dir e ctly w e ca n c o n nect o u r fe eli n gs to o u r o w n n eed s, th e ea sier it is fo r o th er s to res pon d to u s co m pass io n ate ly . I f w e ex p re ss o u r n eed s, w e h av e a b ett e r ch an ce o f gett in g t h em m et. U nfo rtu n ate ly , m ost o f u s h av e n ev er b een ta u gh t to th in k in ter m s o f n eed s. W e a re a cc u sto m ed t o t h in kin g a b ou t w hat’s w ro n g w it h o th er p eo p le w hen o u r n eed s a re n ’t b ein g f u l lle d .  us, i f w e w an t c o ats t o b e hu n g u p i n t h e c lo se t, w e m ay c h ara cte riz e o u r c h ild ren a s la zy f o r le av in g t h em o n t h e co u ch . O r w e m ay i n te rp re t o u r c o -w ork er s a s i r res pon sib le w hen t h ey d on’t g o a b ou t t h eir t a sk s t h e w ay w e w ou ld p ref er t h em t o . I w as o n ce in vit e d to S o u th ern C ali f o rn ia to m ed ia te b et ween so m e la n dow ners an d m ig ra n t fa rm work er s whose co n ic ts had gro w n in cre a sin gly h ostile a n d v io le n t. I b eg an th e m eet in g b y a sk in g th es e tw o qu estio n s: “ W hat is it t h at y o u a re ea ch n eed in g? A nd w hat w ou ld y o u li k e to r e q u est o f t h e o th er i n r e la tio n t o t h es e need s? ” “  e p ro ble m is th at th ese p eo p le are ra cis t!” sh ou te d a fa rm w ork er . “ e p ro ble m is th at th ese p eo p le don’t r es pect la w a n d o rd er !” s h ou te d a la n dow ner e v en m ore lo u d ly . A s is o  en th e ca se , th es e gro u p s w er e m ore s k ille d in an aly zin g th e perc e iv ed w ro n gn es s of oth er s th an in cle arly e x p re ss in g t h eir o w n n eed s. In a co m para b le sit u atio n , I o n ce m et w it h a gro u p o f Is r a eli s an d Pale stin ia n s w ho w an te d to e sta b li s h th e mutu al tr u st n eces sa ry to b rin g pea ce to th eir h om ela n ds. I o p en ed th e ses sio n w it h th e sa m e qu es tio n s, “ W hat is it y o u a re n eed in g a n d w hat w ou ld y o u li k e to r e q u es t fr o m o n e an oth er in r e la tio n to th ose n eed s? ” In ste a d o f d ir e ctly s ta tin g h is n eed s, a P ale stin ia n m ukh ta r ( w ho i s l i k e a v illa g e m ay o r) a n sw ere d , “ Y ou p eo p le are a ctin g li k e a b u n ch o f N azis .” A s ta te m en t li k e th at is n ot li k ely to g et th e co op era tio n o f a g ro u p o f Is r a eli s ! A lm ost im med ia te ly , a n Is r a eli w om an ju m ped u p a n d c o u nte re d , “ M ukh ta r, t h at w as a t o ta lly in sen sit iv e th in g f o r yo u t o s a y !” H ere w ere p eo p le w ho h ad c o m e to geth er to b u ild tr u st a n d h arm on y, b u t a  er o n ly o n e in te rc h an ge, m att er s w er e wors e th an b ef ore th ey b eg an .  is h ap p en s o  en w hen p eo p le are use d to a n aly zin g a n d b la m in g o n e an oth er ra th er th an cle arly ex p res sin g w hat th ey n eed . In th is ca se , th e w om an c o u ld h av e r e sp on ded t o t h e m ukh ta r i n t e rm s o f h er o w n n eed s a n d re q u ests b y s a y in g, f o r e x am ple , “ I a m n eed in g m ore res pect i n o u r d ia lo gu e. In ste a d o f t e lli n g u s h ow y o u t h in k w e are actin g, w ou ld y o u t e ll u s w hat i t i s w e a re d oin g t h at y o u n d d is tu rb in g?” It h as b een m y e x p erie n ce o ver a n d o ver a g ain th at fr o m th e m om en t peo p le b eg in ta lk in g a b ou t w hat th ey n eed r a th er th an w hat’s w ro n g w it h o n e a n oth er, th e p oss ib ili t y o f n din g w ay s to m eet e v er yb o d y’s n eed s is g re atly in cre a se d .  e fo llo w in g a re so m e o f th e basic h u m an n eed s w e all s h are : A uto n om y to c h oose o n e’s d re am s, g o als , v alu es to c h oose o n e’s p la n f o r f u l lli n g o n e’s d re am s, g o als , v alu es C ele b ra tio n to c ele b ra te t h e c re atio n o f l i f e a n d d re am s f u l lle d to c ele b ra te l o ss e s: l o ved o n es, d re am s, et c. ( m ou rn in g) In te g rit y a u th en tic it y c re ativ it y m ean in g se lf – w orth I n te rd ep en den ce a cce p ta n ce ap pre cia tio n clo se n ess c o m mun it y c o n sid era tio n co n tr ib u tio n t o t h e e n ric h m en t o f l i f e (to ex ercis e on e’s p ow er b y g iv in g th at w hic h c o n tr ib u te s t o l i f e ) em otio n al s a fe ty e m path y h on esty (th e e m pow erin g h on esty th at en ab les u s to le arn fr o m o u r li m it a tio n s) lo ve re a ssu ra n ce re sp ec t su pp ort tr u st u n dersta n din g w arm th P la y fu n la u gh te r S p ir it u al C om mun io n b eau ty h arm on y in sp ir a tio n ord er p ea ce P hysic a l N urtu ra n ce a ir f o od m ovem en t, e x erc is e p ro te c tio n f r o m li f e -th re ate n in g f o rm s o f li f e: v ir u ses , b acter ia , in se cts , p re d ato ry a n im als r e st s e x u al e x p re ss io n sh elt e r to u ch w ate r e P ain o f E xp re ssin g O ur N eed s v ersu s t h e P ain o f N ot E xp re ssin g O ur N eed s In a w orld w here w e’r e o  en ju dged h arsh ly fo r id en tif y in g a n d re v ea li n g ou r n eed s, d oin g so ca n b e very fr ig h ten in g. W om en , in p artic u la r, are s u sc e p tib le to c rit ic is m . F or c e n tu ries , th e im ag e of th e lo vin g w om an h as b een a ss o cia te d w it h s a cri ce a n d t h e den ia l o f o n e’s o w n n eed s t o t a k e ca re o f o th ers . B ecau se w om en a re s o cia li z e d t o v ie w t h e ca ret ak in g o f o th er s a s th eir h ig h est d u ty , t h ey o  en l e arn t o i g n ore th ei r o w n n eed s. A t o n e w ork sh op, w e d is c u ss e d w hat h ap p en s t o w om en w ho i n ter nali z e su ch b eli e fs .  ese w om en , i f t h ey a sk f o r w hat t h ey w an t, w ill o  en d o s o i n a w ay t h at b oth r e ec ts a n d r e in fo rc e s t h e beli ef s t h at t h ey h av e no g en uin e rig h t to th eir n eed s an d th at t h eir n ee d s are u n im porta n t. F or ex am ple , b ecau se sh e is fe arfu l o f a sk in g fo r w hat sh e need s, a w om an m ay fa il to s im ply s a y t h at s h e’s h ad a b u sy d ay, i s f e eli n g t ir e d , a n d w an ts s o m e tim e in t h e e v en in g to h ers e lf ; in ste a d , h er w ord s c o m e o u t so u n din g li k e a leg al ca se : “ Y ou k n ow I h av en ’t h ad a m om en t to m yse lf a ll d ay. I ir o n ed a ll th e sh ir ts , d id th e w hole w eek ’s la u n dry, to ok th e dog to th e vet , m ad e din ner , pack ed t h e lu n ch es, a n d c a lle d a ll t h e nei gh bors a b ou t t h e blo ck m eet in g, s o [im plo rin gly ] … s o h ow a b ou t i f y o u … ? ” “N o!” c o m es th e s w i r e sp on se . H er p la in tiv e re q u es t e li c it s r es is ta n ce ra th er t h an c o m pass io n f r o m h er li s ten ers.  ey h av e diffi cu lt y h earin g a n d valu in g t h e n eed s b eh in d h er p le a s, a n d f u rth er m ore re a ct n eg ativ ely t o h er w ea k a tt e m pt t o a rg u e f r o m a p osit io n o f w hat s h e “s h ou ld ” g et o r “ d es er ves ” to g et f r o m t h em . I n t h e e n d t h e sp ea k er is a g ain p er su ad ed t h at h er n eed s d on’t m att e r, n ot r e a li z in g t h at t h ey w ere ex p res se d i n a w ay u n li k ely t o d ra w a p osit iv e r e sp on se . M y m oth er w as o n ce a t a w ork sh op w her e oth er w om en w er e dis c u ss in g how f r ig h te n in g i t w as t o b e e x p res sin g t h ei r n eed s. S u dden ly s h e go t u p a n d le  th e ro om , an d d id n’t re tu rn fo r a lo n g tim e. S h e n ally re ap p eare d , lo okin g v ery p ale . I n t h e p re se n ce o f t h e gro u p, I a sk ed , “ M oth er , a re yo u a ll r ig h t? ” I f w e d on’t v a lu e o u r n eed s, o th ers m ay n ot e it h er. “Y es,” s h e a n sw ere d , “ b u t I ju st h ad a s u dden r e a li z atio n t h at’s v er y h ard fo r m e t o t a k e i n .” “ W hat’s t h at? ” “I’v e ju st b eco m e a w are th at fo r th ir ty -s ix y ears , I w as a n gry w it h y o u r fa th er f o r n ot m eetin g m y n eed s, a n d n ow I r e a li z e t h at I n ev er o n ce cle arly t o ld h im w hat I n eed ed .” M y m oth er’s r e v ela tio n w as a cc u ra te . N ot o n e t im e, t h at I c a n r em ember , did sh e c le arly e x p re ss h er n eed s to m y fa th er . S h e’d h in t a ro u n d a n d g o th ro u gh a ll k in ds o f c o n vo lu tio n s, b u t n ev er w ou ld s h e ask d ir e ctly f o r w hat sh e n eed ed . W e t r ie d t o u n dersta n d w hy it w as s o h ard fo r h er t o h av e don e s o . M y moth er gre w up in an eco n om ic a lly im pover is h ed fa m ily . Sh e re ca lle d a sk in g fo r th in gs as a ch ild an d b ei ng ad m on is h ed b y h er b ro th er s an d sis te rs , “ Y ou s h ou ld n’t a sk f o r t h at! Y ou k n ow we’r e p oor. D o y o u t h in k y o u are th e o n ly p ers o n in th e fa m ily ?” E ven tu ally s h e gre w to fe ar th at a sk in g fo r w hat s h e n eed ed w ou ld o n ly l e a d t o d is a p pro val a n d j u dgm en t. S h e r e la te d a c h ild hood a n ecd ote ab ou t o n e o f h er s is te rs w ho h ad h ad an a p p en dix o p era tio n a n d a  erw ard s h ad b een g iv en a b eau tif u l l i t t le pu rs e b y a n oth er s is te r. M y m oth er w as f o u rte en a t t h e tim e. O h, h ow s h e yearn ed to h av e a n e x q u is it e ly b ea d ed p u rs e li k e h er s is te r’s , b u t s h e dare d n ot o p en her m ou th . S o g u ess w hat? S h e fei gn ed a p ain in h er sid e an d w en t th e w hole w ay w it h h er s to ry. H er f a m ily t o ok h er t o s e v er al d octo rs .  ey w er e un ab le to p ro du ce a d ia g n osis a n d s o o p te d fo r ex plo ra to ry s u rg er y. It h ad b een a b old g am ble o n m y m oth er ’s p art, b u t it w ork ed — sh e was g iv en a n id en tic a l li t t le p u rs e ! W hen s h e r e ce iv ed t h e co vet ed p u rs e , m y m oth er w as ela te d d esp it e b ein g i n p hysic a l a g o n y f r o m t h e su rg ery. T w o n u rs es c a m e in a n d o n e stu ck a th erm om ete r in h er m ou th . M y m oth er sa id , “U m mm, um mm,” t o s h ow t h e p u rs e t o t h e s e co n d n u rs e , w ho a n sw ere d , “ O h, f o r m e? W hy, th an k y o u !” a n d to ok th e p u rs e! M y m oth er w as a t a lo ss , a n d n ev er gu re d o u t h ow to s a y, “ I d id n’t m ean to g iv e it to y o u . P le a se ret urn it to m e.” H er s to ry p oig n an tly r e v ea ls h ow p ain fu l it c a n b e when p eo p le don’t o p en ly a ck n ow le d ge t h eir n eed s. Fro m E m otio n al S la v er y t o E m otio n al L ib era tio n In o u r d ev elo p m en t to w ard a sta te o f em otio n al li b er atio n , m ost o f u s ex p erie n ce t h re e s ta g es i n t h e w ay w e re la te t o o th er s. S ta g e 1 : In th is sta g e, w hic h I ref er to a s e m otio n al sla very, w e b eli e v e o u rs e lv es r e sp on sib le f o r t h e f e eli n gs o f o th er s. W e th in k w e m ust c o n sta n tly s tr iv e t o k eep e v ery o n e h ap py. I f t h ey d on’t a p p ear h ap py, w e f e el r es pon sib le a n d c o m pelle d to d o s o m eth in g a b ou t it .  is c a n e a sily le a d u s to s e e th e very p eo p le w ho a re c lo se st t o u s a s b u rd en s. T ak in g r e sp on sib ili t y f o r t h e f e eli n gs o f o th er s c a n b e ver y d etr im en ta l t o in tim ate re la tio n sh ip s. I ro u tin ely h ear v aria tio n s o n th e fo llo w in g th em e: “I’m r e a lly s c a re d t o b e i n a r e la tio n sh i p. E very t im e I s e e m y p artn er i n p ain o r n eed in g s o m eth in g, I f e el o ver whelm ed . I f e el li k e I ’m in p ris o n , t h at I ’m b ein g sm oth ere d — an d I ju st h av e to g et o u t o f th e re la tio n sh ip a s fa st a s p oss ib le .”  is re sp on se is c o m mon a m on g th ose who ex per ien ce lo ve as d en ia l o f o n e’s o w n n eed s in o rd er t o a tt en d t o t h e need s o f t h e belo ved . I n th e early day s of a re la tio n sh ip , partn ers ty p ic a lly re la te jo yfu lly an d co m pass io n ate ly t o e a ch o th er o u t o f a s en se of f r e ed om .  e re la tio n sh ip is e x h ila ra tin g, sp on ta n eo u s, won der fu l. Even tu ally , how ev er , as th e re la tio n sh ip b eco m es “ s e rio u s,” p artn ers m ay b eg in t o a ssu m e res pon sib ili t y fo r e a ch o th er’s f e eli n gs. F ir st sta g e: Em otio n al sla v er y. W e se e ou rse lv es re sp on sib le f o r o th ers’ f e eli n gs. If I w ere a p artn er w ho is c o n sc io u s o f d oin g t h is , I m ig h t a ck n ow le d ge th e sit u atio n by ex p la in in g, “I ca n ’t bear it w hen I lo se myse lf in r e la tio n sh ip s. W hen I s e e m y p artn er’s p ain , I lo se m e, a n d t h en I ju st h av e to b re a k fr e e.” H ow ev er, if I h av e not r e a ch ed th is le v el o f a w aren ess, I a m li k ely to b la m e m y p artn er fo r th e det er io ra tio n o f th e re la tio n sh ip .  us I m ig h t s a y, “ M y p artn er i s s o n eed y a n d d ep en den t i t ’s r e a lly s tr es sin g o u t o u r re la tio n sh ip .” I n s u ch a c a se , m y p artn er w ou ld d o w ell t o r ej ect t h e notio n t h at t h er e is a n yth in g w ro n g w it h h er n eed s. I t w ou ld o n ly m ak e a b ad s it u atio n w ors e to acce p t t h at b la m e. I n ste a d , s h e c o u ld o ff er a n em path ic r es pon se to t h e pain o f m y e m otio n al s la v ery : “ S o y o u n d y o u rs e lf i n p an ic . I t’s v er y h ard f o r y o u to h old o n to th e d eep c a rin g a n d lo ve we’v e had w it h ou t tu rn in g it in to a r e sp on sib ili t y , d u ty , o bli g atio n … . Y ou sen se yo u r fr e ed om clo sin g d ow n becau se y o u th in k y o u co n sta n tly h av e to ta k e ca re of m e.” If, h ow ev er , in ste a d o f a n e m path ic r e sp on se , s h e sa y s, “A re yo u fe eli n g ten se becau se I hav e b een m ak in g t o o m an y d em an ds o n y o u ?” t h en b oth o f u s a re li k ely t o s ta y e n m esh ed in e m otio n al s la v ery, m ak in g it t h at m uch m ore diffi cu lt fo r th e r e la tio n sh ip t o s u rv iv e. S ta g e 2 : In th is s ta g e, w e b eco m e aw are of th e hig h c o sts o f a ssu m in g re sp on sib ili t y fo r o th ers’ fe eli n gs a n d tr y in g to a cco m mod ate th em a t o u r ow n e x p en se . W hen w e n otic e h ow m uch o f o u r li v es w e’v e m is s e d a n d h ow li t t le w e h av e r e sp on ded to t h e c a ll o f o u r o w n s o u l, w e m ay g et a n gry. I r ef er jo kin gly to th is sta g e as th e o b n ox io u s sta ge becau se w e te n d to w ard o bn oxio u s co m men ts li k e, “ at’s y o u r p ro ble m ! I ’m n ot re sp on sib le fo r yo u r fe eli n gs!” w hen p re se n te d w it h an oth er p er so n’s p ain . W e are cle ar w hat w e a re n ot r e sp on sib le fo r, b u t h av e y et t o le arn h ow t o b e res pon sib le t o o th ers i n a w ay t h at i s n ot e m otio n ally en sla v in g. S eco n d s ta g e:  e o b n oxio u s s ta g e. W e f e el a n gry ; w e n o lo n ger w an t t o b e r e sp on sib le f o r o th ers’ f e eli n gs. A s w e e m erg e fr o m th e s ta g e o f e m otio n al s la v er y, w e m ay c o n tin u e to c a rr y r e m nan ts o f f e ar a n d g u ilt a ro u n d h av in g o u r o w n n eed s.  us i t i s n ot su rp ris in g t h at w e e n d u p e x p re ss in g o u r n eed s i n w ay s t h at s o u n d r ig id a n d unyie ld in g to th e e ars o f o th ers . F or e x am ple , d u rin g a b re a k in o n e of m y work sh op s, a y o u n g w om an e x p res se d ap pre cia tio n fo r th e in sig h ts sh e’d g ain ed in to h er o w n sta te o f e m otio n al e n sla v em ent. W hen th e work sh op re su m ed , I s u ggeste d a n a ctiv it y t o t h e gro u p.  e sa m e yo u n g w om an t h en decla re d ass e rtiv ely , “I’d ra th er do so m eth in g els e .” I sen se d sh e was ex erc is in g her n ew fo u n d rig h t to ex p res s her n eed s— ev en if th ey ra n co u nte r t o t h ose o f o th ers . T o e n co u ra g e h er t o s o rt o u t w hat s h e wan te d , I a sk ed , “ D o y o u w an t t o d o so m eth in g e ls e e v en if it c o n ic ts w it h m y n eed s? ” S h e th ou gh t fo r a m om en t, a n d th en sta m mere d , “Y es … . e r … I m ean , n o.” H er c o n fu sio n re ec ts h ow , in th e o bn oxio u s sta g e, w e hav e yet to g ra sp th at em otio n al li b era tio n e n ta ils m ore t h an s im ply a ss er tin g o u r o w n n eed s. I re ca ll an in cid en t du rin g m y dau gh ter M arla ’s pass a g e to w ard e m otio n al l i b era tio n . S h e h ad a lw ay s b een t h e “p er fe ct l i t t le gir l” w ho d en ie d h er o w n n eed s t o c o m ply w it h t h e w is h es o f o th er s. W hen I b eca m e aw are of h ow fr e q u en tly s h e s u ppre ss e d h er o w n d es ir es in o rd er to p le a se oth er s, I ta lk ed t o h er a b ou t h ow I ’d e n jo y h earin g h er ex pres s h er n eed s m ore o en . When w e rst b ro ach ed t h e s u bje ct, M arla c rie d . “ B ut, D ad dy, I d on’t w an t to d is a p p oin t a n yb o d y!” s h e p ro tes te d h elp les sly . I t r ie d t o s h ow M arla h ow h er h on esty w ou ld b e a g i m ore pre cio u s to o th er s th an a cco m mod atin g th em to p re v en t t h eir u p se t. I a ls o c la ri ed w ay s s h e co u ld em path iz e wit h p eo p le w hen t h ey w ere u p se t w it h ou t t a k in g r es pon sib ili t y f o r t h ei r f e eli n gs. A sh ort tim e la te r, I s a w e v id en ce th at m y d au gh ter w as b eg in nin g to e x p re ss h er n eed s m ore o p en ly . A ca ll ca m e fr o m h er sc h ool p rin cip al, a p p are n tly d is tu rb ed b y a c o m mun ic atio n h e’d h ad w it h M arla , w ho h ad arriv ed a t s c h ool w earin g o vera lls . “ M arla ,” h e’d s a id , “ y o u n g w om en d o n ot d re ss t h is w ay.” T o w hic h M arla h ad r es pon ded , “ B ug o ff !” H earin g th is w as cau se fo r cele b ra tio n : M arla had gra d u ate d fr o m em otio n al s la v ery to o bn oxio u sn es s! S h e was le arn in g to e x p res s h er n eed s an d r is k d ea li n g w it h t h e d is p le a su re of o th er s. S u re ly s h e had y et to a ss er t her n eed s c o m fo rta b ly a n d i n a w ay t h at r es pecte d t h e need s o f o th er s, b u t I t r u ste d t h is w ou ld o cc u r i n t im e. S ta g e 3 : A t t h e t h ir d s ta g e, e m otio n al l i b era tio n , w e r e sp on d t o t h e n eed s of o th ers o u t o f c o m pass io n , n ev er o u t o f fe ar, g u ilt , o r s h am e. O ur a ctio n s are t h ere fo re f u l lli n g t o u s, a s w ell a s t o t h ose who r e ce iv e ou r eff orts . W e acce p t f u ll r e sp on sib ili t y f o r o u r o w n in ten tio n s a n d a ctio n s, b u t n ot f o r t h e fe eli n gs o f o th ers . A t th is s ta g e, w e are aw are th at w e ca n n ev er m eet o u r ow n n eed s a t th e e x p en se o f o th er s. E m otio n al li b er atio n in vo lv es sta tin g cle arly w hat w e n eed in a w ay t h at c o m mun ic ates w e are eq u ally c o n cer ned th at th e n eed s o f o th ers b e fu l lle d . N VC is d esig n ed to su pp ort u s in r e la tin g a t t h is l e v el.  ir d sta g e: Em otio n al li b era tio n . We ta k e re sp on sib ili t y f o r o u r i n te n tio n s a n d a ctio n s. Su m mary  e th ir d c o m pon en t o f N VC is th e ack n ow le d gm en t o f th e need s b eh in d ou r f e eli n gs. W hat o th ers s a y a n d d o m ay b e th e stim ulu s f o r, b u t n ev er t h e cau se o f, o u r fe eli n gs. W hen so m eo n e co m mun ic ates n eg ativ ely , w e hav e fo u r o p tio n s a s t o h ow t o r e ce iv e t h e m ess a g e: ( 1 ) b la m e ou rs e lv es , ( 2 ) b la m e oth ers , (3 ) se n se o u r o w n fe eli n gs an d n eed s, (4 ) sen se th e fe eli n gs an d need s h id den i n t h e o th er p ers o n’s n eg ativ e m essa g e. Ju dgm en ts , crit ic is m s, d ia g n ose s, a n d in ter pret atio n s o f o th er s a re all a li e n ate d ex p re ss io n s of ou r ow n n eed s an d valu es . W hen oth er s h ear crit ic is m , th ey te n d to in vest th ei r e n er gy in s e lf – d ef en se or c o u nter att a ck .  e m ore d ir e c tly w e c a n c o n nect o u r fe eli n gs to o u r n eed s, t h e ea sier it is f o r o th ers t o r e sp on d c o m pass io n ate ly . In a w orld w here w e are o en harsh ly ju dged fo r id en tif y in g an d re v ea li n g o u r n eed s, d oin g s o c a n b e ver y f r ig h ten in g, es pecia lly f o r w om en who a re s o cia li z e d t o i g n ore t h eir o w n n eed s w hile c a rin g f o r o th er s. In th e co u rs e of dev elo p in g em otio n al res pon sib ili t y , m ost of us ex p erie n ce th re e sta g es: (1 ) “em otio n al sla v er y”— beli e v in g ou rs e lv es re sp on sib le fo r th e fe eli n gs o f o th er s, (2 ) “ th e obn oxio u s s ta g e” — in w hic h w e re fu se to ad m it to ca rin g w hat an yo n e els e fe els o r n ee d s, an d (3 ) “e m otio n al li b era tio n”— in w hic h w e a ccep t fu ll r es pon sib ili t y fo r o u r o w n fe eli n gs b u t n ot t h e fe eli n gs o f o th er s, w hile b ei ng a w are th at w e ca n n ev er m eet o u r o w n n eed s a t t h e e x p en se of o th er s. N VC i n A ctio n “B rin g B ack t h e S tig m a o f I lle g it im acy !” A s tu den t o f N on vio le n t C om mun ic atio n v o lu nte er in g a t a fo o d b an k w as sh ock ed w hen an eld erly co -w ork er bu rst ou t fr o m b eh in d a n ew sp ap er, “W hat w e n eed to d o in th is co u ntr y is b rin g b ack th e stig m a o f i lle g it im acy !”  e s tu den t’s h ab it u al r e a ctio n t o t h is k in d o f s ta te m en t w ou ld h av e b een to sa y n oth in g, to ju dge th e oth er se v er ely bu t silen tly , an d ev en tu ally t o p ro ce ss h er o w n f e eli n gs s a fe ly a w ay f r o m t h e sc e n e.  is t im e, s h e r e m em bere d s h e h ad th e op tio n o f li s ten in g fo r th e fe eli n gs an d n eed s b eh in d t h e w ord s t h at h ad s h ock ed h er . Stu den t: ( fi rst ch eck in g ou t her gu ess as to w hat th e co w ork er w as ob se rv in g) Are yo u re a d in g so m eth in g ab ou t te en ag e p re g n an cie s i n t h e p ap er? C o- w ork er: Y es, i t ’s u n beli e v ab le h ow m an y o f t h em a re doin g i t ! S tu den t: ( n ow li s te n in g f o r t h e co -w ork er’s f e eli n g, a n d w hat u nm et n eed m ig h t b e giv in g ris e to th is fe eli n g) A re y o u fe eli n g a la rm ed b ecau se y o u ’d l i k e k id s t o h av e s ta b le fa m ili es ? Co- w ork er: O f c o u rs e ! D o y o u k n ow , m y f a th er w ou ld h av e kille d m e if I h ad d on e a n yth in g l i k e t h at! S tu den t: S o yo u ’r e re m em berin g h ow it w as fo r th e gir ls in yo u r gen era tio n w ho g o t p re g n an t? C o- w ork er: S u re th in g! W e k n ew w hat w ou ld h ap p en to u s if w e go t p re g n an t. W e w ere s c a re d a b ou t it a ll t h e tim e, n ot li k e th es e gir ls n ow ad ay s. S tu den t: A re y o u a n noyed t h at t h ere is n o fe ar o f p u n is h m en t fo r t h e gir ls w ho g et p re g n an t t h ese d ay s? C o- w ork er: W ell, a t le a st fe ar a n d p u n is h m en t w ork ed ! It s a y s h er e th at th ere a re g ir ls s le ep in g a ro u n d w it h d iff er en t m en j u st s o t h ey ca n g et p re g n an t!  at’s r ig h t!  ey h av e bab ies a n d th e res t of u s i n s o cie ty p ay f o r i t !  e stu den t o f N VC h eard tw o d iff er en t fe eli n gs in th is sta tem ent: a sto n is h m en t t h at g ir ls w ou ld d eli b er ate ly g et p reg nan t, a n d a n noyan ce th at t a x p ay ers e n d u p p ay in g fo r c h ild ren b orn in t h is w ay. S h e ch ose w hic h f e eli n g t o e m path iz e w it h . Stu den t: A re y o u a sto n is h ed t o r e a li z e t h at p eo p le are get tin g p reg nan t th ese day s wit h ou t an y co n sid er atio n fo r rep uta tio n , co n se q u en ce s, n an cia l s ta b ili t y … a ll t h e th in gs y o u u se d t o c o n sid er? C o- w ork er: Y ea h , a n d g u ess w ho e n ds u p p ay in g f o r i t ?  e co -w ork er, pro b ab ly fe eli n g heard aro u n d her asto n is h m en t, m oved o n to h er o th er fe eli n g: th at o f a n noyan ce. A s o  en h ap p en s when th ere is a m ix tu re o f fe eli n gs p res en t, th e sp ea k er w ill r et urn to t h ose t h at h av e n ot r e ce iv ed e m path ic a tt en tio n . I t is n ot n eces sa ry f o r th e l i s te n er t o r e ec t b ack a c o m plex m ix tu re of f e eli n gs a ll a t o n ce; t h e ow o f c o m pass io n w ill c o n tin u e as e a ch f e eli n g c o m es u p a g ain in it s tu rn . Stu den t: S o u n ds li k e y o u ’r e e x asp era te d b ecau se yo u ’d li k e y o u r ta x m on ey t o b e u se d f o r o th er p u rp oses . I s t h at s o ? C o- w ork er: C erta in ly is ! D o y o u k n ow th at m y s o n a n d h is w if e wan t a s e co n d c h ild a n d t h ey c a n ’t h av e o n e— ev en t h ou gh t h ey h av e tw o j o b s— becau se i t c o sts s o m uch ? Stu den t: I g u ess y o u ’r e s a d a b ou t th at? Y ou ’d p ro b ab ly lo ve to h av e a se co n d g ra n dch ild … C o- w ork er: Y es, a n d i t ’s n ot j u st f o r m e t h at i t w ou ld m ak e a d iff er en ce. S tu den t: … a n d fo r y o u r so n to h av e th e fa m ily h e wan ts … (E ven th ou gh t h e stu den t g u ess e d o n ly p artia lly c o rre ctly , s h e did n ot in te rru pt th e flow o f e m path y, in ste a d a llo w in g th e co -w ork er to c o n tin u e an d r e a li z e an oth er c o n ce rn .) C o- w ork er: Y es, I t h in k i t ’s s a d t o b e a s in gle c h ild t o o. Stu den t: O h, I s e e; y o u ’d l i k e f o r K atie t o h av e a l i t t le bro th er ? Co- w ork er:  at w ou ld b e n ic e. A t t h is p oin t, t h e s tu den t s e n se d a r e le a se in h er c o -w ork er . A m om en t of sile n ce e la p se d . S h e fe lt su rp ris e d to d is c o ver th at, w hile sh e still wan te d to ex p re ss her ow n vie w s, her urg en cy an d ten sio n had d is s ip ate d b ecau se s h e n o lo n ger fe lt “ a d ver sa ria l.” S h e un dersto od t h e fe eli n gs a n d n eed s b eh in d h er c o -w ork er’s sta te m en ts a n d n o lo n ger fe lt t h at t h e t w o o f t h em w ere “ w orld s a p art.” S tu den t: ( e x p re ssin g h erse lf in N VC, a n d u sin g a ll fo u r p arts of th e pro ce ss : o b se rv a tio n [ O ], f e eli n g [ F ], n eed [ N ], r e q u est [ R ]) Y ou k n ow , w hen yo u rst sa id th at w e sh ou ld b rin g b ack th e stig m a o f ille g it im acy ( O ), I g o t r e a lly s c a re d ( F ), b ecau se it r e a lly m att e rs t o m e t h at a ll o f u s h er e sh are a d eep c a rin g f o r p eo p le n eed in g h elp ( N ). S o m e o f t h e peo p le co m in g h er e fo r fo od a re te en ag e p are n ts ( O ), a n d I w an t to m ak e su re th ey fe el w elc o m e ( N ). W ou ld y o u m in d te lli n g m e how y o u fe el w hen y o u s e e D ash al, o r A m y a n d h er b oyfr ien d, w alk in g i n ? (R )  e d ia lo gu e c o n tin u ed w it h s e v er al m ore ex ch an ges u ntil t h e wom an g o t th e re a ssu ra n ce sh e n eed ed th at h er c o -w ork er d id in deed o ff er ca rin g an d re sp ec tfu l help to un m arrie d te en cli en ts . Even m ore im porta n tly , w hat th e w om an gain ed w as a new ex p er ien ce in e x p re ss in g d is a g re em en t in a w ay th at m et h er n eed s fo r h on esty a n d m utu al r e sp ec t. I n th e m ean tim e, th e co -w ork er le sa tis ed th at h er co n cer ns aro u n d te en pre g n an cy had been fu lly heard . Both parties fe lt u n dersto od , a n d th eir r e la tio n sh ip b en ete d fr o m th ei r h av in g s h are d th eir u n dersta n din g a n d d iff ere n ce s w it h ou t h ostili t y . I n t h e ab sen ce of N VC, th eir re la tio n sh ip m ig h t h av e beg un to d et er io ra te fr o m th is m om en t, a n d th e w ork th ey b oth w an te d to d o in c o m mon — help in g peo p le — mig h t h av e s u ff ere d . Exerc is e 3 A C K N O W LE D GIN G N EED S To p ra ctic e id en tif y in g n eed s, p le a se cir c le th e nu m ber in fr o n t o f ea ch sta te m en t w here th e s p ea k er is a ck n ow le d gin g r es pon sib ili t y fo r h is o r h er fe eli n gs. 1. “ Y ou ir rit a te m e when yo u le av e co m pan y docu m en ts on th e co n fe re n ce r o om oor.” 2. “ I fe el a n gry w hen y o u s a y th at, b ecau se I a m w an tin g res pect a n d I h ear y o u r w ord s a s a n i n su lt .” 3. “ I f e el f r u str a te d w hen y o u c o m e la te .” 4. “ I’m s a d t h at y o u w on’t b e c o m in g f o r d in ner b ecau se I w as h op in g w e co u ld s p en d t h e e v en in g t o geth er .” 5. “ I f e el d is a p p oin te d b ecau se y o u s a id y o u w ou ld d o i t a n d y o u d id n’t .” 6. “ I’m d is c o u ra g ed b ecau se I w ou ld h av e li k ed t o h av e pro gres se d f u rth er in m y w ork b y n ow .” 7. “ L it t le t h in gs p eo p le s a y s o m etim es h u rt m e.” 8. “ I f e el h ap py t h at y o u r e ce iv ed t h at a w ard .” 9. “ I f e el s c a re d w hen y o u r a is e y o u r v o ic e.” 1 0 . “ I a m g ra te fu l t h at y o u o ff ere d m e a r id e becau se I w as n eed in g t o g et h om e b efo re m y c h ild re n a rriv e.” H ere are m y r e sp on se s f o r E xerc is e 3: 1. I f yo u cir c le d th is nu m ber, w e’r e not in ag re em ent. To m e, th e sta te m en t im pli e s t h at t h e o th er p er so n’s b eh av io r is s o le ly r es pon sib le f o r t h e s p ea k er’s f e eli n gs. I t d oesn ’t r e v ea l t h e need s o r t h ou gh ts t h at a re c o n tr ib u tin g t o t h e s p ea k er’s f e eli n gs. T o d o s o , t h e sp ea k er m ig h t h av e sa id , “I’m ir rit a te d w hen yo u le av e co m pan y docu m en ts on th e co n fe re n ce ro om oor, b ecau se I w an t o u r d ocu m en ts to b e sa fe ly s to re d a n d a cce ss ib le .” 2. I f yo u cir c le d th is n u m ber, w e’r e in ag re em ent th at th e sp ea k er is a ck n ow le d gin g r e sp on sib ili t y f o r h is o r h er f e eli n gs. 3. I f y o u c ir c le d t h is n u m ber, w e’r e n ot i n a g re em ent. T o ex pres s t h e need s or t h ou gh ts u n derly in g h is o r h er f e eli n gs, t h e sp ea k er m ig h t h av e sa id , “I f e el f r u str a te d w hen y o u c o m e la te b ecau se I w as h op in g w e’d b e ab le t o g et s o m e f r o n t- r o w s e ats .” 4. I f yo u cir c le d th is n u m ber, w e’r e in ag re em ent th at th e sp ea k er is a ck n ow le d gin g r e sp on sib ili t y f o r h is o r h er f e eli n gs. 5. I f y o u c ir c le d t h is n u m ber, w e’r e n ot i n a g re em ent. T o ex pres s t h e need s an d th ou gh ts u n derly in g h is o r h er fe eli n gs, th e sp ea k er m ig h t h av e sa id , “ W hen y o u s a id y o u ’d d o it a n d th en d id n’t , I fe lt d is a p p oin te d b ecau se I w an t t o b e a b le t o r e ly u p on y o u r w ord s.” 6. I f yo u cir c le d th is n u m ber, w e’r e in ag re em ent th at th e sp ea k er is a ck n ow le d gin g r e sp on sib ili t y f o r h is o r h er f e eli n gs. 7. I f y o u c ir c le d t h is n u m ber, w e’r e n ot i n a g re em ent. T o ex pres s t h e need s an d th ou gh ts u n derly in g h is o r h er fe eli n gs, th e sp ea k er m ig h t h av e sa id , “S o m etim es w hen p eo p le sa y li t t le th in gs, I fe el h u rt b ecau se I wan t t o b e a p pre cia te d , n ot c rit ic iz e d .” 8. I f y o u c ir c le d t h is n u m ber, w e’r e n ot i n a g re em ent. T o ex pres s t h e need s an d th ou gh ts u n derly in g h is o r h er fe eli n gs, th e sp ea k er m ig h t h av e sa id , “ W hen y o u r e ce iv ed t h at a w ard , I f e lt h ap py b ecau se I w as h op in g yo u ’d b e r e co gn iz e d f o r a ll t h e w ork y o u ’d p u t i n to t h e pro je ct.” 9. I f y o u c ir c le d t h is n u m ber, w e’r e n ot i n a g re em ent. T o ex pres s t h e need s an d th ou gh ts u n derly in g h is o r h er fe eli n gs, th e sp ea k er m ig h t h av e sa id , “W hen yo u ra is e yo u r vo ic e, I fe el sc a re d b ecau se I’m te lli n g m yse lf s o m eo n e m ig h t g et h u rt h er e, a n d I n eed t o k n ow t h at w e’r e all s a fe .” 1 0 . I f yo u cir c le d th is n u m ber, w e’r e in ag re em ent th at th e sp ea k er is a ck n ow le d gin g r e sp on sib ili t y f o r h is o r h er f e eli n gs. W 6 Req u estin g  at W hic h W ou ld E nric h L ife e h av e n ow co vere d th e rst th re e co m pon en ts o f N VC, w hic h a d dre ss w hat w e a re o b se rv in g, f e eli n g, a n d need in g. W e h av e le arn ed to d o t h is w it h ou t c rit ic iz in g, a n aly zin g, b la m in g, o r d ia g n osin g o th er s, a n d in a w ay li k ely to in sp ir e c o m pass io n .  e fo u rth a n d n al c o m pon en t o f th is p ro ce ss a d dre ss e s w hat w e wou ld li k e to re q u est o f o th ers in o rd er to e n ric h li f e fo r u s. W hen o u r n eed s a re not b ei ng fu l lle d , w e fo llo w th e ex p re ss io n o f w hat w e a re o b se rv in g, fe eli n g, a n d n eed in g w it h a sp eci c re q u est: w e a sk fo r a ctio n s t h at m ig h t fu l ll o u r n eed s. H ow d o w e ex pres s ou r r e q u ests s o t h at o th ers a re m ore willi n g to r es pon d c o m pass io n ate ly to o u r n eed s? Usin g P osit iv e A ctio n L an gu ag e Fir st o f a ll, w e e x p re ss w hat w e a re r e q u estin g r a th er th an w hat w e are not re q u estin g. “ H ow d o y o u d o a d on’t ? ” g o es a li n e o f a c h ild re n ’s s o n g b y m y co lle a g u e R uth B eb erm ey er: “A ll I k n ow i s I f e el w on’t w hen I ’m t o ld t o d o a d on’t .”  ese ly ric s re v ea l tw o pro blem s co m mon ly en co u nter ed w hen re q u ests a re w ord ed in t h e n eg ativ e. P eo p le are o en c o n fu se d a s t o w hat is a ctu ally b ein g re q u este d , a n d fu rth er m ore , n eg ativ e re q u es ts a re li k ely to p ro vo ke r e sis ta n ce. U se p osit iv e l a n gu ag e w hen m ak in g r e q u ests . A w om an a t a w ork sh op, fr u str a te d th at h er h u sb an d w as s p en din g s o m uch t im e a t w ork , d esc rib ed h ow h er r e q u es t h ad back re d : “ I a sk ed h im n ot to sp en d so m uch tim e a t w ork .  re e week s la te r, h e res pon ded b y an nou n cin g t h at h e’d s ig n ed u p f o r a g o lf t o u rn am en t!” S h e had s u cces sfu lly c o m mun ic ate d t o h im w hat s h e d id n ot w an t— his s p en din g s o m uch t im e at w ork — bu t h ad fa ile d to r e q u est w hat s h e did w an t. E nco u ra g ed to r e w ord h er re q u est, s h e th ou gh t a m in ute an d s a id , “ I w is h I h ad to ld h im th at I w ou ld li k e h im to sp en d at le a st o n e ev en in g a w eek at h om e wit h th e ch ild re n a n d m e.” D urin g th e V ie tn am W ar, I w as ask ed to d eb ate th e war is su e on te le v is io n w it h a m an w hose p osit io n d iff er ed fr o m m in e.  e sh ow w as v id eo ta p ed , so I w as a b le to w atc h it a t h om e th at e v en in g. W hen I sa w m yse lf on th e sc re en co m mun ic atin g in way s I did n’t wan t to be co m mun ic atin g, I fe lt v ery u p se t. “ If I ’m e v er in a n oth er d is c u ss io n ,” I to ld m yse lf , “ I a m d ete rm in ed n ot to d o w hat I d id o n th at p ro gra m ! I’m n ot go in g to b e d efe n siv e. I ’m n ot g o in g to let t h em m ak e a fo ol o f m e.” N otic e h ow I s p oke to m yse lf in te rm s o f w hat I d id n’t w an t to d o r a th er th an in t e rm s o f w hat I d id w an t t o d o. A c h an ce t o r e d eem m yse lf c a m e th e ver y n ex t w eek w hen I w as in vit e d to c o n tin u e th e d eb ate o n th e s a m e pro gra m . A ll th e way to th e stu dio , I re p eate d t o m yse lf a ll t h e t h in gs I d id n’t w an t t o d o. A s s o on a s t h e pro gra m sta rte d , t h e m an la u n ch ed o ff i n ex actly t h e sa m e way h e had a w eek e arli er . For ab ou t te n se co n ds a er he’d n is h ed ta lk in g, I m an ag ed not to c o m mun ic ate in th e w ay s I h ad b een rem in din g m yse lf . In fa ct, I sa id n oth in g. I ju st s a t th ere . A s s o on a s I o p en ed m y m ou th , h ow ev er , I fo u n d w ord s t u m bli n g o u t i n a ll t h e w ay s I h ad b een s o d et er m in ed t o a v o id ! I t w as a p ain fu l le ss o n a b ou t w hat c a n h ap p en w hen I o n ly id en tif y w hat I d on’t w an t t o d o, w it h ou t c la rif y in g w hat I d o w an t t o d o. I w as o n ce i n vit e d t o w ork w it h s o m e h ig h s c h ool s tu den ts w ho s u ff er ed a lo n g li t a n y of grie v an ce s ag ain st th ei r prin cip al.  ey reg ard ed th e prin cip al a s r a cis t, a n d s e arc h ed fo r w ay s to g et e v en w it h h im . A m in is ter w ho w ork ed c lo se ly w it h th e y o u n g p eo p le beca m e deep ly c o n cer ned o ver th e p ro sp ec t o f v io le n ce. O ut o f r es pect f o r t h e m in is ter , t h e stu den ts a g re ed to m eet w it h m e.  ey b eg an b y d esc rib in g w hat t h ey s a w a s d is c rim in atio n on t h e p art o f th e p rin cip al. A er l i s te n in g t o s e v er al o f t h ei r c h arg es, I s u gges te d t h at t h ey p ro ce ed b y c la rif y in g w hat t h ey w an te d f r o m t h e prin cip al. “ W hat g o od w ou ld t h at d o?” s c o ff ed o n e s tu den t i n d is g u st. “ W e alr e a d y w en t to h im to te ll h im w hat w e wan te d . H is a n sw er to u s w as, ‘G et o u t o f h ere ! I d on’t n eed y o u p eo p le t e lli n g m e w hat t o d o!’” I ask ed th e stu den ts w hat th ey h ad re q u es te d o f th e prin cip al.  ey re ca lle d s a y in g to h im th at th ey d id n’t w an t h im te lli n g th em h ow to w ear th eir h air . I su ggeste d th at th ey m ig h t h av e re ce iv ed a m ore co op er ativ e re sp on se i f t h ey h ad e x p re ss e d w hat t h ey d id , r a th er t h an w hat t h ey d id n ot, w an t.  ey h ad t h en in fo rm ed t h e prin cip al t h at t h ey w an te d to b e tr e ate d w it h fa ir n ess , a t w hic h h e h ad b eco m e d ef en siv e, v o cif er ou sly d en yin g e v er h av in g been u n fa ir . I ven tu re d to gu ess th at th e prin cip al w ou ld h av e re sp on ded m ore f a v o ra b ly if t h ey h ad a sk ed fo r s p eci c a ctio n s r a th er t h an v ag u e b eh av io r l i k e “ fa ir t r e atm en t.” W ork in g to geth er, w e fo u n d w ay s to ex pres s th ei r re q u es ts in p osit iv e actio n l a n gu ag e. A t t h e e n d o f t h e m eet in g, t h e stu den ts h ad c la ri ed t h ir ty – eig h t a ctio n s t h ey w an te d t h e p rin cip al to t a k e, in clu din g “ W e’d li k e yo u to a g re e to b la ck s tu den t r e p re se n ta tio n o n d ecis io n s m ad e a b ou t d res s c o d e,” a n d “ W e’d l i k e y o u t o r e fe r t o u s a s ‘b la ck s tu den ts ’ a n d n ot ‘y o u p eo p le .’ ”  e fo llo w in g d ay, th e stu den ts p re sen te d th ei r re q u es ts to th e prin cip al u sin g th e p osit iv e a ctio n la n gu ag e w e had p ra ctic e d ; th at e v en in g I re cei ved a n ela te d p h on e c a ll fr o m th em : th ei r p rin cip al h ad a g re ed to a ll th ir ty -ei gh t re q u ests ! In a d dit io n t o u sin g p osit iv e l a n gu ag e, w e als o w an t t o w ord o u r r e q u es ts in th e fo rm o f co n cre te actio n s th at o th er s ca n u n der ta k e an d to av o id v ag u e, a b str a ct, o r a m big u ou s p h ra sin g. A c a rto on d ep ic ts a m an w ho h as fa lle n in to a la k e. A s h e s tr u gg les to s w im , h e sh ou ts to h is d og o n s h ore , “L ass ie , g et h elp !” In th e n ex t fr a m e, th e dog is ly in g o n a p sy ch ia tr is t’s c o u ch . W e a ll k n ow h ow o p in io n s v ary a s to w hat c o n stit u tes “ h elp ”: s o m e mem bers o f m y fa m ily , w hen a sk ed to h elp w it h th e dis h es , th in k “ h elp ” m ean s s u p erv is io n . A co u ple in dis tr e ss att e n din g a w ork sh op pro vid es an ad dit io n al illu str a tio n o f h ow n on sp eci c la n gu ag e ca n h am per u n der sta n din g an d co m mun ic atio n . “ I w an t y o u to let m e be m e,” th e wom an d ecla re d to h er hu sb an d. “ I d o!” h e r e to rte d . “ N o, y o u d on’t !” s h e in sis te d . A sk ed t o ex pres s hers e lf in p osit iv e a ctio n la n gu ag e, th e wom an r ep li e d , “ I w an t y o u to g iv e m e t h e f r e ed om t o g ro w a n d b e m yse lf .” S u ch a s ta te m en t, h ow ev er , i s j u st a s v ag u e a n d l i k ely t o p ro vo ke a d efen siv e res pon se . S h e str u gg le d t o f o rm ula te h er r e q u est c le arly , a n d t h en a d m it t e d , “ It’s k in d o f a w kw ard , b u t i f I w er e to b e p re cis e , I g u ess w hat I w an t i s f o r y o u t o s m ile a n d s a y t h at a n yth in g I d o is o kay.” O en , t h e u se o f v ag u e a n d a b str a ct la n gu ag e c a n m ask o p pres siv e in te rp ers o n al g am es. M ak in g re q u ests in cle a r, pos it iv e, co n cre te actio n la n gu ag e r e v ea ls w hat w e r e a lly w an t. A s im ila r la ck o f c la rit y o cc u rre d b et ween a fa th er a n d h is  een -y ear- o ld so n w hen th ey c a m e in fo r c o u n se li n g. “A ll I w an t is fo r y o u to sta rt sh ow in g a l i t t le r e sp on sib ili t y ,” c la im ed t h e fa th er . “ Is t h at a sk in g t o o m uch ?” I s u ggeste d t h at h e s p ecif y w hat i t w ou ld t a k e fo r h is s o n t o d em on str a te th e re sp on sib ili t y h e w as se ek in g. A er a d is c u ss io n on h ow to cla rif y h is r e q u est, t h e f a th er r e sp on ded s h eep is h ly , “ W ell, i t d oes n’t s o u n d s o g o od , b u t w hen I s a y t h at I w an t r e sp on sib ili t y , w hat I r e a lly m ean i s t h at I w an t h im t o d o w hat I a sk , w it h ou t q u estio n — to ju m p w hen I s a y ju m p, a n d to s m ile w hile d oin g it .” H e th en a g re ed w it h m e th at if h is so n w ere to a ctu ally b eh av e t h is w ay, i t w ou ld d em on str a te o b ed ien ce r a th er t h an r es pon sib ili t y . L ik e th is fa th er, w e o  en u se v ag u e an d a b str a ct la n gu ag e to in dic ate h ow w e w an t o th er p eo p le to fe el o r b e wit h ou t n am in g a c o n cret e actio n th ey co u ld ta k e to re a ch th at sta te . F or ex am ple , an em plo yer m ak es a gen u in e e ff ort to in vit e fe ed back , te lli n g th e em plo yees, “ I w an t y o u to fe el fr e e to ex p re ss yo u rs e lf aro u n d m e.”  e sta te m en t co m mun ic ates th e em plo yer’s d esir e f o r t h e e m plo yees t o “ fe el f r e e,” b u t n ot w hat t h ey c o u ld d o in o rd er to fe el th is w ay. In ste a d , th e em plo yer c o u ld u se p osit iv e a ctio n la n gu ag e t o m ak e a r e q u est: “ I’d li k e yo u t o te ll m e w hat I m ig h t d o t o m ak e it e a sie r f o r y o u t o f e el f r e e t o e x p res s y o u rs e lv es a ro u n d m e.” V ag u e l a n gu ag e c o n tr ib u te s t o i n te rn al c o n fu sio n . D ep re ssio n i s t h e r e w ard w e g et f o r b ein g “ g o od .” A s a n al illu str a tio n o f h ow th e use of v ag u e la n gu ag e c o n tr ib u tes to in te rn al c o n fu sio n , I w ou ld li k e to p res en t th e co n ver sa tio n th at I w ou ld i n varia b ly h av e d u rin g m y p ra ctic e a s a c li n ic a l p sy ch olo gis t w it h t h e m an y cli e n ts w ho c a m e to m e w it h c o m pla in ts o f d ep res sio n . A er I em path iz e d w it h th e d ep th o f fe eli n g th at a c li en t h ad ju st ex pres se d , o u r ex ch an ges w ou ld t y p ic a lly p ro ce ed i n t h e f o llo w in g m an ner : M BR : W hat a re y o u w an tin g t h at y o u a re not r e ce iv in g? C li e n t: I d on’t k n ow w hat I w an t. M BR : I g u ess e d t h at y o u w ou ld s a y t h at. C li e n t: W hy? M BR : M y th eo ry is th at w e g et d ep re ss e d b ecau se we’r e not g ett in g w hat w e w an t, a n d w e’r e n ot g ett in g w hat w e wan t b ecau se we hav e nev er b een ta u gh t to g et w hat w e w an t. In ste a d , w e’v e been ta u gh t to b e go od li t t le b oys a n d g ir ls a n d g o od m oth er s a n d fa th er s. If w e’r e g o in g to b e o n e o f th ose go od th in gs, b et ter get u se d to b ei ng dep re ss e d . D ep re ss io n is t h e r e w ard w e get fo r b ei ng “ g o o d .” B ut, if y o u w an t to fe el b ett e r, I’d li k e y o u to c la rif y w hat y o u w ou ld li k e p eo p le t o d o t o m ak e l i f e m ore w on derfu l f o r y o u . C li e n t: I j u st w an t s o m eo n e t o l o ve m e.  at’s h ard ly u n re a so n ab le , i s i t ? M BR : It’s a g o od sta rt. N ow I’d li k e y o u to c la rif y w hat y o u w ou ld li k e peo p le to d o t h at w ou ld fu l ll y o u r n eed to b e lo ved . F or ex am ple , w hat c o u ld I d o r ig h t n ow ? Cli e n t: O h, y o u k n ow … M BR : I’m n ot s u re I d o. I ’d li k e y o u t o t e ll m e what y o u w ou ld li k e m e, o r o th ers , t o d o t o g iv e y o u t h e l o ve y o u ’r e lo okin g f o r. C li e n t:  at’s h ard . M BR : Yes, it c a n b e d iffi cu lt t o m ak e c le ar r e q u es ts . B ut t h in k h ow h ard it w ill b e fo r o th ers to r e sp on d to o u r r e q u es t if w e’r e not e v en c le ar w hat i t i s ! C li e n t: I ’m s ta rtin g to g et c le ar w hat I w an t fr o m o th er s to fu l ll m y n eed fo r l o ve, b u t i t ’s e m barra ss in g. M BR : Yes, v ery o  en it is e m barra ss in g. S o w hat w ou ld y o u li k e f o r m e or o th ers t o d o? C li e n t: I f I r e a lly r e ec t u p on w hat I ’m r e q u es tin g w hen I a sk t o b e lo ved , I s u pp ose I w an t y o u t o g u ess w hat I w an t b ef ore I’m e v en a w are of i t . A nd t h en I w an t y o u t o a lw ay s d o i t . M BR : I’m g ra te fu l fo r y o u r c la rit y . I h op e yo u c a n se e how y o u a re not li k ely to n d so m eo n e w ho c a n fu l ll y o u r n eed fo r lo ve if th at’s w hat i t t a k es. V ery o  en , m y c li e n ts w ere a b le t o s e e how t h e la ck o f a w aren ess o f w hat th ey w an te d fr o m o th ers h ad c o n tr ib u te d s ig n i ca n tly to th ei r fr u str a tio n s an d d ep re ss io n . Mak in g R eq u ests C on sc io u sly S o m etim es w e m ay b e a b le t o c o m mun ic ate a c le ar r e q u es t w it h ou t p u tt in g it in w ord s. S u pp ose y o u ’r e in th e kit c h en a n d y o u r s is ter , w ho is w atc h in g te le v is io n in th e li v in g r o om , c a lls o u t, “ I’m th ir sty .” I n th is c a se , it m ay b e obvio u s th at sh e is re q u estin g y o u to b rin g h er a g la ss o f w ater fr o m th e kit c h en . H ow ev er, in oth er in sta n ce s, w e m ay ex pres s ou r dis c o m fo rt an d in co rre c tly a ssu m e t h at t h e li s te n er h as u n der sto od t h e un derly in g r e q u es t. F or e x am ple , a w om an m ig h t s a y to h er h u sb an d, “ I’m a n noyed y o u fo rg o t th e b u tt e r a n d o n io n s I a sk ed y o u to p ic k u p fo r d in ner .” W hile it m ay b e obvio u s to h er th at s h e is a sk in g h im to g o b ack to th e sto re , th e hu sb an d m ay t h in k t h at h er w ord s w ere u tt er ed s o le ly t o m ak e him f e el g u ilt y . W hen w e s im ply e x p re ss o u r f e eli n gs, i t m ay n ot b e c le a r to t h e l i s te n er w hat w e w an t t h em t o d o. Even m ore o  en , w e a re s im ply n ot c o n sc io u s o f w hat w e are re q u es tin g w hen w e sp ea k . W e ta lk to o th ers o r a t th em w it h ou t k n ow in g h ow to e n gag e in a d ia lo gu e w it h th em . W e to ss o u t w ord s, u sin g th e pres en ce o f o th ers a s a w aste b ask et. I n s u ch s it u atio n s, th e li s ten er, u n ab le to d is c er n a c le ar re q u est in th e sp ea k er’s w ord s, m ay ex per ien ce th e kin d o f d is tr es s illu str a te d i n t h e f o llo w in g a n ecd ote . W e a re o  en n ot c o n sc io u s o f w hat w e a re r e q u estin g. I w as s e ate d d ir e c tly a cro ss t h e a is le fr o m a c o u ple on a m in i- tr a in t h at c a rrie s p ass e n gers to th eir re sp ec tiv e ter m in als at th e Dalla s/F ort W orth I n te rn atio n al A ir p ort. F or p ass e n gers in a h u rr y t o c atc h a p la n e, t h e sn ail’s p ace o f t h e t r a in m ay w ell b e i r r it a tin g.  e m an t u rn ed t o h is w if e an d s a id w it h in te n sit y , “ I h av e n ev er s e en a t r a in g o s o s lo w in a ll m y li f e .” S h e sa id n oth in g, ap p earin g te n se an d u n ea sy as to w hat res pon se he mig h t b e ex p ec tin g f r o m h er. H e t h en d id w hat m an y o f u s d o w hen w e’r e not g et tin g th e r e sp on se w e w an t: h e r e p eate d h im se lf . I n a m ark ed ly s tr o n ger v o ic e, h e ex cla im ed , “ I h av e n ev er s e en a t r a in g o s o s lo w i n a ll m y l i f e! ”  e w if e , at a lo ss fo r re sp on se , lo oked ev en m ore dis tr es se d . In d esp era tio n , sh e tu rn ed to h im a n d sa id , “  ey ’r e ele ctr o n ic a lly tim ed .” I d id n’t th in k th is p ie ce o f in fo rm atio n w ou ld s a tis fy h im , a n d in deed it d id n ot, fo r h e re p eate d h im se lf a th ir d tim e— ev en m ore lo u d ly , “ I H AV E N EV ER SE EN A T R A IN G O SO SL O W IN A LL M Y L IF E ! ”  e w if e ’s p atie n ce w as c le arly e x h au ste d a s s h e sn ap p ed b ack a n grily , “ W ell, w hat d o yo u w an t m e t o d o a b ou t i t ? G et o u t a n d p u sh ?” N ow t h er e were tw o p eo p le i n p ain ! W hat r e sp on se w as th e m an w an tin g? I b eli e v e he wan te d to h ear th at h is p ain w as u n dersto od . If h is w if e had kn ow n th is , sh e mig h t h av e re sp on ded , “It so u n ds li k e yo u ’r e sc a re d w e mig h t m is s o u r p la n e, an d dis g u ste d b ecau se y o u ’d l i k e a f a ster t r a in r u n nin g b et ween t h es e ter m in als .” R eq u ests may so u n d li k e dem an ds when u n acco m pan ie d b y t h e s p ea k er’s f e eli n gs a n d n eed s. In t h e a b ove e x ch an ge, t h e w if e h eard t h e hu sb an d’s f r u str a tio n b u t w as clu ele ss a s to w hat h e w as a sk in g fo r. E qu ally p ro blem atic is th e re v er se sit u atio n — when p eo p le s ta te t h eir r e q u es ts w it h ou t rst c o m mun ic atin g t h e fe eli n gs a n d n eed s b eh in d th em .  is is es pecia lly tr u e w hen th e re q u es t ta k es th e fo rm o f a q u estio n . “ W hy d on’t y o u g o a n d g et a h air c u t? ” c a n e a sily b e h eard b y yo u n gste rs as a d em an d o r an att a ck u n les s p aren ts r e m em ber to rst r e v ea l th eir o w n fe eli n gs a n d n eed s: “ W e’r e worrie d th at y o u r h air is g ett in g s o lo n g it m ig h t k eep y o u f r o m s e ei ng t h in gs, es pecia lly w hen y o u ’r e o n y o u r b ik e. H ow a b ou t a h air c u t? ” It i s m ore c o m mon , h ow ev er, f o r p eo p le to t a lk w it h ou t b ei ng c o n sc io u s of w hat th ey are ask in g fo r. “I’m n ot re q u es tin g an yth in g,” th ey m ig h t re m ark . “ I j u st f e lt l i k e s a y in g w hat I s a id .” M y b eli ef i s t h at, w hen ev er w e sa y so m eth in g t o a n oth er p ers o n , w e a re re q u es tin g s o m eth in g i n r et urn . I t m ay sim ply b e a n e m path ic c o n nec tio n — a v er bal o r n on ver bal a ck n ow le d gm en t, a s w it h t h e m an o n t h e t r a in , t h at o u r w ord s h av e been u n der sto od . O r w e m ay b e r e q u estin g h on esty : w e w is h t o k n ow t h e li s ten er’s h on est r e a ctio n t o o u r w ord s. O r w e m ay b e r e q u estin g a n a ctio n t h at w e h op e w ou ld f u l ll o u r need s.  e c le are r w e a re o n w hat w e wan t b ack f r o m t h e oth er p er so n , t h e m ore l i k ely i t i s t h at o u r n eed s w ill b e m et.  e c le a re r w e a re a b ou t w hat w e w an t, t h e m ore l i k ely i t i s t h at w e’l l g et i t . Ask in g f o r a R efl ectio n A s w e k n ow , t h e m ess a g e w e s e n d is n ot a lw ay s t h e m essa g e th at’s r e cei ved . W e g en era lly re ly o n v erb al c u es to d eter m in e whet her o u r m essa g e has b een u n dersto od to o u r s a tis fa ctio n . I f, h ow ev er , w e’r e un cer ta in t h at it h as b een r e ce iv ed a s in te n ded , w e n eed to b e ab le to c le arly r e q u es t a r es pon se th at te lls u s h ow th e m ess a g e w as h eard so a s to b e ab le to c o rre ct a n y m is u n dersta n din g. O n so m e occ a sio n s, a sim ple qu es tio n li k e, “Is th at cle ar? ” w ill s u ffi ce. A t o th er tim es, w e need m ore th an “ Y es, I u n der sto od yo u ,” to fe el c o n den t th at w e’v e b een tr u ly u n der sto od . A t s u ch tim es, w e m ig h t a sk o th ers t o r e ec t b ack in t h ei r o w n w ord s w hat t h ey h eard u s s a y. W e t h en h av e t h e o p p ortu n it y t o r es ta te p arts o f o u r m ess a g e to a d dres s a n y d is c re p an cy o r o m is s io n w e m ig h t h av e notic e d i n t h ei r r e ectio n . T o m ak e s u re t h e m ess a g e w e s e n t is t h e m ess a g e t h at’s r e ce iv ed , a sk t h e l i s te n er t o r e fl ect i t b ack . For ex am ple , a te a ch er ap pro ach es a stu den t an d sa y s, “P et er , I go t co n ce rn ed w hen I c h eck ed m y r e co rd b o ok y es ter day. I w an t to m ak e su re y o u ’r e a w are o f t h e h om ew ork I ’m m is s in g fr o m y o u . W ill y o u d ro p b y m y offi ce a  er s c h ool? ” P ete r m um bles , “O kay, I k n ow ,” a n d th en tu rn s a w ay, le av in g th e te a ch er u n ea sy a s to w het her h er m ess a g e had b een a cc u ra te ly r e ce iv ed . S h e a sk s fo r a r e ec tio n — “C ou ld y o u te ll m e what y o u ju st h eard m e s a y ?” — to w hic h P ete r r e p li e s, “ Y ou s a id I g o tt a m is s s o ccer t o s ta y a  er sc h ool b ecau se y o u d id n’t li k e m y h om ew ork .” C on rm ed in h er s u sp ic io n th at P ete r h ad n ot h eard h er i n te n ded m essa g e, t h e te a ch er t r ies t o r es ta te it , b u t rst s h e i s c a re fu l o f h er n ex t r em ark . A n ass e rtio n li k e “Y ou d id n’t h ear m e,” “ at’s n ot w hat I sa id ,” o r “Y ou ’r e m is u n dersta n din g m e,” m ay ea sily le a d P et er to th in k th at h e is b ein g ch astis e d . Sin ce th e te a ch er per ce iv es Pet er as hav in g sin cer ely r e sp on ded t o h er r e q u est f o r a r e ectio n , s h e m ig h t s a y, “ I’m g ra tef ul t o y o u fo r t e lli n g m e w hat y o u h eard . I c a n s e e th at I d id n’t m ak e m yse lf a s c le ar a s I’d h av e l i k ed , s o l e t m e t r y a g ain .” Exp re ss a p pre cia tio n w hen y o u r li s te n er tr ie s to meet y o u r r e q u est f o r a r e fl ectio n . W hen w e rst b eg in a sk in g o th ers t o r e ect b ack w hat t h ey h ear u s s a y, it m ay fe el aw kw ard a n d str a n ge b ecau se su ch re q u es ts a re ra re ly m ad e. W hen I em ph asiz e th e im porta n ce o f o u r ab ili t y to ask fo r re ectio n s, p eo p le o  en ex p re ss re se rv atio n s.  ey are worrie d ab ou t re a ctio n s li k e, “W hat d o yo u th in k I am — deaf? ” o r, “Q uit p la y in g yo u r p sy ch olo gic a l g am es.” T o p re v en t s u ch r e sp on ses , w e ca n ex pla in to p eo p le ah ea d o f t im e why w e m ay s o m etim es a sk t h em t o r e ect b ack o u r w ord s. W e m ak e cle ar th at w e’r e n ot te stin g th eir li s te n in g sk ills , b u t c h eck in g o u t w heth er w e’v e ex p re ss e d o u rs e lv es cle arly . H ow ev er , sh ou ld th e li s te n er ret ort, “I h eard w hat y o u s a id ; I ’m n ot s tu pid !” w e hav e th e op tio n t o f o cu s o n t h e li s ten er’s f e eli n gs a n d n eed s a n d a sk — eit h er a lo u d o r s ilen tly — “A re yo u s a y in g y o u ’r e fe eli n g a n noyed b ecau se y o u w an t res pect fo r y o u r a b ili t y to u n der sta n d th in gs? ” E m path iz e w it h t h e li s te n er w ho doesn ’t w an t t o r e fl ect b ack . Req u estin g H on esty A er w e’v e o p en ly e x p re ss e d o u rs e lv es a n d r e ce iv ed th e un der sta n din g w e w an t, w e’r e o  en e a g er to k n ow th e oth er p er so n’s re a ctio n to w hat w e’v e sa id . U su ally th e h on esty w e w ou ld li k e to re ce iv e ta k es on e of th re e d ir e c tio n s: S o m etim es w e’d li k e to k n ow th e fe eli n gs th at a re stim ula te d b y w hat w e s a id , a n d th e r e a so n s fo r th ose fe eli n gs. W e m ig h t r e q u es t th is b y ask in g, “ I w ou ld li k e y o u t o t e ll m e h ow y o u f e el a b ou t w hat I ju st s a id , an d y o u r r e a so n s f o r f e eli n g a s y o u d o.” A er w e e x p re ss o u rse lv es v u ln era b ly , w e o  en w an t t o k n ow ( 1 ) w hat t h e l i s te n er i s f e eli n g; So m etim es w e’d l i k e t o k n ow s o m ethin g a b ou t o u r l i s ten er’s t h ou gh ts i n r e sp on se t o w hat t h ey j u st h eard u s s a y. A t t h es e tim es, i t ’s i m porta n t t o s p ecif y w hic h t h ou gh ts w e’d li k e th em t o s h are . F or ex am ple , w e m ig h t sa y, “ I’d li k e y o u to te ll m e if y o u p re d ic t th at m y p ro p osa l w ou ld b e su cce ss fu l, an d if n ot, w hat yo u b eli e v e wou ld p re v en t it s su cces s,” r a th er t h an s im ply s a y in g, “ I’d li k e yo u t o t e ll m e w hat y o u t h in k a b ou t w hat I ’v e s a id .” W hen w e d on’t s p ecif y w hic h t h ou gh ts w e w ou ld l i k e to r e ce iv e, th e o th er p ers o n m ay re sp on d a t g re at len gth w it h th ou gh ts t h at a re n ’t t h e o n es w e a re s e ek in g. (2 ) w hat t h e l i s te n er i s t h in kin g; o r So m etim es w e’d li k e to k n ow w het her th e per so n is w illi n g to ta k e ce rta in a ctio n s t h at w e’v e r e co m men ded . S u ch a r e q u es t m ay s o u n d l i k e th is : “ I’d li k e y o u to te ll m e if y o u w ou ld b e willi n g to p ostp on e ou r m eetin g f o r o n e w eek .” ( 3 ) w heth er th e li s te n er w ou ld b e w illi n g to ta k e a p artic u la r a ctio n . e u se o f N VC re q u ir e s th at w e be co n sc io u s o f th e sp eci c fo rm o f h on esty w e w ou ld li k e to r e ce iv e, a n d to m ak e th at r e q u es t fo r h on es ty in c o n cre te l a n gu ag e. Mak in g R eq u ests o f a G ro u p It is e sp ecia lly im porta n t w hen w e a re ad dres sin g a g ro u p t o b e cle ar a b ou t th e k in d o f u n dersta n din g o r h on esty w e w an t b ack a  er w e’v e ex pres se d o u rs e lv es. W hen w e are n ot cle ar ab ou t th e res pon se we’d li k e, w e may in it ia te u npro du ctiv e c o n vers a tio n s t h at en d u p s a tis fy in g n o o n e’s n eed s. I’v e b een in vit e d fr o m tim e to tim e to w ork w it h g ro u p s o f cit iz en s co n ce rn ed a b ou t ra cis m in th ei r co m mun it ies . O ne is su e th at fr e q u en tly a ris e s a m on g th ese g ro u p s is th at th ei r m eetin gs a re te d io u s a n d fr u it les s.  is la ck of p ro du ctiv it y is very co stly fo r gro u p m em ber s, w ho o en ex p en d li m it e d re so u rc e s to a rra n ge fo r tr a n sp orta tio n a n d ch ild c a re in o rd er to att e n d m eetin gs. F ru str a te d b y p ro lo n ged d is c u ss io n s th at y ie ld li t t le d ir e c tio n , m an y m em bers q u it t h e gro u p s, d ecla rin g m eetin gs a w aste o f t im e. F u rth erm ore , t h e i n stit u tio n al c h an ges t h ey a re str iv in g t o m ak e are n ot u su ally o n es th at o cc u r q u ic k ly o r e a sily . F or a ll th es e re a so n s, w hen su ch g ro u p s d o m eet, it ’s im porta n t th at th ey m ak e go o d u se of th ei r tim e to geth er. I k n ew m em bers o f o n e su ch g ro u p th at h ad b een o rg an iz e d to eff ect ch an ge i n t h e l o ca l s c h ool s y ste m . I t w as t h ei r b eli ef t h at v ario u s e lem ents i n t h e sc h ool sy ste m d is c rim in ate d ag ain st stu den ts on th e basis of ra ce. B ecau se th eir m eetin gs w ere unpro du ctiv e an d th e gro u p w as lo sin g m em bers , t h ey i n vit e d m e t o o b ser ve th ei r d is c u ss io n s. I s u gges te d t h at t h ey co n du ct t h eir m eetin g a s u su al, a n d t h at I w ou ld let t h em k n ow i f I s a w a n y w ay s N VC m ig h t h elp . O ne m an b eg an t h e m eetin g b y c a lli n g t h e gro u p’s a tt en tio n to a r e cen t new sp ap er a rtic le in w hic h a m in orit y m oth er h ad ra is e d co m pla in ts a n d co n ce rn s re g ard in g th e p rin cip al’s tr e atm en t o f h er d au gh ter . A w om an re sp on ded b y s h arin g a s it u atio n th at h ad o cc u rre d to h er w hen s h e was a s tu den t a t t h e s a m e s c h ool. O ne b y o n e, e a ch m em ber t h en r e la te d a s im ila r p ers o n al e x p erie n ce. A er tw en ty m in utes I a sk ed th e gro u p if th ei r n eed s w ere b ein g m et b y t h e c u rre n t d is c u ss io n . N ot o n e p er so n s a id y es . “  is is w hat h ap p en s a ll t h e t im e i n t h ese m eet in gs!” h u ff ed o n e m an , “ I h av e bet ter t h in gs t o d o w it h m y t im e t h an s it a ro u n d l i s ten in g t o t h e sa m e old b u lls h it .” I t h en a d dre ss e d t h e m an w ho h ad i n it ia te d t h e dis c u ss io n : “ C an y o u t e ll m e, w hen y o u b ro u gh t u p th e n ew sp ap er a rtic le , w hat res pon se yo u w er e wan tin g f r o m t h e g ro u p ?” “I th ou gh t it w as in te re stin g,” h e r ep li e d . I ex pla in ed th at I w as a sk in g w hat r e sp on se h e w an te d f r o m t h e gro u p, r a th er t h an w hat h e th ou gh t a b ou t th e a rtic le . H e p on dere d a w hile a n d th en c o n ce d ed , “ I’m n ot su re what I w an te d .” A nd th at’s w hy, I b eli e v e, tw en ty m in utes o f th e gro u p’s v alu ab le tim e had b een sq u an dere d o n fr u it le ss d is c o u rs e . W hen w e ad dres s a gro u p w it h ou t b ein g c le ar w hat w e a re w an tin g b ack , u npro du ctiv e dis c u ss io n s w ill o  en fo llo w . H ow ev er, if e v en o n e m em ber o f a g ro u p is c o n sc io u s o f th e im porta n ce o f c le arly r e q u estin g t h e res pon se th at is d esir e d , h e or s h e ca n ex te n d th is c o n sc io u sn ess to th e gro u p. F or ex am ple , w hen th is p artic u la r sp ea k er d id n’t d e n e w hat re sp on se he wan te d , a m em ber o f th e gro u p m ig h t h av e s a id , “ I’m c o n fu se d a b ou t h ow y o u ’d li k e us to r es pon d to y o u r sto ry. W ou ld y o u b e w illi n g t o s a y w hat r es pon se yo u ’d li k e fr o m u s? ” S u ch in te rv en tio n s c a n p re v en t t h e w aste of p re cio u s g ro u p t im e. In a g ro u p, m uch tim e is w aste d w hen s p ea k ers a re n ’t c e rta in w hat r e sp on se t h ey ’r e w an tin g. C on vers a tio n s o  en d ra g o n a n d o n , f u l lli n g n o o n e’s n eed s, b ecau se it i s u n cle ar w heth er t h e i n it ia to r o f t h e co n ver sa tio n h as g o tt en w hat s h e or h e w an te d . In In dia , w hen p eo p le hav e re ce iv ed th e res pon se th ey w an t in c o n vers a tio n s th ey h av e in it ia te d , th ey s a y “ b as” (p ro n ou n ce d “ b u s” ).  is m ean s, “ Y ou n eed n ot s a y m ore . I fe el s a tis ed a n d a m n ow r e a d y to m ove o n t o s o m eth in g e ls e .”  ou gh w e l a ck s u ch a w ord i n o u r o w n l a n gu ag e, w e ca n b en e t fr o m d ev elo p in g a n d p ro m otin g “ b as-c o n sc io u sn ess” in a ll o u r in te ra ctio n s. Req u ests v ersu s D em an ds O ur re q u ests are re ce iv ed as d em an ds w hen o th er s b eli e v e th ey w ill b e bla m ed o r p u n is h ed if th ey d o n ot c o m ply . W hen p eo p le hear a d em an d, th ey s e e o n ly tw o o p tio n s: s u bm is s io n o r r e b elli o n . E it h er w ay, th e per so n re q u estin g is p erc e iv ed a s c o erc iv e, a n d th e li s ten er’s c ap acit y to res pon d co m pass io n ate ly t o t h e r e q u est i s d im in is h ed . W hen th e o th er p erso n h ea rs a d em an d fr o m u s, th ey se e t w o o p tio n s: t o s u bm it o r t o r e b el.  e m ore w e h av e in t h e p ast b la m ed , p u n is h ed , o r “ la id g u ilt t r ip s” o n o th ers w hen th ey hav en ’t re sp on ded to ou r re q u es ts , th e hig h er th e li k eli h ood t h at o u r r e q u ests w ill n ow b e heard a s d em an ds. W e a ls o p ay f o r o th ers’ u se o f s u ch t a ctic s. T o t h e deg re e th at p eo p le in o u r li v es h av e been b la m ed , p u n is h ed , o r u rg ed to fe el g u ilt y fo r n ot d oin g w hat o th er s h av e re q u este d , t h e m ore l i k ely t h ey a re to c a rr y t h is b ag gag e to e v er y s u bse q u en t re la tio n sh ip a n d h ear a d em an d i n a n y r e q u es t. T o te ll if it ’s a d em an d o r a r e q u est, o b se r v e w hat th e sp ea k er d oes i f t h e r e q u est i s n ot c o m pli e d w it h . Let’s lo ok a t tw o v aria tio n s o f a s it u atio n . Ja ck s a y s to h is fr ien d Ja n e, “I’m lo n ely a n d w ou ld li k e y o u to sp en d th e ev en in g w it h m e.” Is th at a re q u est o r a d em an d?  e a n sw er is th at w e d on’t k n ow u ntil w e ob ser ve h ow Ja ck tr e ats Ja n e if sh e d oes n’t c o m ply . S u pp ose sh e rep li es , “ Ja ck , I’m r e a lly t ir e d . I f y o u ’d li k e s o m e c o m pan y, h ow a b ou t n din g s o m eo n e els e to b e w it h y o u t h is e v en in g?” I f J a ck t h en r em ark s, “ H ow t y p ic a l o f y o u t o b e so se l sh !” h is r e q u est w as in fa ct a d em an d. I n ste a d o f em path iz in g w it h h er n eed t o r e st, h e h as b la m ed h er. I t’s a d em an d i f t h e s p ea k er t h en c rit ic iz es o r j u dges. Con sid er a s e co n d s c e n ario : Ja ck : I’m l o n ely a n d w ou ld l i k e y o u t o s p en d t h e ev en in g w it h m e. Ja n e: Ja ck , I ’m r e a lly tir e d . If y o u ’d li k e so m e c o m pan y, h ow a b ou t n din g so m eo n e e ls e t o b e w it h y o u t o n ig h t? Ja ck : (tu rn s a w ay w ord le ssly ) Ja n e: (s e n sin g h e is u pse t) I s s o m eth in g b oth erin g y o u ? Ja ck : N o. Ja n e: C om e o n , J a ck , I c a n s e n se s o m ethin g’s g o in g o n . W hat’s t h e m att er ? Ja ck : Y ou k n ow h ow lo n ely I ’m fe eli n g. I f y o u r e a lly lo ved m e, y o u ’d s p en d th e e v en in g w it h m e. A gain , in ste a d o f e m path iz in g, Ja ck n ow in ter pret s Ja n e’s res pon se to m ean t h at s h e d oesn ’t lo ve h im a n d t h at s h e has r ej ecte d h im .  e m ore we in te rp re t n on co m pli a n ce a s re je ctio n , th e m ore li k ely o u r re q u es ts w ill b e h eard as d em an ds.  is le a d s to a se lf – fu l lli n g p ro p h ec y, fo r th e more p eo p le h ear d em an ds, t h e l e ss t h ey en jo y b ei ng a ro u n d u s. I t’s a d em an d i f t h e s p ea k er t h en l a y s a g u ilt t r ip . O n th e o th er h an d, w e w ou ld k n ow th at Ja ck ’s re q u es t h ad b een a gen u in e re q u est, n ot a d em an d, if h is res pon se to Ja n e had ex pres se d a re sp ec tfu l re co gn it io n o f h er fe eli n gs an d n eed s. F or ex am ple: “S o, Ja n e, y o u ’r e f e eli n g w orn o u t a n d n eed in g s o m e r es t t h is e v en in g?” W e ca n h elp o th ers tr u st th at w e are re q u es tin g, n ot d em an din g, b y in dic atin g th at w e w ou ld o n ly w an t th em to co m ply if th ey ca n d o so w illi n gly .  us w e m ig h t a sk , “ W ou ld y o u b e w illi n g t o s et t h e ta b le? ” r a th er th an “ I w ou ld li k e y o u t o s e t t h e ta b le .” H ow ev er , t h e m ost p ow er fu l w ay t o c o m mun ic ate th at w e a re m ak in g a g en uin e re q u es t is to em path iz e wit h p eo p le w hen t h ey d on’t a g re e t o t h e re q u es t. I t’s a r e q u est i f t h e s p ea k er t h en s h ow s e m path y t o w ard th e o th er p erso n’s n eed s. We de mon str a te t h at w e a re m ak in g a r e q u es t r a th er t h an a d em an d b y h ow w e r e sp on d w hen o th ers d on’t c o m ply . If w e a re prep are d to s h ow a n em path ic u n dersta n din g o f w hat p re v en ts s o m eo n e f r o m d oin g a s w e ask ed , th en b y m y d e n it io n , w e h av e m ad e a r e q u es t, n ot a d em an d. C hoosin g t o r e q u est r a th er t h an d em an d d oes n ot m ean w e g iv e up w hen s o m eo n e sa y s n o t o o u r r e q u est. I t d oes m ean t h at w e don’t en gag e in p er su asio n u ntil w e hav e e m path iz e d w it h w hat’s p re v en tin g t h e oth er p er so n f r o m s a y in g y es . Defi nin g O ur O bje ctiv e W hen M ak in g R eq u ests E xp re ss in g g en u in e r e q u ests a ls o r e q u ir es a n a w aren ess o f o u r o bje ctiv e. If o u r o bje c tiv e is o n ly t o c h an ge p eo p le an d t h ei r b eh av io r o r t o g et o u r w ay, th en N VC i s n ot a n a p pro p ria te t o ol.  e pro ce ss i s d es ig n ed f o r t h ose of u s w ho w ou ld li k e o th ers t o c h an ge a n d r es pon d, b u t o n ly if t h ey c h oose to d o so w illi n gly a n d co m pass io n ate ly .  e obje ctiv e of N VC is to es ta b li s h a re la tio n sh ip b ase d o n h on esty an d em path y. W hen o th er s tr u st th at o u r prim ary c o m mit m en t i s t o t h e q u ali t y o f t h e re la tio n sh ip , a n d t h at w e ex pect th is p ro ce ss t o f u l ll e v ery o n e’s n eed s, t h en t h ey c a n t r u st t h at o u r r e q u es ts a re t r u e r e q u ests a n d n ot c a m ou ag ed d em an ds. O ur o b je ctiv e is a re la tio ns hip b ase d o n h on esty a n d em path y. A c o n sc io u sn ess o f th is o bje c tiv e is d iffi cu lt to m ain ta in , es pecia lly fo r p are n ts , te a ch ers , m an ag ers , an d oth er s w hose work ce n ter s aro u n d in u en cin g p eo p le a n d o bta in in g b eh av io ra l res ult s . A m oth er w ho o n ce re tu rn ed to a w ork sh op a  er a lu n ch b re a k a n nou n ce d , “ M arsh all, I w en t hom e a n d t r ie d i t . I t d id n’t w ork .” I a sk ed h er t o d es crib e w hat s h e’d d on e. “I w en t hom e an d ex p re ss e d m y fe eli n gs an d need s, ju st as w e’d p ra ctic e d . I m ad e n o c rit ic is m , n o j u dgm en ts o f m y s o n . I s im ply s a id , ‘L ook, w hen I s e e t h at y o u h av en ’t d on e th e work y o u s a id y o u w er e go in g t o d o, I f e el v ery d is a p p oin te d . I w an te d t o b e ab le to c o m e h om e a n d n d t h e hou se in o rd er a n d y o u r c h ore s c o m ple te d .’  en I m ad e a re q u es t: I to ld h im I w an te d h im t o c le an i t u p i m med ia te ly .” “ It s o u n ds li k e y o u c le arly e x p re ss e d a ll t h e co m pon en ts ,” I c o m men te d . “W hat h ap p en ed ?” “H e d id n’t d o i t .” “  en w hat h ap p en ed ?” I a sk ed . “I t o ld h im h e c o u ld n’t g o t h ro u gh l i f e bei ng l a zy a n d i r res pon sib le .” I c o u ld se e th at th is w om an w as n ot y et a b le to d is tin gu is h b et ween ex p re ss in g r e q u ests a n d m ak in g d em an ds. S h e was s till d e nin g t h e pro ces s as s u cce ss fu l o n ly i f s h e g o t c o m pli a n ce f o r h er “ re q u es ts .” D urin g t h e in it ia l ph ase s of le arn in g th is pro ce ss , w e may n d ou rs e lv es ap p ly in g th e co m pon en ts o f N VC m ech an ic a lly w it h ou t aw aren ess o f th e un der ly in g pu rp ose . S o m etim es, how ev er, ev en w hen w e’r e co n sc io u s of ou r in ten t an d ex p re ss o u r re q u est w it h ca re , p eo p le may still h ear a d em an d.  is is p artic u la rly tr u e w hen w e o cc u py p osit io n s o f a u th orit y a n d a re sp ea k in g w it h t h ose w ho h av e h ad p ast e x p er ien ce s w it h c o er civ e au th orit y gu res . Once, th e a d m in is tr a to r o f a h ig h s c h ool in vit e d m e to d em on str a te to te a ch ers how N VC m ig h t help th em co m mun ic ate wit h stu den ts w ho w ere n ’t c o op era tin g a s t h e t e a ch er s w ou ld h av e li k ed . I w as a sk ed t o m eet w it h fo rty s tu den ts w ho h ad b een d eem ed “ s o cia lly a n d e m otio n ally m ala d ju ste d .” I w as s tr u ck b y th e way s u ch la b els s er ve as se lf – fu l lli n g p ro p h ecie s. I f y o u w er e a s tu den t w ho h ad b een th u s la b ele d , w ou ld n’t it ju st g iv e y o u p erm is s io n t o h av e so m e f u n a t s c h ool b y r es is tin g w hate v er w as a sk ed o f y o u ? W hen w e g iv e peo p le la b els , w e te n d t o a ct in a w ay th at c o n tr ib u te s to th e v ery b eh av io r th at c o n ce rn s u s, w hic h w e th en vie w a s fu rth er c o n rm atio n o f o u r d ia g n osis . S in ce th es e stu den ts k n ew th ey h ad b een c la ss i ed a s “ s o cia lly a n d em otio n ally m ala d ju ste d ,” I w asn ’t s u rp ris e d t h at w hen I w alk ed i n , m ost o f t h em w er e han gin g o u t t h e w in dow h olle rin g o b sc e n it ie s a t t h eir f r ien ds i n t h e co u rty ard b elo w . I b eg an b y m ak in g a r e q u est: “ I’d li k e y o u a ll t o c o m e over a n d s it d ow n so I c a n t e ll y o u w ho I a m a n d w hat I ’d li k e u s t o d o t o d ay.” A bou t h alf t h e stu den ts c a m e o ver. U nce rta in th at th ey h ad a ll h eard m e, I rep eate d m y re q u est. W it h th at, th e re m ain der of th e stu den ts sa t dow n, w it h th e ex ce p tio n o f tw o y o u n g m en w ho rem ain ed d ra p ed o ver th e win dow sill. U nfo rtu n ate ly f o r m e, t h ese t w o w er e th e big gest s tu den ts i n t h e cla ss . “ E xcu se m e,” I a d dre ss e d t h em , “ w ou ld o n e o f y o u t w o g en tlem en t e ll m e what yo u h eard m e sa y ?” O ne o f th em tu rn ed to w ard m e an d sn orte d , “Y ea h , y o u s a id w e h ad t o g o o ver t h er e an d s it d ow n.” I t h ou gh t t o m yse lf , “ U h, o h , h e’s h eard m y r e q u est a s a d em an d.” O ut lo u d I sa id , “S ir ” — I’v e le arn ed a lw ay s to sa y “s ir ” to p eo p le wit h b ic e p s li k e h is , e sp ecia lly w hen o n e o f t h em s p orts a t a tt o o— “w ou ld y o u b e w illi n g t o t e ll m e h ow I c o u ld h av e let y o u k n ow w hat I w as w an tin g s o t h at it w ou ld n’t s o u n d l i k e I w as b oss in g y o u a ro u n d?” “H uh?” H av in g b een c o n dit io n ed to ex pect d em an ds fr o m a u th orit ies , he w as n ot u se d t o m y d iff ere n t a p pro ach . “ H ow c a n I l e t y o u k n ow w hat I ’m wan tin g f r o m y o u s o i t d oesn ’t s o u n d l i k e I d on’t c a re ab ou t w hat y o u ’d l i k e? ” I r e p eate d . H e h esit a te d f o r a m om en t a n d s h ru gged , “ I d on’t k n ow .” “ W hat’s g o in g o n b etw een y o u a n d m e rig h t n ow is a g o o d ex am ple of w hat I w as w an tin g u s to ta lk a b ou t to d ay. I b eli e v e peo p le ca n en jo y e a ch o th er a l o t b ett e r i f t h ey c a n s a y w hat t h ey w ou ld l i k e w it h ou t b oss in g o th er s aro u n d. W hen I t e ll y o u w hat I ’d l i k e, I ’m n ot s a y in g t h at y o u h av e to d o i t o r I’l l t r y t o m ak e y o u r l i f e m is e ra b le . I d on’t k n ow h ow t o s a y t h at i n a w ay t h at y o u c a n tr u st.” T o m y r e li e f, th is s e em ed to m ak e sen se to th e yo u n g m an w ho, to geth er w it h h is fr ie n d, s a u nter ed o ver to jo in th e gro u p. In c er ta in s it u atio n s, s u ch a s t h is o n e, it m ay t a k e aw hile f o r o u r r e q u es ts t o b e cle arly s e en f o r w hat t h ey a re . W hen m ak in g a r e q u est, it is a ls o h elp fu l t o s c a n o u r m in ds f o r t h e so rt o f t h ou gh ts t h at a u to m atic a lly t r a n sfo rm r e q u es ts i n to d em an ds: H e sh ou ld b e c le an in g u p a  er h im se lf . S h e’s su pp ose d t o d o w hat I a sk . I d ese rv e t o g et a r a is e . I’m ju stifi ed i n h av in g t h em s ta y l a te r. I h av e a rig h t t o m ore t im e o ff . W hen w e fr a m e o u r n eed s w it h th es e th ou gh ts , w e a re bou n d to ju dge o th ers w hen t h ey d on’t d o a s w e r e q u es t. I h ad t h es e se lf – r ig h te o u s t h ou gh ts in m y m in d o n ce w hen m y y o u n ger so n w as n ot ta k in g o u t th e garb ag e. W hen w e w ere d iv id in g t h e h ou se h old c h ores , h e had a g re ed t o t h is t a sk , b u t ev ery d ay w e w ou ld h av e a n oth er str u gg le ab ou t g ett in g th e garb ag e ou t. E very d ay I w ou ld r e m in d h im , “  is is y o u r jo b,” a n d “ W e all h av e jo b s” — w it h t h e s o le o bje c tiv e o f g ett in g h im t o t a k e ou t t h e garb ag e. F in ally , o n e n ig h t I li s te n ed m ore clo se ly t o w hat h e’d b een t e lli n g m e all a lo n g a b ou t w hy th e g arb ag e w asn ’t g o in g o u t. I w ro te th e fo llo w in g s o n g a er th at ev en in g’s dis c u ss io n . A er m y so n fe lt m y em path y fo r his p osit io n , h e b eg an ta k in g o u t th e garb ag e wit h ou t an y fu rth er rem in der fr o m m e. If I c le a rly u n dersta n d yo u i n te n d n o d em an d, I’l l u su ally r e sp on d w hen y o u c a ll . B ut i f y o u c o m e acro ss li k e a h ig h a n d m ig h ty b oss , yo u ’l l f e el l i k e yo u r a n i n to a w all . A nd w hen y o u r e m in d m e so p io u sly a b ou t a ll t h ose th in gs y o u ’v e don e f o r m e, y o u ’d b ette r g et r e a d y: H ere co m es a n oth er b ou t!  en y o u c a n s h ou t, y o u c a n s p it , m oa n , g ro a n , a n d t h ro w a fi t; I s till w on’t t a ke th e ga rb age ou t. N ow e v en i f y o u s h ou ld c h an ge yo u r s ty le , It’s g o in g t o t a ke m e a l i t tle w hile b efo re I c a n f o rg iv e an d f o rg et. B eca u se it s e e m s t o m e th at y o u d id n’t s e e m e as h u m an t o o u ntil a ll y o u r s ta n dard s w ere m et. — “S o n g f r o m B re tt” b y M arsh all B . R ose n berg Su m mary  e f o u rth c o m pon en t o f N VC a d dres ses t h e qu es tio n o f w hat w e w ou ld li k e to re q u est o f e a ch o th er to e n ric h e a ch o f o u r li v es. W e tr y to a v o id v ag u e, a b str a ct, or am big u ou s ph ra sin g, an d rem ember to u se posit iv e actio n la n gu ag e b y s ta tin g w hat w e a re r e q u estin g r a th er t h an w hat w e a re n ot. E ach tim e w e sp ea k , th e c le are r w e a re ab ou t w hat w e w an t b ack , th e m ore li k ely w e a re to g et it . S in ce th e m essa g e we sen d is n ot a lw ay s th e m ess a g e t h at’s r e ce iv ed , w e n eed t o le arn h ow t o n d o u t i f o u r m essa g e has b een acc u ra te ly h eard . E sp ecia lly w hen w e are ex p res sin g o u rs e lv es in a g ro u p, w e n eed t o b e c le ar a b ou t t h e natu re of t h e res pon se we a re wan tin g. O th erw is e w e m ay be in it ia tin g unpro du ctiv e co n ver sa tio n s th at w aste c o n sid era b le g ro u p t im e. R eq u ests a re r e ce iv ed a s d em an ds w hen l i s ten ers b eli e v e th at t h ey w ill b e bla m ed o r p u n is h ed i f t h ey d o n ot c o m ply . W e c a n h elp o th er s t r u st t h at w e are r e q u estin g, n ot d em an din g, b y in dic atin g o u r d es ir e fo r t h em t o c o m ply o n ly if th ey ca n d o so w illi n gly .  e obje ctiv e of N VC is n ot to ch an ge p eo p le an d th eir beh av io r in ord er to get ou r w ay ; it is to es ta b li s h re la tio n sh ip s base d on h on esty an d em path y th at w ill ev en tu ally fu l ll e v ery o n e’s n eed s. N VC i n A ctio n Sh arin g F ea rs A bou t a B est F rie n d’s S m ok in g A l an d Burt hav e been best fr ien ds fo r over th ir ty years . A l, a non sm oker, h as d on e e v ery th in g h e ca n o ver th e years to p er su ad e B urt to g iv e u p h is tw o-p ack -a -d ay h ab it . In th e past, w hen A l h ad tr ie d t o g et h im t o q u it , B urt h ad o  en a cc u se d A l o f j u dgin g h im . Aw are d u rin g th e p ast y ear o f th e in cre a sin g s e v er it y o f h is fr ien d’s h ack in g co u gh , A l n ds h im se lf b u rstin g o u t o n e day w it h all th e en erg y a n d l i f e t h at h ad b een b u rie d i n h is u n ex pres se d a n ger a n d f e ar. A l: B urt, I k n ow w e’v e ta lk ed a b ou t th is a d ozen tim es, b u t li s te n . I’m s c a re d y o u r d am ned c ig are tt es a re go in g to k ill y o u ! Y ou ’r e m y b est f r ie n d, a n d I w an t y o u a ro u n d fo r a s lo n g a s I c a n h av e yo u . P le a se d on’t t h in k I ’m ju dgin g y o u . I ’m n ot— I’m ju st r e a lly w orrie d . B urt: N o, I h ear y o u r c o n ce rn . W e’v e b een f r ien ds f o r a l o n g t im e … A l: ( m akin g a r e q u est) W ou ld y o u b e w illi n g t o q u it ? B urt: I w is h I c o u ld . A l: ( li s te n in g fo r t h e fe eli n gs a n d n ee d s p re v en tin g B urt fr o m a gre e in g to th e re q u est) A re y o u s c a re d to tr y b ecau se y o u d on’t w an t to fa il? B urt: Y ea h … y o u k n ow h ow m an y tim es I ’v e tr ie d b ef ore … I k n ow p eo p le t h in k l e ss o f m e f o r n ot b ei ng a b le to q u it . A l: ( g u essin g a t w hat B urt m ig h t w an t t o r e q u est) I d on’t t h in k le ss o f yo u . A nd i f y o u t r ie d a n d f a ile d a g ain , I s till w ou ld n’t . I ju st w is h y o u ’d t r y. B urt:  an ks. B ut y o u ’r e n ot t h e o n ly o n e… . I t’s e v er yo n e: y o u c a n s e e it i n t h eir e y es— th ey t h in k y o u ’r e a f a ilu re . A l: ( e m path iz in g w it h B urt’s fe eli n g) Is it k in d o f o verw helm in g to w orr y a b ou t w hat o th ers m ig h t t h in k, w hen ju st q u it t in g is h ard e n ou gh ? B urt: I re a lly h ate th e id ea th at I m ig h t b e ad dic te d , th at I h av e so m eth in g t h at I j u st c a n ’t c o n tr o l … A l: ( A l’s e y es c o n n ect w it h B urt’s ; h e nod s h is h ea d . A l’s in te re st a n d atte n tio n t o B urt’s d ee p f e eli n gs a n d n eed s a re re v ea le d t h ro u gh h is e y es a n d t h e sile n ce th at f o llo w s.) B urt: I m ean , I d on’t e v en li k e sm okin g a n y m ore . It’s li k e y o u ’r e a paria h i f y o u d o i t i n p u bli c . I t’s e m barra ss in g. A l: ( c o n tin u in g to e m path iz e) It s o u n ds li k e y o u ’d r e a lly li k e to q u it , b u t a re s c a re d y o u m ig h t fa il— an d h ow th at w ou ld b e fo r y o u r se lf – im ag e a n d c o n den ce. B urt: Y ea h , I g u ess t h at’s it … . Y ou k n ow , I d on’t t h in k I ’v e ev er t a lk ed a b ou t it b efo re . U su ally w hen p eo p le te ll m e to q u it , I ju st te ll th em t o g et lo st. I ’d li k e t o q u it , b u t I d on’t w an t a ll t h at p res su re fr o m p eo p le . A l: I w ou ld n’t w an t t o p re ssu re y o u . I d on’t k n ow if I c o u ld r e a ssu re y o u a b ou t y o u r fe ars a ro u n d n ot su cce ed in g, b u t I su re wou ld li k e to s u pp ort y o u in a n y w ay I c a n .  at is … if y o u w an t m e to … . Burt: Y es, I d o. I’m re a lly to u ch ed b y y o u r c o n ce rn a n d w illi n gn es s. B ut … s u pp ose I’m n ot r e a d y to tr y y et , is th at o kay w it h y o u to o? A l: O f c o u rs e , B urt, I ’l l s till li k e y o u a s m uch . I t’s ju st t h at I w an t t o li k e y o u f o r l o n ger! B ecau se A l’s re q u est w as a gen u in e re q u es t, not a dem an d, he m ain ta in ed aw are n ess of his co m mit m en t to th e qu ali t y of th e re la tio n sh ip , r e g ard le ss o f B urt’s r es pon se . H e ex pres se d t h is a w aren ess an d h is r e sp ec t fo r B urt’s n eed fo r a u to n om y th ro u gh h is w ord s, “ I’l l s till li k e y o u ,” w hile sim ult a n eo u sly ex pres sin g h is o w n n eed “to li k e yo u f o r l o n ger.” B urt: W ell, th en , m ay b e I w ill tr y a g ain … b u t d on’t te ll a n yo n e els e , o kay ? A l: S u re , y o u d ecid e w hen y o u ’r e r e a d y; I w on’t b e m en tio n in g it t o a n yb o d y. Exerc is e 4 E X PR ESSIN G R EQ UEST S To s e e w heth er w e’r e in a g re em en t a b ou t th e cle ar ex pres sio n o f re q u es ts , c ir c le t h e n u m ber in f r o n t o f e a ch o f t h e fo llo w in g s ta te m en ts in w hic h t h e sp ea k er i s c le arly r e q u estin g t h at a s p eci c a ctio n b e ta k en . 1. “ I w an t y o u t o u n dersta n d m e.” 2. “ I’d l i k e y o u t o t e ll m e o n e t h in g t h at I d id t h at y o u a p pre cia te .” 3. “ I’d l i k e y o u t o f e el m ore c o n den ce i n y o u rs e lf .” 4. “ I w an t y o u t o s to p d rin kin g.” 5. “ I’d l i k e y o u t o l e t m e b e m e.” 6. “ I’d l i k e y o u t o b e h on est w it h m e ab ou t y ester day ’s m eet in g.” 7. “ I w ou ld l i k e y o u t o d riv e a t o r b elo w t h e sp eed l i m it .” 8. “ I’d l i k e t o g et t o k n ow y o u b ett e r.” 9. “ I w ou ld l i k e y o u t o s h ow r e sp ec t f o r m y p riv acy.” 1 0 . “ I’d l i k e y o u t o p re p are s u pp er m ore o en .” H ere are m y r e sp on se s f o r E xerc is e 4: 1. I f y o u c ir c le d th is n u m ber, w e’r e n ot in a g re em ent. T o m e, th e word u n dersta n d d oes n ot c le arly e x p re ss a re q u es t fo r a sp eci c a ctio n . A re q u est fo r a s p eci c a ctio n m ig h t b e: “ I w an t y o u t o t e ll m e w hat y o u h eard m e s a y.” 2. I f y o u c ir c le d t h is n u m ber, w e’r e i n a g re em ent t h at t h e sp ea k er i s c le arly r e q u estin g a s p eci c a ctio n . 3. I f y o u c ir c le d th is n u m ber, w e’r e not in a g re em ent. T o m e, th e word s fe el m ore co n fi den ce d o n ot cle arly ex p re ss a re q u es t fo r a sp eci c actio n . A r e q u est fo r a s p eci c a ctio n m ig h t b e: “ I’d li k e yo u to ta k e a co u rs e in a ss e rtiv en ess tr a in in g, w hic h I b eli e v e wou ld in cre a se yo u r se lf – c o n den ce.” 4. 4 . I f y o u c ir c le d t h is n u m ber, w e’r e not i n a g re em ent. T o m e, t h e word s sto p d rin kin g d o n ot e x p re ss w hat t h e s p ea k er w an ts , b u t r a th er w hat h e or s h e d oesn ’t w an t. A r e q u est fo r a s p eci c a ctio n m ig h t b e: “ I w an t yo u t o t e ll m e w hat n eed s o f y o u rs a re m et b y d rin kin g, a n d t o d is c u ss w it h m e o th er w ay s o f m eetin g t h ose need s.” 5. I f y o u c ir c le d t h is n u m ber, w e’r e not i n a g re em ent. T o m e, t h e w ord s le t m e be me d o n ot cle arly ex p re ss a re q u est fo r a sp eci c actio n . A re q u est f o r a s p eci c a ctio n m ig h t b e: “ I w an t y o u t o t e ll m e y o u w on’t l e av e o u r r e la tio n sh ip — ev en i f I d o s o m e t h in gs t h at y o u d on’t l i k e.” 6. I f y o u c ir c le d t h is n u m ber, w e’r e n ot i n a g re em ent. T o m e, t h e w ord s b e h on est w it h m e d o n ot c le arly e x p re ss a r e q u est fo r a s p eci c a ctio n . A r e q u est fo r a s p eci c a ctio n m ig h t b e: “ I w an t y o u to te ll m e how y o u fe el a b ou t w hat I d id a n d w hat y o u ’d l i k e m e to d o d iff er en tly .” 7. I f y o u c ir c le d t h is n u m ber, w e’r e i n a g re em ent t h at t h e sp ea k er i s c le arly r e q u estin g a s p eci c a ctio n . 8. I f y o u c ir c le d t h is n u m ber, w e’r e n ot i n a g re em ent. T o m e, t h e w ord s g et to k n ow y o u b ette r d o n ot c le arly e x p re ss a r e q u est f o r a s p eci c a ctio n . A r e q u est fo r a s p eci c a ctio n m ig h t b e: “ I’d li k e y o u to te ll m e if y o u w ou ld b e w illi n g t o m eet f o r l u n ch o n ce a w eek .” 9. I f y o u c ir c le d th is n u m ber, w e’r e not in a g re em ent. T o m e, th e word s sh ow re sp ect fo r m y priv a cy d o n ot cle arly ex p re ss a re q u est fo r a sp eci c a ctio n . A r e q u est f o r a s p eci c a ctio n m ig h t b e: “ I’d li k e y o u t o a g re e t o k n ock b efo re y o u e n te r m y o ffi ce.” 1 0 . I f y o u c ir c le d th is n u m ber, w e’r e not in a g re em ent. T o m e, th e word s m ore o en d o n ot cle arly ex p re ss a re q u es t fo r a sp eci c actio n . A re q u est fo r a s p eci c a ctio n m ig h t b e: “ I’d li k e y o u to p rep are su pp er ev ery M on day n ig h t.” T 7 Rece iv in g E m path ic a lly h e la st fo u r c h ap te rs d esc rib ed t h e fo u r c o m pon en ts o f N VC: w hat w e are o b se rv in g, f e eli n g, a n d n eed in g, a n d w hat w e w ou ld li k e to r e q u es t to e n ric h o u r li v es. N ow w e tu rn fr o m s e lf – ex pres sio n to a p p ly th es e sa m e fo u r c o m pon en ts t o h earin g w hat o th er s a re ob ser vin g, f e eli n g, n eed in g, a n d re q u estin g. W e r e fe r to t h is p art o f t h e co m mun ic atio n p ro ce ss a s re ce iv in g em path ic a lly .  e t w o p arts o f N VC : 1. e x p re ssin g h on estly 2 . r e ce iv in g e m path ic a lly Pre se n ce : D on’t J u st D o S om eth in g, S ta n d  ere E m path y is a r e sp ec tfu l u n dersta n din g o f w hat o th er s a re ex per ien cin g.  e Chin ese ph ilo so p h er Chu an g-T zu sta te d th at tr u e em path y re q u ir es li s te n in g w it h th e w hole b ein g: “  e hearin g th at is o n ly in th e ears is o n e th in g.  e h earin g o f th e u n dersta n din g is a n oth er . B ut th e hearin g o f th e sp ir it is n ot li m it e d to a n y o n e fa cu lt y , to th e ear, o r to th e m in d. H en ce it d em an ds th e em ptin ess o f all th e fa cu lt ies . A nd w hen th e fa cu lt ies are e m pty , th en th e w hole b ein g li s ten s.  ere is th en a d ir e ct g ra sp o f w hat is r ig h t th ere b efo re y o u th at c a n n ev er b e heard w it h th e ear o r u n der sto od w it h t h e m in d.” E m path y: em pty in g o u r m in d a n d li s te n in g w it h o u r w hole b ein g Em path y w it h o th ers o cc u rs o n ly w hen w e hav e su cces sfu lly sh ed a ll p re co n ce iv ed id ea s a n d ju dgm en ts a b ou t th em .  e Austr ia n -b orn Is r a eli p h ilo so p h er M artin Buber desc rib es th is qu ali t y of pres en ce th at li f e d em an ds o f u s: “ In s p it e o f a ll s im ila rit ies , e v er y li v in g s it u atio n h as, li k e a n ew born c h ild , a n ew fa ce, t h at h as n ev er b een b ef ore an d w ill n ev er c o m e ag ain . It d em an ds o f y o u a r e a ctio n t h at c a n not b e prep are d b ef ore h an d. It d em an ds n oth in g o f w hat is p ast. It d em an ds p res en ce, res pon sib ili t y ; it d em an ds y o u .”  e pre se n ce th at em path y re q u ir es is not ea sy to m ain ta in . “ e cap acit y t o g iv e o n e’s a tt e n tio n t o a s u ff erer is a v er y r a re an d d iffi cu lt t h in g; it is a lm ost a m ir a cle ; it is a m ir a cle ,” a ss er ts F ren ch p h ilo so p h er S im on e W eil. “ N early a ll t h ose w ho t h in k t h ey h av e th e cap acit y d o n ot p oss es s it .” I n ste a d o f o ff erin g e m path y, w e ten d in ste a d to g iv e ad vic e o r r e a ssu ra n ce a n d to e x p la in o u r o w n p osit io n o r fe eli n g. E m path y, o n th e oth er h an d, re q u ir e s u s t o f o cu s f u ll a tt e n tio n o n t h e oth er p er so n’s m essa g e. W e giv e to o th ers t h e t im e a n d s p ace t h ey n eed to e x p res s t h em se lv es fu lly a n d to fe el u n dersto od .  ere is a B udd h is t sa y in g th at ap tly d es crib es th is ab ili t y : “D on’t j u st d o s o m eth in g, s ta n d t h er e.” Ask b efo re o ff erin g a d vic e o r r e a ssu ra n ce . It is o  en fr u str a tin g fo r s o m eo n e need in g em path y to h av e us a ssu m e th at th ey w an t re a ssu ra n ce o r “ x-it ” a d vic e. I re ce iv ed a les so n fr o m m y dau gh te r th at ta u gh t m e to c h eck w het her a d vic e o r r e a ssu ra n ce is w an te d b efo re o ff erin g a n y. S h e w as lo okin g in t h e m ir ro r o n e d ay a n d s a id , “ I’m a s u gly a s a p ig .” “ Y ou ’r e th e m ost g o rg eo u s cre atu re God ev er p u t o n th e fa ce of th e earth ,” I d ecla re d . Sh e sh ot m e a lo ok o f ex asp er atio n , ex cla im ed , “O h, D ad dy!” a n d s la m med th e d oor a s s h e le th e ro om . I la te r fo u n d o u t th at sh e h ad w an te d s o m e e m path y. I n ste a d o f m y ill- tim ed r e a ssu ra n ce, I c o u ld h av e a sk ed , “ A re y o u f e eli n g d is a p p oin te d w it h y o u r a p p eara n ce t o d ay ?” M y fr ie n d H olle y H um ph re y id en ti ed so m e c o m mon b eh av io rs th at p re v en t u s fr o m b ein g su ffi cie n tly p res en t to co n nect em path ic a lly w it h o th ers .  e f o llo w in g a re e x am ples : Advis in g: “ I t h in k y o u s h ou ld … ” “ H ow c o m e yo u d id n’t … ? ” O ne-u ppin g: “  at’s n oth in g; w ait ’l l y o u h ear w hat h ap p en ed t o m e.” E du catin g: “  is c o u ld tu rn in to a v er y p osit iv e ex per ien ce fo r y o u if y o u j u st … ” C on so li n g: “ It w asn ’t y o u r f a u lt ; y o u d id t h e bes t y o u c o u ld .” S to ry -te lli n g: “  at r e m in ds m e o f t h e tim e … ” S h u tt in g d ow n: “ C heer u p. D on’t f e el s o b ad .” S y m path iz in g: “ O h, y o u p oor t h in g … ” I n te rro gatin g: “ W hen d id t h is b eg in ?” E xp la in in g: “ I w ou ld h av e c a lle d b u t … ” C orre c tin g: “  at’s n ot h ow i t h ap p en ed .” I n h is b o ok W hen B ad  in gs H app en to G oo d P eo p le , R ab bi H aro ld K ush n er d esc rib es h ow p ain fu l it w as fo r h im , w hen h is s o n w as d yin g, to h ear th e w ord s p eo p le o ff ere d th at w ere in ten ded to m ak e him fe el b et ter . Even m ore p ain fu l w as h is re co gn it io n th at fo r tw en ty y ears h e had b een sa y in g t h e s a m e t h in gs t o o th er p eo p le in s im ila r s it u atio n s! B eli e v in g w e h av e t o “ x” s it u atio n s a n d m ak e oth er s f e el b et ter p re v en ts u s fr o m bein g pre se n t.  ose of us in th e ro le of co u n se lo r or p sy ch oth era p is t a re p artic u la rly s u sc e p tib le to t h is b eli ef . O nce, w hen I w as work in g w it h tw en ty -th re e m en ta l h ea lt h p ro fe ss io n als , I ask ed th em to w rit e , w ord fo r w ord , h ow th ey w ou ld res pon d to a c li en t w ho sa y s, “ I’m f e eli n g v ery d ep re ss e d . I ju st d on’t s e e an y r e a so n to g o o n .” I c o lle cte d th e an sw ers t h ey h ad w rit t e n d ow n a n d a n nou n ce d , “ I a m n ow g o in g t o r e a d o u t lo u d w hat e a ch o f y o u w ro te . I m ag in e yo u rs e lf i n t h e ro le of t h e per so n w ho ex p re ss e d t h e f e eli n g o f d ep re ss io n , a n d r a is e yo u r h an d a  er e a ch s ta tem ent yo u h ear th at g iv es y o u a s e n se th at y o u ’v e been u n der sto od .” H an ds w er e ra is e d to on ly th re e of th e tw en ty -th re e res pon ses . Q uestio n s su ch as, “ W hen d id th is b eg in ?” c o n stit u te d th e m ost fr e q u en t res pon se; th ey g iv e th e a p p eara n ce t h at t h e p ro fe ss io n al is o bta in in g t h e in fo rm atio n n eces sa ry to dia g n ose an d th en tr e at th e pro blem . In fa ct, su ch in te lle ctu al u n dersta n din g of a pro ble m blo ck s th e kin d of pres en ce th at em path y re q u ir e s. W hen w e a re th in kin g a b ou t p eo p le ’s w ord s a n d li s ten in g to h ow th ey c o n nec t to o u r th eo rie s, w e are lo okin g a t p eo p le— we are not w it h t h em .  e k ey i n gre d ie n t o f e m path y i s p res en ce : w e a re w holly p res en t w it h t h e o th er p arty a n d w hat th ey a re ex per ien cin g.  is q u ali t y o f p res en ce d is tin gu is h es em path y fr o m eit h er m en ta l un der sta n din g or sy m path y. W hile w e m ay c h oose a t tim es to sy m path iz e w it h o th er s b y fe eli n g th ei r fe eli n gs, it ’s h elp fu l to b e a w are th at d u rin g th e mom en t w e are off er in g sy m path y, w e a re n ot e m path iz in g. In te lle ctu al u n dersta n din g b lo ck s e m path y. Lis te n in g f o r F eeli n gs a n d N eed s In N VC, n o m att e r w hat w ord s p eo p le use to ex pres s t h em se lv es , w e li s ten fo r th eir o b se rv atio n s, fe eli n gs, n eed s, a n d r e q u es ts . I m ag in e yo u ’v e lo an ed y o u r c a r t o a n ew n eig h bor w ho h ad a p er so n al em ergen cy, a n d w hen y o u r fa m ily n ds o u t, t h ey r e a ct w it h i n ten sit y : “ Y ou a re a f o ol f o r h av in g t r u ste d a to ta l str a n ger!” Y ou c a n u se th e co m pon en ts o f N VC to tu n e in to th e fe eli n gs a n d n eed s o f t h ose f a m ily m em ber s i n c o n tr a st t o ei th er ( 1 ) b la m in g yo u rs e lf b y t a k in g t h e m ess a g e p ers o n ally , o r ( 2 ) b la m in g a n d j u dgin g t h em . No m att e r w hat o th ers s a y, w e o n ly h ea r w hat t h ey a re (1 ) ob se r v in g, (2 ) fe eli n g, (3) need in g, an d (4) r e q u estin g. In th is s it u atio n , it ’s o bvio u s w hat th e fa m ily is o b ser vin g a n d r e a ctin g to : t h e l e n din g o f t h e c a r t o a r e la tiv e str a n ger. I n o th er s it u atio n s, i t m ay n ot b e s o c le ar. I f a c o lle a g u e te lls u s, “ Y ou ’r e not a g o od te am p la y er ,” w e m ay n ot k n ow w hat h e o r s h e is o b ser vin g, a lt h ou gh w e ca n u su ally g u es s a t t h e beh av io r t h at m ig h t h av e t r ig gere d s u ch a s ta te m en t.  e f o llo w in g e x ch an ge, f r o m a w ork sh op, d em on str a te s t h e diffi cu lt y o f fo cu sin g o n o th er p eo p le ’s fe eli n gs a n d n eed s w hen w e a re acc u sto m ed to a ssu m in g re sp on sib ili t y fo r th eir fe eli n gs a n d ta k in g m essa g es p er so n ally .  e w om an in t h is d ia lo gu e w an te d to le arn to h ear t h e fe eli n gs a n d n eed s beh in d c e rta in o f h er h u sb an d’s s ta te m en ts . I s u ggeste d t h at s h e gu es s a t h is f e eli n gs a n d n eed s a n d t h en c h eck i t o u t w it h h im . Husb an d’s s ta te m en t: W hat g o od d oes t a lk in g t o y o u d o? Y ou n ev er l i s ten . Wom an : A re y o u f e eli n g u n hap py w it h m e? M BR : W hen y o u sa y “w it h m e,” y o u im ply th at h is fe eli n gs a re th e re su lt o f w hat y o u d id . I w ou ld p ref er fo r y o u to s a y, “A re yo u u n hap py b ecau se yo u w ere n eed in g … ?” an d n ot “A re yo u u n hap py w it h m e?” I t w ou ld p u t y o u r a tt en tio n o n w hat’s g o in g on w it h in h im a n d d ecre a se th e li k eli h ood o f y o u r ta k in g th e m ess a g e p ers o n ally . W om an : B ut w hat w ou ld I sa y ? “A re yo u u n hap py b ecau se yo u … ? B ecau se y o u w hat? ” M BR : G et yo u r clu e fr o m th e co n te n t of yo u r h u sb an d’s m ess a g e, “W hat g o od d oes ta lk in g to y o u d o? Y ou n ev er li s ten .” W hat is h e n eed in g t h at h e’s n ot g ett in g w hen h e sa y s t h at? W om an : (tr y in g to em path iz e wit h th e need s ex p re ss e d th ro u gh her h u sb an d’s m ess a ge) A re y o u f e eli n g u n hap py b ecau se yo u f e el l i k e I d on’t u n dersta n d y o u ? M BR : N otic e th at y o u a re fo cu sin g o n w hat h e’s th in kin g, a n d n ot o n w hat he’s need in g. I th in k yo u ’l l n d peo p le to be le ss th re ate n in g if y o u h ear w hat th ey ’r e need in g ra th er th an w hat th ey ’r e t h in kin g a b ou t y o u . I n ste a d o f h earin g t h at h e’s u n hap py b ecau se h e t h in ks y o u d on’t l i s te n , f o cu s o n w hat h e’s n eed in g b y sa y in g, “ A re y o u u n hap py b ecau se yo u a re need in g … ” W om an : (tr y in g a ga in ) A re y o u f e eli n g u n hap py b ecau se yo u a re need in g to b e h eard ? M BR :  at’s w hat I h ad in m in d. D oes it m ak e a d iff er en ce fo r y o u to h ear h im t h is w ay ? W om an : D e n it e ly — a big diff ere n ce. I se e what’s go in g on fo r him w it h ou t h earin g t h at I h ad d on e a n yth in g w ro n g. L is te n t o w hat p eo p le a re n eed in g r a th er t h an w hat t h ey a re t h in kin g. Para p h ra sin g A er w e f o cu s o u r a tt e n tio n a n d h ear w hat o th er s a re ob ser vin g, f e eli n g, a n d need in g a n d w hat t h ey a re r e q u estin g to e n ric h t h ei r li v es , w e m ay w is h to r e ec t b ack b y p ara p h ra sin g w hat w e hav e un der sto od . In o u r p re v io u s dis c u ss io n o n r e q u ests ( C hap te r 6 ) , w e d is c u ss e d h ow t o a sk f o r a r e ectio n ; now w e w ill l o ok a t h ow t o o ff er i t t o o th er s. If we hav e acc u ra te ly re ce iv ed th e oth er party ’s m ess a g e, ou r para p h ra sin g w ill co n rm th is fo r th em . If, on th e oth er han d, ou r para p h ra se is in co rre c t, w e g iv e th e sp ea k er a n o p p ortu n it y to c o rre ct u s. A noth er a d van ta g e o f c h oosin g t o r e ect a m ess a g e back t o t h e oth er p arty is t h at it o ff ers t h em t im e t o r e ect o n w hat t h ey ’v e sa id a n d a n o p p ortu n it y to d elv e d eep er i n to t h em se lv es. N VC su ggests th at o u r p ara p h ra sin g ta k e th e fo rm o f q u es tio n s th at re v ea l o u r u n dersta n din g w hile e li c it in g a n y n ece ss a ry c o rre ctio n s f r o m t h e sp ea k er. Q uestio n s m ay f o cu s o n t h es e co m pon en ts : 1. w hat o th ers a re o b se rv in g: “A re y o u r e a ctin g to h ow m an y e v en in gs I w as g o n e l a st w eek ?” 2. h ow o th ers a re f e eli n g a n d t h e n eed s g en er atin g t h ei r f e eli n gs: “A re yo u fe eli n g h u rt b ecau se y o u w ou ld h av e li k ed m ore ap pre cia tio n o f y o u r eff orts t h an y o u r e ce iv ed ?” 3. w hat o th ers a re r e q u estin g: “ A re y o u w an tin g m e to t e ll y o u m y r e a so n s fo r s a y in g w hat I d id ?”  ese q u estio n s r e q u ir e u s t o s e n se w hat’s g o in g o n w it h in o th er p eo p le , w hile in vit in g th eir c o rre c tio n s sh ou ld w e hav e sen se d in co rre ctly . N otic e th e d iff ere n ce b etw een t h ese q u estio n s a n d t h e on es b elo w : 1. “ W hat d id I d o t h at y o u a re r e fe rrin g t o ?” 2. “ H ow a re y o u f e eli n g?” “ W hy a re y o u f e eli n g t h at w ay ?” 3. “ W hat a re y o u w an tin g m e t o d o a b ou t i t ? ”  is s e co n d s e t o f q u estio n s a sk s fo r in fo rm atio n w it h ou t rst s en sin g th e s p ea k er’s r e a li t y .  ou gh th ey m ay a p p ear to b e th e m ost d ir e ct w ay to co n nec t w it h w hat’s go in g on w it h in th e oth er p er so n , I’v e fo u n d th at q u estio n s li k e th ese a re n ot th e sa fes t ro u te to o bta in th e in fo rm atio n w e se ek . M an y su ch q u estio n s m ay g iv e sp ea k er s th e im pres sio n th at w e’r e a sc h oolt e a ch er e x am in in g t h em o r a p sy ch oth er ap is t w ork in g o n a c a se . I f w e do d ecid e t o a sk f o r i n fo rm atio n i n t h is w ay, h ow ev er , I ’v e fo u n d t h at p eo p le f e el s a fe r if w e rst r e v ea l th e fe eli n gs a n d n eed s w it h in o u rs e lv es th at a re g en era tin g t h e q u estio n .  us, in ste a d o f a sk in g s o m eo n e, “ W hat d id I d o?” w e m ig h t s a y, “ I’m fr u str a te d b ecau se I’d li k e to b e cle arer a b ou t w hat y o u are r e fe rr in g to . W ou ld y o u b e w illi n g to te ll m e what I’v e don e th at le a d s yo u t o s e e m e in t h is w ay ?” W hile t h is s tep m ay n ot b e neces sa ry — or e v en h elp fu l— in s it u atio n s w here o u r fe eli n gs a n d n eed s a re cle arly c o n vey ed b y th e co n te x t o r to n e o f v o ic e, I w ou ld re co m men d it p artic u la rly d u rin g m om en ts w hen t h e q u estio n s w e ask a re acco m pan ie d b y s tr o n g em otio n s. W hen ask in g fo r in fo rm atio n , fi rst ex p re ss ou r ow n fe eli n gs a n d n eed s. H ow d o w e d ete rm in e if an o cc a sio n ca lls fo r u s to re ect p eo p le ’s m ess a g es b ack to th em ? C erta in ly if w e are un su re th at w e hav e acc u ra te ly u n dersto od t h e m ess a g e, w e m ig h t u se para p h ra sin g t o e li c it a c o rre ctio n t o o u r g u ess . B ut e v en i f w e a re c o n den t t h at w e’v e un der sto od t h em , w e m ay se n se th e o th er p arty w an tin g co n rm atio n th at th ei r m essa g e has b een a cc u ra te ly r e ce iv ed .  ey m ay e v en ex pres s t h is d es ir e over tly b y a sk in g, “ Is th at cle ar? ” or “D o yo u u n dersta n d w hat I m ean ?” A t su ch m om en ts , h earin g a c le ar p ara p h ra se w ill o  en b e m ore re a ssu rin g t o t h e sp ea k er t h an h earin g s im ply , “ Y es, I u n dersta n d.” F or e x am ple , s h ortly a  er p artic ip atin g in a n N VC t r a in in g, a v o lu nte er at a h osp it a l w as re q u este d b y so m e n u rs es to ta lk to a n e ld er ly p atien t: “ W e’v e t o ld t h is w om an s h e i s n ’t t h at s ic k a n d t h at s h e’d g et b et ter i f s h e to ok h er m ed ic in e, b u t a ll s h e d oes is s it in h er r o om a ll d ay lo n g r ep eatin g, ‘I w an t to d ie . I w an t to d ie .’ ”  e v o lu nte er a p pro ach ed th e eld er ly w om an , an d a s th e n u rs e s h ad p re d ic te d , fo u n d h er sit t in g a lo n e, w his p er in g o ver an d o ver, “ I w an t t o d ie .” “ S o y o u w ou ld li k e to d ie ,” th e v o lu nte er em path iz e d . S u rp ris e d , th e w om an b ro ke o ff h er c h an t a n d a p p eare d r e li e v ed . S h e beg an to ta lk a b ou t how no on e un dersto od how te rrib le sh e was fe eli n g.  e vo lu nte er co n tin u ed to re ec t b ack th e w om an ’s fe eli n gs; b ef ore lo n g, su ch w arm th h ad en te re d th eir d ia lo gu e th at th ey w er e sit t in g w it h th ei r a rm s lo ck ed a ro u n d e a ch o th er. L ate r t h at d ay, t h e nu rs es q u es tio n ed t h e vo lu nte er a b ou t h er m ag ic fo rm ula : th e eld erly w om an h ad sta rte d to eat an d ta k e her m ed ic in e, a n d w as a p p are n tly i n b et ter s p ir it s . A lt h ou gh t h e nu rs es h ad t r ie d to h elp h er w it h a d vic e a n d r e a ssu ra n ce, it w asn ’t u ntil h er in ter actio n w it h t h e vo lu nte er th at th is w om an re ce iv ed w hat sh e was tr u ly need in g: co n nec tio n w it h an oth er hu m an bei ng w ho co u ld hear her pro fo u n d desp air .  ere a re n o i n fa lli b le g u id eli n es r eg ard in g w hen t o p ara p h ra se , b u t a s a r u le of th u m b, it is sa fe to assu m e th at sp ea k er s ex pres sin g in ten se ly e m otio n al m ess a g es w ou ld ap pre cia te o u r re ectin g th es e back to th em . When w e o u rs e lv es a re ta lk in g, w e ca n m ak e it e a sier fo r th e li s ten er if w e cle arly s ig n if y w hen w e w an t o r d on’t w an t o u r w ord s t o b e re ecte d b ack t o u s. R efl ect b ack m ess a g es t h at a re e m otio n ally c h arg ed .  ere are occ a sio n s w hen w e m ay ch oose not to ver bally re ect so m eo n e’s s ta te m en ts o u t o f r e sp ect f o r c e rta in c u lt u ra l n orm s. F or ex am ple , a C hin ese m an o n ce a tt e n ded a w ork sh op t o le arn h ow t o h ear t h e fe eli n gs an d n eed s b eh in d h is fa th er’s rem ark s. B ecau se he co u ld n ot b ear th e crit ic is m a n d att a ck h e c o n tin u ally h eard in h is fa th er ’s w ord s, th is m an d re a d ed v is it in g h is fa th er a n d a v o id ed h im fo r m on th s a t a t im e. H e ca m e to m e t e n y ears la te r a n d r e p orte d t h at h is a b ili t y t o h ear f e eli n gs a n d n eed s h ad r a d ic a lly t r a n sfo rm ed h is r e la tio n sh ip w it h h is f a th er t o t h e poin t w her e th ey n ow e n jo y a c lo se a n d lo vin g c o n nectio n . A lt h ou gh h e li s ten s fo r h is f a th er’s fe eli n gs a n d n eed s, h ow ev er , h e does n ot p ara p h ra se w hat h e h ears . “ I n ev er s a y it o u t lo u d,” h e e x p la in ed . “ In o u r c u lt u re , to d ir e ct- ta lk to a p ers o n a b ou t th eir fe eli n gs is s o m ethin g th ey ’r e not u se d to . B ut th an ks to t h e fa ct th at I n o lo n ger h ear w hat h e sa y s a s a n a tt a ck , b u t a s h is o w n fe eli n gs a n d n eed s, o u r r e la tio n sh ip h as b eco m e en orm ou sly w on der fu l.” Para p h ra se on ly when it co n tr ib u te s to gre a te r co m passio n a n d u n dersta n din g. “S o y o u ’r e n ev er g o in g t o t a lk d ir e ctly t o h im a b ou t f e eli n gs, b u t it h elp s to b e a b le t o h ear t h em ?” I a sk ed . “N o, n ow I th in k I ’m p ro b ab ly r e a d y,” h e an sw ere d . “ N ow th at w e hav e su ch a s o li d r e la tio n sh ip , if I w ere to s a y to h im , ‘D ad , I ’d li k e to b e ab le to t a lk d ir e c tly t o y o u a b ou t w hat w e a re fe eli n g,’ I t h in k h e ju st m ig h t b e re a d y to d o i t .” W hen w e p ara p h ra se , th e to n e o f vo ic e w e u se is h ig h ly im porta n t. W hen h earin g t h em se lv es r e ecte d b ack , p eo p le are li k ely t o b e sen sit iv e to t h e sli g h te st hin t of crit ic is m or sa rc a sm .  ey are li k ew is e neg ativ ely a ff ec te d b y a d ecla ra tiv e to n e th at im pli es th at w e a re te lli n g th em w hat is g o in g o n in sid e o f th em . If w e a re co n sc io u sly li s ten in g fo r o th er p eo p le ’s f e eli n gs an d n eed s, how ev er, ou r to n e co m mun ic ates th at w e’r e ask in g w heth er w e h av e u n dersto od — not c la im in g t h at w e hav e un der sto od . W e a ls o n eed t o b e p re p are d f o r t h e poss ib ili t y t h at t h e in ten tio n b eh in d ou r p ara p h ra sin g w ill b e m is in te rp ret ed . “ D on’t p u ll a n y o f t h at p sy ch olo gy cra p o n m e!” w e m ay b e to ld . S h ou ld th is o cc u r, w e co n tin u e ou r eff ort to s e n se th e s p ea k er’s fe eli n gs a n d n eed s; p er hap s w e se e in th is c a se th at th e sp ea k er d oesn ’t tr u st o u r m otiv es an d n eed s m ore un dersta n din g o f o u r in te n tio n s b efo re h e c a n a p pre cia te h earin g o u r p ara p h ra ses . A s w e’v e se en , all c rit ic is m , a tt a ck , in su lt s , a n d ju dgm en ts v an is h w hen w e fo cu s a tt en tio n o n h earin g t h e fe eli n gs a n d n ee d s b eh in d a m ess a g e.  e m ore we pra ctic e in th is w ay, th e m ore w e r e a li z e a s im ple tr u th : b eh in d a ll th ose m essa g es w e’v e a llo w ed o u rs e lv es t o b e i n tim id ate d b y a re ju st i n div id u als w it h u n m et need s a p p ea li n g to u s to c o n tr ib u te to th ei r w ell- b ei ng. W hen w e re cei ve m ess a g es w it h th is a w are n ess , w e nev er fe el d eh u m an iz e d b y w hat o th er s hav e to sa y to u s. W e o n ly fe el d eh u m an iz e d w hen w e get tr a p p ed in d ero gato ry im ag es of oth er peo p le or th ou gh ts of w ro n gn es s ab ou t ou rs e lv es. A s a u th or a n d m yth olo gis t Jo sep h C am pbell su ggeste d , “‘W hat w ill t h ey t h in k o f m e?’ m ust b e p u t a sid e fo r b li s s .” W e beg in t o f e el t h is b li s s w hen m ess a g es p re v io u sly e x p erien ce d a s c rit ic a l o r b la m in g b eg in to b e se en f o r t h e g i s t h ey a re : o p p ortu n it ies t o g iv e to p eo p le w ho a re in p ain . Beh in d in tim id atin g mess a g es are mere ly peo p le a p p ea li n g t o u s t o m eet t h eir n eed s. A d iffi cu lt m ess a g e b eco m es a n o p p ortu n it y to en ric h so m eo n e’s l i f e . If it h ap p en s re g u la rly th at p eo p le dis tr u st o u r m otiv es a n d sin cer it y w hen w e para p h ra se th eir w ord s, w e m ay need to ex am in e ou r ow n in te n tio n s m ore clo se ly . P erh ap s w e are para p h ra sin g an d en gag in g th e co m pon en ts of N VC in a m ech an is tic w ay w it h ou t m ain ta in in g cle ar co n sc io u sn ess o f p u rp ose . W e m ig h t a sk o u rs e lv es , f o r ex am ple , w het her w e are m ore i n te n t o n a p p ly in g t h e p ro ce ss “ c o rre ctly ” t h an o n c o n nectin g w it h t h e h u m an b ein g in fr o n t o f u s. O r p er hap s, e v en th ou gh w e a re usin g th e fo rm o f N VC, o u r o n ly i n te re st i s i n c h an gin g t h e oth er p er so n’s b eh av io r. S o m e peo p le re sis t para p h ra sin g as a waste of tim e. O ne cit y a d m in is tr a to r e x p la in ed d u rin g a p ra ctic e s es sio n , “ I’m p aid t o g iv e fa cts a n d so lu tio n s, n ot t o s it a ro u n d d oin g p sy ch oth er ap y w it h e v er yo n e who c o m es in to m y o ffi ce.”  is s a m e a d m in is tr a to r, h ow ev er , w as b ei ng c o n fr o n te d b y an gry c it iz e n s w ho w ou ld c o m e to h im w it h th ei r p ass io n ate c o n cer ns a n d le av e d is s a tis ed fo r n ot h av in g b een h eard . S o m e o f th es e cit iz en s la ter c o n ded to m e, “ W hen y o u g o to h is o ffi ce, h e giv es y o u a b u n ch o f fa cts , b u t y o u n ev er k n ow w heth er h e’s h eard y o u rst. W hen th at h ap p en s, y o u sta rt to d is tr u st h is fa cts .” P ara p h ra sin g te n ds to sa v e, ra th er th an w aste , tim e. S tu die s in la b or- m an ag em en t n eg otia tio n s d em on str a te th at th e tim e re q u ir e d to re a ch co n ic t re so lu tio n is cu t in h alf w hen ea ch n eg otia to r ag re es, b efo re re sp on din g, to a cc u ra te ly rep eat w hat th e pre v io u s sp ea k er h ad s a id . P ara p h ra sin g s a v es t im e. I re ca ll a m an who was in it ia lly sk ep tic a l ab ou t th e valu e of p ara p h ra sin g. H e a n d h is w if e w er e att en din g a n N VC w ork sh op du rin g a tim e w hen th eir m arria g e w as bes et by ser io u s pro blem s. D urin g th e w ork sh op, h is w if e s a id t o h im , “ Y ou n ev er l i s ten t o m e.” “ I d o t o o,” h e r e p li e d . “N o, y o u d on’t ,” s h e c o u nte re d . I a d dre ss e d t h e hu sb an d: “ I’m a fr a id y o u j u st p ro ved h er p oin t. Y ou d id n’t r e sp on d i n a w ay t h at l e ts h er k n ow t h at y o u w er e li s ten in g t o h er .” H e w as p u zzle d b y t h e p oin t I w as m ak in g, s o I a sk ed f o r p er m is s io n t o p la y h is r o le — whic h h e g la d ly g av e sin ce h e w asn ’t h av in g t o o m uch s u cces s wit h i t . H is w if e a n d I t h en h ad t h e fo llo w in g ex ch an ge: W if e: “ Y ou n ev er l i s te n t o m e.” M BR i n r o le of h u sb an d: “ It s o u n ds l i k e y o u ’r e t e rrib ly f r u str a te d b ecau se y o u w ou ld l i k e t o f e el m ore c o n nectio n w hen w e sp ea k .”  e w if e w as m oved t o t e ars w hen s h e n ally r e ce iv ed t h is c o n rm atio n th at sh e h ad b een u n dersto od . I tu rn ed to th e hu sb an d a n d ex pla in ed , “ I b eli e v e t h is is w hat s h e is t e lli n g y o u s h e need s— a r e ectio n o f h er fe eli n gs an d n ee d s a s a c o n rm atio n th at sh e’d b een h eard .”  e hu sb an d se em ed d u m bfo u n ded . “ Is th at a ll sh e w an te d ?” h e ask ed , in cre d u lo u s th at su ch a s im ple a ct c o u ld h av e h ad s u ch a s tr o n g i m pact o n h is w if e . A sh ort tim e la te r, h e e n jo yed th e sa tis fa ctio n rsth an d w hen h is w if e r e ec te d b ack to h im a sta te m en t th at h e had m ad e wit h g re at em otio n al in te n sit y . S av o rin g h er p ara p h ra se , h e lo oked a t m e an d d ecla re d , “ It’s v ali d .” I t is a p oig n an t e x p erie n ce to re ce iv e co n cret e ev id en ce th at so m eo n e is e m path ic a lly c o n nec te d t o u s. Su sta in in g E m path y I re co m men d a llo w in g o th ers th e op p ortu n it y to fu lly e x p res s th em se lv es b efo re tu rn in g o u r a tt e n tio n to so lu tio n s o r re q u es ts fo r re li ef . W hen w e pro ce ed t o o q u ic k ly t o w hat p eo p le m ig h t b e re q u es tin g, w e m ay n ot c o n vey o u r g en u in e in te re st in th eir fe eli n gs a n d n eed s; in ste a d , th ey m ay g et th e im pre ss io n th at w e’r e in a h u rr y to ei th er b e fr e e of th em o r to x th ei r pro ble m . F u rth erm ore , a n i n it ia l m ess a g e is o  en l i k e th e tip o f a n i c eb er g; i t m ay be fo llo w ed by as yet un ex pres se d , bu t re la te d — an d o en m ore p ow erfu l— fe eli n gs. B y m ain ta in in g o u r a tt en tio n o n w hat’s g o in g o n w it h in o th ers , w e o ff er th em a c h an ce to fu lly ex plo re an d ex pres s th ei r in ter io r se lv es. W e w ou ld ste m th is ow if w e wer e to sh i a tt en tio n to o q u ic k ly e it h er t o t h eir r e q u est o r t o o u r o w n d es ir e to ex pres s o u rs e lv es . Su pp ose a m oth er co m es to u s, sa y in g, “M y ch ild is im poss ib le . N o m att e r w hat I t e ll h im t o d o, h e d oes n’t li s te n .” W e m ig h t r e ect h er f e eli n gs an d n eed s b y s a y in g, “ It s o u n ds li k e yo u ’r e fe eli n g d es per ate a n d w ou ld li k e to n d so m e w ay o f c o n nec tin g w it h y o u r so n .” S u ch a p ara p h ra se o en en co u ra g es a p ers o n to lo ok w it h in . If w e hav e acc u ra te ly re ecte d h er sta te m en t, t h e m oth er m ig h t t o u ch u p on o th er f e eli n gs: “ M ay b e it ’s m y f a u lt . I ’m a lw ay s y elli n g a t h im .” A s th e li s ten er, w e wou ld c o n tin u e to s ta y w it h t h e f e eli n gs a n d n eed s b ein g e x p res se d a n d s a y, f o r ex am ple , “ A re yo u f e eli n g gu ilt y b ecau se y o u w ou ld h av e li k ed to h av e been m ore un dersta n din g o f h im th an yo u hav e been at tim es?” If th e moth er co n tin u es to sen se u n dersta n din g in o u r re ec tio n , sh e m ig h t m ove fu rth er in to h er fe eli n gs an d d ecla re , “ I’m ju st a f a ilu re a s a m oth er .” W e c o n tin u e to r em ain w it h t h e fe eli n gs a n d n eed s b ein g e x p re ss e d : “ S o y o u ’r e fe eli n g d is c o u ra g ed a n d w an t to r e la te d iff ere n tly t o h im ?” W e p er sis t in t h is m an ner u ntil t h e per so n h as ex h au ste d a ll h er f e eli n gs s u rro u n din g t h is i s su e. W hen w e s ta y w it h e m path y, w e a llo w s p ea k ers t o t o u ch d eep er l e v els o f t h em se lv es. W hat e v id en ce is th ere th at w e’v e ad eq u ate ly em path iz e d w it h th e oth er p ers o n ? F ir st, w hen a n in div id u al r e a li z e s th at e v er yth in g g o in g o n w it h in has re ce iv ed fu ll e m path ic u n dersta n din g, th ey w ill e x p er ien ce a sen se of re li e f. W e ca n beco m e aw are of th is ph en om en on by notic in g a co rre sp on din g re le a se o f te n sio n in o u r o w n b o d y. A se co n d, e v en m ore o bvio u s s ig n is th at th e p ers o n w ill s to p ta lk in g. If w e a re u n ce rta in a s to w heth er w e h av e s ta y ed lo n g e n ou gh in th e pro ce ss , w e c a n a lw ay s a sk , “ Is th ere m ore t h at y o u w an te d t o s a y ?” W e k n ow a s p ea k er h as r e ce iv ed a d eq u ate e m path y w hen (1 ) w e s e n se a r e le a se o f t e n sio n , o r ( 2) t h e fl ow o f w ord s co m es t o a h alt . When P ain B lo ck s O ur A bili t y t o Em path iz e It is im poss ib le fo r u s to g iv e so m eth in g to an oth er if w e don’t h av e it o u rs e lv es. L ik ew is e , if w e n d o u rs e lv es u n ab le or u nw illi n g to em path iz e d esp it e o u r e ff orts , it i s u su ally a s ig n t h at w e are to o s ta rv ed f o r em path y t o b e a b le to o ff er it to o th ers . S o m etim es, if w e op en ly a ck n ow le d ge th at o u r ow n dis tr e ss is pre v en tin g us fr o m res pon din g em path ic a lly , th e oth er p ers o n m ay c o m e t h ro u gh w it h t h e em path y w e need . W e n eed e m path y t o g iv e e m path y. A t o th er tim es, it m ay b e n eces sa ry to p ro vid e ou rs e lv es w it h so m e “e m erg en cy rst a id ” e m path y b y li s te n in g to w hat’s g o in g o n in o u rs e lv es w it h th e sa m e q u ali t y o f p re sen ce an d att en tio n th at w e off er to o th er s. F orm er U nit e d N atio n s S ecre ta ry -G en eral D ag H am marsk jo ld o n ce sa id , “ e m ore fa it h fu lly y o u li s te n to th e vo ic e w it h in y o u , th e bet ter y o u w ill h ear w hat is h ap p en in g o u ts id e.” If w e b eco m e sk ille d a t g iv in g o u rs e lv es em path y, w e o  en ex p erie n ce in ju st a fe w se co n ds a n atu ra l re le a se of en erg y t h at t h en e n ab le s u s t o b e p res en t w it h t h e oth er p er so n . I f t h is f a ils t o h ap p en , h ow ev er, w e h av e a c o u ple of o th er c h oic e s. W e c a n sc re am — non vio le n tly . I re ca ll sp en din g th re e day s m ed ia tin g betw een tw o g an gs th at h ad b een k illi n g e a ch o th er o ff . O ne gan g c a lle d th em se lv es B la ck E gyp tia n s; t h e o th er , t h e East S t. L ou is P oli c e D ep artm en t.  e s c o re w as t w o t o o n e— a t o ta l o f t h re e dea d w it h in a m on th . A er t h re e te n se d ay s tr y in g to b rin g th ese gro u p s to geth er to h ear e a ch o th er a n d re so lv e th eir d iff ere n ce s, I w as d riv in g h om e an d th in kin g h ow I n ev er w an te d t o b e i n t h e m id d le o f a c o n ic t a g ain f o r t h e res t o f m y l i f e .  e rst th in g I sa w w hen I w alk ed th ro u gh th e back d oor w as m y ch ild re n e n ta n gle d in a gh t. I h ad n o en ergy to em path iz e w it h t h em s o I s c re am ed n on vio le n tly : “ H ey, I ’m in a lo t o f p ain ! R ig h t n ow I r e a lly d o n ot w an t t o d ea l w it h y o u r gh tin g! I j u st w an t s o m e p ea ce a n d q u ie t!” M y o ld er so n , t h en n in e, s to p p ed s h ort, l o oked a t m e, a n d a sk ed , “ D o y o u w an t t o t a lk a b ou t i t ? ” If w e a re a b le t o s p ea k o u r p ain n ak ed ly w it h ou t b la m e, I n d t h at e v en p eo p le i n d is tr e ss a re s o m etim es a b le to h ear o u r n eed . O f c o u rs e I w ou ld n’t w an t to sc re am , “W hat’s th e m att er w it h yo u ? D on’t yo u k n ow h ow to b eh av e a n y b ett e r? I ju st g o t h om e a er a r o u gh d ay !” o r in sin u ate in a n y w ay th at th eir beh av io r w as at fa u lt . I sc re am n on vio len tly by ca lli n g att e n tio n t o m y o w n d esp era te n eed s a n d p ain i n t h e m om en t. I f, h ow ev er, t h e o th er p arty i s a ls o ex per ien cin g s u ch i n ten sit y o f f e eli n gs th at th ey c a n n eit h er h ear u s n or le av e us a lo n e, a n d n eit h er em ergen cy em path y n or n on vio le n t s c re am in g h as s er ved u s w ell, o u r t h ir d r e co u rs e is t o p hysic a lly re m ove o u rs e lv es fr o m th e sit u atio n . W e giv e ou rs e lv es tim e ou t a n d th e o p p ortu n it y to a cq u ir e th e em path y w e need to ret urn in a d iff ere n t f r a m e o f m in d. Su m mary E m path y is a r e sp ec tfu l u n dersta n din g o f w hat o th er s a re ex p er ien cin g. W e o en h av e a str o n g u rg e to g iv e a d vic e o r re a ssu ra n ce a n d to ex pla in o u r ow n p osit io n o r f e eli n g. E m path y, h ow ev er , c a lls u p on u s t o em pty o u r m in d an d l i s te n t o o th ers w it h o u r w hole b ei ng. In N VC, n o m att e r w hat w ord s o th er s m ay u se to ex pres s t h em se lv es , w e sim ply li s te n fo r th eir o b se rv atio n s, fe eli n gs, n eed s, a n d r e q u es ts .  en w e m ay w is h to r e ec t b ack , p ara p h ra sin g w hat w e h av e un dersto od . W e sta y w it h e m path y a n d a llo w o th ers th e op p ortu n it y to fu lly e x p res s th em se lv es b efo re w e t u rn o u r a tt e n tio n t o s o lu tio n s o r r e q u es ts f o r r e li ef . W e n eed em path y to g iv e em path y. W hen w e sen se ou rs e lv es b ei ng defe n siv e or un ab le to em path iz e, w e need to (1 ) sto p, bre ath e, giv e o u rs e lv es e m path y; ( 2 ) s c re am n on vio len tly ; o r ( 3 ) t a k e tim e ou t. N VC i n A ctio n A W if e C on nects W it h H er D yin g H usb an d A p atie n t h ad ju st b een d ia g n ose d w it h an ad van ce d sta g e o f lu n g ca n ce r.  e f o llo w in g s c e n e a t h is h om e, i n vo lv in g t h e patien t, h is w if e , a n d a v is it in g n u rs e , r e p re se n ts a la st o p p ortu n it y fo r h im to c o n nect em otio n ally w it h h is w if e a n d d is c u ss h is d yin g b ef ore bei ng a d m it t e d to th e h osp it a l.  e w if e b eg an th e co n ver sa tio n w it h th e nu rs e by co m pla in in g a b ou t th e p hysic a l th er ap is t w ho w as p art o f th e hom e hea lt h c a re t e am a ss ig n ed t o h er h u sb an d’s c a re . W if e : S h e’s a b ad t h era p is t. N urs e : (li s te n in g e m path ic a lly to w hat th e wif e is fe eli n g a n d w an tin g) A re y o u f e eli n g a n noyed a n d w an tin g t o s e e a d iff er en t q u ali t y o f c a re ? W if e : S h e d oesn ’t d o a n yth in g. S h e m ad e him s to p w alk in g w hen h is p u ls e g o t h ig h . N urs e : (c o n tin u in g to h ea r th e wif e ’s fe eli n gs a n d w an ts ) Is it b ecau se yo u w an t y o u r h u sb an d to g et b et ter th at y o u ’r e sc a re d if th e physic a l t h era p is t d oesn ’t p u sh h im , h e w on’t g et s tr o n ger? W if e : (sta rtin g t o c r y ) Y es, I ’m s o s c a re d ! N urs e : A re y o u s c a re d o f l o sin g h im ? W if e : Y es, w e’v e b een t o geth er s o l o n g. N urs e : (li s te n in g fo r o th er fe eli n gs b eh in d th e fe a r) A re y o u w orr y in g ab ou t h ow y o u w ou ld f e el i f h e d ies ? W if e : I ju st c a n ’t im ag in e h ow I a m g o in g to li v e wit h ou t h im . H e’s a lw ay s b een t h ere f o r m e. A lw ay s. N urs e : S o y o u ’r e s a d w hen y o u t h in k o f l i v in g w it h ou t h im ? W if e :  ere is n o o n e e ls e b esid es h im . H e’s a ll I h av e, y o u k n ow . M y dau gh te r w on’t e v en t a lk t o m e. N urs e : It so u n ds li k e w hen yo u th in k of yo u r d au gh ter , yo u fe el fr u str a te d b ecau se y o u w is h y o u h ad a d iff er en t re la tio n sh ip w it h h er. W if e : I w is h I d id , b u t s h e i s s u ch a s e l sh p er so n . I d on’t k n ow w hy I e v en b oth ere d h av in g k id s. A l o t o f g o o d i t d oes m e now ! N urs e : S o u n ds to m e li k e yo u m ig h t be so m ew hat an gry an d dis a p p oin te d b ecau se y o u w an t m ore su pp ort fr o m th e fa m ily d u rin g y o u r h u sb an d’s i lln ess . W if e : Y es, h e’s s o s ic k ; I d on’t k n ow h ow I a m g o in g to g et th ro u gh th is a lo n e. I h av en ’t a n yo n e … n ot e v en t o t a lk t o , ex ce p t w it h y o u h ere … n ow . E ven h e w on’t ta lk a b ou t it … . L ook a t h im ! (H usb an d re m ain s sile n t an d im pa ssiv e.) H e doesn ’t sa y a n yth in g! N urs e : A re y o u s a d , w is h in g t h e t w o o f y o u c o u ld s u pp ort e a ch o th er an d f e el m ore c o n nec te d ? W if e : Y es. ( S h e pau se s, t h en m akes a r e q u est.) T alk t o h im t h e w ay y o u ta lk t o m e. N urs e : (w is h in g to c le a rly u n dersta n d th e need th at is b ein g a d dre ss e d b eh in d t h e w if e ’s r e q u est) A re y o u w an tin g h im t o b e li s te n ed t o in a w ay t h at h elp s h im e x p re ss w hat h e’s f e eli n g i n sid e? W if e : Y es, y es, t h at’s e x actly it ! I w an t h im t o f e el c o m fo rta b le ta lk in g an d I w an t t o k n ow w hat h e i s f e eli n g. U sin g t h e n u rs e’s g u ess , t h e w if e w as a b le to rst b eco m e aw are of w hat sh e w an te d a n d th en n d th e w ord s to a rtic u la te it .  is w as a k ey m om en t: o  en it is d iffi cu lt fo r p eo p le to id en tif y w hat t h ey w an t in a s it u atio n , e v en th ou gh th ey m ay k n ow w hat th ey d on’t w an t. W e se e h ow a c le ar r e q u est— “T alk to h im th e way y o u ta lk to m e” — is a g i t h at e m pow ers th e o th er p ers o n .  e nu rs e was th en a b le to a ct in a w ay s h e k n ew t o b e i n h arm on y w it h t h e w if e ’s w is h es.  is a lt e re d t h e atm osp h ere in th e r o om , a s th e n u rs e an d th e wif e co u ld n ow “ w ork to geth er,” b oth i n a c o m pass io n ate m od e. N urs e : (tu rn in g to th e hu sb an d) H ow d o y o u fe el w hen y o u h ear w hat y o u r w if e h as s h are d ? H usb an d: I r e a lly l o ve h er. N urs e : A re y o u g la d t o h av e a n o p p ortu n it y t o t a lk a b ou t t h is w it h h er? H usb an d: Yes, w e n eed t o t a lk a b ou t i t . N urs e : W ou ld y o u b e w illi n g to s a y h ow y o u a re fe eli n g a b ou t th e ca n ce r? H usb an d: (a  er a b rie f s ile n ce) N ot v ery g o od .  e w ord s g o od an d ba d are o  en u se d to d esc rib e fe eli n gs w hen p eo p le h av e y et t o id en tif y t h e s p eci c e m otio n t h ey a re ex per ien cin g. E xp re ss in g h is f e eli n gs m ore p re cis e ly w ou ld h elp t h is p atien t w it h t h e em otio n al c o n nec tio n h e w as s e ek in g w it h h is w if e . N urs e : (e n co u ra gin g h im to m ove to w ard m ore pre cis io n ) A re y o u sc a re d a b ou t d yin g? H usb an d: N o, n ot sc a re d . ( N otic e th e nu rse ’s in co rre ct g u ess d oes n ot h am per t h e co n tin u ed fl ow o f d ia lo gu e.) N urs e : (B eca u se th is patie n t is n ’t ab le to verb ali z e his in te rn al ex p erie n ce ea sily , th e nu rse co n tin u es to su pp ort h im in th e pro ce ss .) D o y o u f e el a n gry a b ou t d yin g? Husb an d: N o, n ot a n gry. N urs e : (A t t h is p oin t, a  er t w o i n co rre ct g u ess e s, t h e nu rse decid es t o e x p re ss h er o w n fe eli n gs.) W ell, n ow I ’m p u zzle d a b ou t w hat y o u m ay b e f e eli n g, a n d w on der i f y o u c a n t e ll m e. H usb an d: I r e ck o n , I ’m t h in kin g h ow s h e’l l d o w it h ou t m e. N urs e : O h, a re y o u w orrie d s h e m ay n ot b e ab le to h an dle her li f e w it h ou t y o u ? H usb an d: Yes, w orrie d s h e’l l m is s m e. N urs e : (S h e is a w are th at d yin g p atie n ts o  en h an g o n d u e to w orr y o ver th ose th ey are le a vin g beh in d, an d so m etim es need re a ssu ra n ce th at lo ved o n es c a n a cce p t t h eir d ea th b efo re th ey ca n le t th em se lv es g o .) D o y o u w an t to h ear h ow y o u r w if e fe els w hen y o u s a y t h at? H usb an d: Yes. H ere t h e w if e j o in ed t h e c o n vers a tio n ; i n t h e co n tin u ed p res en ce o f th e n u rs e , t h e c o u ple b eg an t o e x p res s t h em se lv es o p en ly t o e a ch o th er . In t h is d ia lo gu e, t h e w if e b eg an w it h a c o m pla in t a b ou t t h e physic a l th era p is t. H ow ev er, a  er a se ries o f ex ch an ges d u rin g w hic h sh e fe lt e m path ic a lly r e ce iv ed , s h e w as a b le to d eter m in e th at w hat s h e re a lly s o u gh t w as a d eep er c o n nec tio n w it h h er h u sb an d d u rin g th is c rit ic a l sta g e o f t h eir l i v es. Exerc is e 5 R EC EIV IN G E M PA T H IC A LLY V ER SU S N O N-E M PA T H IC A LLY T o s e e w heth er w e a re i n a g re em en t a b ou t t h e ver bal ex pres sio n o f em path y, p le a se c ir c le th e n u m ber in fr o n t o f e a ch sta te m en t in w hic h p er so n B is r e sp on din g e m path ic a lly t o w hat i s g o in g o n w it h in P er so n A . 1. P ers o n A : H ow c o u ld I d o s o m eth in g s o s tu pid ? P ers o n B : N ob o d y i s p erfe c t; y o u ’r e t o o h ard o n y o u rs e lf . 2 . P ers o n A : If y o u a sk m e, w e o u gh t t o s h ip a ll t h es e im mig ra n ts b ack t o w here t h ey c a m e f r o m . Pers o n B : D o y o u r e a lly t h in k t h at w ou ld s o lv e an yth in g? 3 . P ers o n A : You a re n ’t G od ! P ers o n B : A re y o u fe eli n g fr u str a te d b ecau se yo u w ou ld li k e m e to a d m it th at th ere ca n b e oth er w ay s of in ter pret in g th is m att e r? 4 . P ers o n A : I th in k th at y o u ta k e m e fo r g ra n te d . I w on der h ow y o u w ou ld m an ag e w it h ou t m e. P ers o n B :  at’s n ot t r u e! I d on’t t a k e y o u f o r g ra n te d . 5. P ers o n A : H ow c o u ld y o u s a y a t h in g l i k e t h at t o m e? Pers o n B : A re y o u f e eli n g h u rt b ecau se I s a id t h at? 6 . P ers o n A : I’m fu rio u s w it h m y h u sb an d. H e’s n ev er a ro u n d w hen I n eed h im . Pers o n B : You t h in k h e s h ou ld b e a ro u n d m ore th an h e is ? 7 . P ers o n A : I’m d is g u ste d w it h h ow h eav y I ’m g ett in g. P ers o n B : Perh ap s j o ggin g w ou ld h elp . 8. P ers o n A : I’v e been a nerv o u s w re ck pla n nin g fo r m y dau gh ter ’s w ed din g. H er an cé’s f a m ily i s n ot h elp in g. A bou t e v er y d ay th ey c h an ge th eir m in ds a b ou t th e kin d o f w ed din g th ey w ou ld l i k e. P ers o n B : So y o u ’r e f e eli n g n erv o u s a b ou t h ow t o m ak e arra n gem en ts a n d w ou ld a p pre cia te i t i f y o u r f u tu re in -la w s c o u ld b e m ore aw are o f t h e c o m pli c atio n s t h eir i n decis io n c re ate s f o r y o u ? 9. P ers o n A : W hen m y r e la tiv es c o m e w it h ou t let tin g m e kn ow a h ea d o f tim e, I f e el in vad ed . I t r e m in ds m e of h ow m y p aren ts u se d to d is re g ard m y n eed s a n d w ou ld p la n t h in gs f o r m e. P ers o n B : I k n ow h ow y o u f e el. I u se d t o f e el t h at w ay t o o. 10. P ers o n A : I’m d is a p p oin te d w it h y o u r p erfo rm an ce. I w ou ld h av e li k ed y o u r d ep artm en t t o d ou ble y o u r p ro du ctio n l a st m on th . Pers o n B : I u n dersta n d th at y o u a re d is a p p oin te d , b u t w e hav e had m an y a b se n ce s d u e t o i lln ess . H ere are m y r e sp on se s f o r E xerc is e 5: 1. I d id n’t c ir c le th is o n e b ecau se I se e Per so n B g iv in g re a ssu ra n ce to P ers o n A ra th er th an em path ic a lly re ce iv in g w hat Per so n A is e x p re ss in g. 2. I s e e P ers o n B a tt e m ptin g t o e d u cate Per so n A r a th er t h an em path ic a lly r e ce iv in g w hat P ers o n A i s e x p re ss in g. 3. I f y o u c ir c le d th is w e a re in a g re em ent. I se e Per so n B em path ic a lly r e ce iv in g w hat P ers o n A i s e x p re ss in g. 4. I d id n’t c ir c le t h is o n e b ecau se I s e e Per so n B d is a g re ei ng a n d d ef en din g ra th er t h an e m path ic a lly r e ce iv in g w hat i s g o in g o n i n P er so n A . 5. I s e e P ers o n B ta k in g r e sp on sib ili t y fo r P er so n A ’s fe eli n gs r a th er th an em path ic a lly r e ce iv in g w hat i s g o in g o n i n P er so n A . A n e x am ple of a n em path ic r e sp on se m ig h t b e: “A re yo u fe eli n g h u rt b ecau se yo u w ou ld h av e l i k ed m e t o a g re e t o d o w hat y o u r e q u es te d ?” 6. I f y o u c ir c le d t h is w e a re in p artia l a g re em ent. I s e e Per so n B r e cei vin g Pers o n A ’s t h ou gh ts . H ow ev er, I b eli e v e we c o n nect m ore deep ly w hen w e re ce iv e th e fe eli n gs an d n eed s b ei ng ex p res se d ra th er th an th e th ou gh ts .  ere fo re , I w ou ld h av e pref er re d it i f P er so n B h ad s a id , “ S o yo u ’r e fe eli n g fu rio u s b ecau se y o u w ou ld li k e h im to b e aro u n d m ore th an h e i s ? ” 7. I d id n’t c ir c le t h is o n e b ecau se I s e e Per so n B g iv in g a d vic e r a th er t h an em path ic a lly r e ce iv in g w hat i s g o in g o n i n P er so n A . 8. I f y o u c ir c le d th is w e a re in a g re em ent. I se e Per so n B em path ic a lly r e ce iv in g w hat i s g o in g o n i n P ers o n A . 9. I did n’t cir c le th is on e becau se I se e Per so n B assu m in g th ey u n dersta n d an d ta lk in g ab ou t th ei r ow n fe eli n gs ra th er th an em path ic a lly r e ce iv in g w hat i s g o in g o n i n P er so n A . 10 . I d id n’t c ir c le th is o n e b ecau se I s e e Per so n B s ta rtin g b y fo cu sin g o n P ers o n A ’s f e eli n gs b u t t h en s h i in g t o ex pla in in g. 8 e P ow er o f E m path y C Em path y  at H ea ls a rl R ogers d esc rib ed t h e i m pact o f e m path y o n i t s r e cip ien ts : “ W hen … s o m eo n e r e a lly h ears y o u w it h ou t p ass in g ju dgm en t o n y o u , w it h ou t tr y in g to ta k e re sp on sib ili t y fo r y o u , w it h ou t tr y in g to m old y o u , it fe els d am n g o od ! … W hen I h av e b een li s te n ed t o a n d w hen I h av e been h eard , I a m a b le t o r e p erc e iv e m y w orld in a n ew w ay a n d t o g o o n . I t is a sto n is h in g how e le m en ts th at se em in so lu ble beco m e so lu ble when so m eo n e li s ten s, h ow co n fu sio n s th at se em ir rem ed ia b le tu rn in to re la tiv ely cle ar ow in g str e am s w hen o n e i s h eard .” E m path y a llo w s u s “ to r e p erc e iv e [ o u r] w orld in a n ew w ay a n d t o g o o n .” O ne o f m y f a v o rit e s to rie s a b ou t em path y c o m es f r o m t h e prin cip al o f a n in novativ e s c h ool. S h e h ad re tu rn ed a  er lu n ch o n e d ay to n d M illy , a n ele m en ta ry s c h ool s tu den t, s it t in g d eje cte d ly i n h er o ffi ce wait in g t o s e e her . Sh e s a t d ow n n ex t t o M illy , w ho b eg an , “ M rs . A nder so n , h av e yo u e v er h ad a w eek w hen e v ery th in g y o u d id h u rt s o m eb o d y e ls e , a n d y o u n ev er i n ten ded to h u rt a n yo n e a t a ll? ” “Y es,” th e p rin cip al re p li e d , “I th in k I u n der sta n d,” w her eu pon M illy p ro ce ed ed t o d esc rib e h er w eek . “ B y n ow ,” t h e prin cip al r e la te d , “ I w as q u it e la te f o r a v ery i m porta n t m eetin g— still h ad m y c o at o n — an d a n xio u s n ot t o k eep a r o om f u ll o f p eo p le w ait in g, a n d s o I a sk ed , ‘M illy , w hat c a n I d o f o r yo u ?’ M illy r e a ch ed o ver, to ok b oth m y s h ou ld er s in h er h an ds, lo oked m e str a ig h t i n t h e e y es, a n d s a id v ery rm ly , ‘M rs . A nder so n , I d on’t w an t y o u t o d o a n yth in g; I j u st w an t y o u t o l i s te n .’ “ D on’t j u st d o s o m eth in g… .” “  is w as o n e o f t h e m ost s ig n i ca n t m om en ts o f le arn in g in m y li f e— t a u gh t to m e b y a c h ild — so I th ou gh t, ‘N ev er m in d th e ro om fu l o f a d u lt s w ait in g fo r m e!’ M illy a n d I m oved o ver to a b en ch th at a ff ord ed u s m ore priv acy a n d s a t, m y a rm a ro u n d h er s h ou ld er s, h er h ea d o n m y c h es t, a n d her a rm a ro u n d m y w ais t, w hile sh e ta lk ed u ntil sh e was d on e. A nd y o u k n ow , i t d id n’t t a k e t h at l o n g.” O ne o f t h e m ost s a tis fy in g a sp ec ts o f m y w ork i s t o h ear h ow i n div id u als h av e u se d N VC to str e n gth en th ei r ab ili t y to co n nect em path ic a lly w it h o th ers . M y fr ie n d L au re n ce, w ho li v es in S w it z e rla n d, d esc rib ed h ow u p set sh e fe lt w hen h er s ix -y ear- o ld s o n h ad s to rm ed a w ay a n grily w hile sh e was still ta lk in g to him . Is a b elle , her ten -y ear- o ld dau gh ter , who had acco m pan ie d h er to a re ce n t N VC w ork sh op, rem ark ed , “S o y o u ’r e re a lly a n gry, M om . Y ou ’d li k e fo r h im to ta lk w hen h e’s a n gry a n d n ot r u n o ff .” L au re n ce m arv ele d at how , up on hearin g Is a b elle ’s w ord s, sh e fe lt an im med ia te d im in is h in g o f te n sio n , a n d w as su bse q u en tly a b le to b e m ore u n dersta n din g w it h h er s o n w hen h e ret urn ed . A c o lle g e in str u cto r d esc rib ed h ow r e la tio n sh ip s b et ween s tu den ts a n d fa cu lt y h ad b een a ff ec te d w hen s e v er al m em ber s o f th e fa cu lt y le arn ed to li s te n e m path ic a lly a n d t o e x p re ss t h em se lv es m ore vu ln er ab ly a n d h on es tly . “  e stu den ts o p en ed u p m ore a n d m ore an d to ld u s a b ou t th e vario u s p ers o n al p ro ble m s th at w ere in ter fer in g w it h th ei r stu dies .  e m ore th ey ta lk ed a b ou t it , t h e m ore w ork t h ey w ere ab le to c o m plet e. E ven t h ou gh t h is k in d o f li s te n in g t o ok a lo t o f o u r t im e, w e were gla d t o s p en d it i n t h is w ay. U nfo rtu n ate ly , th e d ean go t u p set ; h e sa id w e wer e not co u n se lo rs an d sh ou ld s p en d m ore t im e t e a ch in g a n d l es s t im e ta lk in g w it h t h e stu den ts .” W hen I a sk ed h ow t h e f a cu lt y h ad d ea lt w it h t h is , t h e in str u cto r r ep li e d , “W e e m path iz e d w it h t h e d ean ’s c o n cer n. W e heard t h at h e fe lt w orrie d a n d w an te d to k n ow th at w e w ere n ’t get tin g in vo lv ed in th in gs w e co u ld n’t h an dle . W e a ls o h eard th at h e n eed ed re a ssu ra n ce th at th e tim e sp en t o n ta lk in g w asn ’t c u tt in g in to o u r te a ch in g r e sp on sib ili t ie s. H e s e em ed r e li e v ed b y th e w ay w e li s te n ed to h im . W e co n tin u ed to ta lk w it h th e stu den ts b ecau se w e c o u ld s e e t h at t h e m ore we li s te n ed t o t h em , t h e bet ter t h ey d id i n t h eir s tu die s.” W hen w e w ork in a h ie ra rc h ic a lly str u ctu re d in stit u tio n , th er e is a te n den cy to h ear c o m man ds a n d ju dgm en ts fr o m th ose hig h er u p in th e h ie ra rc h y. W hile w e m ay e a sily em path iz e w it h o u r p eer s a n d w it h t h ose in le ss p ow erfu l p osit io n s, w e m ay n d o u rs e lv es b ei ng d efen siv e or a p olo get ic , in ste a d o f e m path ic , in t h e p re se n ce o f t h ose we id en tif y a s o u r “ s u p er io rs .” is is w hy I w as p artic u la rly p le a se d th at th es e fa cu lt y m em ber s h ad re m em bere d t o e m path iz e w it h t h ei r d ean a s w ell a s w it h t h ei r s tu den ts . I t’s hard er to em path iz e w it h th os e w ho ap p ea r to p oss e ss m ore p ow er, s ta tu s, o r r e so u rc e s. Em path y a n d t h e A bili t y t o B e V uln era b le B ecau se w e are ca lle d to re v ea l o u r d eep es t fe eli n gs an d n ee d s, w e may so m etim es n d it c h alle n gin g to e x p res s o u rs e lv es in N VC. S elf – ex pres sio n b eco m es e a sie r, h ow ev er, a  er w e em path iz e w it h o th er s, b ecau se we will t h en h av e to u ch ed th eir h u m an nes s a n d r e a li z e d th e co m mon q u ali t ies w e sh are .  e m ore w e c o n nec t w it h t h e fe eli n gs a n d n eed s b eh in d t h ei r w ord s, th e le ss f r ig h te n in g i t i s t o o p en u p t o o th er p eo p le .  e sit u atio n s w her e we are t h e m ost r e lu cta n t t o e x p re ss v u ln er ab ili t y a re o en t h ose w her e w e w an t to m ain ta in a “ to u gh i m ag e” f o r f e ar o f l o sin g a u th orit y o r c o n tr o l.  e m ore w e e m path iz e w it h th e o th er p arty , th e s a fe r w e f e el. O nce I sh ow ed m y v u ln era b ili t y to s o m e m em ber s o f a str e et g an g in C le v ela n d b y a ck n ow le d gin g th e h u rt I w as fe eli n g an d m y d es ir e to b e tr e ate d w it h m ore r e sp ec t. “ O h, lo ok,” o n e of th em r em ark ed , “ h e’s fe eli n g hu rt; is n ’t th at to o b ad !” a t w hic h p oin t a ll h is fr ien ds c h im ed in la u gh in g. H ere a g ain , I c o u ld in te rp re t th em a s ta k in g a d van ta g e o f m y v u ln er ab ili t y ( O ptio n 2 : B la m e o th ers ), o r I c o u ld e m path iz e w it h t h e fe eli n gs a n d n eed s beh in d t h eir b eh av io r ( O ptio n 4 : S en se oth er s’ f e eli n gs a n d n eed s). If, how ev er, I hav e an im ag e th at I’m bei ng hu m ili a te d an d ta k en ad van ta g e of, I m ay fe el to o w ou n ded , an gry, or sc a re d to be ab le to e m path iz e. A t s u ch a m om en t, I w ou ld n eed t o w it h dra w p hysic a lly i n o rd er to o ff er m yse lf s o m e e m path y o r to r e q u es t it fr o m a r e li a b le so u rc e. A er dis c o verin g th e n eed s th at h ad b een so p ow er fu lly tr ig gere d in m e an d re ce iv in g a d eq u ate e m path y fo r t h em , I w ou ld t h en b e re a d y to r et urn a n d em path iz e w it h th e o th er p arty . In sit u atio n s o f p ain , I re co m men d rst g ett in g th e e m path y n ece ss a ry to g o b ey o n d th e th ou gh ts o cc u pyin g o u r hea d s a n d r e co gn iz e o u r d eep er n eed s. A s I li s te n ed c lo se ly t o t h e g an g m em ber ’s r em ark , “ O h lo ok, h e’s f e eli n g hu rt; i s n ’t t h at t o o b ad ?” a n d t h e la u gh ter t h at f o llo w ed , I s en se d t h at h e an d his f r ie n ds w ere a n noyed a n d n ot w an tin g t o b e su bje cte d t o g u ilt t r ip s a n d m an ip u la tio n .  ey m ay h av e b een re a ctin g to p eo p le in th ei r p asts w ho use d p h ra se s li k e th at h u rts m e to im ply d is a p pro val. S in ce I d id n’t v er if y it w it h th em o u t lo u d, I h av e n o w ay o f k n ow in g if m y g u es s w as in fa ct a cc u ra te . Ju st fo cu sin g m y a tt e n tio n th er e, h ow ev er , k ep t m e fr o m ei th er ta k in g it p ers o n ally o r g ett in g a n gry. I n ste a d o f ju dgin g t h em fo r r id ic u li n g m e o r tr e atin g m e d is re sp ec tfu lly , I c o n cen tr a te d o n h earin g th e pain a n d th e n eed s b eh in d s u ch b eh av io r. “ H ey,” o n e o f t h em b u rst o u t, “ th is is a b u n ch o f c ra p y o u ’r e off er in g u s! S u pp ose th ere a re m em bers o f a n oth er g an g h er e an d th ey h av e gu n s a n d yo u d on’t . A nd y o u s a y j u st s ta n d t h er e an d ta lk t o t h em ? C ra p !”  en e v ery b o d y w as l a u gh in g a g ain , a n d a g ain I d ir e cte d m y a tt en tio n t o t h eir f e eli n gs a n d n eed s: “ S o it s o u n ds li k e y o u ’r e re a lly f e d u p w it h le arn in g so m eth in g t h at h as n o r e le v an ce i n t h ose sit u atio n s? ” “Y ea h , a n d if y o u li v ed in t h is n ei gh borh ood , y o u ’d kn ow t h is is a b u n ch o f c ra p .” “ S o y o u n eed to tr u st th at s o m eo n e te a ch in g y o u s o m eth in g h as s o m e kn ow le d ge o f y o u r n eig h borh ood ?” “D am n r ig h t. S o m e o f t h ese d u des w ou ld b la st y o u a w ay b ef ore yo u g o t tw o w ord s o u t o f y o u r m ou th !” “A nd y o u n eed to tr u st th at so m eo n e tr y in g to te a ch y o u so m ethin g un dersta n ds t h e d an gers a ro u n d h er e? ” I c o n tin u ed t o li s te n i n t h is m an ner , so m etim es v erb ali z in g w hat I h eard a n d s o m etim es n ot.  is c o n tin u ed fo r fo rty – ve m in ute s, an d th en I sen se d a sh i : th ey fe lt th at I w as tr u ly u n dersta n din g th em . A co u n se lo r in th e pro gra m n otic e d th e sh i , an d ask ed t h em o u t l o u d, “ W hat d o y o u t h in k o f t h is m an ?”  e gen tlem an w ho h ad b een g iv in g m e th e r o u gh est tim e rep li e d , “ H e’s th e bes t s p ea k er w e’v e ev er h ad .” A sto n is h ed , t h e c o u n se lo r t u rn ed t o m e an d w his p er ed , “ B ut y o u h av en ’t s a id a n yth in g!” In fa ct, I h ad sa id a lo t b y d em on str a tin g th at th er e was n oth in g th ey c o u ld th ro w a t m e th at c o u ld n’t b e tr a n sla te d in to u n iv er sa l h u m an f e eli n gs a n d n eed s. W e “ s a y a l o t” b y l i s te n in g f o r o th er p eo p le ’s f e eli n gs a n d need s. I Usin g E m path y t o D efu se D an ger  e ab ili t y to o ff er em path y to p eo p le in str es sfu l sit u atio n s ca n d ef use p ote n tia l v io le n ce. A t e a ch er i n t h e i n ner c it y o f S t. L ou is r e la te d a n i n cid en t w her e sh e had co n sc ie n tio u sly s ta y ed a  er s c h ool to h elp a s tu den t, e v en th ou gh te a ch er s were w arn ed , fo r th eir o w n s a fet y, to le av e th e bu ild in g a  er c la ss es w er e dis m is s e d . A s tr a n ger e n te re d h er c la ss ro om , w her e th e fo llo w in g ex ch an ge to ok p la ce : Y ou n g m an : Tak e o ff y o u r c lo th es. T ea ch er: (n otic in g t h at t h e yo u ng m an w as s h akin g) I ’m s e n sin g t h is i s v ery s c a ry f o r y o u . You n g m an : D id y o u h ear m e? G od d am n i t , t a k e off y o u r clo th es! T ea ch er: I’m s e n sin g y o u ’r e r e a lly p is s e d o ff r ig h t n ow a n d yo u w an t m e t o d o w hat y o u ’r e t e lli n g m e. Y ou n g m an : You ’r e d am ned r ig h t, a n d y o u ’r e g o in g t o g et h u rt i f y o u d on’t . T ea ch er: I’d l i k e y o u t o t e ll m e i f t h ere ’s s o m e o th er w ay o f m eetin g y o u r n eed s t h at w ou ld n’t h u rt m e. Y ou n g m an : I s a id t a k e t h em o ff . Tea ch er: I c a n h ear h ow m uch y o u w an t t h is . A t t h e sa m e tim e, I w an t y o u t o k n ow h ow s c a re d a n d h orrib le I fe el, a n d h ow g ra te fu l I ’d b e i f y o u ’d l e av e w it h ou t hu rtin g m e. Y ou n g m an : G iv e m e y o u r p u rs e .  e t e a ch er h an ded t h e s tr a n ger h er p u rs e , r e li e v ed n ot t o b e ra p ed . S h e la te r d esc rib ed h ow , e a ch tim e sh e em path iz e d w it h th e yo u n g m an , sh e co u ld s e n se h im b eco m in g le ss a d am an t in h is in ten tio n to fo llo w th ro u gh w it h t h e r a p e. A m etr o p oli t a n p oli c e o ffi ce r att en din g a fo llo w -u p tr a in in g in N VC on ce g re ete d m e w it h t h is a cco u nt: I ’m s u re g la d y o u h ad u s p ra ctic in g e m path y w it h a n gry p eo p le th at la st t im e. J u st a f e w d ay s a  er o u r s es sio n , I w en t t o a rres t s o m eo n e in a p u bli c h ou sin g p ro je c t. W hen I b ro u gh t h im o u t, m y ca r w as su rro u n ded b y a b ou t s ix ty p eo p le sc re am in g t h in gs a t m e l i k e, ‘L et h im g o ! H e d id n’t d o an yth in g! Y ou p oli c e are a b u n ch o f ra cis t p ig s!’ A lt h ou gh I w as s k ep tic a l t h at e m path y w ou ld h elp , I d id n’t h av e m an y oth er o p tio n s. S o I r e ec te d b ack t h e fe eli n gs t h at w er e co m in g a t m e; I s a id t h in gs li k e, ‘S o y o u d on’t t r u st m y r e a so n s fo r a rres tin g t h is m an ? You th in k it has to do w it h ra ce? ’ A er se v er al m in utes of m y co n tin u in g t o r e ec t t h eir f e eli n gs, t h e gro u p b eca m e les s h ostile . I n t h e en d t h ey o p en ed a p ath s o I c o u ld g et t o m y c a r. F in ally , I ’d li k e t o i llu str a te h ow a y o u n g w om an u se d e m path y t o b yp ass v io le n ce d u rin g h er n ig h t sh i a t a d ru g d et oxi catio n c en ter in T oro n to .  e y o u n g w om an r e co u nte d th is s to ry d u rin g th e se co n d N VC w ork sh op sh e a tt e n ded . A t e le v en o ’c lo ck o n e n ig h t, a fe w w eek s a  er h er rst N VC tr a in in g, a m an w ho’d o bvio u sly b een ta k in g d ru gs w alk ed in o ff th e str e et a n d d em an ded a r o om .  e y o u n g w om an s ta rte d t o ex pla in t o h im th at a ll t h e r o om s h ad b een lle d f o r t h e n ig h t. S h e was a b ou t t o h an d t h e m an t h e ad dre ss o f a n oth er d eto x c e n te r w hen h e hu rle d h er to th e gro u n d. “  e nex t th in g I k n ew , h e w as sit t in g a cro ss m y c h es t h old in g a k n if e to m y th ro at a n d s h ou tin g, ‘Y ou b it c h , d on’t l i e to m e! Y ou d o t o o h av e a r o om !’” S h e t h en p ro ce ed ed t o a p p ly h er t r a in in g b y l i s ten in g f o r h is f e eli n gs a n d need s. “ Y ou re m em bere d to do th at un der th ose co n dit io n s? ” I ask ed , im pre ss e d . “W hat ch oic e did I hav e? Desp er atio n so m etim es m ak es go od co m mun ic ato rs o f u s a ll! Y ou k n ow , M arsh all,” s h e ad ded , “ th at j o ke yo u t o ld i n t h e w ork sh op r e a lly h elp ed m e. I n f a ct, I t h in k i t s a v ed m y l i f e .” “ W hat j o ke?” “R em em ber w hen y o u s a id n ev er t o p u t y o u r ‘b u t’ i n t h e fa ce of a n a n gry p ers o n ? I w as a ll r e a d y to s ta rt a rg u in g w it h h im ; I w as a b ou t to s a y, ‘B ut I d on’t h av e a r o om !’ w hen I r e m em ber ed y o u r jo ke. I t h ad r e a lly s ta y ed w it h m e b ecau se o n ly th e w eek b efo re , I w as a rg u in g w it h m y m oth er a n d s h e’d s a id to m e, ‘I c o u ld k ill y o u w hen y o u a n sw er “ b u t” to e v er yth in g I sa y !’ I m ag in e, i f m y o w n m oth er w as a n gry en ou gh t o k ill m e fo r u sin g t h at w ord , what w ou ld t h is m an h av e d on e? I f I ’d s a id , ‘B ut I d on’t h av e a r o om !’ w hen h e w as s c re am in g a t m e, I h av e n o d ou bt h e w ou ld h av e sli t m y t h ro at. R ath er th an p u t yo u r “b u t” in th e fa ce o f an an gry p erso n , e m path iz e. “S o in ste a d , I to ok a d eep b re ath a n d s a id , ‘I t s o u n ds li k e yo u ’r e re a lly a n gry a n d y o u w an t t o b e g iv en a r o om .’ H e yelle d b ack , ‘I m ay b e an a d dic t, b u t b y G od , I d ese rv e r e sp ec t. I’m tir e d o f n ob o d y g iv in g m e r es pect. M y pare n ts d on’t g iv e m e r e sp ec t. I ’m g o n na g et r es pect!’ I ju st fo cu se d o n h is f e eli n gs a n d n eed s a n d s a id , ‘A re yo u f e d u p, n ot g et tin g t h e res pect t h at y o u w an t? ’” “ H ow l o n g d id t h is g o o n ?” I a sk ed . “O h, a b ou t a n oth er t h ir ty – ve m in utes ,” s h e rep li e d . “ at m ust h av e b een t e rrif y in g.” “ N o, n ot a  er th e rst c o u ple o f in ter ch an ges, b ecau se th en s o m ethin g els e w e’d le arn ed h ere b eca m e a p p aren t. W hen I c o n cen tr a te d o n li s ten in g fo r h is fe eli n gs a n d n eed s, I s to p p ed s e ei ng h im a s a m on ster . I c o u ld s e e, ju st a s y o u ’d s a id , h ow p eo p le w ho s e em li k e m on ster s a re sim ply h u m an b ein gs w hose la n gu ag e a n d b eh av io r s o m etim es k eep u s fr o m s e ei ng th ei r hu m an ness .  e m ore I w as a b le to fo cu s m y a tt en tio n o n h is fe eli n gs a n d need s, th e m ore I s a w h im a s a p er so n fu ll o f d esp air w hose need s w er en ’t b ein g m et. I b eca m e c o n den t t h at i f I h eld m y a tt en tio n t h er e, I w ou ld n’t b e hu rt. A er h e’d r e ce iv ed t h e e m path y h e need ed , h e go t o ff m e, p u t t h e kn if e a w ay, a n d I h elp ed h im n d a r o om a t a n oth er c e n ter .” W hen w e l i s te n f o r f e eli n gs a n d n eed s, w e n o l o n ger s e e p eo p le a s m on ste rs. D eli g h te d t h at s h e’d le arn ed t o r es pon d e m path ic a lly i n s u ch a n ex tr em e sit u atio n , I a sk ed c u rio u sly , “ W hat a re yo u d oin g b ack h er e? It s o u n ds li k e yo u ’v e m aste re d N VC an d sh ou ld be ou t te a ch in g oth er s w hat yo u ’v e le arn ed .” “ N ow I n eed y o u t o h elp m e w it h a h ard o n e,” s h e sa id . “I’m a lm ost a fr a id t o a sk . W hat c o u ld b e hard er t h an t h at? ” “N ow I n eed y o u t o h elp m e w it h m y m oth er . D es pit e all t h e in sig h t I g o t in to t h at ‘b u t’ p h en om en on , y o u k n ow w hat h ap p en ed ? A t s u pp er t h e nex t ev en in g w hen I t o ld m y m oth er w hat h ad h ap p en ed , s h e sa id , ‘Y ou ’r e go in g to c au se y o u r f a th er a n d m e t o h av e a h eart a tt a ck if y o u k eep t h at jo b. Y ou sim ply h av e t o n d d iff ere n t w ork !’ S o g u es s w hat I s a id t o h er ? ‘B ut, m oth er, it ’s m y l i f e !’” I t m ay b e d iffi cu lt to em path iz e w it h th os e w ho are c lo se st t o u s. I c o u ld n’t h av e a sk ed fo r a m ore c o m pelli n g ex am ple of h ow d iffi cu lt it c a n b e t o r e sp on d e m path ic a lly t o o n e’s o w n f a m ily m em ber s! Em path y i n H ea rin g S om eo n e’s “ N o!” B ecau se o f o u r te n den cy to r e a d r ej ectio n in to s o m eo n e els e’s “ n o” a n d “ I d on’t w an t to … ,” th ese are im porta n t m ess a g es fo r u s to b e ab le to e m path iz e w it h . If w e ta k e th em p er so n ally , w e may fe el h u rt w it h ou t u n dersta n din g w hat’s a ctu ally g o in g o n w it h in th e oth er p er so n . W hen w e sh in e t h e li g h t o f c o n sc io u sn ess o n t h e fe eli n gs a n d n eed s b eh in d s o m eo n e els e’s “n o,” h ow ev er, w e b eco m e c o gn iz a n t o f w hat th ey a re wan tin g th at p re v en ts t h em f r o m r e sp on din g a s w e w ou ld l i k e. E m path iz in g w it h so m eo n e’s “n o” pro te cts us fr o m ta k in g i t p erso n ally . O ne tim e I a sk ed a w om an d u rin g a w ork sh op b re a k to jo in m e an d oth er p artic ip an ts fo r s o m e ic e c re am n earb y. “ N o!” s h e rep li e d b ru sq u ely .  e to n e o f h er v o ic e le d m e to in ter pret h er a n sw er a s a r ej ectio n , u ntil I r e m in ded m yse lf to tu n e in to th e fe eli n gs an d need s sh e mig h t be ex p re ss in g t h ro u gh h er “ n o.” “ I s en se th at y o u a re an gry,” I s a id . “ Is t h at s o ?” “N o,” s h e r e p li e d , “ it ’s ju st t h at I d on’t w an t t o b e co rre cte d e v er y t im e I op en m y m ou th .” N ow I s e n se d th at s h e w as fe arfu l r a th er th an a n gry. I c h eck ed th is o u t by a sk in g, “ S o y o u ’r e f e eli n g f e arfu l a n d w an t t o p ro te ct y o u rs e lf f r o m b ei ng in a s it u atio n w here y o u m ig h t b e j u dged f o r h ow y o u c o m mun ic ate? ” “Y es,” s h e a ffi rm ed , “ I c a n i m ag in e sit t in g i n t h e ic e c re am s h op w it h y o u an d h av in g y o u n otic e e v ery th in g I s a y.” I th en d is c o vere d th at th e w ay I’d been pro vid in g fe ed back in th e w ork sh op h ad b een fr ig h te n in g to h er . M y e m path y fo r h er m essa g e had ta k en t h e s tin g o u t o f h er “ n o” fo r m e: I h eard h er d esir e to a v o id r e cei vin g sim ila r fe ed back in pu bli c . A ssu rin g her th at I w ou ld n’t ev alu ate her co m mun ic atio n in pu bli c , I th en co n fer re d w it h her on w ay s to giv e fe ed back t h at w ou ld le av e h er f e eli n g s a fe . A nd y es, s h e jo in ed t h e gro u p f o r ic e c re am . Em path y t o R ev iv e a L if e le ss C on versa tio n W e h av e a ll fo u n d o u rs e lv es in t h e m id st o f a li f e les s c o n ver sa tio n . P er hap s w e’r e a t a s o cia l e v en t, h earin g w ord s w it h ou t fe eli n g a n y c o n nectio n t o t h e sp ea k er. O r w e’r e li s te n in g t o s o m eo n e m y f r ien d K elly B ry so n w ou ld c a ll a “ B ab ble -o n -ia n ”— so m eo n e who eli c it s in th eir li s te n ers th e fe ar of in te rm in ab le c o n vers a tio n . V it a li t y d ra in s o u t o f c o n ver sa tio n s w hen w e lo se c o n nec tio n w it h t h e fe eli n gs a n d n eed s g en eratin g t h e sp ea k er ’s w ord s, a n d w it h t h e r e q u ests a ss o cia te d w it h t h ose need s.  is eff ect is c o m mon w hen p eo p le ta lk w it h ou t co n sc io u sn es s o f w hat th ey are fe eli n g, n eed in g, o r re q u estin g. I n ste a d o f b ein g e n gag ed i n a n ex ch an ge o f l i f e en ergy w it h o th er hu m an b ein gs, w e s e e o u rs e lv es b eco m in g w aste b ask et s f o r t h ei r w ord s. H ow a n d w hen d o w e in te rr u pt a d ea d c o n ver sa tio n to b rin g it b ack to li f e ? I’d su ggest th e b est tim e to in ter ru pt is w hen w e’v e heard o n e word m ore th an w e w an t to h ear.  e lo n ger w e wait , th e hard er it is to b e civ il w hen w e d o s te p in . O ur in te n tio n in in ter ru ptin g is n ot to c la im t h e oor fo r o u rs e lv es, b u t to h elp t h e s p ea k er c o n nect to t h e li f e en er gy b eh in d t h e w ord s b ein g s p oken . W e d o t h is b y t u n in g i n t o p oss ib le fe eli n gs a n d n eed s.  us, i f a n a u nt i s r e p eatin g th e s to ry a b ou t h ow tw en ty y ears a g o h er h u sb an d d es er te d h er an d h er tw o sm all c h ild re n , w e m ig h t in ter ru pt b y sa y in g, “S o, A untie , it s o u n ds l i k e y o u a re s till f e eli n g h u rt, w is h in g y o u ’d b een t r e ate d m ore fa ir ly .” P eo p le a re n ot a w are th at e m path y is o  en w hat th ey a re need in g. N eith er do th ey re a li z e th at th ey are m ore li k ely to re ce iv e th at em path y by ex p re ss in g t h e fe eli n gs a n d n eed s t h at a re ali v e in t h em t h an b y r e co u ntin g ta le s o f p ast i n ju stic e a n d h ard sh ip . T o brin g a co n versa tio n b ack to li f e : in te rr u pt w it h e m path y. A noth er w ay to b rin g a c o n vers a tio n to li f e is to o p en ly ex pres s o u r desir e t o b e m ore c o n nec te d , a n d t o r e q u es t in fo rm atio n t h at w ou ld h elp u s esta b li s h t h at c o n nec tio n . O nce, a t a c o ck ta il p arty , I w as in t h e m id st o f a n a b u n dan t ow o f w ord s t h at t o m e se em ed li f e les s. “ E xcu se m e,” I b ro ke in , ad dre ss in g t h e g ro u p o f n in e o th er p eo p le I’d f o u n d m yse lf w it h , “ I’m f e eli n g im patie n t becau se I’d li k e to be more co n necte d w it h yo u , bu t ou r co n vers a tio n is n ’t c re atin g th e k in d o f c o n nectio n I’m w an tin g. I’d li k e to k n ow i f t h e c o n vers a tio n w e’v e b een h av in g i s m eetin g y o u r n eed s, a n d i f s o , w hat n eed s o f y o u rs a re b ein g m et t h ro u gh i t .” A ll n in e p eo p le s ta re d a t m e a s if I h ad t h ro w n a r a t in t h e pu n ch b ow l. F ortu n ate ly , I re m em bere d to tu n e in to th e fe eli n gs an d n eed s bei ng ex p re ss e d th ro u gh th eir sile n ce. “A re yo u an noyed w it h m y in ter ru ptin g becau se y o u w ou ld h av e l i k ed t o c o n tin u e th e co n ver sa tio n ?” I a sk ed . A er a n oth er s ile n ce, o n e o f th e m en r ep li e d , “ N o, I’m n ot a n noyed . I w as th in kin g a b ou t w hat y o u w er e ask in g. A nd n o, I w asn ’t en jo yin g th e co n vers a tio n ; i n f a ct, I w as t o ta lly b ore d w it h i t .” W hat b ore s t h e l i s te n er b ore s t h e s p ea k er t o o. A t th e tim e, I w as s u rp ris e d to h ear h is r es pon se becau se he had b een th e o n e d oin g m ost o f th e ta lk in g! N ow I a m n o lo n ger su rp ris e d : I h av e sin ce d is c o vere d th at co n vers a tio n s th at are li f e les s fo r th e li s ten er are e q u ally s o f o r t h e s p ea k er. Y ou m ay w on der h ow w e ca n m uster th e co u ra g e to atly in ter ru pt so m eo n e in t h e m id d le o f a s e n ten ce. I o n ce co n du cte d a n in fo rm al s u rv ey, p osin g t h e f o llo w in g q u estio n : “ If y o u a re usin g m ore word s t h an s o m eb o d y w an ts t o h ear, d o y o u w an t t h at p er so n t o p ret en d t o li s te n o r t o s to p y o u ?” O f t h e s c o re s o f p eo p le I a p pro ach ed , a ll b u t o n e ex p res se d a p ref er en ce to b e s to p p ed .  eir a n sw ers g av e m e co u ra g e b y c o n vin cin g m e th at i t i s m ore c o n sid era te t o in te rr u pt p eo p le t h an t o p ret en d t o li s ten . A ll o f u s w an t o u r w ord s t o e n ric h o th ers , n ot t o b u rd en t h em . Sp ea k ers pre fe r th at li s te n ers in te rr u pt ra th er th an p re te n d t o l i s te n . Em path y f o r S ile n ce O ne o f th e h ard est m ess a g es fo r m an y o f u s to e m path iz e w it h is s ilen ce.  is is e sp ecia lly tr u e w hen w e’v e ex pres se d o u rs e lv es v u ln er ab ly a n d n eed to k n ow h ow o th ers a re re a ctin g to o u r w ord s. A t su ch tim es, it ’s e a sy to p ro je c t o u r w orst f e ars o n to t h e la ck o f r es pon se an d f o rg et t o c o n nect w it h t h e f e eli n gs a n d n eed s b ein g e x p res se d t h ro u gh t h e silen ce. O ne t im e w hen I w as w ork in g w it h t h e sta ff o f a b u sin es s o rg an iz a tio n , I w as ta lk in g a b ou t so m eth in g d eep ly em otio n al a n d b eg an to c ry. W hen I lo oked u p, I re ce iv ed a re sp on se fr o m th e org an iz atio n’s d ir e cto r th at w as n ot e a sy fo r m e t o r e ce iv e: s ile n ce. H e tu rn ed h is f a ce fr o m m e w it h w hat I in te rp re te d t o b e a n e x p re ss io n o f d is g u st. F ortu n ate ly , I r em ember ed t o p u t m y a tt e n tio n o n w hat m ig h t b e g o in g o n w it h in h im , a n d s a id , “ I’m s en sin g fr o m y o u r re sp on se to m y c ry in g th at y o u ’r e fe eli n g d is g u ste d , a n d y o u ’d p re fe r t o h av e s o m eo n e m ore in c o n tr o l o f h is f e eli n gs c o n su lt in g w it h y o u r sta ff .” E m path iz e w it h s ile n ce b y li s te n in g f o r t h e f e eli n gs a n d n eed s b eh in d i t . If h e h ad a n sw ere d y es, I w ou ld h av e been a b le to a cce p t th at w e had d iff ere n t v alu es aro u n d ex p re ss in g em otio n s, w it h ou t so m eh ow th in kin g th at I w as w ro n g fo r h av in g e x p res se d m y em otio n s a s I d id . B ut in ste a d o f “y es,” t h e d ir e c to r r e p li e d , “ N o, n ot a t a ll. I w as ju st t h in kin g o f h ow m y w if e w is h es I c o u ld c ry.” H e w en t o n to r e v ea l th at h is w if e , w ho w as d iv o rc in g him , h ad b een c o m pla in in g t h at l i v in g w it h h im w as l i k e l i v in g w it h a r o ck . D urin g m y p ra ctic e a s a p sy ch oth er ap is t, I w as c o n ta cte d b y t h e paren ts o f a tw en ty -y ear- o ld wom an un der psy ch ia tr ic ca re . Sh e had been u n derg o in g m ed ic atio n , h osp it a li z atio n , a n d sh ock tr e atm en ts fo r se v er al m on th s, a n d h ad b eco m e m ute th re e m on th s b ef ore her p aren ts c o n ta cte d m e. W hen t h ey b ro u gh t h er t o m y o ffi ce, s h e had t o b e ass is te d b ecau se , le t o h ers e lf , s h e d id n’t m ove. In m y o ffi ce, s h e c ro u ch ed in h er c h air , s h ak in g, h er e y es o n th e oor. T ry in g t o c o n nec t e m path ic a lly w it h t h e fe eli n gs a n d n eed s b ei ng ex pres se d I th ro u gh h er n on verb al m ess a g e, I s a id , “ I’m s en sin g t h at y o u a re fr ig h ten ed a n d w ou ld l i k e t o b e s u re t h at i t ’s s a fe to t a lk . I s t h at a cc u ra te ?” S h e s h ow ed n o r e a ctio n , s o I e x p res se d m y o w n fe eli n g b y s a y in g, “ I’m v ery c o n ce rn ed a b ou t y o u , a n d I ’d li k e yo u to te ll m e if t h er e’s s o m ethin g I c o u ld s a y o r d o t o m ak e y o u f e el s a fer .” S till n o r es pon se . F or t h e nex t f o rty m in ute s, I c o n tin u ed to e it h er re ec t h er fe eli n gs a n d n eed s o r ex pres s m y ow n.  ere w as n o v is ib le r e sp on se , n or e v en t h e sli g h tes t r e co gn it io n t h at I w as t r y in g t o c o m mun ic ate w it h h er . F in ally I ex pres se d t h at I w as t ir e d , a n d th at I w an te d h er t o r e tu rn t h e f o llo w in g d ay.  e n ex t fe w d ay s w ere li k e t h e rst. I c o n tin u ed fo cu sin g m y a tt en tio n o n h er fe eli n gs a n d n eed s, s o m etim es v er bally r e ectin g w hat I u n der sto od an d s o m etim es d oin g s o s ile n tly . F ro m tim e to tim e I w ou ld ex pres s w hat w as g o in g o n i n m yse lf . S h e s a t s h ak in g i n h er c h air , s a y in g n oth in g. O n t h e f o u rth d ay, w hen s h e s till d id n’t r es pon d, I r e a ch ed o ver a n d h eld h er han d. N ot kn ow in g w heth er m y w ord s w ere co m mun ic atin g m y co n ce rn , I h op ed t h e p hysic a l c o n ta ct m ig h t d o s o m ore eff ectiv ely . A t rst c o n ta ct, h er m usc le s t e n se d a n d s h e sh ra n k f u rth er b ack i n to h er c h air . I w as ab ou t t o r e le a se h er h an d w hen I s en se d a s li g h t y ie ld in g, s o I k ep t m y h old ; a er a f e w m om en ts I n otic e d a p ro gres siv e re la x atio n o n h er p art. I h eld h er h an d f o r s e v era l m in ute s w hile I t a lk ed t o h er a s I h ad t h e rst f e w d ay s. S till s h e s a id n oth in g. W hen sh e arriv ed th e n ex t d ay, sh e ap p eare d ev en m ore ten se th an b efo re , b u t t h ere w as o n e d iff ere n ce: s h e ex ten ded a c len ch ed st t o w ard m e while t u rn in g h er f a ce a w ay f r o m m e. I w as a t rst c o n fu se d b y t h e ges tu re , b u t th en se n se d sh e h ad so m eth in g in h er h an d sh e wan te d m e to h av e. T ak in g h er st in m y h an d, I p rie d o p en h er n gers . In h er p alm w as a c ru m ple d n ote w it h th e fo llo w in g m ess a g e: “P le a se help m e sa y w hat’s i n sid e.” I w as ela te d to re ce iv e th is sig n o f h er d es ir e to c o m mun ic ate . A er an oth er h ou r o f e n co u ra g em en t, s h e n ally e x p res se d a rst s en ten ce, s lo w ly a n d fe arfu lly . W hen I re ec te d b ack w hat I h ad h eard h er sa y in g, sh e ap p eare d r e li e v ed a n d th en c o n tin u ed , s lo w ly a n d fe arfu lly , to ta lk . A y ear la te r, s h e s e n t m e a c o p y o f t h e f o llo w in g en tr ies f r o m h er j o u rn al: c a m e o u t o f th e h osp it a l, a w ay fr o m sh ock tr e atm en ts a n d str o n g m ed ic in e.  at w as a b ou t A pril.  e th re e m on th s b ef ore th at a re co m ple te ly b la n k in m y m in d, a s w ell a s th e th re e an d a h alf y ears b efo re A pril.  ey s a y t h at, a  er g ett in g o u t o f t h e hosp it a l, I w en t t h ro u gh a t im e at h om e o f n ot e atin g, n ot ta lk in g, a n d w an tin g to s ta y in b ed a ll th e tim e.  en I w as re fe rre d to D r. R osen ber g fo r co u n se li n g. I d on’t r e m em ber m uch o f t h ose n ex t t w o o r t h re e m on th s o th er t h an b ei ng i n D r. R ose n berg ’s o ffi ce a n d t a lk in g w it h h im . I’d b eg u n ‘w ak in g u p’ sin ce th at rst ses sio n w it h h im . I’d b eg un sh arin g w it h h im th in gs th at b oth er ed m e— th in gs th at I w ou ld n ev er h av e d re am ed o f t e lli n g a n yo n e a b ou t. A nd I r em ember h ow m uch t h at m ean t t o m e. I t w as s o h ard t o t a lk . B ut D r. R osen ber g c a re d a b ou t m e an d sh ow ed it , an d I w an te d to ta lk w it h h im . I w as alw ay s gla d a erw ard s t h at I h ad le t s o m eth in g o u t. I r em ember c o u ntin g t h e day s, e v en t h e h ou rs , u ntil m y n ex t a p p oin tm en t w it h h im . I’v e a ls o l e arn ed t h at f a cin g r e a li t y i s n ot a ll b ad . I a m r e a li z in g m ore a n d m ore o f t h e t h in gs t h at I n ee d t o s ta n d u p t o , t h in gs t h at I n eed t o g et o u t a n d d o o n m y o w n.  is i s s c a ry. A nd it ’s v ery h ard . A nd it ’s s o d is c o u ra g in g t h at w hen I a m tr y in g r e a lly a lo t, I c a n s till fa il s o te rrib ly . B ut th e go od p art o f re a li t y i s t h at I ’v e b een s e ein g t h at i t i n clu des w on derfu l t h in gs, t o o. I’v e le arn ed in t h e p ast y ear a b ou t h ow w on derfu l it c a n b e to s h are m yse lf w it h o th er p eo p le . I th in k it w as m ostly ju st o n e part th at I le arn ed , a b ou t t h e t h rill o f m y t a lk in g t o o th er p eo p le an d h av in g t h em actu ally l i s te n — ev en r e a lly u n dersta n d a t t im es. I c o n tin u e to b e a m aze d b y th e h ea li n g p ow er o f em path y. T im e an d ag ain I hav e wit n ess e d peo p le tr a n sc e n d th e para ly zin g eff ects of p sy ch olo gic a l p ain w hen t h ey h av e su ffi cien t c o n ta ct w it h so m eo n e w ho c a n h ear th em em path ic a lly . As li s ten ers, we don’t need in sig h ts in to p sy ch olo gic a l d yn am ic s o r tr a in in g in p sy ch oth er ap y. W hat is es sen tia l is o u r a b ili t y to b e p re se n t to w hat’s re a lly g o in g o n w it h in — to th e un iq u e fe eli n gs a n d n eed s a p ers o n i s e x p er ien cin g i n t h at v er y m om en t. E m path y l i e s i n o u r a b ili t y t o be p re se n t. Su m mary O ur a b ili t y t o o ff er e m path y c a n a llo w u s t o s ta y v u ln er ab le , d ef use poten tia l v io le n ce, h ear th e w ord no w it h ou t ta k in g it a s a r e je c tio n , r e v iv e a li f e les s co n vers a tio n , an d ev en hear th e fe eli n gs an d n eed s ex p res se d th ro u gh sile n ce. Tim e an d ag ain , peo p le tr a n sc e n d th e para ly zin g eff ects of p sy ch olo gic a l p ain w hen t h ey h av e su ffi cien t c o n ta ct w it h s o m eo n e w ho c a n h ear t h em e m path ic a lly . W 9 Con n ectin g C om pa ssio n ate ly W it h O urse lv es L et u s b eco m e th e ch an ge w e se ek i n t h e w orld . — Mah atm a G an dh i e h av e s e en h ow N VC c o n tr ib u tes to r e la tio n sh ip s w it h fr ien ds a n d fa m ily , at work an d in th e poli t ic a l aren a. It s m ost cru cia l ap p li c atio n , h ow ev er, m ay b e in th e way w e tr e at o u rs e lv es . W hen w e are in te rn ally vio le n t to w ard ou rs e lv es , it is diffi cu lt to be gen uin ely c o m pass io n ate t o w ard o th ers . N VC ’s m ost im porta n t u se m ay b e in d ev elo p in g s e lf – c o m passio n . Rem em berin g t h e S p ecia ln ess o f W hat W e A re In t h e p la y A  ou sa n d C lo w ns b y H erb G ard n er, t h e p ro ta g o n is t r ef uses t o r e le a se h is t w elv e-y ear- o ld n ep h ew t o c h ild -w elf a re au th orit ies , d ecla rin g, “ I w an t h im to g et to k n ow e x actly th e sp ecia l th in g h e is o r e ls e he won’t n otic e it w hen it s ta rts t o g o . I w an t h im t o s ta y a w ak e … I w an t t o b e su re h e s e es a ll t h e w ild p oss ib ili t ie s. I w an t h im t o k n ow i t ’s w orth a ll t h e tr o u ble ju st to g iv e t h e w orld a li t t le g o osin g w hen y o u g et t h e ch an ce. A nd I w an t h im t o k n ow t h e s u btle , s n ea k y, i m porta n t r e a so n w hy h e w as b orn a h u m an b ein g a n d n ot a c h air .” I am g ra v ely co n ce rn ed th at m an y o f u s h av e lo st aw aren ess o f “th e sp ecia l th in g” w e are ; w e h av e fo rg o tt en th e “s u btle , sn ea k y, i m porta n t re a so n” t h e u n cle s o p ass io n ate ly w an te d h is n ep h ew t o k n ow . W hen c rit ic a l se lf – c o n ce p ts pre v en t us fr o m se ei ng th e beau ty in ou rs e lv es , w e lo se c o n nec tio n w it h th e d iv in e e n erg y th at is o u r s o u rc e. C on dit io n ed to v ie w o u rs e lv es as o bje c ts -o bje c ts fu ll o f sh ortc o m in gs— is it an y w on der th at m an y o f u s e n d u p r e la tin g v io le n tly t o o u rs e lv es ? An i m porta n t a re a w here t h is v io len ce c a n b e rep la ce d w it h c o m pass io n is in ou r m om en t- to -m om en t ev alu atio n of ou rs e lv es . Sin ce we wan t w hate v er w e d o t o l e a d t o t h e e n ric h m en t o f l i f e , i t i s c rit ic a l t o k n ow h ow t o e v alu ate e v en ts a n d c o n dit io n s i n w ay s t h at h elp u s le arn a n d m ak e on go in g ch oic e s t h at s e rv e u s. U nfo rtu n ate ly , t h e way w e’v e been t r a in ed t o e v alu ate o u rs e lv es o  en p ro m ote s m ore s e lf – h atr e d t h an l e arn in g. W e u se N VC t o e v a lu ate o u rse lv es i n w ay s t h at e n gen der g ro w th r a th er t h an s e lf – h atr e d . Eva lu atin g O urse lv es W hen W e’v e B een L ess  an P erfe ct In a r o u tin e w ork sh op a ctiv it y , I a sk p artic ip an ts t o r e ca ll a r e ce n t o cc a sio n w hen t h ey d id s o m eth in g t h ey w is h t h ey h ad n’t . W e t h en lo ok a t h ow t h ey sp oke to th em se lv es im med ia te ly a er h av in g m ad e what is ref er re d in c o m mon la n gu ag e a s a “ m is ta k e” o r “e rro r.” T yp ic a l s ta te m en ts w er e: “  at w as d u m b!” “ H ow c o u ld y o u d o s u ch a s tu pid th in g?” “ W hat’s w ro n g w it h y o u ?” “ Y ou ’r e a lw ay s m ess in g u p !” “  at’s s e l sh !”  ese s p ea k ers h ad b een t a u gh t to ju dge t h em se lv es in w ay s t h at im ply t h at w hat th ey d id w as w ro n g o r b ad ; th ei r se lf – a d m on is h m en t im pli c it ly a ssu m es t h at t h ey d ese rv e t o s u ff er f o r w hat t h ey ’v e don e. I t is t r a g ic t h at s o m an y of us get en m esh ed in se lf – h atr e d ra th er th an ben et fr o m ou r m is ta k es, w hic h s h ow u s o u r l i m it a tio n s a n d g u id e us t o w ard s g ro w th . E ven w hen w e s o m etim es d o “ le arn a le ss o n” fr o m m is ta k es fo r w hic h w e ju dge o u rs e lv es h arsh ly , I w orr y a b ou t th e natu re of th e en ergy b eh in d th at k in d o f c h an ge a n d le arn in g. I ’d li k e c h an ge to b e s tim ula te d b y a c le ar d esir e to e n ric h li f e fo r o u rs e lv es o r fo r o th er s ra th er th an b y d es tr u ctiv e en erg ie s s u ch a s s h am e o r g u ilt . I f th e w ay w e ev alu ate ou rs e lv es le a d s us to fe el sh am e, an d w e co n se q u en tly ch an ge ou r beh av io r, w e are allo w in g ou r gro w in g an d le arn in g to b e g u id ed b y se lf – h atr e d . S h am e is a fo rm o f se lf – h atr e d , a n d actio n s ta k en in r e a ctio n to s h am e are not fr e e an d jo yfu l a cts . E ven if o u r in te n tio n is to b eh av e w it h m ore kin dn es s a n d sen sit iv it y , if p eo p le sen se sh am e o r g u ilt b eh in d o u r a ctio n s, t h ey a re les s li k ely t o a p pre cia te what w e do t h an i f w e a re m otiv ate d p u re ly b y t h e hu m an d es ir e to c o n tr ib u te to l i f e . In o u r la n gu ag e th ere is a w ord w it h en orm ou s p ow er to c re ate sh am e an d g u ilt .  is v io le n t w ord , w hic h w e co m mon ly u se to e v alu ate ou rs e lv es , is so d eep ly in gra in ed in o u r c o n sc io u sn ess th at m an y o f u s w ou ld h av e tr o u ble im ag in in g h ow to li v e w it h ou t it . It is th e word sh ou ld , a s in “I sh ou ld h av e k n ow n b ett e r” o r “ I s h ou ld n’t h av e don e t h at.” M ost o f t h e tim e when w e u se th is w ord w it h o u rs e lv es , w e res is t le arn in g, b ecau se sh ou ld i m pli e s th at th ere is n o c h oic e. H um an b ei ngs, w hen h earin g a n y k in d o f d em an d, t e n d t o r e sis t b ecau se it t h re ate n s o u r a u to n om y— ou r s tr o n g n eed fo r c h oic e. W e h av e t h is r e a ctio n t o t y ra n ny e v en w hen it ’s in ter nal t y ra n ny in t h e f o rm o f a sh ou ld . Avo id s h ou ld in g y o u rse lf ! A sim ila r e x p re ss io n o f in te rn al d em an d o cc u rs in th e fo llo w in g se lf – e v alu atio n : “W hat I’m d oin g is ju st ter rib le . I re a lly m ust d o so m ethin g ab ou t it !”  in k fo r a m om en t o f a ll th e peo p le yo u ’v e heard s a y, “ I r e a lly s h ou ld g iv e u p s m okin g,” o r, “ I r e a lly h av e to d o s o m eth in g a b ou t ex ercis in g m ore .”  ey k eep s a y in g w hat t h ey “ m ust” d o a n d t h ey k eep r es is tin g d oin g it , b ecau se h u m an b ein gs w ere n ot m ean t t o b e sla v es . W e w er e not m ean t t o s u cc u m b to th e d ic ta te s o f s h ou ld a n d have to , w heth er th ey co m e fr o m o u ts id e o r in sid e o f o u rs e lv es. A nd if w e d o yie ld an d su bm it to th es e dem an ds, o u r a ctio n s a ris e f r o m a n en ergy t h at i s d ev o id o f l i f e- giv in g j o y. Tra n sla tin g S elf – Ju dgm en ts a n d I n ner D em an ds W hen w e co m mun ic ate w it h o u rs e lv es o n a reg ula r b asis th ro u gh in ner ju dgm en t, b la m e, a n d d em an d, it ’s n ot s u rp ris in g t h at o u r s e lf – c o n cep t g iv es in t o f e eli n g m ore li k e a c h air t h an a h u m an b ei ng. A b asic p rem is e of N VC is t h at w hen ev er w e i m ply t h at s o m eo n e i s w ro n g o r b ad , w hat w e are re a lly s a y in g is th at h e o r sh e is n ot a ctin g in h arm on y w it h o u r n eed s. If th e p ers o n w e a re ju dgin g h ap p en s to b e ou rs e lv es , w hat w e are sa y in g is , “I m yse lf a m n ot b eh av in g in h arm on y w it h m y o w n n eed s.” I a m c o n vin ce d th at if w e le arn t o e v alu ate o u rs e lv es in t e rm s o f w het her a n d h ow w ell o u r n eed s are bein g fu l lle d , w e are much m ore li k ely to le arn fr o m th e ev alu atio n . O ur c h alle n ge t h en , w hen w e a re doin g s o m eth in g t h at is n ot en ric h in g li f e , is to ev alu ate o u rs e lv es m om en t b y m om en t in a w ay th at in sp ir es c h an ge b oth ( 1 ) i n t h e d ir e c tio n o f w her e w e w ou ld l i k e t o g o , a n d ( 2 ) o u t o f re sp ec t a n d c o m pass io n f o r o u rs e lv es , r a th er t h an o u t o f s e lf – h atr e d , g u ilt o r sh am e. S elf – ju dgm en ts , li k e all ju dgm en ts , are tr a g ic e x p re ssio n s o f u n m et n eed s. NVC M ou rn in g A er a l i f e tim e o f s c h ooli n g a n d s o cia li z atio n , i t i s p ro b ab ly t o o l a te fo r m ost o f u s t o t r a in o u r m in ds t o t h in k p u re ly i n t er m s o f w hat w e need a n d v alu e fr o m m om en t to m om en t. H ow ev er , ju st a s w e h av e le arn ed to tr a n sla te ju dgm en ts w hen c o n vers in g w it h o th er s, w e c a n t r a in o u rs e lv es t o r e co gn iz e ju dgm en ta l se lf – ta lk an d to im med ia te ly fo cu s ou r att en tio n on th e u n derly in g n eed s. F or e x am ple , i f w e n d o u rs e lv es r e a ctin g r ep ro ach fu lly t o s o m eth in g w e did (“ L ook, yo u ju st m ess e d u p ag ain !” ), w e ca n q u ic k ly sto p an d ask o u rs e lv es, “W hat u n m et n eed of m in e is b ei ng ex pres se d th ro u gh th is m ora li s tic ju dgm en t? ” W hen w e d o c o n nect t o t h e need — an d t h er e m ay b e se v era l la y ers o f n eed s— we w ill n otic e a rem ark ab le sh i in o u r b o d ies . In ste a d o f th e sh am e, g u ilt , o r d ep res sio n w e li k ely fe el w hen crit ic iz in g ou rs e lv es fo r h av in g “ m ess e d u p a g ain ,” w e w ill ex per ien ce a n y n u m ber o f o th er fe eli n gs. W heth er it ’s s a d n es s, fr u str a tio n , d is a p p oin tm en t, fe ar, g rief , or s o m e o th er fe eli n g, w e h av e b een en dow ed b y n atu re wit h t h es e fe eli n gs fo r a p u rp ose : t h ey m obili z e u s t o p u rsu e an d f u l ll w hat w e need o r v alu e.  e im pact of th ese fe eli n gs on ou r sp ir it an d bo d ies is su bsta n tia lly d iff ere n t fr o m th e d is c o n nec tio n th at is b ro u gh t o n b y g u ilt , sh am e, a n d dep re ss io n . M ou rn in g in N VC is th e p ro ce ss o f fu lly c o n nectin g w it h th e un m et need s an d th e fe eli n gs th at are g en er ate d w hen w e h av e been les s th an p erfe c t. I t i s a n e x p erie n ce o f r e g ret , b u t r eg ret t h at h elp s u s l e arn f r o m w hat w e h av e d on e w it h ou t b la m in g o r h atin g o u rs e lv es . W e se e how o u r b eh av io r ra n c o u nte r t o o u r o w n n eed s a n d v alu es , a n d w e o p en o u rs e lv es t o f e eli n gs th at a ris e o u t o f t h at a w are n ess . W hen o u r c o n sc io u sn ess i s f o cu se d o n w hat w e n eed , w e a re n atu ra lly s tim ula te d t o w ard c re ativ e poss ib ili t ies f o r h ow t o g et th at n eed m et. In co n tr a st, th e mora li s tic ju dgm en ts w e use when bla m in g o u rs e lv es te n d to o b sc u re su ch p oss ib ili t ies a n d to p er pet uate a sta te o f s e lf – p u n is h m en t. N VC m ou rn in g: c o n nectin g w it h t h e f e eli n gs a n d u n m et n eed s s tim ula te d b y p ast a ctio n s w e n ow r e g re t. Self – F org iv en ess W e f o llo w u p o n t h e p ro ce ss o f m ou rn in g w it h s e lf – fo rg iv en ess. T u rn in g o u r att e n tio n t o t h e p art o f t h e s e lf w hic h c h ose to a ct in t h e way t h at le d t o t h e pre se n t sit u atio n , w e a sk o u rs e lv es , “ W hen I b eh av ed in th e way w hic h I n ow r e g re t, w hat n eed o f m in e w as I t r y in g t o m eet? ” I b eli e v e th at h u m an b ein gs a re a lw ay s a ctin g in th e ser vic e o f n eed s a n d v alu es .  is is tr u e w heth er th e a ctio n d oes o r d oes n ot m eet th e need , o r w het her it ’s o n e we en d u p c ele b ra tin g o r r e g re tt in g. W hen w e li s te n e m path ic a lly to o u rs e lv es , w e w ill b e ab le to h ear th e u n derly in g need . Self – fo rg iv en es s occ u rs th e mom en t th is em path ic c o n nec tio n is m ad e.  en w e a re ab le to r e co gn iz e h ow o u r c h oic e was a n att e m pt to se rv e li f e , e v en a s th e m ou rn in g p ro ce ss te a ch es u s h ow it fe ll s h ort o f f u l lli n g o u r n eed s. A n im porta n t a sp ec t o f se lf – c o m pass io n is to b e ab le to e m path ic a lly h old b oth p arts o f o u rs e lv es— th e se lf t h at r eg ret s a p ast a ctio n a n d t h e se lf t h at to ok th e a ctio n in th e rst p la ce.  e pro ce ss o f m ou rn in g a n d se lf – fo rg iv en ess f r e es u s in t h e d ir e c tio n o f le arn in g a n d g ro w in g. I n c o n nectin g m om en t b y m om en t t o o u r n eed s, w e in cre a se ou r c re ativ e cap acit y t o a ct i n h arm on y w it h t h em . N VC s e lf – fo rg iv en ess: c o n ne ctin g w it h t h e n eed w e w ere tr y in g to m eet w hen w e to ok th e a ctio n th at w e n ow re g re t. e L ess o n o f t h e P olk a-D ott e d S u it I w ou ld li k e to illu str a te th e p ro ce ss o f m ou rn in g a n d se lf – fo rg iv en ess b y re ca lli n g a p ers o n al e v en t.  e d ay b ef ore an im porta n t w ork sh op, I h ad b ou gh t a li g h t g ra y su m mer su it to w ear. A t th e en d o f th e well- a tt en ded w ork sh op, I w as s w arm ed b y p artic ip an ts a sk in g fo r m y s ig n atu re , a d dres s, a n d o th er in fo rm atio n . W it h tim e clo sin g in o n an oth er ap p oin tm en t, I h aste n ed t o a tt e n d t o t h e r e q u ests o f t h e partic ip an ts , s ig n in g a n d s c rib bli n g on t h e m an y b it s o f p ap er t h ru st in f r o n t o f m e. A s I r u sh ed o u t t h e door, I s tu ck m y p en — un cap p ed — in th e pock et o f m y n ew su it . O nce ou ts id e, I d is c o vere d t o m y h orro r t h at in ste a d o f t h e nic e li g h t g ra y s u it , I n ow h ad a p olk a-d ott e d s u it ! F or tw en ty m in ute s I w as b ru ta l w it h m yse lf : “H ow c o u ld y o u b e so c a re le ss ? W hat a s tu pid t h in g to d o!” I h ad ju st r u in ed a b ra n d-n ew s u it : if e v er I n eed ed c o m pass io n a n d u n der sta n din g, t h is w as t h e tim e, y et t h er e I was r e sp on din g t o m yse lf i n a w ay t h at l e m e fe eli n g w ors e th an e v er . Fortu n ate ly — a er o n ly tw en ty m in utes — I n otic e d w hat I w as d oin g. I s to p p ed , lo oked f o r t h e n eed o f m in e th at w as u n m et b y h av in g le t h e pen un cap p ed , a n d a sk ed m yse lf , “ W hat n eed li es b eh in d m y ju dgin g m yse lf a s ‘c a re le ss’ a n d ‘s tu pid ?’” I m med ia te ly I s a w t h at it w as t o t a k e bet ter c a re of m yse lf : t o h av e giv en m ore a tt e n tio n to m y o w n n eed s w hile I w as r u sh in g to a d dre ss e v ery o n e els e’s n eed s. A s s o on a s I to u ch ed th at p art o f m yse lf a n d c o n necte d to th e deep lo n gin g to b e m ore a w are a n d c a rin g o f m y o w n n eed s, m y fe eli n gs sh i ed .  ere w as a r e le a se o f t e n sio n in m y b o d y a s t h e an ger, s h am e, a n d gu ilt I w as h arb orin g to w ard m yse lf d is s ip ate d . I fu lly m ou rn ed th e ru in ed su it a n d u n cap p ed p en a s I o p en ed t o f e eli n gs o f s a d n ess a ris in g a lo n g w it h t h e y earn in g t o t a k e b ett e r c a re o f m yse lf . N ex t I s h i ed m y a tt e n tio n t o t h e n eed I w as m eet in g w hen I s li p p ed t h e u n cap p ed p en in to m y p ock et. I re co gn iz e d h ow m uch I v alu ed c a re an d co n sid era tio n fo r o th er p eo p le ’s n eed s. O f c o u rs e , in t a k in g s u ch g o od c a re o f o th er p eo p le ’s n eed s, I h ad n ot t a k en t h e tim e to d o t h e sa m e fo r m yse lf . B ut i n ste a d o f b la m e, I f e lt a w av e of c o m pass io n f o r m yse lf a s I r e a li z e d t h at e v en m y r u sh in g a n d p u tt in g th e pen a w ay u nth in kin gly h ad c o m e ou t o f se rv in g m y o w n n eed t o r e sp on d t o o th er s i n a c a rin g w ay ! We a re c o m passio n ate w it h o u rse lv es w hen w e a re a b le t o em bra ce all p arts of ou rse lv es an d re co gn iz e th e n eed s a n d v a lu es e x p re ss e d b y e a ch p art. In t h at c o m pass io n ate p la ce, I a m a b le to h old b oth n eed s: in o n e han d, to r e sp on d in a c a rin g w ay t o o th er s’ n eed s, a n d in t h e oth er , t o b e aw are of an d ta k e b ett e r ca re o f m y o w n n eed s. O n b eco m in g co n sc io u s o f b oth n eed s, I c a n im ag in e w ay s o f b eh av in g d iff er en tly in s im ila r s it u atio n s a n d arriv in g a t s o lu tio n s m ore r e so u rc e fu lly t h an i f I l o se th at c o n sc io u sn es s i n a s e a o f s e lf – ju dgm en t. Don’t D o A nyth in g  at I s n ’t P la y ! In a d dit io n t o t h e p ro ce ss o f m ou rn in g a n d s e lf – fo rg iv en ess, a n oth er a sp ect o f se lf – c o m pass io n I em ph asiz e is in th e en ergy th at’s b eh in d w hate v er actio n w e t a k e. W hen I a d vis e , “ D on’t d o a n yth in g t h at i s n ’t p la y !” s o m e ta k e m e t o b e r a d ic a l, e v en i n sa n e. I e arn es tly b eli e v e, h ow ev er , t h at a n i m porta n t fo rm o f s e lf – c o m pass io n is to m ak e ch oic e s m otiv ate d p u re ly b y o u r d es ir e to c o n tr ib u te t o li f e r a th er t h an o u t o f f e ar, g u ilt , s h am e, d u ty , o r o bli g atio n . W hen w e a re c o n sc io u s o f th e li f e- en ric h in g p u rp ose b eh in d a n a ctio n w e ta k e, w hen t h e s o le e n erg y t h at m otiv ate s u s i s s im ply t o m ak e li f e w on der fu l fo r o th ers a n d o u rs e lv es, t h en e v en h ard w ork h as a n e lem ent o f p la y in it . C orre sp on din gly , a n o th erw is e jo yfu l a ctiv it y p er fo rm ed o u t o f o bli g atio n , du ty , f e ar, g u ilt , o r s h am e w ill l o se it s j o y a n d e v en tu ally en gen der r es is ta n ce. W e w an t t o t a k e a ctio n o u t o f t h e d esir e t o co n tr ib u te t o li f e r a th er t h an o u t o f f e a r, g u ilt , s h am e, o r o b li g atio n . In C hap te r 2 , w e co n sid ere d re p la cin g la n gu ag e th at im pli es la ck o f ch oic e w it h la n gu ag e th at a ck n ow le d ges c h oic e. M an y y ears a g o I b eg an to e n gag e in an activ it y w hic h sig n i ca n tly en la rg ed th e pool of jo y an d hap pin ess av aila b le to m y li f e , w hile d im in is h in g d ep res sio n , gu ilt , an d sh am e. I o ff er it h ere as a p oss ib le way to d eep en o u r co m pass io n fo r o u rs e lv es, t o h elp u s li v e o u r li v es o u t o f jo yo u s p la y b y s ta y in g g ro u n ded in a c le ar a w are n ess o f t h e l i f e -e n ric h in g n eed b eh in d e v er yth in g w e do. Tra n sla tin g “ H av e t o ” t o “ C hoos e t o ” S te p 1 W hat d o y o u d o in y o u r li f e t h at y o u d on’t e x p er ien ce a s p la y fu l? L is t o n a p ie ce o f p ap er a ll t h ose t h in gs t h at y o u t e ll y o u rs e lf y o u h av e to d o. L is t a n y activ it y y o u d re a d b u t d o a n yw ay b ecau se yo u p er ce iv e yo u rs e lf to h av e no ch oic e. W hen I rst r e v ie w ed m y o w n li s t, ju st s e ei ng h ow lo n g it w as g av e m e in sig h t a s t o w hy s o m uch o f m y t im e was s p en t n ot en jo yin g li f e . I n otic e d h ow m an y ord in ary, daily th in gs I w as doin g by tr ic k in g m yse lf in to b eli e v in g t h at I h ad t o d o t h em .  e rst i t e m o n m y l i s t w as “ w rit e c li n ic a l r ep orts .” I h ate d w rit in g t h es e re p orts , y et I w as s p en din g a t le a st a n h ou r o f a g o n y o ver th em e v er y d ay. M y s e co n d i t e m w as “ d riv e t h e c h ild ren ’s c a r p ool t o s c h ool.” Ste p 2 A er co m ple tin g yo u r li s t, cle arly ack n ow le d ge to yo u rs e lf th at yo u are d oin g t h ese t h in gs b ecau se y o u c h oose to d o t h em , n ot b ecau se y o u h av e t o . In se rt t h e w ord s “ I c h oose to … “ i n f r o n t o f e a ch i t e m y o u l i s te d . I re ca ll m y ow n re sis ta n ce to th is ste p . “W rit in g cli n ic a l rep orts ,” I in sis te d to m yse lf , “ is n ot s o m eth in g I c h oose to d o! I h av e to d o it . I’m a c li n ic a l p sy ch olo gis t. I h av e t o w rit e th es e rep orts .” Ste p 3 A er h av in g a ck n ow le d ged t h at y o u c h oose to d o a p artic u la r a ctiv it y , g et i n t o u ch w it h t h e in te n tio n b eh in d y o u r c h oic e b y c o m plet in g t h e sta tem ent, I c h oose t o … b ecau se I w an t … . At rst I f u m ble d t o i d en tif y w hat I w an te d f r o m w rit in g c li n ic a l r ep orts . I h ad a lr e a d y d ete rm in ed , s e v era l m on th s e arli er , th at th e rep orts d id n ot se rv e m y c li e n ts e n ou gh to ju stif y th e tim e th ey w ere ta k in g, s o w hy w as I c o n tin u in g t o in vest s o m uch e n er gy in t h ei r p rep ara tio n ? F in ally I r e a li z e d th at I w as c h oosin g t o w rit e t h e r ep orts s o le ly b ecau se I w an te d t h e in co m e th ey p ro vid ed . A s s o on a s I r e co gn iz e d th is , I n ev er w ro te an oth er c li n ic a l re p ort. I c a n ’t te ll y o u h ow jo yfu l I fe el ju st th in kin g o f h ow m an y c li n ic a l re p orts I h av en ’t w rit t e n sin ce th at m om en t th ir ty – ve years a g o ! W hen I re a li z e d th at m on ey w as m y p rim ary m otiv atio n , I im med ia te ly s a w th at I c o u ld n d o th er w ay s to t a k e c a re of m yse lf n an cia lly , a n d t h at in fa ct, I ’d r a th er s c av en ge i n g arb ag e c a n s f o r f o od t h an w rit e an oth er c li n ic a l r ep ort.  e n ex t it e m o n m y li s t o f u njo yfu l ta sk s w as d riv in g th e ch ild ren to s c h ool. W hen I ex am in ed th e re a so n b eh in d th at ch ore , h ow ev er , I fe lt a p pre cia tio n fo r th e b en e ts m y ch ild ren re ce iv ed fr o m att en din g th ei r sc h ool.  ey c o u ld e a sily w alk to th e neig h borh ood s c h ool, b u t th ei r o w n sc h ool w as f a r m ore in h arm on y w it h m y e d u catio n al v alu es . I c o n tin u ed t o d riv e, b u t w it h a d iff ere n t e n erg y; in ste a d o f “ O h, d arn , I h av e to d riv e th e ca r p ool t o d ay,” I w as c o n sc io u s o f m y p u rp ose , w hic h w as fo r m y c h ild ren to h av e a qu ali t y of ed u catio n th at w as ver y d ear to m e. O f co u rs e I so m etim es n eed ed t o r e m in d m yse lf t w o o r t h re e tim es d u rin g t h e driv e to r e fo cu s m y m in d o n w hat p u rp ose m y a ctio n w as s er vin g. W it h e v er y c h oic e y o u m ak e, b e c o n sc io u s o f w hat n eed it s e r v es. Cult iv atin g A w are n ess o f t h e E nerg y B eh in d O ur A ctio n s A s y o u e x p lo re t h e s ta te m en t, “ I c h oose to … b ecau se I w an t … ,” y o u m ay d is c o ver— as I d id w it h t h e c h ild ren ’s c a r p ool— th e im porta n t v alu es b eh in d th e c h oic e s y o u ’v e m ad e. I a m c o n vin ce d t h at a  er w e gain c la rit y r eg ard in g th e n eed b ein g s e rv ed b y o u r a ctio n s, w e ca n e x p er ien ce th ose actio n s a s p la y e v en w hen t h ey i n vo lv e h ard w ork , c h allen ge, o r f r u str a tio n . For s o m e it e m s o n y o u r li s t, h ow ev er , y o u m ig h t u n co ver o n e o r s e v er al o f t h e f o llo w in g m otiv atio n s: (1 ) F O R M ON EY M on ey is a m ajo r fo rm o f ex tr in sic re w ard in o u r so ciet y. C hoic es p ro m pte d b y a d esir e f o r r e w ard a re co stly : t h ey d ep riv e us o f t h e jo y in li f e t h at c o m es w it h a ctio n s g ro u n ded in th e cle ar in ten tio n to c o n tr ib u te to a h u m an n eed . M on ey is n ot a “n eed ” a s w e de ne it in N VC; it is o n e of co u ntle ss s tr a te g ie s t h at m ay b e s e le cte d t o a d dres s a n eed . (2 ) F O R A PPR O VA L Lik e m on ey, a p pro val fr o m o th er s is a fo rm o f e x tr in sic re w ard . O ur cu lt u re h as e d u cate d u s t o h u n ger f o r r e w ard . W e a tt en ded s c h ools t h at u se d ex tr in sic m ean s to m otiv ate u s to stu dy; w e g re w u p in h om es w her e we were r e w ard ed f o r b ein g g o od li t t le boys a n d g ir ls , a n d w er e pu n is h ed w hen ou r c a re ta k ers ju dged u s to b e o th er wis e .  us, a s a d u lt s , w e e a sily tr ic k o u rs e lv es in to b eli e v in g t h at li f e c o n sis ts o f d oin g t h in gs fo r r e w ard ; w e are a d dic te d t o g ett in g a s m ile , a p at o n t h e back , a n d p eo p le ’s v er bal ju dgm en ts t h at w e a re a “g o od p ers o n ,” “g o od p aren t,” “g o o d c it iz e n ,” “g o o d w ork er ,” “ g o od f r ie n d,” a n d s o fo rth . W e d o t h in gs t o g et p eo p le to li k e u s a n d a v o id t h in gs t h at m ay l e a d p eo p le t o d is li k e o r p u n is h u s. I n d i t t r a g ic t h at w e w ork s o h ard t o b u y l o ve an d a ssu m e th at w e m ust d en y o u rs e lv es a n d d o fo r o th ers in o rd er to b e li k ed . I n fa ct, w hen w e do th in gs s o le ly in t h e s p ir it o f e n han cin g li f e , w e w ill n d o th er s a p pre cia tin g us.  eir a p pre cia tio n , h ow ev er, is o n ly a fe ed back m ech an is m c o n rm in g th at o u r e ff orts h ad t h e in te n ded e ff ec t.  e r e co gn it io n t h at w e hav e ch osen to u se o u r p ow er to s e rv e li f e a n d h av e don e so s u cce ss fu lly b rin gs u s th e gen u in e jo y o f c ele b ra tin g o u rs e lv es in a w ay t h at a p pro val f r o m o th er s c a n n ev er o ff er. ( 3 ) T O E SC A PE P U N IS H M EN T So m e of us pay in co m e ta x prim arily to av o id pu n is h m en t. A s a co n se q u en ce, w e a re li k ely to a p pro ach th at y early r it u al w it h a d eg re e of re se n tm en t. I r e ca ll, h ow ev er, f r o m m y c h ild hood h ow d iff er en tly m y f a th er an d g ra n dfa th er f e lt a b ou t p ay in g t a x es .  ey h ad i m mig ra te d t o t h e U nit e d S ta te s fr o m R uss ia an d w ere d es ir o u s o f su pp ortin g a go ver nm en t th ey b eli e v ed w as p ro te c tin g p eo p le i n a w ay t h at t h e cza r h ad n ot. I m ag in in g t h e m an y p eo p le w hose w elf a re w as b ei ng s er ved b y th ei r ta x m on ey, th ey fe lt e arn est p le a su re a s t h ey s e n t t h eir c h eck s t o t h e U .S . g o ver nm en t. ( 4 ) T O A V O ID S H AM E  ere m ay b e s o m e t a sk s w e c h oose to d o ju st t o a v o id s h am e. W e kn ow th at i f w e d on’t d o t h em , w e’l l e n d u p s u ff erin g s e v er e se lf – ju dgm en t, h earin g ou r o w n v o ic e t e lli n g u s t h ere is s o m eth in g w ro n g o r s tu pid a b ou t u s. I f w e do s o m eth in g s tim ula te d s o le ly b y t h e urg e t o a v o id s h am e, w e w ill g en erally e n d u p d ete stin g i t . ( 5 ) T O A V O ID G U IL T In o th er in sta n ce s, w e m ay th in k, “If I d on’t d o th is , p eo p le will b e d is a p p oin te d in m e.” W e a re a fr a id w e’l l e n d u p fe eli n g g u ilt y fo r fa ili n g to f u l ll oth er p eo p le ’s ex p ec ta tio n s of u s.  ere is a w orld of d iff er en ce b etw een d oin g s o m eth in g f o r o th er s in o rd er t o a v o id g u ilt a n d d oin g it o u t of a c le ar a w are n ess o f o u r o w n n eed t o c o n tr ib u te to t h e hap pin es s o f o th er hu m an b ein gs.  e rst is a w orld lle d w it h m is er y; t h e se co n d is a w orld lle d w it h p la y. B e co n sc io u s of actio n s m otiv ate d b y th e d esir e fo r m on ey o r a p pro va l, a n d b y fe a r, s h am e, o r g u ilt . K now th e p ric e y o u p ay f o r t h em . (6 ) T O S A TIS F Y A S E N SE O F D U TY W hen w e u se la n gu ag e w hic h d en ies c h oic e ( fo r ex am ple , w ord s s u ch a s sh ou ld , h ave to , o u gh t, m ust, c a n’t , s u pp ose d t o , e tc .) , o u r b eh av io rs a ris e o u t of a v ag u e s e n se o f g u ilt , d u ty , o r o bli g atio n . I c o n sid er t h is to b e t h e m ost s o cia lly d an gero u s a n d p ers o n ally u n fo rtu n ate of a ll th e way s w e act w hen w e’r e c u t o ff f r o m o u r n eed s. In C hap te r 2 w e sa w h ow th e co n ce p t o f A m ts sp ra ch e a llo w ed A dolf E ic h m an n a n d h is c o lle a g u es to s en d ten s o f th ou sa n ds o f p eo p le to th ei r death s w it h ou t f e eli n g e m otio n ally a ff ecte d o r p er so n ally r es pon sib le . W hen w e s p ea k a la n gu ag e t h at d en ie s c h oic e, w e fo rfei t t h e li f e in o u rs e lv es fo r a r o b otli k e m en ta li t y t h at d is c o n nects u s f r o m o u r o w n c o re .  e m ost d an gero u s o f all b eh av io rs m ay co n sis t o f d oin g t h in gs “ b eca u se w e’r e s u pp ose d t o .” A er e x am in in g t h e li s t o f it e m s y o u h av e gen er ate d , y o u m ay d ecid e to s to p d oin g c e rta in th in gs in th e s a m e sp ir it th at I c h ose to fo reg o w rit in g cli n ic a l r e p orts . A s r a d ic a l a s i t m ay s e em , i t i s p oss ib le to d o t h in gs o n ly o u t of p la y. I b eli e v e th at to th e d eg re e th at w e en gag e m om en t b y m om en t in t h e pla y fu ln ess of en ric h in g li f e— motiv ate d so le ly by th e des ir e fo r en ric h in g l i f e — to t h at d eg re e a re w e bei ng c o m pass io n ate w it h o u rs e lv es . Su m mary  e m ost c ru cia l a p p li c atio n o f N VC m ay b e in t h e way w e tr e at o u rs e lv es . W hen w e m ak e m is ta k es, in ste a d o f g et tin g c au gh t u p in m ora li s tic se lf – ju dgm en ts , w e c a n u se t h e p ro ce ss o f N VC m ou rn in g a n d s e lf – fo rg iv en ess t o s h ow u s w here w e c a n g ro w . B y a ss es sin g o u r b eh av io rs i n t er m s o f o u r o w n un m et n eed s, t h e im petu s fo r c h an ge c o m es n ot o u t o f s h am e, g u ilt , a n ger , or d ep re ss io n , b u t o u t o f th e g en u in e des ir e to c o n tr ib u te to o u r o w n a n d oth ers’ w ell- b ein g. W e a ls o c u lt iv ate s e lf – c o m pass io n b y c o n sc io u sly c h oosin g i n d aily l i f e to a ct o n ly in s e rv ic e t o o u r o w n n eed s a n d v alu es r a th er t h an o u t o f d u ty , fo r ex tr in sic r e w ard s, o r t o a v o id g u ilt , s h am e, a n d p u n is h m en t. I f w e re v ie w t h e jo yle ss a cts t o w hic h w e c u rre n tly s u bje ct o u rs e lv es a n d m ak e th e tr a n sla tio n fr o m “ h av e t o ” t o “ c h oose t o ,” w e w ill d is c o ver m ore pla y a n d i n teg rit y i n o u r li v es. T 10 Exp re ssin g A nger F u lly h e s u bje c t o f a n ger g iv es u s a u n iq u e op p ortu n it y to d iv e m ore deep ly i n to N VC. B ecau se it b rin gs m an y a sp ects o f th is p ro ce ss in to sh arp fo cu s, th e e x p re ss io n o f a n ger c le arly d em on str a te s th e diff er en ce bet ween N VC a n d o th er f o rm s o f c o m mun ic atio n . H urtin g p eo p le i s t o o s u p erfi cia l. I w ou ld li k e to su ggest th at h it t in g, b la m in g, h u rtin g o th er s— whet her physic a lly o r e m otio n ally — are a ll s u p er cia l e x p res sio n s o f w hat i s g o in g o n w it h in u s w hen w e a re a n gry. I f w e a re tr u ly a n gry, w e wou ld w an t a m uch m ore p ow erfu l w ay t o f u lly e x p re ss o u rs e lv es .  is u n dersta n din g c o m es a s a r e li ef to m an y g ro u p s I w ork w it h th at e x p erie n ce o p pre ss io n a n d d is c rim in atio n a n d w an t t o in cre a se th ei r p ow er to eff ec t ch an ge. Su ch gro u p s are un ea sy w hen th ey hear th e ter m s non vio le n t o r c o m pa ssio n ate co m mun ic atio n b ecau se th ey h av e so o  en been u rg ed t o s ti e t h eir a n ger, c a lm d ow n, a n d a cce p t t h e sta tu s q u o.  ey w orr y ab ou t ap pro ach es th at v ie w th ei r an ger as an u n des ir a b le qu ali t y n eed in g to b e p u rg ed .  e p ro ces s w e are desc rib in g, h ow ev er , d oes n ot en co u ra g e u s to ig n ore , s q u ash , o r s w allo w a n ger, b u t r a th er to ex pres s t h e co re o f o u r a n ger f u lly a n d w hole h earte d ly . Dis tin gu is h in g S tim ulu s F ro m C au se  e rst s te p t o f u lly e x p re ss in g a n ger i n N VC i s t o d iv o rc e t h e oth er p er so n fr o m a n y r e sp on sib ili t y f o r o u r a n ger. W e rid o u rs e lv es o f t h ou gh ts s u ch a s, “ H e (o r sh e o r th ey ) m ad e m e a n gry w hen th ey d id th at.” S u ch th in kin g le a d s u s t o e x p re ss o u r a n ger s u p er cia lly b y b la m in g o r p u n is h in g t h e oth er p ers o n . E arli e r w e s a w t h at t h e b eh av io r o f o th er s m ay b e a s tim ulu s f o r o u r fe eli n gs, b u t n ot t h e c au se . W e a re nev er a n gry b ecau se of w hat s o m eo n e els e d id . W e c a n id en tif y th e o th er p er so n’s b eh av io r a s th e stim ulu s, b u t it is i m porta n t t o e sta b li s h a c le ar s e p ara tio n b et ween s tim ulu s a n d c au se . W e a re n ev er a n gry b eca u se o f w hat o th ers s a y o r d o. I’d li k e to illu str a te t h is d is tin ctio n w it h a n e x am ple fr o m m y w ork a t a S w ed is h p ris o n . M y jo b w as to s h ow p ris o n ers w ho h ad b eh av ed in v io len t way s h ow t o f u lly e x p re ss t h eir a n ger r a th er t h an t o k ill, b eat, o r r a p e oth er p eo p le . D urin g a n e x erc is e c a lli n g o n p artic ip an ts t o i d en tif y t h e stim ulu s o f th eir a n ger, o n e p ris o n er w ro te : “  re e week s a g o I m ad e a r e q u es t to th e pris o n o ffi cia ls a n d th ey s till h av en ’t r es pon ded to it .” H is s ta te m en t w as a c le ar o b se rv atio n o f a s tim ulu s, d es crib in g w hat o th er p eo p le had d on e. I t h en a sk ed h im to s ta te t h e c au se of h is a n ger: “ W hen t h is h ap p en ed , yo u f e lt a n gry b ecau se w hat? ” “ I ju st t o ld y o u ,” h e e x cla im ed . “ I f e lt a n gry b ecau se th ey d id n’t r es pon d to m y r e q u est!” B y e q u atin g s tim ulu s a n d c au se , h e had t r ic k ed h im se lf in to t h in kin g t h at i t w as t h e b eh av io r o f t h e pris o n o ffi cia ls t h at w as m ak in g h im a n gry.  is is a n e a sy h ab it t o a cq u ir e in a c u lt u re th at u ses g u ilt a s a m ean s of c o n tr o lli n g p eo p le . I n s u ch c u lt u res , it b eco m es i m porta n t t o t r ic k p eo p le i n to t h in kin g t h at w e c a n m ake o th ers f e el a c e rta in w ay. W here g u ilt is a ta ctic o f m an ip u la tio n an d co er cio n , it is u sef ul to c o n fu se stim ulu s a n d c au se . A s m en tio n ed e arli er , c h ild ren w ho h ear, “It h u rts M om my a n d D ad dy w hen y o u g et p oor g ra d es,” a re le d t o b eli e v e th at th eir b eh av io r is th e cau se o f th ei r p aren ts ’ p ain .  e sa m e dyn am ic is o b se rv ed a m on g i n tim ate p artn ers : “ It r e a lly d is a p p oin ts m e w hen y o u ’r e not here fo r m y b ir th d ay.”  e E ngli s h la n gu ag e fa cili t a te s t h e use of t h is g u ilt – in du cin g t a ctic . T o m otiv ate b y g u ilt , m ix u p s tim ulu s a n d c a u se . W e s a y : “ Y ou m ak e m e a n gry.” “ Y ou h u rt m e b y d oin g th at.” “I fe el s a d b ecau se y o u d id t h at.” W e u se o u r la n gu ag e in m an y d iff er en t w ay s to t r ic k o u rs e lv es in to b eli e v in g th at o u r fe eli n gs res ult fr o m w hat o th er s d o.  e rst s te p in t h e p ro ce ss o f fu lly ex pres sin g o u r a n ger is to r e a li z e th at w hat o th er p eo p le d o i s n ev er t h e c au se of h ow w e fe el.  e c a u se o f a n ger li e s in o u r t h in kin g— in t h ou gh ts o f b la m e a n d j u dgm en t. S o w hat is th e cau se o f an ger? In C hap te r 5 , w e d is c u ss e d th e fo u r op tio n s w e h av e w hen c o n fr o n te d w it h a m ess a g e or b eh av io r t h at w e don’t l i k e. A nger is g en era te d w hen w e ch oose th e se co n d o p tio n : w hen ev er w e are a n gry, w e a re n din g fa u lt — we are ch oosin g to p la y G od b y ju dgin g o r b la m in g t h e o th er p ers o n f o r b ein g w ro n g o r d es er vin g p u n is h m en t. I w ou ld li k e to su ggest th at th is is th e c au se of a n ger. E ven if w e are not in it ia lly c o n sc io u s o f i t , t h e c au se o f a n ger i s l o cate d i n o u r o w n t h in kin g.  e th ir d op tio n desc rib ed in C hap te r 5 is to sh in e th e li g h t of co n sc io u sn ess o n o u r o w n fe eli n gs a n d n eed s. R ath er t h an g o in g u p to o u r hea d to m ak e a m en ta l an aly sis o f w ro n gn es s reg ard in g so m eb o d y, w e ch oose to co n nec t to th e li f e th at is w it h in u s.  is li f e en er gy is m ost p alp ab le a n d a cce ss ib le w hen w e fo cu s o n w hat w e need i n e a ch m om en t. F or e x am ple , if s o m eo n e a rriv es la te fo r a n a p p oin tm en t a n d w e need re a ssu ra n ce t h at s h e c a re s a b ou t u s, w e m ay f e el h u rt. I f, i n ste a d , o u r n eed i s t o s p en d t im e p u rp ose fu lly a n d c o n str u ctiv ely , w e m ay f e el f r u str a te d . B ut i f o u r n eed is fo r th ir ty m in ute s o f q u iet s o li t u de, w e m ay b e gra tef ul fo r h er ta rd in ess a n d fe el p le a se d .  us, it is n ot th e beh av io r o f th e oth er p er so n bu t o u r o w n n eed th at c au se s o u r fe eli n g. W hen w e a re co n necte d to o u r n eed , w heth er it is fo r re a ssu ra n ce, p u rp osef uln es s, o r so li t u de, w e are in t o u ch w it h o u r li f e e n erg y. W e m ay h av e str o n g fe eli n gs, b u t w e are nev er an gry. A nger is a r e su lt o f li f e -a li en atin g t h in kin g t h at is d is c o n necte d f r o m n eed s. I t in dic ate s t h at w e h av e m oved u p t o o u r h ea d t o a n aly ze an d ju dge so m eb o d y r a th er t h an f o cu s o n w hic h o f o u r n eed s a re not g ett in g m et. In ad dit io n to th e th ir d o p tio n o f fo cu sin g o n o u r o w n n eed s an d fe eli n gs, t h e c h oic e i s o u rs a t a n y m om en t t o s h in e th e li g h t o f c o n sc io u sn ess o n th e oth er p ers o n’s fe eli n gs an d n eed s. W hen w e ch oose th is fo u rth o p tio n , w e a ls o n ev er f e el a n ger. W e are not r ep res sin g t h e an ger; w e se e how an ger is s im ply a b se n t in e a ch m om en t th at w e a re fu lly p res en t w it h th e oth er p ers o n’s f e eli n gs a n d n eed s. All A nger H as a L if e -S er v in g C ore “B ut,” I a m a sk ed , “a re n ’t th ere cir c u m sta n ce s in w hic h a n ger is ju sti ed ? Is n ’t ‘r ig h te o u s in dig n atio n’ ca lle d fo r in th e fa ce of ca re les s, th ou gh tles s pollu tio n o f th e e n vir o n m en t, fo r e x am ple? ” M y a n sw er is th at I str o n gly b eli e v e th at to w hate v er d eg re e I su pp ort th e co n sc io u sn ess th at th er e is s u ch a th in g a s a “c a re le ss a ctio n” o r a “c o n sc ien tio u s a ctio n ,” a “g re ed y p ers o n” o r a “ m ora l p ers o n ,” I a m c o n tr ib u tin g to v io len ce o n th is p la n et . Rath er th an a g re ein g o r d is a g re ein g a b ou t w hat p eo p le a re fo r m urd erin g, ra p in g, or p ollu tin g th e en vir o n m en t, I beli e v e we ser ve li f e bet ter by fo cu sin g a tt e n tio n o n w hat w e a re n eed in g. W hen w e j u dge o th ers, w e c o n tr ib u te t o vio le n ce . I s e e a ll a n ger a s a r e su lt o f li f e -a li en atin g, v io len ce -p ro vo kin g t h in kin g. A t t h e c o re o f a ll a n ger i s a n eed t h at i s n ot b ei ng f u l lle d .  us a n ger c a n b e valu ab le if w e u se it a s a n a la rm c lo ck to w ak e us u p — to r e a li z e we hav e a need th at is n ’t b ein g m et a n d th at w e a re th in kin g in a w ay th at m ak es it u n li k ely t o b e m et. T o f u lly e x p res s a n ger r e q u ir es f u ll c o n sc io u sn es s o f o u r n eed . In a d dit io n , e n erg y is r e q u ir e d to g et th e need m et. A nger , h ow ev er , co -o p ts o u r en erg y b y d ir e c tin g it to w ard p u n is h in g p eo p le ra th er th an m eetin g ou r need s. In ste a d of en gag in g in “r ig h te o u s in dig n atio n ,” I re co m men d c o n nec tin g e m path ic a lly w it h o u r o w n n eed s o r t h ose of o th er s.  is m ay ta k e ex te n siv e pra ctic e, w her eb y over an d over ag ain , w e co n sc io u sly re p la ce th e p h ra se “ I a m a n gry b ecau se th ey … ” w it h “ I a m a n gry b eca u se I a m n eed in g … ” U se a n ger a s a w ak e-u p c a ll. I o n ce w as t a u gh t a r e m ark ab le les so n w hile w ork in g w it h s tu den ts in a c o rre c tio n al s c h ool f o r c h ild re n i n W is c o n sin . O n t w o su cce ss iv e d ay s I w as h it o n t h e n ose i n r e m ark ab ly s im ila r w ay s.  e rst t im e, I r e ce iv ed a s h arp b lo w a cro ss t h e n ose f r o m a n e lb ow w hile i n ter ce d in g i n a gh t b et ween t w o stu den ts . I w as s o e n ra g ed it w as a ll I c o u ld d o to k eep m yse lf f r o m h it t in g back . (O n th e str e ets o f D etr o it w her e I g re w u p, it to ok fa r les s th an a n elb ow i n t h e n ose t o p ro vo ke m e t o r a g e.)  e se co n d d ay : s im ila r s it u atio n , sa m e n ose — an d t h u s m ore p hysic a l p ain — bu t n ot a b it o f a n ger! A nger co -o p ts ou r en erg y by div ertin g it to w ard p u n it iv e a ctio n s. R e ec tin g d eep ly th at e v en in g o n th is ex per ien ce, I re co gn iz e d h ow I h ad la b ele d t h e rst c h ild in m y m in d a s a “ s p oile d b ra t.”  at im ag e was in m y h ea d b efo re h is e lb ow e v er c au gh t m y n ose , a n d w hen it d id , it w as n o lo n ger s im ply a n e lb ow h it t in g m y n ose . I t w as: “  at o bn oxio u s b ra t h as n o rig h t t o d o t h is !” I h ad a n oth er ju dgm en t a b ou t t h e se co n d c h ild ; I s a w h im a s a “ p ath etic c re atu re .” S in ce I h ad a ten den cy to w orr y a b ou t th is c h ild , ev en th ou gh m y n ose w as h u rtin g a n d b le ed in g m uch m ore se v er ely , th e se co n d d ay I fe lt n o r a g e a t a ll. I c o u ld n ot h av e re ce iv ed a m ore pow er fu l le ss o n t o h elp m e s e e t h at i t ’s n ot w hat t h e oth er p er so n d oes , b u t t h e im ag es an d i n te rp re ta tio n s i n m y o w n h ea d t h at p ro du ce m y a n ger. Stim ulu s v ersu s C au se : P ra ctic a l I m pli c a tio n s I e m ph asiz e th e d is tin ctio n b etw een c au se an d stim ulu s o n p ra ctic a l a n d ta ctic a l a s w ell a s o n p h ilo so p h ic a l g ro u n ds. I ’d l i k e to i llu str a te t h is p oin t b y re tu rn in g t o m y d ia lo gu e w it h J o h n , t h e Sw ed is h p ris o n er: Jo h n :  re e w eek s a g o I m ad e a r e q u es t to t h e pris o n o ffi cia ls a n d t h ey still h av en ’t r e sp on ded t o m y r e q u es t. M BR : So w hen t h is h ap p en ed , y o u f e lt a n gry b ecau se w hat? J o h n : I j u st t o ld y o u .  ey d id n’t r e sp on d t o m y r e q u es t! M BR : H old i t . I n ste a d o f s a y in g, “ I f e lt a n gry b ecau se th ey … ,” s to p a n d beco m e c o n sc io u s o f w hat y o u ’r e t e lli n g y o u rs e lf t h at’s m ak in g y o u so a n gry. Jo h n : I’m n ot t e lli n g m yse lf a n yth in g. M BR : Sto p, s lo w d ow n, j u st l i s te n t o w hat’s g o in g o n i n sid e. Jo h n : (a  er s ile n tly r e fl ectin g) I ’m t e lli n g m yse lf t h at t h ey h av e n o r es pect fo r h u m an b ein gs; t h ey a re a b u n ch o f c o ld , f a celes s b u re au cra ts w ho d on’t g iv e a d am n a b ou t a n yb o d y b u t t h em se lv es !  ey ’r e a re a l b u n ch o f … M BR :  an ks, t h at’s e n ou gh . N ow y o u k n ow w hy y o u ’r e an gry — it ’s t h at k in d o f t h in kin g. Jo h n : B ut w hat’s w ro n g w it h t h in kin g t h at w ay ? M BR : I’m n ot s a y in g t h ere i s a n yth in g w ro n g w it h t h in kin g t h at w ay. N otic e i f I s a y t h ere i s s o m eth in g w ro n g w it h y o u f o r t h in kin g t h at w ay, I ’d b e t h in kin g t h e s a m e w ay a b ou t y o u . I d on’t s a y i t ’s w ro n g t o ju dge p eo p le , t o c a ll t h em f a cele ss b u re au cra ts o r t o l a b el t h ei r actio n s i n co n sid era te o r s e l sh . H ow ev er , i t ’s t h at k in d o f t h in kin g on y o u r p art t h at m ak es y o u f e el v er y a n gry. F o cu s y o u r a tt en tio n on y o u r n eed s: w hat a re y o u r n eed s i n t h is s it u atio n ? Jo h n : (a  er a l o n g s ile n ce) M arsh all, I n eed t h e t r a in in g I w as r e q u es tin g. If I d on’t g et t h at t r a in in g, a s s u re as I ’m s it t in g h er e, I ’m g o n na en d up b ack i n t h is p ris o n w hen I g et o u t. M BR : N ow t h at y o u r a tt e n tio n i s o n y o u r n eed s, h ow d o y o u f e el? J o h n : Sca re d . M BR : N ow p u t y o u rs e lf i n t h e s h oes o f a p ris o n o ffi cia l. I f I ’m a n i n m ate , a m I m ore l i k ely t o g et m y n eed s m et i f I c o m e to y o u s a y in g, “ H ey, I r e a lly n eed t h at t r a in in g a n d I ’m s c a re d o f w hat’s g o in g t o h ap p en if I d on’t g et i t ,” o r i f I a p pro ach w hile s e ei ng y o u a s a f a celes s bu re au cra t? E ven i f I d on’t s a y t h ose w ord s o u t l o u d, m y e y es w ill r e v ea l t h at k in d o f t h in kin g. W hic h w ay a m I m ore li k ely t o g et m y need s m et? (Jo h n s ta re s a t t h e floor a n d r e m ain s s ile n t.) M BR : H ey, b u ddy, w hat’s g o in g o n ? Jo h n : C an ’t t a lk a b ou t i t . W hen w e b eco m e a w are o f o u r n eed s, a n ger g iv es w ay t o li f e -s e r v in g f e eli n gs.  re e h ou rs la te r, Jo h n a p pro ach ed m e an d s a id , “ M arsh all, I w is h y o u h ad ta u gh t m e tw o y ears a g o w hat y o u ta u gh t m e th is m orn in g. I w ou ld n’t h av e h ad t o k ill m y b est f r ie n d.” V io le n ce c o m es f r o m t h e b eli e f t h at o th er p eo p le c a u se o u r p ain a n d t h ere fo re d ese r v e p u n is h m en t. A ll v io le n ce i s t h e r e su lt o f p eo p le t r ic k in g t h em se lv es , a s d id t h is y o u n g m an , in to b eli e v in g th at th eir p ain d er iv es fr o m o th er p eo p le an d th at c o n se q u en tly t h ose p eo p le d ese rv e to b e pu n is h ed . O ne tim e I s a w m y y o u n ger s o n ta k e a  y-c en t p ie ce fr o m h is s is ter ’s r o om . I s a id , “ B re tt , d id y o u a sk y o u r s is ter w het her y o u c o u ld h av e th at? ” “ I d id n’t t a k e it f r o m h er,” h e a n sw er ed . N ow I fa ce d m y fo u r o p tio n s. I c o u ld h av e ca lle d h im a li a r, w hic h w ou ld , h ow ev er , h av e work ed ag ain st m y gett in g m y n eed s m et s in ce a n y ju dgm en t o f a n oth er p er so n d im in is h es t h e li k eli h ood o f o u r n eed s b ein g m et. W her e I fo cu se d m y a tt en tio n a t th at m om en t w as c rit ic a l. I f I w ere t o ju dge h im a li a r, it w ou ld p oin t m e in o n e dir e c tio n . I f I w ere t o t h in k t h at h e did n’t r es pect m e e n ou gh t o t e ll m e th e tr u th , I w ou ld b e p oin te d in a n oth er d ir e ctio n . I f, h ow ev er , I w er e eith er t o em path iz e w it h h im a t t h at m om en t, o r e x p res s n ak ed ly w hat I w as fe eli n g an d n eed in g, I w ou ld g re atly in cre a se th e poss ib ili t y o f g ett in g m y n eed s m et. W e r e ca ll f o u r o p tio n s w hen h ea rin g a d iffi cu lt m ess a g e: 1 . B la m e o u rse lv es 2 . B la m e o th ers 3 . S en se o u r o w n f e eli n gs a n d n eed s 4. S en se o th ers’ f e eli n gs a n d n eed s  e w ay I e x p re ss e d m y c h oic e — whic h i n t h is s it u atio n t u rn ed o u t t o b e h elp fu l— was n ot so m uch th ro u gh w hat I sa id , b u t th ro u gh w hat I d id . In ste a d o f j u dgin g h im a s l y in g, I t r ie d t o h ear h is f e eli n g: h e w as s c a re d , a n d his n eed w as to p ro te c t h im se lf fr o m b ei ng p u n is h ed . B y e m path iz in g w it h h im , I h ad a c h an ce o f m ak in g a n e m otio n al c o n nectio n o u t o f w hic h w e co u ld b oth g et o u r n eed s m et. H ow ev er , if I h ad a p pro ach ed h im w it h th e vie w th at h e w as ly in g— ev en if I h ad n’t e x p res se d it o u t lo u d— he wou ld h av e b een le ss li k ely t o fe el s a fe ex pres sin g t r u th fu lly w hat h ad h ap p en ed . I w ou ld h av e th en b eco m e p art o f th e pro ce ss : b y th e ver y a ct o f ju dgin g an oth er p ers o n a s a l i a r, I w ou ld c o n tr ib u te to a s e lf – fu l lli n g p ro p h ec y. W hy w ou ld p eo p le w an t to te ll th e tr u th , k n ow in g th ey w ill b e ju dged an d pu n is h ed f o r d oin g s o ? Ju dgm en ts of oth ers co n tr ib u te to se lf – fu lfi lli n g pro p h ecie s. I w ou ld li k e to s u ggest th at w hen o u r h ea d s a re lle d w it h ju dgm en ts a n d an aly se s th at oth ers are bad , gre ed y, ir res pon sib le , ly in g, ch eatin g, p ollu tin g th e en vir o n m en t, v alu in g p ro t m ore th an li f e , o r b eh av in g in o th er w ay s t h ey s h ou ld n’t , v ery f e w o f t h em w ill b e in ter es te d in o u r n eed s. If w e w an t to p ro te c t th e e n vir o n m en t, a n d w e g o to a c o rp ora te ex ecu tiv e w it h th e a tt it u de, “ Y ou k n ow , y o u a re re a lly a k iller o f th e pla n et , y o u h av e n o rig h t to ab u se th e la n d in th is w ay,” w e hav e se v er ely im pair e d o u r ch an ce s o f g ett in g o u r n eed s m et. I t i s a r a re hu m an b ei ng w ho c a n m ain ta in f o cu s o n o u r n eed s w hen w e a re ex p res sin g th em th ro u gh im ag es o f th ei r wro n gn ess . O f c o u rs e , w e m ay b e su cces sfu l in u sin g su ch ju dgm en ts to in tim id ate p eo p le in to m eetin g o u r n eed s. I f th ey fe el s o fr ig h ten ed , g u ilt y , o r a sh am ed t h at t h ey c h an ge t h eir b eh av io r, w e m ay c o m e to b eli e v e th at it i s p oss ib le t o “ w in ” b y t e lli n g p eo p le w hat’s w ro n g w it h t h em . Wit h a b ro ad er p ersp ec tiv e, h ow ev er , w e re a li z e t h at e a ch t im e ou r n eed s are m et in t h is w ay, w e n ot o n ly lo se , b u t w e hav e co n tr ib u te d v er y t a n gib ly t o v io le n ce o n th e p la n et. W e m ay h av e so lv ed a n im med ia te p ro blem , b u t w e w ill hav e cre ate d an oth er on e.  e more peo p le hear bla m e an d ju dgm en t, t h e m ore d efe n siv e a n d a g gres siv e th ey b eco m e an d t h e les s t h ey w ill c a re a b ou t o u r n eed s i n t h e f u tu re . S o e v en i f o u r p res en t n eed i s m et i n t h e s e n se t h at p eo p le d o w hat w e w an t, w e w ill p ay f o r i t l a te r. Fou r S te p s t o E xp re ssin g A nger L et’s lo ok a t w hat t h e p ro ce ss o f f u lly ex pres sin g o u r a n ger a ctu ally r e q u ir es in c o n cre te fo rm .  e rst s te p is t o s to p a n d d o n oth in g ex ce p t t o b re ath e. W e r e fr a in f r o m m ak in g a n y m ove to b la m e or p u n is h t h e oth er p er so n . W e sim ply s ta y q u ie t.  en w e id en tif y th e th ou gh ts th at a re m ak in g u s a n gry. F or e x am ple , w e o verh ear a s ta te m en t t h at l e a d s u s t o b eli e v e th at w e’v e been ex clu ded fr o m a c o n vers a tio n b ecau se of ra ce. W e sen se an ger, sto p, a n d re co gn iz e t h e t h ou gh ts s tir rin g in o u r h ea d : “ It’s u n fa ir t o a ct li k e th at. S h e’s b ein g r a cis t.” W e k n ow t h at a ll ju dgm en ts l i k e th es e are tr a g ic e x p res sio n s o f u n m et n eed s, so w e ta k e th e n ex t ste p a n d c o n nect to th e nee d s b eh in d th ose th ou gh ts . If w e ju dge so m eo n e to b e ra cis t, th e need m ay b e fo r in clu sio n , e q u ali t y , r e sp ec t, o r c o n nectio n . S te p s t o e x p re ssin g a n ger: 1 . S to p . B re a th e. 2 . I d en tif y o u r j u dgm en ta l t h ou gh ts . 3 . C on nect w it h o u r n eed s. 4 . E xp re ss o u r f e eli n gs a n d u n m et n eed s. T o f u lly e x p re ss o u rs e lv es, w e n ow o p en o u r m ou th a n d s p ea k t h e an ger — bu t th e an ger h as been tr a n sfo rm ed in to n eed s an d n eed -c o n necte d fe eli n gs. T o a rtic u la te t h ese f e eli n gs m ay r e q u ir e a lo t o f c o u ra g e. F or m e it ’s e a sy to g et a n gry a n d te ll p eo p le , “  at w as a r a cis t th in g to d o!” I n fa ct, I m ay e v en e n jo y s a y in g s u ch th in gs, b u t to g et d ow n to th e deep er fe eli n gs an d n eed s b eh in d s u ch a s ta te m en t m ay b e ver y f r ig h ten in g. T o f u lly ex pres s ou r a n ger, w e m ay s a y t o t h e o th er p er so n , “ W hen y o u en ter ed t h e ro om a n d sta rte d ta lk in g to th e o th ers a n d d id n’t s a y a n yth in g to m e, a n d th en m ad e th e c o m men t a b ou t w hit e p eo p le , I f e lt r e a lly s ic k t o m y s to m ach , a n d g o t s o sc a re d ; i t t r ig gere d o ff a ll k in ds o f n eed s o n m y p art t o b e tr e ate d e q u ally . I ’d l i k e y o u t o t e ll m e h ow y o u f e el w hen I t e ll y o u t h is .” Offerin g E m path y F ir st In m ost ca se s, h ow ev er, an oth er step n eed s to ta k e pla ce bef ore we ca n ex p ec t t h e o th er p arty t o c o n nec t w it h w hat i s g o in g o n i n u s. B ecau se it w ill o  en be d iffi cu lt fo r oth ers to re ce iv e ou r fe eli n gs an d n eed s in su ch sit u atio n s, i f w e w an t t h em t o h ear u s w e w ou ld n eed rst t o e m path iz e w it h t h em .  e m ore w e e m path iz e w it h w hat le a d s t h em to b eh av e in t h e way s th at a re n ot m eetin g o u r n eed s, t h e m ore li k ely it is t h at t h ey w ill b e ab le to r e cip ro cate a  erw ard s. O ver t h e la st t h ir ty y ears I ’v e h ad a w ea lt h o f e x p er ien ce s p ea k in g N VC w it h p eo p le w ho h arb or str o n g beli ef s ab ou t sp eci c ra ces an d et hn ic g ro u p s. E arly o n e m orn in g I w as p ic k ed u p b y a c a b a t a n a ir p ort t o t a k e m e in to t o w n. A m ess a g e f r o m t h e d is p atc h er c a m e over t h e lo u dsp ea k er f o r t h e ca b bie : “ P ic k u p M r. F is h m an a t th e sy n ag o gu e on M ain S tr e et .”  e m an n ex t t o m e i n t h e c a b m utt e re d , “  ese kik es g et u p e arly i n t h e m orn in g s o th ey c a n s c re w e v ery b o d y o u t o f t h ei r m on ey.”  e m ore w e h ea r t h em , t h e m ore t h ey ’l l h ea r u s. F or tw en ty s e co n ds, th ere w as s m oke co m in g o u t o f m y e ars . I n e arli er y ears , m y rst r e a ctio n w ou ld h av e been to w an t to p hysic a lly h u rt s u ch a p ers o n . In ste a d I to ok a fe w d eep bre ath s an d th en gav e myse lf so m e em path y f o r t h e h u rt, f e ar, a n d r a g e t h at w er e stir rin g in sid e m e. I a tt en ded to m y fe eli n gs. I sta y ed c o n sc io u s th at m y a n ger w asn ’t c o m in g fr o m m y fe llo w p ass e n ger n or th e sta te m en t h e had ju st m ad e. H is c o m men t h ad tr ig gere d o ff a v o lc a n o i n sid e o f m e, b u t I k n ew t h at m y a n ger a n d p ro fo u n d fe ar c a m e fr o m a fa r d eep er s o u rc e t h an t h ose word s h e had ju st u tt er ed . I s a t b ack a n d s im ply a llo w ed th e v io len t th ou gh ts to p la y th em se lv es o u t. I e v en e n jo yed t h e i m ag e o f a ctu ally g ra b bin g h is h ea d a n d s m ash in g i t . G iv in g m yse lf th is e m path y e n ab le d m e to th en fo cu s m y a tt en tio n o n th e h u m an ness b eh in d h is m ess a g e, a  er w hic h th e rst w ord s o u t o f m y m ou th w ere , “ A re y o u f e eli n g … ? ” I t r ie d t o em path iz e w it h h im , t o h ear h is p ain . W hy? B ecau se I w an te d t o s e e th e beau ty i n h im , a n d I w an te d f o r h im t o fu lly a p pre h en d w hat I h ad ex per ien ce d w hen h e mad e h is rem ark . I kn ew I w ou ld n’t re ce iv e th at k in d o f u n dersta n din g if th er e wer e a sto rm b re w in g in sid e o f h im . M y in te n tio n w as to c o n nect w it h h im a n d s h ow a r e sp ec tfu l e m path y f o r t h e li f e e n er gy i n h im t h at w as b eh in d t h e co m men t. M y e x p erie n ce to ld m e th at if I w er e ab le to em path iz e, th en h e wou ld b e ab le t o h ear m e i n r e tu rn . I t w ou ld n ot b e ea sy , b u t h e w ou ld b e ab le to . S ta y c o n sc io u s o f t h e v io le n t t h ou gh ts t h at a ris e in o u r m in ds, w it h ou t j u dgin g t h em . “A re y o u f e eli n g f r u str a te d ?” I a sk ed . “ It a p p ears t h at y o u m ig h t h av e had so m e b ad e x p erie n ce s w it h J e w is h p eo p le .” H e e y ed m e f o r a m om en t. “ Y ea h !  ese peo p le are dis g u stin g.  ey ’l l d o an yth in g f o r m on ey.” “ Y ou f e el d is tr u st a n d t h e n eed t o p ro te ct y o u rs e lf w hen y o u ’r e in vo lv ed in n an cia l a ff air s w it h t h em ?” “  at’s r ig h t!” h e e x cla im ed , c o n tin u in g t o r e le a se m ore ju dgm en ts , a s I li s te n ed fo r th e fe eli n g an d n ee d b eh in d ea ch o n e. W hen w e set tle ou r att e n tio n o n o th er p eo p le ’s fe eli n gs a n d n eed s, w e ex p er ien ce o u r c o m mon h u m an it y . W hen I h ear th at h e’s sc a re d an d w an ts to p ro te ct h im se lf , I re co gn iz e h ow I a ls o h av e a n ee d t o p ro te ct m yse lf a n d I t o o k n ow w hat it ’s l i k e to b e sc a re d . W hen m y c o n sc io u sn ess is fo cu se d o n a n oth er h u m an b ein g’s fe eli n gs a n d n eed s, I s e e th e un iv er sa li t y o f o u r ex per ien ce. I h ad a m ajo r c o n ic t w it h w hat w en t o n in h is h ea d , b u t I ’v e le arn ed th at I en jo y h u m an b ein gs m ore if I d on’t h ear w hat th ey th in k. E sp ecia lly w it h fo lk s w ho h av e h is k in d o f t h ou gh ts . I ’v e le arn ed t o s a v o r li f e m uch m ore by o n ly h earin g w hat’s g o in g o n in th eir h earts a n d n ot g ett in g c au gh t u p w it h th e stu ff i n t h eir h ea d s. W hen w e h ea r a n oth er p erso n’s fe eli n gs a n d n eed s, w e re co gn iz e o u r c o m mon h u m an it y .  is m an k ep t o n p ou rin g o u t h is s a d n es s a n d f r u str a tio n . B ef ore I k n ew it , h e’d n is h ed w it h J e w s a n d m oved o n t o b la ck s. H e w as c h arg ed w it h p ain aro u n d a n u m ber o f s u bje c ts . A er n early ten m in utes o f m y ju st li s ten in g, h e s to p p ed : h e h ad f e lt u n dersto od .  en I l e t h im k n ow w hat w as g o in g o n i n m e: M BR : You k n ow , w hen y o u rst s ta rte d t o t a lk , I f e lt a l o t o f a n ger, a l o t o f fr u str a tio n , s a d n ess , a n d d is c o u ra g em en t, b ecau se I’v e had v er y diff ere n t e x p erie n ce s w it h J e w s t h an y o u ’v e had , a n d I w as w an tin g yo u t o h av e m uch m ore t h e k in d o f ex per ien ce s I ’v e had . C an y o u te ll m e w hat y o u h eard m e s a y ? M an : O h, I ’m n ot s a y in g t h ey ’r e a ll … M BR : Excu se m e, h old o n , h old i t . C an y o u t e ll m e w hat y o u h eard m e sa y ? M an : W hat a re y o u t a lk in g a b ou t? M BR : Let m e r e p eat w hat I ’m t r y in g t o s a y. I r e a lly w an t y o u t o j u st h ear th e p ain I f e lt w hen I h eard y o u r w ord s. I t’s r e a lly i m porta n t t o m e th at y o u h ear t h at. I w as s a y in g I f e lt a r e a l s en se of s a d n es s b ecau se m y e x p erie n ce s w it h J e w is h p eo p le hav e been v er y d iff er en t. I w as ju st w is h in g t h at y o u h ad h ad s o m e ex per ien ce s t h at w er e diff er en t fr o m t h e o n es y o u w ere d esc rib in g. C an y o u t e ll m e w hat y o u h eard m e s a y ? M an : You ’r e s a y in g I h av e n o r ig h t t o t a lk t h e w ay I d id . M BR : N o, I w ou ld l i k e y o u t o h ear m e d iff er en tly . I r e a lly d on’t w an t t o b la m e y o u . I h av e n o d esir e t o b la m e yo u . O ur n eed i s f o r t h e o th er p erso n t o tr u ly h ea r o u r p ain . I in te n ded to slo w d ow n th e c o n ver sa tio n , b ecau se in m y ex per ien ce, to w hate v er d eg re e p eo p le h ear b la m e, t h ey h av e fa ile d t o h ear o u r p ain . I f t h is m an sa id , “ ose w ere te rrib le th in gs fo r m e to sa y ; th ose wer e ra cis t re m ark s I m ad e,” h e w ou ld n ot h av e heard m y p ain . A s s o on a s p eo p le th in k th at th ey h av e d on e s o m eth in g w ro n g, th ey w ill n ot b e fu lly a p pre h en din g ou r p ain . Peo p le d o n ot h ea r o u r p ain w hen t h ey b eli e v e t h ey a re a t f a u lt . I d idn ’t w an t h im to h ear b la m e, b ecau se I w an te d h im to k n ow w hat h ad g o n e o n in m y h eart w hen h e utt er ed h is rem ark . B la m in g is ea sy . P eo p le a re u se d to h earin g b la m e; so m etim es th ey a g re e wit h it a n d h ate t h em se lv es— whic h d oesn ’t sto p th em fr o m b eh av in g th e sa m e way — an d so m etim es th ey h ate u s fo r c a lli n g th em ra cis ts o r w hate v er — whic h a ls o d oesn ’t s to p t h eir b eh av io r. I f w e s en se bla m e en ter in g t h ei r m in d, a s I d id i n t h e c a b , w e m ay n eed t o s lo w d ow n, g o b ack , a n d h ear t h ei r p ain f o r a w hile m ore . Tak in g O ur T im e Pro b ab ly th e m ost im porta n t p art o f le arn in g h ow to li v e th e pro ces s w e hav e b een d is c u ss in g is to ta k e ou r tim e. W e m ay fe el a w kw ard d ev ia tin g fr o m th e h ab it u al b eh av io rs th at o u r c o n dit io n in g h as re n dere d a u to m atic , b u t if o u r in te n tio n is to c o n sc io u sly li v e li f e in h arm on y w it h o u r v alu es , th en w e’l l w an t t o t a k e o u r t im e. A fr ie n d o f m in e, S am W illi a m s, jo tt e d d ow n th e basic c o m pon en ts o f th e N VC p ro ce ss o n a th re e-b y- ve ca rd , w hic h h e wou ld u se as a c h eat sh eet a t w ork . W hen h is b oss w ou ld c o n fr o n t h im , S am w ou ld s to p, r ef er t o t h e c a rd in h is h an d, a n d ta k e tim e to r em ember h ow to r es pon d. W hen I a sk ed w heth er h is c o lle a g u es w er e n din g h im a li t t le str a n ge, c o n sta n tly s ta rin g in to h is h an d a n d ta k in g s o m uch tim e to fo rm h is s en ten ces , S am re p li e d , “ It d oesn ’t a ctu ally t a k e t h at m uch m ore tim e, b u t e v en if it d id , it ’s s till w orth it to m e. It’s im porta n t fo r m e to k n ow th at I a m r es pon din g to p eo p le t h e w ay I r e a lly w an t to .” A t h om e h e was m ore over t, ex pla in in g to h is w if e a n d c h ild re n w hy h e w as t a k in g t h e tim e an d t r o u ble to c o n su lt t h e ca rd . W hen ev er t h ere w as a n a rg u m en t in t h e fa m ily , h e wou ld p u ll o u t t h e ca rd a n d t a k e h is t im e. A er a b ou t a m on th , h e fe lt c o m fo rta b le en ou gh t o p u t it aw ay.  en o n e ev en in g, h e an d S co tt ie , ag e fo u r, w er e hav in g a co n ic t over te le v is io n an d it w asn ’t go in g w ell. “D ad dy,” Sco tt ie sa id u rg en tly , “ g et t h e c a rd !” F or th ose of yo u w is h in g to ap p ly N VC, es pecia lly in ch allen gin g sit u atio n s o f a n ger, I w ou ld s u gges t t h e fo llo w in g ex ercis e . A s w e hav e se en , ou r a n ger c o m es fr o m ju dgm en ts , la b els , a n d th ou gh ts o f b la m e, o f w hat p eo p le “s h ou ld ” d o a n d w hat th ey “d es er ve.” L is t th e ju dgm en ts th at oat m ost f r e q u en tly in y o u r h ea d b y u sin g t h e cu e, “ I d on’t li k e peo p le who a re … ” C olle c t a ll s u ch n eg ativ e ju dgm en ts i n y o u r h ea d a n d t h en a sk y o u rs e lf , “ W hen I m ak e th at ju dgm en t o f a p er so n , w hat am I n eed in g an d n ot gett in g?” I n t h is w ay, y o u t r a in y o u rs e lf to f r a m e yo u r t h in kin g in ter m s o f u n m et n eed s r a th er t h an i n t e rm s o f j u dgm en ts o f o th er p eo p le . P ra ctic e t r a n sla tin g e a ch j u dgm en t i n to a n u n m et n eed . Tak e y o u r t im e. P ra ctic e is e ss e n tia l, b ecau se m ost o f u s w er e ra is e d , i f n ot o n t h e str e et s of D etr o it , th en s o m ew here o n ly s li g h tly le ss v io len t. Ju dgin g a n d b la m in g hav e b eco m e se co n d n atu re to u s. T o p ra ctic e N VC, w e n eed to p ro ce ed slo w ly , t h in k c a re fu lly b efo re w e s p ea k , a n d o  en j u st t a k e a d eep b re ath a n d not s p ea k a t a ll. L earn in g t h e p ro ce ss a n d a p p ly in g i t b oth t a k e tim e. Su m mary B la m in g a n d p u n is h in g o th ers a re su p er cia l ex pres sio n s o f a n ger . If w e w is h t o f u lly e x p re ss a n ger, t h e rst s te p is t o d iv o rc e t h e oth er p er so n f r o m an y r e sp on sib ili t y f o r o u r a n ger. I n ste a d w e sh in e th e li g h t o f c o n sc io u sn es s on o u r o w n fe eli n gs a n d n eed s. B y e x p res sin g o u r n eed s, w e are fa r m ore li k ely t o g et t h em m et t h an b y j u dgin g, b la m in g, o r p u n is h in g o th er s.  e fo u r s te p s t o e x p re ss in g a n ger a re (1 ) s to p a n d b re ath e, ( 2 ) id en tif y o u r ju dgm en ta l th ou gh ts , ( 3 ) c o n nect w it h o u r n eed s, a n d ( 4 ) ex pres s o u r fe eli n gs a n d u n m et n eed s. S o m etim es, in b et ween ste p s 3 a n d 4 , w e m ay ch oose to e m path iz e w it h th e o th er p er so n s o th at h e or s h e will b e bet ter a b le t o h ear u s w hen w e e x p re ss o u rs e lv es i n s tep 4 . W e n eed t o t a k e o u r t im e b oth i n l e arn in g a n d i n a p p ly in g t h e pro ces s o f N VC. N VC i n A ctio n Pare n t a n d T een D ia lo gu e: A L if e - re a te n in g I s su e In th is sit u atio n ,  een -y ear- o ld B ill to ok a c a r, w it h ou t p er m is s io n , fr o m J o rg e, a f a m ily f r ie n d. H e w en t o n a j o y r id e w it h t w o f r ien ds a n d re tu rn ed th e c a r u n dam ag ed to th e gara g e, w her e it s a b sen ce h ad n ot b een d ete c te d . S in ce t h en , h ow ev er , J o rg e’s f o u rte en -y ear- o ld d au gh ter , Eva, w ho had go n e alo n g fo r th e rid e, to ld her fa th er w hat had h ap p en ed . Jo rg e in fo rm ed B ill’s fa th er , w ho is n ow ap pro ach in g h is s o n .  e f a th er h as j u st r e ce n tly b een p ra ctic in g N VC. Fath er: S o I h ear y o u , E va, a n d D av e t o ok J o rg e’s c a r w it h ou t a sk in g. B ill: N o, w e d id n’t ! F ath er: (in a l o u d v o ic e) D on’t l i e t o m e; i t ’l l o n ly m ak e i t w ors e!  en h e r e m em bere d t o rst c o n nect t o h is o w n f e eli n gs a n d n eed s in o rd er t o s ta y i n c o n nec tio n w it h h is s o n . Fath er: Y ou j u st s it t h ere f o r a m om en t; I n eed t o t h in k. G oin g in sid e h im se lf , h e sa w h ow a n gry a n d sc a re d h e was. A ngry w hen t e lli n g h im se lf , “ B ill s h ou ld h av e kn ow n b et ter !” a n d “ W hat a l i a r h e’s b eco m e!” S ca re d w hen h e t h in ks o f a ll t h e poten tia l c o n se q u en ces o f n ot o n ly B ill’s a ctio n , b u t h is o w n m is ju dgm en t o f w hat h is so n m ig h t d o. F ath er: (sile n tly t o h im se lf )  at w as s tu pid o f m e to a ssu m e he kn ow s bette r. S om eo n e co u ld h ave go tte n k ille d i n t h is ! ( th en c a tc h in g him se lf ) O op s, I n eed t o t r a n sla te th e la b els “ stu pid ” a n d “ li a r” in to f e eli n gs a n d n eed s. F or “ stu pid ,” I g u ess t h e fe eli n g i s d is a pp oin tm en t i n m yse lf : I w ou ld h ave li k ed t o t h in k t h at I k n ew h im b ette r. A nd a s f o r “ li a r,” I ’m f e eli n g p re tt y s c a re d b eca u se I w an t t o b e ab le to c o u nt o n g ettin g a cc u ra te in fo rm atio n t o d ea l w it h t h is s it u atio n . Fath er: (o u t l o u d, a  er s ile n ce w hile he m ull s o ver h ow t o b eg in t a lk in g) B ill, a re y o u w orrie d t h at y o u ’d b e pu n is h ed i f y o u g av e m e acc u ra te i n fo rm atio n ? B ill: Y ea h , y o u ’r e a lw ay s s o m ean w hen ev er I d o a n yth in g y o u d on’t l i k e. F ath er: A re y o u s a y in g y o u ’d l i k e m ore u n der sta n din g a n d f a ir er tr e atm en t f o r w hat y o u d o? B ill: O h, s u re , l i k e I ’m r e a lly g o n na g et f a ir t r e atm en t a n d un dersta n din g f r o m y o u ! Fath er: (sile n tly t o h im se lf ) B oy, d o I g et a n gry w hen h e sa ys t h at! C an’t h e se e how h ard I ’m t r y in g? I r e a lly n eed a l i t tle re sp ect f o r h ow h ard t h is i s , a n d I g u ess a ls o a l i t tle ca rin g f o r h ow s c a re d I ’m f e eli n g. F ath er: (o u t l o u d t o B ill ) S o u n ds t o m e l i k e y o u ’r e w orrie d t h at n o m att e r w hat y o u s a y, y o u w on’t b e tr e ate d f a ir ly ? B ill: W hat d o y o u c a re a b ou t t r e atin g m e fa ir ly ? W hen s o m eth in g hap p en s, y o u j u st w an t s o m eo n e to p u n is h . B es id es , w hat’s t h e big d ea l? E ven i f w e d id t a k e t h e c a r, n o o n e g o t h u rt a n d i t ’s b ack w here i t w as. I m ean , t h is i s n o m ajo r c rim e w av e. F ath er: A re y o u s c a re d t h ere ’l l b e h arsh c o n se q u en ce s i f y o u a d m it t o t a k in g t h e c a r, a n d y o u w an t t o t r u st t h at y o u ’l l b e tr e ate d ju stly ? B ill: Y ea h . Fath er: (a llo w in g t im e fo r s ile n ce an d t h e c o n n ectio n t o g o d ee p er) W hat c o u ld I d o t o g iv e y o u t h at r e a ssu ra n ce ? B ill: P ro m is e t o n ev er p u n is h m e a g ain . Fath er: (A w are th at p u nis h m en t w ill n ot h elp B ill d ev elo p c o n sc io u sn ess a ro u n d p ote n tia l c o n se q u en ce s o f h is b eh avio r, b u t w ill o n ly c o n tr ib u te to g re a te r d is c o n n ectio n a n d r e sis ta n ce , B ill’s f a th er e x p re ss e s w illi n gn ess t o a gre e to B ill’s r e q u est.) I ’d b e o p en t o t h at a g re em en t i f y o u a g re e t o s ta y i n d ia lo gu e w it h m e.  at is , w e t a lk u ntil I ’m s a tis ed y o u ’r e aw are of a ll t h e poss ib le c o n se q u en ce s o f y o u r h av in g t a k en t h at c a r. H ow ev er , i n t h e fu tu re , i f i t h ap p en s t h at I ’m n ot c o n den t t h at y o u s e e th e p ote n tia l d an ger o f w hat y o u ’r e i n f o r, I m ig h t s till u se fo rc e — b u t o n ly i n o rd er t o p ro te c t y o u . B ill: W ow , g re at! I t r e a lly f e els g o od k n ow in g I ’m s o s tu pid y o u h av e t o u se f o rc e t o p ro te c t m e f r o m m yse lf ! F ath er: (lo sin g t o u ch w it h h is o w n n eed s, b u t s ile n tly ) M an , t h ere are tim es w hen I c o u ld j u st k ill t h e li t tle … I’m s o f u rio u s w hen h e sa ys t h in gs l i k e th at! I t r e a lly d oesn ’t s e e m l i k e he ca re s…. D am n, w hat a m I n eed in g h ere? I ’m n eed in g t o k n ow , w hen I ’m w ork in g th is h ard , t h at a t l e a st h e ca re s.) F ath er: (o u t l o u d, a n grily ) Y ou k n ow , B ill, w hen y o u s a y t h in gs l i k e th at, I g et r e a lly p is s e d o ff . I ’m t r y in g s o h ard t o s ta y w it h y o u on t h is , a n d w hen I h ear t h in gs l i k e th at … L ook, I n eed t o k n ow i f y o u e v en w an t t o k eep t a lk in g w it h m e. B ill: I d on’t c a re . F ath er: B ill, I r e a lly w an t t o l i s te n t o y o u r a th er t h an f a ll i n to m y o ld h ab it s o f b la m in g a n d t h re ate n in g y o u w hen ev er s o m eth in g co m es u p t h at I ’m u p se t a b ou t. B ut w hen I h ear y o u s a y t h in gs li k e, “ It f e els g o od t o k n ow I ’m s o s tu pid ,” i n t h e to n e o f v o ic e y o u j u st u se d , I n d i t h ard t o c o n tr o l m yse lf . I c o u ld u se yo u r help o n t h is .  at i s , i f y o u w ou ld r a th er m e li s ten t o y o u t h an b la m e o r t h re ate n . O r i f n ot, t h en , I s u pp ose m y o th er o p tio n is t o j u st h an dle t h is t h e w ay I ’m u se d t o h an dli n g t h in gs. B ill: A nd w hat w ou ld t h at b e? F ath er: W ell, b y n ow , I ’d p ro b ab ly b e s a y in g, “ H ey, y o u ’r e gro u n ded f o r tw o y ears : n o T V, n o c a r, n o m on ey, n o d ate s, n o n oth in g! ” B ill: W ell, I g u ess I ’d w an t y o u t o d o i t t h e new w ay t h en . Fath er: (w it h h u m or) I ’m g la d t o s e e t h at y o u r s e n se o f s e lf – p re se rv atio n i s s till i n ta ct. N ow I n eed y o u t o t e ll m e w het her yo u ’r e w illi n g t o s h are s o m e h on esty a n d v u ln er ab ili t y . B ill: W hat d o y o u m ean b y “ v u ln era b ili t y ”? F ath er: It m ean s t h at y o u t e ll m e w hat y o u a re re a lly f e eli n g a b ou t t h e th in gs w e’r e t a lk in g a b ou t, a n d I t e ll y o u t h e sa m e fr o m m y en d. ( in a fi rm v o ic e) A re y o u w illi n g? B ill: O kay, I ’l l t r y. F ath er: (w it h s ig h o f r e li e f)  an k y o u . I ’m g ra te fu l f o r y o u r w illi n gn es s to t r y. D id I t e ll y o u — Jo rg e g ro u n ded E va f o r t h re e m on th s— sh e w on’t b e a llo w ed t o d o a n yth in g. H ow d o y o u f e el a b ou t th at? B ill: O h m an , w hat a b u m mer; t h at’s s o u n fa ir ! F ath er: I’d l i k e t o h ear h ow y o u r e a lly f e el a b ou t i t . B ill: I t o ld y o u — it ’s t o ta lly u n fa ir ! F ath er: (r e a li z in g B ill i s n ’t i n t o u ch w it h w hat h e’s f e eli n g, d ecid es t o g u ess ) A re y o u s a d t h at s h e’s h av in g t o p ay s o m uch f o r h er m is ta k e? B ill: N o, i t ’s n ot t h at. I m ean , i t w asn ’t h er m is ta k e re a lly . F ath er: O h, s o a re y o u u p se t s h e’s p ay in g f o r s o m eth in g t h at w as y o u r id ea t o s ta rt w it h ? B ill: W ell, y ea h , s h e j u st w en t a lo n g w it h w hat I t o ld h er t o d o. F ath er: S o u n ds t o m e l i k e y o u ’r e k in d o f h u rtin g i n sid e se ei ng t h e kin d of e ff ec t y o u r d ecis io n h ad o n E va. B ill: S o rta . F ath er: B illy , I r e a lly n eed t o k n ow t h at y o u a re ab le to s e e how y o u r actio n s h av e c o n se q u en ce s. B ill: W ell, I w asn ’t t h in kin g a b ou t w hat c o u ld ’v e go n e w ro n g. Y ea h , I g u ess I d id r e a lly s c re w u p b ad . Fath er: I’d r a th er y o u s e e i t a s s o m eth in g y o u d id t h at d id n’t t u rn o u t th e w ay y o u w an te d . A nd I s till n eed r e a ssu ra n ce a b ou t y o u r bein g a w are o f t h e c o n se q u en ce s. W ou ld y o u t e ll m e w hat y o u ’r e f e eli n g r ig h t n ow a b ou t w hat y o u d id ? B ill: I f e el r e a lly s tu pid , D ad … . I d id n’t m ean t o h u rt a n yo n e. F ath er: (tr a n sla tin g B ill’s s e lf – ju dgm en ts i n to f e eli n gs a n d n eed s) S o yo u ’r e s a d , a n d r e g re t w hat y o u d id b ecau se yo u ’d l i k e t o b e tr u ste d n ot t o d o h arm ? Bill: Y ea h , I d id n’t m ean t o c au se s o m uch t r o u ble . I j u st d id n’t t h in k a b ou t i t . F ath er: A re y o u s a y in g y o u w is h y o u h ad t h ou gh t a b ou t i t m ore an d go tt e n c le are r b efo re y o u a cte d ? B ill: ( r e fl ectin g) Y ea h … F ath er: W ell, i t ’s r e a ssu rin g f o r m e t o h ear t h at, a n d f o r t h er e to b e so m e r e a l h ea li n g w it h J o rg e, I w ou ld l i k e y o u t o g o t o h im a n d te ll h im w hat y o u j u st t o ld m e. W ou ld y o u b e w illi n g t o d o th at? B ill: O h m an , t h at’s s o s c a ry ; h e’l l b e r e a lly m ad ! Fath er: Y ea h , i t ’s l i k ely h e w ill b e.  at’s o n e o f t h e co n se q u en ce s. A re y o u w illi n g t o b e r e sp on sib le f o r y o u r a ctio n s? I l i k e J o rg e a n d I w an t t o k eep h im f o r a f r ie n d, a n d I ’m g u es sin g t h at y o u w ou ld l i k e t o k eep y o u r c o n nec tio n w it h E va. I s t h at t h e ca se? B ill: S h e’s o n e o f m y b est f r ie n ds. F ath er: S o s h all w e g o s e e t h em ? Bill: ( fe a rfu lly a n d r e lu cta n tly ) W ell … o kay. Y ea h , I g u ess s o . F ath er: A re y o u s c a re d a n d n eed in g t o k n ow t h at y o u w ill b e sa fe if y o u g o t h ere ? Bill: Y ea h . Fath er: W e’l l g o t o geth er: I ’l l b e t h ere f o r y o u a n d w it h y o u . I ’m r e a lly p ro u d t h at y o u a re w illi n g. N 11 Con fl ic t R eso lu tio n a n d M ed ia tio n ow th at yo u are fa m ili a r w it h th e ste p s in vo lv ed in N on vio len t Com mun ic atio n , I w an t to a d d res s h ow to a p p ly th em in res olv in g co n ic ts .  ese c o u ld b e c o n ic ts b et ween y o u rs e lf a n d so m eo n e els e , o r yo u m ay b e a sk ed to — or c h oose to — in vo lv e yo u rs e lf in a c o n ic t b et ween o th ers : f a m ily m em bers , p artn ers , c o -w ork er s, o r e v en s tr a n gers in c o n ic t. W hate v er t h e s it u atio n m ay b e, r es olv in g c o n ic ts i n vo lv es a ll t h e prin cip les I o u tli n ed p re v io u sly in th is b o ok: o b ser vin g, id en tif y in g an d ex pres sin g fe eli n gs, co n nec tin g fe eli n gs w it h n eed s, an d m ak in g d oab le re q u es ts o f an oth er p ers o n u sin g c le ar, c o n cret e, p osit iv e actio n l a n gu ag e. O ver th e co u rs e of se v era l deca d es , I’v e use d Non vio len t Com mun ic atio n to re so lv e co n ic ts aro u n d th e world . I’v e met w it h u n hap py c o u ple s, fa m ili e s, w ork er s a n d t h ei r e m plo yers , a n d e th n ic g ro u p s at w ar w it h e a ch o th er. M y e x p er ien ce h as ta u gh t m e th at it ’s p oss ib le to r e so lv e ju st a b ou t a n y c o n ic t t o e v er yb o d y’s s a tis fa ctio n . A ll it t a k es i s a lo t of p atie n ce, th e w illi n gn ess to e sta b li s h a h u m an c o n nectio n , th e in ten tio n to fo llo w N VC p rin cip le s u ntil y o u re a ch a res olu tio n , a n d tr u st th at th e pro ce ss w ill w ork . Hum an C on nectio n In N VC-s ty le c o n ic t r e so lu tio n , c re atin g a c o n nectio n b et ween t h e peo p le w ho a re in c o n ic t is t h e m ost im porta n t t h in g.  is is w hat e n ab le s a ll t h e oth er ste p s o f N VC to w ork , b ecau se it ’s n ot u ntil y o u h av e fo rg ed th at c o n nec tio n th at e a ch s id e w ill s e ek to k n ow ex actly w hat th e oth er s id e is f e eli n g a n d n eed in g.  e p artie s a ls o n eed to k n ow fr o m th e sta rt th at th e obje c tiv e is n ot t o g et t h e o th er s id e t o d o w hat t h ey w an t t h em t o d o. A nd on ce th e tw o s id es u n dersta n d th at, it b eco m es p oss ib le— so m etim es e v en ea sy — to h av e a c o n vers a tio n a b ou t h ow t o m eet t h ei r n eed s. C re a tin g a co n nectio n betw een peo p le is th e m ost im porta n t t h in g. W it h N VC, w e’r e tr y in g to li v e a d iff er en t v alu e sy stem w hile w e are a sk in g f o r t h in gs t o c h an ge. W hat’s m ost i m porta n t i s t h at e v er y c o n nectio n alo n g th e li n e m ir ro rs th e k in d o f w orld w e’r e tr y in g to c re ate . E ach step n eed s t o r e ec t e n erg etic a lly w hat w e’r e a er , w hic h is a h olo gra p h ic im ag e o f t h e q u ali t y o f r e la tio n sh ip s w e’r e tr y in g t o c re ate . I n s h ort, h ow w e ask f o r ch an ge r e ec ts th e v alu e s y ste m w e’r e tr y in g to s u pp ort. W hen w e se e th e diff ere n ce b etw een t h ese t w o o bje ctiv es , w e co n sc io u sly r ef ra in f r o m t r y in g to g et a p ers o n t o d o w hat w e w an t. I n ste a d w e w ork t o c re ate t h at q u ali t y o f m utu al c o n ce rn a n d r e sp ec t w here ea ch p arty t h in ks t h ei r o w n n eed s m att er a n d t h ey a re c o n sc io u s t h at t h eir n eed s a n d t h e oth er p er so n’s w ell- b ei ng a re in te rd ep en den t. W hen th at hap p en s, it ’s am azin g how co n ic ts th at o th erw is e s e em i r re so lv ab le a re e a sily r es olv ed . W hen I ’m a sk ed t o r e so lv e a c o n ic t, I w ork t o le a d t h e tw o s id es t o t h is c a rin g a n d r e sp ec tfu l c o n nec tio n .  is is o  en t h e to u gh p art. O nce th at is a cco m pli s h ed , I h elp b oth s id es c re ate s tr a te g ies t h at w ill r es olv e th e co n ic t to b oth s id es’ s a tis fa ctio n . N otic e th at I u se th e w ord sa tis fa ctio n in ste a d o f c o m pro m is e! M ost a tt e m pts a t r e so lu tio n s e arc h f o r c o m pro m is e , w hic h m ean s e v er yb o d y g iv es so m eth in g u p a n d n eit h er s id e is s a tis ed . N VC is d iff er en t; o u r o bje ctiv e is t o m eet e v ery o n e’s n eed s f u lly . NVC C on fl ic t R eso lu tio n v ersu s T ra d it io n al M ed ia tio n Let’s c o n sid er t h e h u m an c o n nec tio n a sp ect o f N VC a g ain , t h is t im e lo okin g at t h ir d -p arty m ed ia tio n — a p ers o n s te p pin g i n t o r es olv e a c o n ic t b et ween tw o o th er p artie s. W hen I ’m w ork in g w it h tw o p eo p le , o r tw o g ro u p s, th at h av e a co n ic t th ey h av en ’t b een ab le to re so lv e, I ap pro ach th is ver y diff ere n tly f r o m t h e w ay p ro fe ss io n al m ed ia to rs o  en a p pro ach a c o n ic t. F or e x am ple , o n ce I w as i n A ustr ia m eet in g w it h a g ro u p o f p ro fes sio n al m ed ia to rs w ho w ork o n m an y k in ds o f in ter natio n al co n ic ts , in clu din g th ose b etw een u n io n s a n d m an ag em ent. I d es crib ed s e v er al c o n ic ts I h ad m ed ia te d , su ch as on e in C ali f o rn ia bet ween la n dow ners an d m ig ra n t w ork ers w here t h ere h ad b een c o n sid er ab le physic a l v io len ce. A nd I t a lk ed a b ou t m ed ia tin g b etw een tw o A fr ic a n tr ib es (w hic h I d is c u ss fu lly in m y bo ok Sp ea k Pea ce in a W orld of C on flic t) an d a fe w oth er ex tr e m ely e n tr e n ch ed , d an gero u s c o n ic ts . I w as a sk ed h ow m uch tim e I g iv e m yse lf to s tu dy a s it u atio n I w as to m ed ia te . H e w as re fe rrin g to th e pro ce ss m ost m ed ia to rs u se: ed u catin g th em se lv es a b ou t t h e i s su es i n vo lv ed i n t h e co n ic t a n d t h en m ed ia tin g w it h th ose is su es a s t h e f o cu s i n ste a d o f f o cu sin g o n c re atin g a h u m an c o n nectio n . In f a ct, i n t y p ic a l t h ir d -p arty m ed ia tio n , t h e co n ic tin g p arties m ay n ot e v en b e in t h e s a m e r o om . O nce, a s a p artic ip an t in m ed ia tio n , o u r p arty w as in o n e ro om an d th e o th er p arty w as in an oth er ro om , w it h th e med ia to r tr a v eli n g b ack a n d fo rth b etw een ro om s. H e’d a sk u s, “ W hat d o y o u w an t th em to d o?” a n d h e’d ta k e th at b ack to th e oth er s id e an d s e e if th ey w er e willi n g t o d o it .  en h e w ou ld c o m e b ack a n d s a y, “  ey ’r e unw illi n g t o d o th at, b u t h ow a b ou t t h is ? ” M an y m ed ia to rs d e n e th eir r o le as a “ th ir d h ea d ” tr y in g to th in k o f a w ay t o g et e v ery b o d y t o c o m e t o a n a g re em ent.  ey a re not a t a ll c o n cer ned w it h cre atin g a q u ali t y o f co n nectio n , th u s o ver lo okin g th e on ly co n ic t re so lu tio n to ol I h av e e v er k n ow n to w ork . W hen I d esc rib ed th e NVC m eth od a n d th e ro le o f h u m an c o n nectio n , o n e of th e partic ip an ts a t th e A ustr ia m eetin g r a is e d t h e o bje c tio n t h at I w as t a lk in g a b ou t p sy ch oth er ap y, a n d t h at m ed ia to rs w ere n ot p sy ch oth er ap is ts . In m y e x p erie n ce, c o n nec tin g p eo p le at th is le v el is n ’t p sy ch oth er ap y; it ’s a ctu ally t h e c o re o f m ed ia tio n b ecau se when y o u m ak e th e co n nectio n , t h e pro ble m s o lv es i t s e lf m ost o f t h e t im e. I n ste a d o f a t h ir d h ea d a sk in g, “ W hat c a n w e a g re e t o h ere ?,” if w e h ad a c le ar s ta te m en t o f e a ch p er so n’s n eed s— w hat th ose p artie s n eed rig h t n ow fr o m e a ch o th er— we w ill th en d is c o ver w hat c a n b e d on e t o g et e v ery b o d y’s n eed s m et.  ese beco m e th e str a teg ies t h e p artie s a g re e t o i m ple m en t a  er t h e m ed ia tio n s es sio n c o n clu des a n d t h e partie s l e av e t h e r o om . W hen y o u m ak e th e co n n ectio n , th e p ro b le m u su ally s o lv es i t s e lf . NVC C on fl ic t R eso lu tio n S te p s— A Q uic k O ver v ie w B efo re w e g et d eep er in to a d is c u ss io n o f s o m e o f t h e oth er k ey e lem ents o f co n ic t r e so lu tio n , le t m e g iv e y o u a t h u m bn ail s k et ch o f t h e step s in vo lv ed in r e so lv in g a c o n ic t b etw een o u rs e lv es a n d s o m eb o d y e ls e .  ere are ve ste p s in th is p ro ce ss . E it h er s id e m ay e x p res s th ei r n eed s rst, b u t fo r th e sa k e o f s im pli c it y i n t h is o verv ie w , l et ’s a ssu m e w e beg in w it h o u r n eed s. F ir st, w e e x p re ss o u r o w n n eed s. S eco n d, w e s e arc h f o r t h e r e a l n eed s o f t h e oth er p er so n , n o m att er h ow th ey a re e x p re ss in g th em se lv es. If th ey a re not e x p res sin g a n ee d , b u t in ste a d an op in io n , ju dgm en t, or an aly sis , w e re co gn iz e th at, an d co n tin u e to se ek th e n eed b eh in d th ei r w ord s, th e need u n der neath w hat t h ey a re s a y in g.  ir d , w e v erif y th at w e b oth a cc u ra te ly re co gn iz e th e oth er p er so n’s n eed s, a n d i f n ot, c o n tin u e t o s e ek t h e need b eh in d t h ei r w ord s. F ou rth , w e p ro vid e a s m uch e m path y a s is r e q u ir e d fo r u s t o m utu ally h ear e a ch o th er’s n eed s a cc u ra te ly . A nd  h, h av in g cla ri ed b oth p arties ’ n eed s in th e sit u atio n , w e pro p ose s tr a te g ie s fo r r e so lv in g th e co n ic t, fr a m in g th em in p osit iv e actio n l a n gu ag e.  ro u gh ou t, w e’r e li s te n in g t o e a ch o th er w it h u tm ost c a re , a v o id in g t h e use o f l a n gu ag e t h at i m pli e s w ro n gn es s o n ei th er s id e. A vo id t h e u se o f l a n gu ag e t h at i m pli e s w ro n gn ess. On N eed s, S tr a te g ie s, a n d A naly sis S in ce th e u n dersta n din g a n d e x p res sio n o f n eed s a re es sen tia l to r es olv in g co n ic ts th ro u gh N VC, le t u s re v ie w th is v it a l co n cep t w hic h h as b een em ph asiz e d t h ro u gh ou t t h is b o ok, a n d p artic u la rly i n C hap te r 5 . F u n dam en ta lly , n eed s a re t h e r es ou rc e s li f e re q u ir es t o s u sta in it s e lf . W e all h av e p hysic a l n eed s: a ir , w ater , fo o d , res t. A nd w e h av e psy ch olo gic a l n eed s s u ch a s u n dersta n din g, s u pp ort, h on esty , a n d m ean in g. I b eli e v e th at a ll p eo p le b asic a lly h av e th e s a m e need s r eg ard les s o f n atio n ali t y , r e li g io n , gen der, i n co m e, e d u catio n , e tc . N ex t, le t’s c o n sid er th e d iff ere n ce b et ween a p er so n’s n eed s a n d h is o r h er s tr a te g y f o r f u l lli n g t h em . I t i s i m porta n t, w hen r es olv in g c o n ic ts , t h at w e c a n c le arly r e co gn iz e t h e d iff eren ce b et ween n eed s a n d s tr a te g ies . M an y o f u s h av e g re at d iffi cu lt y ex pres sin g o u r n eed s: w e hav e been ta u gh t b y so cie ty to c rit ic iz e, in su lt , a n d o th er wis e (m is )c o m mun ic ate in w ay s t h at k eep u s a p art. I n a c o n ic t, b oth p arties u su ally s p en d to o m uch tim e in te n t o n p ro vin g th em se lv es r ig h t, a n d th e oth er p arty w ro n g, r a th er th an p ay in g a tt e n tio n to th eir o w n a n d th e oth er ’s n eed s. A nd s u ch v er bal co n ic ts c a n f a r t o o e a sily e sc a la te i n to v io len ce — an d e v en w ar. I n o rd er n ot t o c o n fu se n eed s a n d s tr a te g ies , i t i s i m porta n t t o r e ca ll t h at n eed s c o n ta in n o re fe re n ce to a n yb od y ta kin g a n y p artic u la r a ctio n . O n th e oth er h an d, str a te g ie s, w hic h m ay a p p ear in th e fo rm o f re q u es ts , d es ir es , wan ts , a n d “ s o lu tio n s,” r e fe r t o sp ecifi c a ctio n s t h at s p ecifi c p eo p le m ay t a ke. F or e x am ple , I o n ce m et w it h a c o u ple who h ad ju st a b ou t g iv en u p o n th eir m arria g e. I a sk ed t h e h u sb an d w hat n eed s o f h is w er en ’t b ei ng f u l lle d in t h e m arria g e. H e s a id , “ I n ee d to g et o u t o f t h is m arria g e.” W hat h e was d esc rib in g w as a s p eci c p ers o n ( h im se lf ) ta k in g a s p eci c a ctio n ( le av in g th e m arria g e). H e w asn ’t e x p re ss in g a n eed ; h e w as i d en tif y in g a s tr a teg y. I p oin te d th is o u t to th e h u sb an d a n d s u gges te d th at h e rst c la rif y h is a n d h is w if e ’s n eed s b efo re u n derta k in g th e str a te g y o f “ g ett in g o u t o f th is m arria g e.” A er b oth o f th em h ad co n necte d w it h th ei r o w n an d ea ch o th er’s n eed s, t h ey d is c o vere d t h at t h es e need s c o u ld b e m et w it h s tr a teg ies o th er th an e n din g th e m arria g e.  e hu sb an d a ck n ow le d ged h is n eed s fo r ap pre cia tio n an d un dersta n din g fo r th e str es s gen erate d by his ra th er dem an din g jo b ; t h e w if e r e co gn iz e d h er n eed s f o r c lo sen ess a n d c o n nectio n in a s it u atio n w here s h e e x p erie n ce d h er h u sb an d’s jo b o cc u pyin g m uch o f h is t im e. O nce th ey tr u ly u n dersto od th ei r m utu al n eed s, th is h u sb an d a n d w if e w ere a b le t o a rriv e a t a s e t o f a g re em ents t h at s a tis ed b oth t h ei r n eed s w hile w ork in g a ro u n d t h e d em an ds o f t h e hu sb an d’s j o b. In t h e c a se o f a n oth er c o u ple , t h e la ck o f “ n eed s li t e ra cy ” t o ok t h e fo rm o f c o n fu sio n b etw een t h e e x p re ss io n o f n eed s a n d t h e ex pres sio n o f a n aly sis , a n d u lt im ate ly le d to th eir in ic tin g p hysic a l v io len ce o n e a ch o th er . I w as in vit e d t o m ed ia te i n t h is s it u atio n a t t h e en d o f a w ork p la ce tr a in in g w hen a m an te arfu lly d esc rib ed h is sit u atio n a n d a sk ed if h e an d h is w if e co u ld s p ea k w it h m e i n p riv ate . I a g re ed t o m eet t h em a t t h eir h om e, a n d o p en ed t h e ev en in g b y s a y in g: “I’m a w are th at y o u ’r e b oth in a lo t o f p ain . L et ’s b eg in w it h e a ch o f y o u ex p re ss in g w hate v er n eed s o f y o u rs a ren ’t b ei ng f u l lle d i n y o u r r e la tio n sh ip . O nce y o u u n dersta n d e a ch o th er ’s n eed s, I’m c o n den t w e ca n w ork o n str a te g ie s t o m eet t h ose n eed s.” N ot b ein g “n eed s li t e ra te ,” th e h u sb an d sta rte d o ff b y te lli n g h is w if e , “  e p ro ble m w it h y o u is th at y o u ’r e to ta lly in sen sit iv e to m y n eed s.” S h e an sw ere d i n t h e s a m e m an ner, “  at’s t y p ic a l o f y o u t o s a y u n fa ir t h in gs li k e th at!” I n ste a d o f e x p re ss in g n eed s, th ey w er e doin g a n aly sis , w hic h is e a sily h eard a s c rit ic is m b y a li s te n er. A s m en tio n ed e arli er in t h is b o ok, a n aly ses th at im ply w ro n gn ess a re e ss e n tia lly tr a g ic ex pres sio n s o f u n m et n eed s. In th e ca se of th is co u ple , th e hu sb an d had a need fo r su pp ort an d un dersta n din g b u t e x p re ss e d it i n t e rm s o f t h e w if e ’s “ in sen sit iv it y .”  e w if e a ls o h ad a n eed fo r b ein g a cc u ra te ly u n dersto od , b u t sh e ex pres se d it in t e rm s o f th e h u sb an d’s “u n fa ir n es s.” It to ok a w hile to m ove th ro u gh th e la y ers o f n eed s o n t h e p art o f b oth h u sb an d a n d w if e , b u t o n ly t h ro u gh t r u ly a ck n ow le d gin g a n d a p pre cia tin g e a ch o th er ’s n eed s w er e th ey n ally a b le to b eg in th e p ro ce ss o f ex p lo rin g str a te g ies to ad dres s th ei r lo n g-s ta n din g co n ic ts . I o n ce w ork ed w it h a c o m pan y w her e both m ora le an d p ro du ctiv it y t o ok a div e du e to a very dis tu rb in g co n ic t. Tw o fa ctio n s in th e sa m e dep artm en t w ere gh tin g o ver w hic h so  w are to u se , gen er atin g str o n g em otio n s o n b oth s id es. O ne f a ctio n h ad w ork ed e sp ecia lly h ard t o d ev elo p th e s o  w are t h at w as p re se n tly in u se , a n d w an te d t o s e e it s c o n tin u ed u se .  e o th er f a ctio n h ad s tr o n g e m otio n s t ie d u p i n c re atin g n ew s o  w are . I s ta rte d b y a sk in g e a ch s id e to te ll m e w hat n eed s o f th ei rs w ou ld b e b ett e r f u l lle d b y t h e s o  w are t h ey a d vo cate d .  eir r es pon se w as t o o ff er a n in te lle c tu al a n aly sis th at th e o th er s id e re ce iv ed a s c rit ic is m . A m em ber o n th e sid e th at fa v o re d n ew so  w are sa id : “W e ca n co n tin u e to b e over ly c o n se rv ativ e, b u t i f w e d o t h at, I t h in k w e co u ld b e ou t o f w ork i n t h e fu tu re . P ro gre ss m ean s th at w e ta k e so m e ris k s, an d d are to sh ow th at w e are b ey o n d o ld -fa sh io n ed w ay s o f d oin g th in gs.” A m em ber o f th e op p osin g fa ctio n re sp on ded , “B ut I th in k th at im pu ls iv ely g ra b bin g fo r e v er y n ew th in g t h at c o m es a lo n g is n ot in o u r b es t in ter es t.”  ey a ck n ow le d ged t h at th ey h ad b een r e p eatin g th ese s a m e an aly ses fo r m on th s a n d w er e get tin g n ow here o th er t h an i n cre a sin g t e n sio n f o r t h em se lv es . In te lle ctu al a n aly sis i s o  en r e ce iv ed a s c rit ic is m . W hen w e d on’t k n ow h ow t o d ir e ctly a n d c le arly ex pres s w hat w e need , bu t c a n o n ly m ak e a n aly se s o f o th er s t h at s o u n d li k e crit ic is m t o t h em , w ars a re n ev er f a r a w ay — wheth er v erb al, p sy ch olo gic a l, o r p hysic a l. Sen sin g O th ers’ N eed s, N o M att e r W hat  ey ’r e S ay in g To r e so lv e c o n ic ts u sin g N VC, w e need to tr a in o u rs e lv es to h ear p eo p le e x p re ss in g n eed s r e g ard le ss o f h ow t h ey d o t h e ex p res sin g. I f w e r e a lly w an t to b e o f ass is ta n ce to o th ers , th e rst th in g to le arn is to tr a n sla te a n y m ess a g e in to a n e x p re ss io n o f a n eed .  e m ess a g e m ig h t ta k e th e fo rm o f sile n ce, d en ia l, a ju dgm en ta l r e m ark , a g es tu re— or, h op ef ully , a r e q u es t. W e hon e o u r s k ills t o h ear t h e n eed w it h in e v er y m essa g e, e v en i f a t rst w e hav e to r e ly o n g u ess e s. F or e x am ple , in th e m id d le o f a c o n ver sa tio n , if I a sk th e oth er p er so n so m eth in g a b ou t w hat t h ey ’v e ju st s a id , a n d I a m m et w it h “  at’s a s tu pid q u estio n ,” I h ear t h em e x p re ss in g a n eed in t h e fo rm o f a ju dgm en t o f m e. I p ro ce ed t o g u ess w hat t h at n eed m ig h t b e— may b e th e qu es tio n I a sk ed d id n ot f u l ll t h eir n eed t o b e u n dersto od . O r if I a sk m y p artn er t o t a lk a b ou t th e s tr e ss i n o u r r e la tio n sh ip a n d t h ey a n sw er, “ I d on’t w an t t o t a lk a b ou t i t ,” I m ay s e n se t h at t h eir n eed is fo r p ro te ctio n f r o m w hat t h ey im ag in e co u ld h ap p en if w e w ere to c o m mun ic ate ab ou t o u r re la tio n sh ip . S o th is is o u r w ork : l e arn in g t o r e co gn iz e t h e n eed i n s ta te m en ts t h at d on’t o ver tly ex pres s an y n eed . It ta k es p ra ctic e, a n d it a lw ay s in vo lv es s o m e g u ess in g. O nce we se n se w hat th e o th er p ers o n n eed s, w e ca n c h eck in w it h th em , a n d th en h elp t h em p u t t h eir n eed i n to w ord s. I f w e are ab le to t r u ly h ear t h ei r n eed , a n ew le v el o f c o n nec tio n is fo rg ed — a c rit ic a l p ie ce th at m oves th e co n ic t to w ard s u cce ss fu l r e so lu tio n . L ea rn to h ea r n eed s re g ard le ss o f h ow p eo p le e x p re ss th em . In w ork sh op s fo r m arrie d c o u ples , I o  en lo ok fo r th e co u ple wit h th e lo n gest u n re so lv ed c o n ic t to d em on str a te m y p re d ic tio n th at, o n ce ea ch sid e c a n sta te th e o th er sid e’s n eed s, it w ou ld ta k e no m ore th an tw en ty m in ute s fo r th e c o n ic t to c o m e to a r es olu tio n . O nce th er e was a c o u ple w hose m arria g e su ff ere d th ir ty -n in e years of co n ic t ab ou t m on ey. Six m on th s in to th e m arria g e, th e w if e had tw ic e o ver dra w n th ei r ch eck in g acco u nt w here u p on t h e h u sb an d t o ok c o n tr o l o f t h e n an ce s a n d w ou ld n o lo n ger le t h er w rit e c h eck s.  e tw o o f th em h ad n ev er sto p p ed a rg u in g ab ou t i t s in ce.  e w if e c h alle n ged m y p re d ic tio n , s a y in g th at e v en th ou gh th ey h ad a g o od m arria g e a n d c a n c o m mun ic ate well, it w ou ld n’t b e poss ib le fo r th ei r his to ric a lly e n tr e n ch ed c o n ic t t o r es olv e so q u ic k ly . I i n vit e d h er t o b eg in b y t e lli n g m e i f s h e kn ew w hat h er h u sb an d’s n eed s w ere i n t h is c o n ic t. S h e r e p li e d , “ H e o bvio u sly d oesn ’t w an t m e to s p en d a n y m on ey.” T o w hic h h er h u sb an d e x cla im ed : “  at’s r id ic u lo u s!” I n s ta tin g t h at h er h u sb an d d id n’t w an t h er t o s p en d a n y m on ey, t h e w if e w as id en tif y in g w hat I ca ll a str a te g y. E ven if sh e had b een acc u ra te in g u ess in g h er h u sb an d’s str a te g y, s h e h ad n ow here id en ti ed h is n eed . H ere a g ain is th e k ey d is tin ctio n . B y m y d e nit io n , a n eed d oes n’t ref er to a sp eci c a ctio n , s u ch a s s p en din g o r n ot s p en din g m on ey. I t o ld t h e w if e th at a ll p eo p le sh are th e sa m e n eed s, an d if sh e co u ld o n ly u n der sta n d h er hu sb an d’s n eed s, th e is su e w ou ld b e res olv ed . W hen en co u ra g ed a g ain to s ta te h er h u sb an d’s n eed s, s h e r e p li e d , “ H e is ju st li k e h is f a th er ,” d es crib in g how h is fa th er h ad b een r e lu cta n t to s p en d m on ey. A t th is p oin t, s h e was m ak in g a n a n aly sis . I s to p p ed h er t o a sk a g ain , “ W hat w as h is n eed ?” It b eca m e cle ar th at, ev en a er th ir ty -n in e years o f “c o m mun ic atin g w ell,” s h e s till h ad n o i d ea w hat h is n eed s w er e. I t h en tu rn ed to t h e h u sb an d. “ S in ce y o u r w if e is n ’t in to u ch w it h w hat y o u r n eed s a re , w hy d on’t y o u te ll h er ? W hat n eed s a re yo u m eet in g b y keep in g t h e c h eck b o ok f r o m h er? ” C rit ic is m an d dia g n osis get in th e w ay of pea ce fu l re so lu tio n o f c o n fl ic ts . T o w hic h h e r e sp on ded , “ M arsh all, s h e’s a w on derfu l w if e , a w on der fu l m oth er. B ut w hen it c o m es t o m on ey, s h e’s t o ta lly ir res pon sib le .” H is u se of dia gn osis ( “ S h e i s i r re sp on sib le .” ) i s r e ec tiv e of l a n gu ag e t h at g et s i n t h e w ay o f p ea ce fu l re so lu tio n o f c o n ic ts . W hen ei th er s id e hears it s e lf c rit ic iz e d , d ia g n ose d , o r i n te rp re te d , t h e e n er gy o f t h e sit u atio n w ill li k ely t u rn to w ard s e lf – d efe n se a n d c o u nte r- a cc u sa tio n s r a th er t h an t o w ard r es olu tio n . I t r ie d t o h ear t h e f e eli n g a n d n eed b eh in d h im s ta tin g t h at h is w if e was ir re sp on sib le : “A re y o u fe eli n g sc a re d b ecau se y o u h av e a n eed to p ro te ct y o u r fa m ily eco n om ic a lly ?” H e ag re ed th at th is w as in deed th e ca se . A dm it t e d ly , I h ad m ere ly g u ess e d c o rre ctly , b u t I d id n’t h av e to g et it r ig h t th e rst tim e b ecau se e v en if I h ad g u ess e d w ro n g, I w ou ld s till h av e been fo cu sin g o n h is n eed s— an d th at’s th e heart o f th e m att er . I n fa ct, w hen w e re ec t b ack in co rre c t g u ess e s to o th er s, it m ay h elp t h em g et in to u ch w it h t h eir t r u e n eed s. I t t a k es t h em o u t o f a n aly sis t o w ard g re ate r c o n nectio n t o li f e . Hav e t h e N eed s B een H ea rd ?  e h u sb an d h ad n ally a ck n ow le d ged h is n eed : t o k eep h is f a m ily s a fe .  e nex t s te p is t o a sc e rta in t h at t h e wif e heard t h at n eed .  is is a c ru cia l s ta g e in c o n ic t r e so lu tio n . W e m ust n ot a ssu m e th at w hen o n e party ex pres ses a n eed c le arly , th at th e o th er p arty h ears it a cc u ra te ly . I a sk ed th e wif e , “ C an y o u te ll m e back w hat yo u heard to be yo u r hu sb an d’s n eed s in th is s it u atio n ?” “W ell, ju st b ecau se I o verd re w th e ban k a cco u nt a c o u ple of tim es, it d oesn ’t m ean I ’m g o in g t o c o n tin u e doin g i t .” H er r e sp on se w as n ot u nusu al. W hen w e h av e pain b u ilt u p o ver m an y years , it c a n g et in t h e w ay o f o u r a b ili t y t o h ear c le arly , e v en w hen w hat is b ein g e x p re ss e d is c le ar t o o th ers . T o c o n tin u e, I s a id t o t h e wif e: “ I’d li k e to te ll y o u w hat I h eard y o u r h u sb an d s a y, a n d I ’d li k e y o u to r ep eat it b ack . I h eard th at y o u r h u sb an d s a y s h e has a n eed to p ro te ct th e fa m ily , a n d h e’s s c a re d b ecau se h e w an ts t o b e s u re th at t h e fa m ily i s p ro te cte d .” Em path y t o E ase t h e P ain  at P re v en ts H ea rin g But s h e w as s till in to o m uch p ain to h ear m e.  is b rin gs u p a n oth er s k ill t h at is n eed ed if w e a re to e ff ectiv ely en gag e th e NVC p ro ce ss o f c o n ic t re so lu tio n . W hen p eo p le a re u p set , t h ey o  en n eed em path y b ef ore th ey c a n h ear w hat i s b ein g s a id t o th em . I n t h is i n sta n ce, I c h an ged c o u rs e: i n ste a d o f tr y in g to h av e h er r e p eat w hat h er h u sb an d h ad s a id , I t r ie d to u n der sta n d th e p ain s h e w as in — th e p ain t h at k ep t h er f r o m h earin g h im . E sp ecia lly if t h ere is a lo n g h is to ry o f p ain , it is im porta n t to o ff er e n ou gh em path y s o th at th e p artie s fe el re a ssu re d th at th ei r p ain is bei ng re co gn iz e d an d un dersto od . P eo p le o  en n eed e m path y b efo re t h ey a re a b le t o h ea r w hat i s b ein g s a id . W hen I a d dre ss e d th e w if e w it h em path y, “I sen se th at y o u ’r e fe eli n g re a lly hu rt an d yo u n eed to be tr u ste d th at yo u ca n le arn fr o m past e x p erie n ce,” th e e x p re ss io n in h er e y es s h ow ed m e h ow m uch s h e need ed th at u n dersta n din g. “ Y es, e x actly ,” s h e rep li e d , b u t w hen a sk ed t o r ep eat b ack w hat h er h u sb an d h ad sa id , sh e an sw ere d , “H e th in ks I sp en d to o m uch m on ey.” J u st a s w e a re n ot t r a in ed t o e x p res s o u r o w n n eed s, m ost o f u s h av e not b een tr a in ed in h earin g th e n eed s o f o th er s. A ll th is w if e co u ld h ear w as crit ic is m o r d ia g n osis o n p art o f h er h u sb an d. I e n co u ra g ed h er to tr y to s im ply h ear h is n eed s. A er I r ep eate d h is n eed — fo r s a fet y f o r h is f a m ily — tw o m ore tim es, sh e n ally w as ab le to h ear it .  en, a er a fe w m ore r o u n ds, th ey w ere b oth a b le to h ear e a ch o th er ’s n eed s. A nd ju st a s I h ad p re d ic te d , o n ce th ey u n dersto od — fo r th e rst tim e in th ir ty -n in e years — e a ch oth er’s n eed s co n ce rn in g th e ch eck b o ok, it to ok le ss th an tw en ty m in ute s t o n d p ra ctic a l w ay s t o m eet b oth t h ei r n eed s.  e m ore e x p erie n ce I h av e g ain ed in m ed ia tin g c o n ic ts o ver t h e years a n d t h e m ore I ’v e s e en w hat l e a d s f a m ili es t o a rg u e an d n atio n s t o g o t o w ar, t h e m ore co n vin ce d I am th at m ost sc h oolc h ild ren co u ld so lv e th es e co n ic ts . I f w e c o u ld ju st s a y, “ H er e are th e need s o f b oth s id es . H er e are th e re so u rc e s. W hat c a n b e d on e t o m eet t h es e need s? ,” c o n ic ts w ou ld b e ea sily r e so lv ed . B ut i n ste a d , o u r t h in kin g i s f o cu se d o n d eh u m an iz in g o n e an oth er w it h la b els a n d ju dgm en ts u ntil e v en t h e sim ples t o f c o n ic ts b eco m es v er y diffi cu lt to so lv e. N VC h elp s u s av o id th at tr a p , th er eb y en han cin g th e ch an ce s o f r e a ch in g a s a tis fy in g r es olu tio n . Usin g P re se n t a n d P osit iv e A ctio n L an gu ag e t o R eso lv e C on fl ic t A lt h ou gh I a d dre ss e d t h e u se o f p res en t, p osit iv e actio n l a n gu ag e i n C hap te r 6, I ’d li k e to p re se n t a fe w m ore e x am ples to d em on str a te it s im porta n ce in r e so lv in g co n ic ts . O nce b oth p arties h av e co n necte d w it h ea ch o th er ’s n eed s, th e n ex t ste p is to arriv e at str a te g ies th at m eet th ose need s. It’s i m porta n t to a v o id m ovin g h astily in to str a te g ies , a s th is m ay res ult in a c o m pro m is e th at la ck s th e deep qu ali t y of au th en tic res olu tio n th at is p oss ib le . B y fu lly h earin g e a ch o th er ’s n eed s b ef ore ad dres sin g so lu tio n s, p artie s in c o n ic t a re m uch m ore li k ely to a d her e to th e ag re em ents th ey m ak e t o e a ch o th er.  e p ro ce ss o f r es olv in g c o n ic t h as t o en d w it h a ctio n s th at m eet ev ery b o d y’s n eed s. It is th e pres en ta tio n o f str a te g ies in cle ar, p re se n t, p osit iv e a ctio n l a n gu ag e t h at m oves c o n ic ts t o w ard r es olu tio n . A pre se n t la n gu age sta te m en t re fe rs to w hat is w an te d at th is m om en t. F or e x am ple , o n e p arty m ig h t s a y, “ I’d li k e y o u to te ll m e if y o u w ou ld b e w illi n g t o — ” a n d d esc rib e t h e a ctio n t h ey ’d li k e th e oth er p arty t o t a k e.  e use o f a p re se n t la n gu ag e r e q u est t h at b eg in s w it h “ W ou ld y o u b e willi n g t o … ” h elp s fo ste r a r e sp ec tfu l d is c u ss io n . If th e oth er s id e an sw ers th at th ey are n ot w illi n g, it in vit e s t h e n ex t s tep o f u n der sta n din g w hat p re v en ts t h ei r willi n gn ess . O n t h e o th er h an d, i n t h e a b se n ce o f p res en t la n gu ag e, a r e q u es t s u ch a s “I’d l i k e y o u t o g o t o t h e s h ow w it h m e Satu rd ay n ig h t” f a ils t o c o n vey w hat’s b ein g a sk ed o f th e li s te n er a t th at m om en t.  e u se o f p re se n t la n gu ag e to h on e s u ch a r e q u est, f o r e x am ple , “ W ou ld y o u b e willi n g t o t e ll m e whet her yo u w ill g o to th e sh ow w it h m e S atu rd ay n ig h t? ,” su pp orts cla rit y an d on go in g c o n nec tio n in th e e x ch an ge. W e ca n fu rth er c la rif y th e re q u es t b y in dic atin g w hat w e m ay w an t f r o m t h e oth er p er so n i n t h e pres en t m om en t, “ W ou ld y o u b e w illi n g t o t e ll m e h ow y o u f e el a b ou t g o in g t o t h e sh ow w it h m e S atu rd ay n ig h t? ”  e c le are r w e a re reg ard in g t h e res pon se w e w an t r ig h t n ow f r o m t h e o th er p arty , t h e m ore eff ectiv ely w e m ove th e co n ic t t o w ard r e so lu tio n . Usin g A ctio n V erb s In C hap te r 6 , w e t o u ch ed u p on t h e r o le o f a ctio n la n gu ag e in f o rm in g N VC re q u ests . I n s it u atio n s o f c o n ic t, it is e sp ecia lly im porta n t t o f o cu s o n w hat w e d o w an t r a th er t h an w hat w e d o n ot w an t. T alk in g a b ou t w hat o n e d oesn ’t w an t c a n e a sily c re ate c o n fu sio n a n d r es is ta n ce a m on g c o n ic tin g p arties . Actio n la n gu ag e re q u ir e s th e u se of a ctio n v er bs, w hile a ls o a v o id in g la n gu ag e t h at o b sc u re s, o r l a n gu ag e t h at c a n r e a d ily b e in fer re d a s a n a tt a ck . I’d l i k e t o i llu str a te t h is w it h a s it u atio n w her e a w om an e x p res se d a n eed f o r u n dersta n din g th at w asn ’t b ein g m et in h er p rim ary r e la tio n sh ip . A er h er partn er was ab le to acc u ra te ly hear an d re ect back th e need fo r u n dersta n din g, I tu rn ed to th e w om an a n d sa id , “O kay, let ’s g et d ow n to s tr a te g ie s. W hat d o y o u w an t f r o m y o u r p artn er in o rd er t o m eet y o u r n eed fo r u n dersta n din g?” S h e f a ce d h er p artn er a n d s a id , “ I’d li k e y o u t o li s ten t o m e w hen I ta lk to y o u .” “I d o li s te n to y o u w hen y o u ta lk !,” th e partn er re to rte d . It’s n ot u nusu al, if s o m eo n e te lls u s th ey ’d li k e u s to li s ten w hen th ey a re t a lk in g, f o r u s t o h ear a cc u sa tio n s a n d t h u s f e el s o m e r es en tm en t. A ctio n l a n gu ag e r e q u ir e s t h e u se o f a ctio n v erb s.  ey w en t b ack a n d fo rth , w it h t h e partn er r ep eatin g, “ I d o li s ten ,” a n d th e w om an co u nte rin g, “N o, yo u d on’t .”  ey to ld m e th ey ’d h ad th is “ c o n vers a tio n” fo r tw elv e y ears , a s it u atio n th at is ty p ic a l in c o n ic ts w hen partie s u se v ag u e w ord s li k e “ li s te n ” to ex pres s s tr a te g ies . I s u gges t in ste a d th e use of actio n verb s to cap tu re so m eth in g th at w e ca n se e or hea r h app en in g— so m eth in g t h at c a n b e re co rd ed w it h a v id eo c a m era . “ L is te n in g” o cc u rs in sid e a p ers o n’s h ea d ; an oth er p er so n ca n not se e whet her it is h ap p en in g o r n ot. O ne w ay to d eter m in e th at s o m eo n e is a ctu ally li s ten in g is t o h av e t h at p ers o n r e ec t b ack w hat h ad b een s a id : w e ask t h e per so n t o t a k e a n a ctio n t h at w e o u rs e lv es c a n s e e or h ear. I f t h e oth er p arty c a n t e ll u s w hat w as ju st s a id , w e k n ow t h at p er so n h eard a n d w as in deed li s ten in g to u s. In an oth er co n ic t b etw een a h u sb an d an d w if e , th e wif e wan te d to k n ow t h at h er h u sb an d r e sp ec te d h er c h oic e s. O nce s h e ex p re ss e d h er n eed su cce ss fu lly , h er n ex t s te p w as to g et c le ar o n h er s tr a te g y fo r m eet in g th at n eed a n d t o m ak e a r e q u est o f t h e hu sb an d. S h e to ld h im , “ I w an t y o u t o g iv e m e t h e f r e ed om to g ro w a n d b e m yse lf .” “ I d o,” h e rep li e d , a n d ju st a s w it h t h e o th er c o u ple , th is w as fo llo w ed b y a fr u it les s v o lle y o f “ Y es, I d o,” a n d “N o, y o u d on’t .” N on -a ctio n la n gu ag e, su ch as “G iv e me th e fr e ed om to g ro w ” o  en ex ace rb ate s co n ic t. In th is in sta n ce, th e hu sb an d h eard h im se lf bei ng ju dged a s d om in eerin g. I p oin te d o u t to th e wif e th at it w asn ’t c le ar to h er hu sb an d w hat s h e w an te d : “ P le a se te ll h im e x actly w hat y o u ’d li k e him t o do to m eet y o u r n eed t o h av e y o u r c h oic e s r es pecte d .” “ I w an t y o u to le t m e— ,” sh e b eg an . I in ter ru pte d th at “let ” w as to o vag u e: “ W hat d o y o u r e a lly m ean w hen y o u s a y y o u w an t s o m eb o d y t o ‘l et ’ yo u ?” A er re ec tin g fo r a fe w se co n ds, sh e arriv ed at an im porta n t u n dersta n din g. S h e a ck n ow le d ged t h at w hat s h e re a lly m ean t w hen s h e sa id t h in gs l i k e “ I w an t y o u t o l e t m e b e” a n d “ I w an t y o u t o g iv e m e th e fr e ed om to g ro w ” is fo r h er h u sb an d to te ll h er th at n o m att er w hat s h e did , it w as o kay. W hen s h e g o t c le ar a s to w hat s h e was a ctu ally r e q u es tin g— fo r h im to te ll h er s o m eth in g — sh e r e co gn iz e d th at w hat s h e w an te d d id n ot le av e him m uch fr e ed om to be him se lf an d to hav e h is ch oic e s re sp ec te d . A nd m ain ta in in g r e sp ec t i s a k ey e le m en t i n s u cces sfu l c o n ic t r es olu tio n . M ain ta in in g re sp ect is a key ele m en t in su cce ssfu l co n fl ic t r e so lu tio n . Tra n sla tin g “ N o” W hen w e e x p re ss a r e q u est, it ’s v er y im porta n t t o b e res pectfu l o f t h e oth er p ers o n’s re a ctio n , w heth er or not th ey ag re e to ou r re q u es t. M an y m ed ia tio n s I h av e w it n ess e d c o n sis t o f w ait in g fo r p eo p le to w ear d ow n to t h e p oin t w here t h ey ’l l a cce p t a n y c o m pro m is e .  is i s v er y d iff er en t f r o m a r e so lu tio n i n w hic h e v ery o n e’s n eed s a re m et a n d n ob o d y ex per ien ces l o ss . In C hap te r 8 , w e d is c o vere d th e im porta n ce of n ot h earin g “n o” as re je c tio n . L is te n in g ca re fu lly to th e mess a g e beh in d th e “n o” help s us u n dersta n d t h e o th er p ers o n’s n eed s: W hen t h ey s a y “ n o,” t h ey’r e sa yin g t h ey h ave a n eed t h at k ee p s t h em f r o m s a yin g “ y es” t o w hat w e are ask in g. I f w e c a n h ear t h e n eed b eh in d a “ n o,” w e c a n c o n tin u e th e co n ic t r es olu tio n p ro ces s — main ta in in g o u r f o cu s o n n din g a w ay t o m eet e v er yb o d y’s n eed s— ev en if t h e o th er p arty s a y s “ n o” t o t h e p artic u la r s tr a te g y w e pres en te d t h em . NVC a n d t h e M ed ia to r R ole A lt h ou gh in th is ch ap te r I h av e off ere d ex am ples fr o m m ed ia tio n s I’v e fa cili t a te d b etw een c o n ic tin g p arties , th e fo cu s s o fa r h as b een o n h ow to a p p ly th ese sk ills w hen re so lv in g c o n ic ts b et ween o u rs e lv es a n d a n oth er p ers o n .  ere a re , h ow ev er, a fe w th in gs to k eep in m in d a t th ose tim es when w e w an t to u se o u r N VC to ols to h elp tw o o th er p arties re a ch a re so lu tio n a n d w e t a k e o n t h e r o le of m ed ia to r. You r R ole , a n d T ru st i n t h e P ro ce ss W hen e n te rin g a c o n ic t p ro ce ss a s m ed ia to r, a g o od p la ce to s ta rt m ig h t b e to a ssu re th e p eo p le in c o n ic t th at w e are not th er e to ta k e sid es , b u t to s u pp ort th em in h earin g e a ch o th er , a n d to h elp g u id e th em to a s o lu tio n th at m eets e v ery o n e’s n eed s. D ep en din g o n t h e cir c u m sta n ce s, w e m ay a ls o w an t to c o n vey o u r c o n den ce th at, if th e parties fo llo w th e step s o f N VC, both o f t h eir n eed s w ill b e m et i n t h e en d. Rem em ber: I t’s N ot A bou t U s At t h e b eg in nin g o f t h e c h ap te r, I em ph asiz e d t h at t h e obje ctiv e is n ot t o g et th e o th er p ers o n to d o w hat w e wan t th em to d o.  is als o ap p li es to m ed ia tin g s o m eo n e e ls e’s c o n ic t.  ou gh w e m ay h av e ou r o w n w is h es f o r h ow th e co n ic t is re so lv ed — esp ecia lly if th e co n ic t is b et ween fa m ily , fr ie n ds, o r co -w ork ers — we n ee d to rem ember th at w e are not h er e to a cco m pli s h o u r o w n g o als .  e m ed ia to r’s r o le is t o c re ate a n en vir o n m en t i n w hic h t h e p artie s c a n c o n nec t, ex pres s t h ei r n eed s, u n der sta n d e a ch o th er ’s n eed s, a n d a rriv e a t s tr a te g ie s t o m eet t h ose need s.  e o b je ctiv e i s n ot t o g et t h e p artie s t o do what w e w an t th em t o d o. Em erg en cy F ir st- A id E m path y A s m ed ia to r, I s tr e ss m y i n te n tio n f o r b oth p arties t o b e fu lly a n d a cc u ra te ly u n dersto od . D esp it e t h at, a s s o on a s I e x p res s em path y t o w ard o n e sid e, it i s n ot u nu su al fo r th e o th er s id e to im med ia te ly a cc u se m e of fa v o rit is m . A t th is t im e, w hat’s c a lle d f o r i s e m ergen cy rst- a id em path y.  is m ig h t s o u n d li k e “S o y o u ’r e re a lly a n noyed , a n d y o u n eed so m e a ssu ra n ce th at y o u ’r e g o in g t o g et y o u r s id e o n t h e t a b le? ” Once t h e e m path y h as b een e x p res se d , I r em in d t h em t h at e v er yo n e w ill h av e th e o p p ortu n it y to b e h eard , a n d th ei r tu rn w ill b e nex t. It is th en h elp fu l to co n rm th ey are in ag re em ent w it h w ait in g by ask in g, fo r ex am ple , “A re y o u fe eli n g re a ssu re d ab ou t th at, o r w ou ld y o u li k e more r e a ssu ra n ce t h at y o u r o p p ortu n it y t o b e heard w ill c o m e so on ?” W e m ay n eed t o d o t h is r e p eate d ly t o k eep t h e m ed ia tio n o n t r a ck . Keep T ra ck : F ollo w t h e B ou n cin g B all W hen w e a re m ed ia tin g, w e h av e to “ k eep s c o re ” b y p ay in g c a ref ul a tt en tio n to w hat h as b een sa id , m ak in g su re both p arties h av e th e op p ortu n it y to e x p re ss th eir n eed s, li s te n to th e oth er p er so n’s n eed s, a n d m ak e re q u es ts . W e a ls o n eed to “ fo llo w th e b ou n cin g b all” : b ei ng c o n sc io u s o f w her e on e party le  o ff s o w e c a n r e tu rn to w hat th at p arty s a id a  er th e oth er p arty h as b een h eard .  is ca n b e ch alle n gin g, esp ecia lly w hen th in gs get h eate d . In su ch sit u atio n s, I o  en n d it h elp fu l t o u se a w hit e board o r ip c h art t o c ap tu re th e e ss e n ce o f w hat w as s p oken b y t h e la st s p ea k er w ho h ad o p p ortu n it y t o e x p re ss a f e eli n g o r n eed .  is fo rm o f v is u al t r a ck in g c a n a ls o s er ve to r e a ssu re both p arties t h at th eir n eed s w ill b e a d dre ss e d b ecau se so o  en b ef ore we hav e a c h an ce to f u lly d ra w o u t o n e p arty ’s n eed s, t h e oth er w ill b e ju m pin g a h ea d t o ex pres s th em se lv es. T ak in g th e tim e to n ote th ose need s in a w ay th at is v is ib le to e v ery o n e p re se n t c a n h elp t h e li s ten er f e el c o m fo rta b le th at t h ei r o w n n eed s w ill a ls o b e a d dre ss e d . I n t h is w ay, e v er yo n e ca n m ore ea sily o ff er t h ei r f u ll a tt e n tio n t o w hat i s b ein g e x p re ss e d i n t h e cu rren t m om en t. Keep t h e C on versa tio n i n t h e P re se n t A noth er im porta n t qu ali t y to brin g to m ed ia tio n is aw aren ess of th e m om en t: w ho n eed s w hat rig h t n ow ? W hat are th ei r p res en t re q u es ts ? M ain ta in in g t h is a w are n ess r e q u ir es a lo t o f p ra ctic e in b ei ng p res en t in t h e m om en t, w hic h i s s o m eth in g m ost o f u s h av e nev er b een t a u gh t t o d o. A s w e m ove t h ro u gh t h e m ed ia tio n p ro ce ss , i t i s l i k ely t h at w e w ill h ear a l o t o f d is c u ss io n a b ou t w hat h ap p en ed in t h e past a n d w hat p eo p le wan t t o h ap p en d iff ere n tly in th e fu tu re . H ow ev er , co n ic t res olu tio n ca n on ly h ap p en r ig h t n ow , s o n ow i s w her e w e need t o f o cu s. Keep  in gs M ovin g A noth er m ed ia tio n ta sk is to k eep th e co n ver sa tio n fr o m g ett in g b ogged d ow n; t h is c a n h ap p en v ery e a sily , a s p eo p le o en t h in k t h at if t h ey ju st t e ll t h at s a m e s to ry on e m ore tim e, t h ey w ill n ally b e u n dersto od a n d t h e oth er p ers o n w ill d o w hat t h ey w an t. T o k eep th in gs m ovin g, th e m ed ia to r n eed s to a sk eff ectiv e qu es tio n s, a n d w hen n ece ss a ry, m ain ta in o r e v en s p eed u p t h e pace. O nce, w hen I w as sc h ed u le d t o le a d a w ork sh op i n a s m all t o w n, t h e ev en t o rg an iz er a sk ed i f I w ou ld h elp h im w it h a p ers o n al d is p u te re la te d to th e div is io n o f fa m ily p ro p erty . I a g re ed t o m ed ia te , a w are th er e was o n ly a t h re e- hou r w in dow in b etw een w ork sh op s t o d o s o .  e f a m ily d is p u te c e n te re d o n a m an w ho o w ned a la rg e f a rm a n d w as ab ou t to r e tir e . H is tw o s o n s w ere at w ar o ver h ow th e p ro p erty w as to b e d iv id ed .  ey h ad n’t s p oken in ei gh t y ears e v en th ou gh th ey li v ed c lo se to e a ch o th er a t t h e s a m e e n d o f t h e fa rm . I m et t h e bro th er s, t h ei r w iv es , a n d th eir sis te r, all o f w hom w ere in vo lv ed in th is set o f co m pli c ate d leg al m att e rs a n d e ig h t y ears o f p ain . In o rd er t o g et t h in gs m ovin g— an d t o s ta y o n s c h ed u le— I h ad t o s p eed u p th e m ed ia tio n p ro ce ss . T o k eep th em fr o m sp en din g tim e te lli n g th e sa m e s to rie s o ver a n d o ver, I a sk ed o n e o f th e bro th er s if I c o u ld p la y h is r o le ; t h en I w ou ld s w it c h a n d p la y t h e part o f t h e oth er b ro th er . U se r o le -p la y t o s p eed u p t h e m ed ia tio n p ro ce ss. A s I w as g o in g th ro u gh m y r o le -p la y, I jo ked a b ou t w an tin g to s e e if I w as p la y in g th e p art r ig h t b y a sk in g if I c o u ld c h eck in w it h m y “d ir e cto r.” L ookin g o ver a t t h e b ro th er w hose part I h ad b een p la y in g, I s a w s o m ethin g I w asn ’t p re p are d fo r: h e h ad te ars in h is ey es. I gu es se d th at h e was ex p erie n cin g d eep e m path y, b oth w it h h im se lf f r o m m y p la y in g h is r o le , a s w ell a s f o r h is b ro th er’s p ain , w hic h h e had n ot s e en u ntil t h en .  e nex t d ay, th e fa th er a p pro ach ed m e, a ls o w it h t e arfu l e y es , t o s a y t h at t h e nig h t b ef ore th e w hole fa m ily h ad g o n e o u t to d in ner fo r th e rst tim e in ei gh t y ears .  ou gh th e co n ic t h ad p ers is te d fo r years , w it h la w yer s o n b oth sid es w ork in g u n su cce ss fu lly to c o m e to a g re em ent, it b eca m e sim ple to r es olv e on ce t h e b ro th ers h eard e a ch o th er ’s p ain a n d n eed s a s r e v ea le d t h ro u gh t h e ro le -p la y in g. If I h ad w ait e d fo r b oth o f th em to te ll th ei r sto ries , th e re so lu tio n w ou ld h av e t a k en m uch l o n ger. W hen r e ly in g o n th is m eth od , I p er io d ic a lly tu rn to th e per so n w hose ro le I ’m p la y in g, a d dre ss in g th em a s “ m y d ir e cto r” to s e e how I a m d oin g. F or a w hile I th ou gh t I h ad a ctin g ta len t b ecau se of h ow o  en I n d th em cry in g a n d s a y in g, “  at’s e x actly w hat I’v e been tr y in g to s a y !” H ow ev er , when I s ta rte d t r a in in g o th ers i n r o le- pla y in g, I n ow k n ow t h at a n y o f u s c a n d o it a s lo n g a s w e a re in t o u ch w it h o u r o w n n eed s. N o m att er w hat e ls e is g o in g o n , w e a ll h av e t h e s a m e n eed s. N eed s a re un iv er sa l. I so m etim es w ork w it h p eo p le w ho h av e been ra p ed o r to rtu re d a n d w here t h e p erp etr a to r i s a b se n t, I w ou ld a ssu m e th ei r r o le . O en tim es th e v ic tim is su rp ris e d to h ear m e in th e ro le- pla y sa y in g th e sa m e th in g th ey h ad h eard fr o m th ei r p er pet ra to r, a n d p res s m e wit h th e qu estio n , “ B ut h ow d id y o u k n ow ?” I b eli e v e th e an sw er to t h at q u es tio n is t h at I k n ow b ecau se I a m th at p er so n . A nd so a re we all. A s w e ap p ly a li t e ra cy o f fe eli n gs an d n eed s, w e are not th in kin g ab ou t th e is su es , b u t sim ply p u tt in g o u rs e lv es i n t h e o th er p er so n’s s h oes , t r y in g t o b e th at p er so n . “G ett in g t h e p art r ig h t” is n ot in o u r t h ou gh ts , a lt h ou gh f r o m t im e to t im e we c h eck i n w it h t h e “ d ir e c to r” b ecau se we d on’t a lw ay s g et it r ig h t. N ob o d y gets it rig h t a ll th e tim e, a n d th at’s n e. If w e’r e off th e m ark , th e per so n w hom w e a re p la y in g w ill le t u s k n ow o n e way o r a n oth er . W e are th u s off ere d a n oth er o p p ortu n it y t o m ak e a c lo ser g u es s. R ole -p la y is sim ply pu tt in g ou rse lv es in th e oth er p erso n’s s h oes. In te rr u ptin g So m etim es m ed ia tio n s g et h eate d , w it h p eo p le sh ou tin g a t o r ta lk in g o ver o n e a n oth er. T o k eep th e p ro ces s o n tr a ck u n der su ch c ir c u m sta n ces , w e need to g et c o m fo rta b le w it h in ter ru ptin g. O nce w hen I w as m ed ia tin g in I s r a el, a n d h av in g a d iffi cu lt tim e becau se my tr a n sla to r w as to o p oli t e , I n ally ta u gh t h im to b e n asty : “ S h u t th em u p !,” I in str u cte d . “ T ell th em to w ait u ntil w e a t l e a st g et t h e t r a n sla tio n o u t b ef ore th ey g o b ack t o s c re am in g at e a ch o th er.” S o w hen b oth s id es a re sc re am in g o r t a lk in g a t t h e sa m e tim e, I in se rt m yse lf : “ E xcu se m e, e x cu se m e, e x cu se m e!” I r e p eat th is a s lo u d ly a n d a s o  en a s n ece ss a ry u ntil I r eg ain t h ei r a tt en tio n . W hen w e a re g ra b bin g t h eir a tt e n tio n , w e hav e to b e qu ic k . I f t h e per so n re a cts w it h a n ger w hen w e i n te rr u pt, w e c a n s en se th at t h ey a re in t o o m uch p ain to h ear u s.  is is th e tim e fo r e m ergen cy rst- a id e m path y. H er e is w hat i t m ig h t s o u n d l i k e, u sin g a n ex am ple fr o m a b u sin es s m eet in g. Sp ea k er:  is h ap p en s a ll t h e t im e!  ey ’v e alr e a d y c a lle d t h re e m eet in gs, a n d e a ch t im e t h ere i s s o m e n ew r a tio n ale as t o w hy i t c a n ’t b e d on e. L ast t im e t h ey ev en s ig n ed a n a g re em en t! N ow a n oth er pro m is e a n d i t w ill b e j u st t h at: a n oth er p ro m is e!  ere’s l i t t le p oin t i n w ork in g w it h p eo p le w ho … M ed ia to r: E xcu se m e, e x cu se m e, E X C U SE M E! C ou ld y o u t e ll m e back w hat t h e o th er p ers o n s a id ? Sp ea k er: (r e a li z in g h e had n ot l i s te n ed t o w hat h ad b ee n s a id ) N o! M ed ia to r: S o y o u ’r e f e eli n g s o f u ll o f d is tr u st r ig h t n ow a n d r e a lly n eed so m e t r u st t h at p eo p le w ill d o w hat t h ey s a y ? S p ea k er: W ell, o f c o u rs e b u t … M ed ia to r: S o c o u ld y o u t e ll m e w hat y o u h eard t h em s a y ? L et m e rep eat i t f o r y o u . I h ear t h e o th er s id e s a y in g t h ey h av e a r e a l n eed f o r in te g rit y . C ou ld y o u j u st s a y i t b ack s o I ’m s u re w e all u n der sta n d ea ch o th er? S p ea k er: (sile n ce) M ed ia to r: N o?  en l e t m e s a y i t a g ain . A nd w e sa y i t a g ain . We m ig h t v ie w o u r r o le a s th at o f a tr a n sla to r— tr a n sla tin g e a ch p arty ’s m ess a g e s o a s to b e u n dersto od b y th e oth er . I a sk th em to g et u se d to m y in te rr u ptin g fo r th e sa k e o f re so lv in g th e co n ic t. W hen I d o in ter ru pt, I a ls o ch eck th at th e sp ea k er fe els th at I’m tr a n sla tin g th em acc u ra te ly . I tr a n sla te m an y m ess a g es ev en if I am o n ly g u ess in g, b u t th e sp ea k er is a lw ay s t h e n al a u th orit y o n t h e a cc u ra cy o f m y t r a n sla tio n . It’s im porta n t to re m em ber th at th e pu rp ose of in ter ru ptin g an d gra b bin g p eo p le ’s att e n tio n b ack in th is w ay is to res to re th e pro ces s o f m ak in g ob se rv atio n s, id en tif y in g an d ex pres sin g fe eli n gs, co n nectin g fe eli n gs w it h n eed s, an d m ak in g doab le re q u es ts usin g cle ar, co n cret e, p osit iv e a ctio n l a n gu ag e.  e p u rp ose o f i n te rr u ptin g i s t o r e sto re t h e p ro ce ss. When P eo p le S ay “ N o” t o M eetin g F ace t o Face I a m o p tim is tic a b ou t w hat c a n h ap p en w hen w e brin g p eo p le to get her to e x p re ss t h eir n eed s a n d r e q u ests . H ow ev er , o n e of t h e big gest p ro blem s I ’v e en co u nte re d is s im ply g ett in g a cce ss t o b oth p arties . B ecau se it o cc a sio n ally t a k es tim e fo r a p arty to b eco m e cle ar ab ou t it s o w n n eed s, m ed ia to rs re q u ir e a d eq u ate a cce ss i n o rd er f o r b oth p arties t o ex pres s, a n d t h en r e cei ve ea ch o th er’s n eed s. O en tim es, w hat w e hear fr o m s o m eo n e in c o n ic t is : “ N o, t h ere ’s n o u se t a lk in g— th ey w on’t li s ten . I ’v e tr ie d t o t a lk a n d it d oes n’t w ork .” T o so lv e th is p ro ble m I’v e so u gh t str a te g ies to res olv e co n ic ts w her e peo p le in c o n ic t a re u nw illi n g t o m eet . O ne m ethod t h at s h ow s p ro m is in g re su lt s re li e s on th e u se of an au dio re co rd er . I w ork w it h ea ch p arty s e p ara te ly w hile p la y in g t h e r o le o f t h e oth er s id e. I f t h er e are tw o p eo p le in o u r o w n l i v es w ho a re i n t o o m uch p ain t o b e w illi n g t o m eet , t h is w ou ld b e an o p tio n f o r u s t o c o n sid er. A s a n e x am ple , a w om an w as s u ff erin g h eav ily fr o m a c o n ic t w it h h er hu sb an d, p artic u la rly f r o m t h e w ay h e w as d ir e ctin g a n ger t o w ard h er . F ir st, I li s te n ed in a w ay th at s u pp orte d h er to c le arly e x p res s h er n eed s a n d to e x p erie n ce b ein g re ce iv ed w it h res pectfu l u n der sta n din g.  en, I to ok o n th e r o le o f h er h u sb an d, a n d a sk ed h er t o li s ten t o m e as I ex pres se d w hat I g u ess e d t o b e t h e h u sb an d’s n eed s.  e n eed s o f t h e c o n ic tin g p arties h av in g b een c le arly c o n vey ed i n t h is r o le -p la y, I a sk ed t h e w om an t o s h are th e re co rd in g w it h h er h u sb an d f o r h is r e a ctio n . B ecau se I h ad , in th is ca se , b een acc u ra te in g u es sin g th e hu sb an d’s n eed s, h e e x p erie n ce d h u ge r e li ef w hen li s ten in g t o t h e re co rd in g. W it h t h e in cre a se d t r u st t h at c a m e f r o m h earin g h im se lf u n der sto od , h e la ter a g re ed to c o m e in s o w e c o u ld w ork to geth er u ntil t h e tw o o f t h em fo u n d w ay s o f m eetin g t h eir n eed s i n m utu ally r es pectfu l w ay s. W hen th e h ard est th in g a b ou t r es olv in g a c o n ic t is g et tin g th e parties t o geth er in th e sa m e ro om , th e use of re co rd ed ro le- pla y s m ay b e th e an sw er. In fo rm al M ed ia tio n : S tic k in g O ur N ose i n O th er P eo p le ’s B usin ess In fo rm al m ed ia tio n is a p oli t e w ay t o r ef er t o m ed ia tin g in s it u atio n s w her e we’v e n ot b een i n vit e d t o d o s o . I n s o m an y w ord s, w e’r e stic k in g o u r n ose in o th er p eo p le ’s b u sin ess . I w as s h op pin g in a g ro ce ry s to re on e d ay w hen I s a w a w om an s tr ik e h er t o d d le r. S h e w as a b ou t t o d o it a g ain w hen I ju m ped in . S h e did n’t a sk , “M arsh all, w ou ld y o u m ed ia te b et ween u s? ” A noth er t im e I w as w alk in g in t h e str e ets o f P aris ; a w om an w as w alk in g alo n gsid e me when a ra th er in eb ria te d m an r a n u p f r o m b eh in d, t u rn ed h er a ro u n d, a n d s la p p ed h er in t h e f a ce. A s t h ere w asn ’t t im e f o r m e to t a lk w it h t h is m an , I r es orte d t o t h e pro te c tiv e u se o f fo rc e b y r e str a in in g h im ju st a s h e was a b ou t t o s tr ik e her ag ain . I in se rte d m yse lf betw een th e tw o, an d stu ck m y n ose in th ei r bu sin ess . O n a n oth er o cc a sio n , d u rin g a b u sin es s m eet in g, I w atc h ed tw o fa ctio n s in a r e p etit io u s e x ch an ge, a rg u in g b ack a n d fo rth o ver a n a g e- old i s su e a n d a g ain I s tu ck m y n ose i n b et ween t h em . When w e w it n ess b eh av io rs th at ra is e co n ce rn in u s— un les s it is a sit u atio n t h at c a lls f o r t h e p ro te ctiv e use of f o rc e a s d es crib ed in C hap te r 1 2 — th e rst t h in g w e d o is t o e m path iz e w it h t h e need s o f t h e per so n w ho is b eh av in g in th e w ay w e d is li k e. In th e rst sit u atio n , if w e wan te d to se e m ore v io le n ce d ir e c te d a t t h e t o d d le r, w e co u ld , in ste a d o f o ff erin g em path y to th e m oth er, s a y s o m eth in g to im ply th at s h e was w ro n g to h it th e ch ild . Su ch a r e sp on se o n o u r p art w ou ld o n ly es ca la te t h e sit u atio n . W e n eed t o b e w ell p ra ctic e d a t h ea rin g t h e n eed i n a n y m ess a g e. In o rd er t o b e t r u ly h elp fu l t o p eo p le in w hose bu sin es s w e a re stic k in g ou r n ose w e n eed to h av e d ev elo p ed a n ex ten siv e li t er acy r eg ard in g n eed s, a n d b e w ell p ra ctic e d a t h earin g t h e need i n a n y m essa g e, i n clu din g t h e need u n dern eath t h e a ct o f s la p pin g a n oth er p er so n . A nd w e n eed t o b e pra ctic e d in v erb al e m path y su ch th at th e peo p le sen se th at w e are co n necte d w it h t h eir n eed . We n eed to r e m em ber, w hen w e ch oose to s tic k o u r n ose in s o m eo n e’s b u sin ess , it ’s n ot e n ou gh t o s im ply s u pp ort s o m eo n e to g et i n t o u ch w it h h is o r h er o w n n eed s. W e a im to p ra ctic e a ll th e oth er ste p s c o ver ed in th is c h ap te r. F or e x am ple , a  er e m path iz in g, w e m ay te ll th e to d d ler ’s m oth er th at w e c a re a b ou t s a fe ty a n d h av e a n eed t o p ro te ct p eo p le , a n d t h en r e q u es t her w illi n gn ess t o t r y a n oth er s tr a teg y t o m eet h er n eed w it h h er c h ild . W e re fr a in , h ow ev er, fr o m m en tio n in g o u r o w n n eed s reg ard in g th e p ers o n’s b eh av io r u ntil it i s c le ar t o t h em t h at w e u n dersta n d a n d c a re ab ou t his o r h er n eed s. O th erw is e p eo p le w ill n ot c a re ab ou t o u r n eed s n or w ill t h ey s e e th at th eir n eed s a n d o u rs a re on e an d th e sa m e. A s ex pres se d s o b eau tif u lly b y A li c e W alk er i n  e C olo r P urp le: “ O ne d ay w hen I w as s it t in g qu ie t a n d fe eli n g li k e a m oth erles s c h ild , w hic h I w as, it c o m e to m e: th at fe eli n g o f b ein g p art o f e v ery th in g, n ot s ep ara te a t a ll. I k n ew t h at if I c u t a t r e e, m y a rm w ou ld b le ed .” U nle ss w e m ak e s u re th at b oth s id es a re aw are of th ei r o w n a s w ell a s ea ch o th er’s n eed s, it w ill b e h ard fo r u s t o s u cce ed w hen w e s tic k o u r n ose in o th er p eo p le ’s b u sin ess . W e a re l i k ely t o g et c au gh t u p i n s c a rc it y t h in kin g — se ein g o n ly th e im porta n ce o f o u r o w n n eed s b ei ng m et. W hen s c a rc it y t h in kin g th en g ets m ix ed w it h rig h t- a n d-w ro n g th in kin g, an y o f u s ca n b eco m e m ili t a n t an d vio le n t, an d bli n ded to ev en th e most obvio u s so lu tio n s. A t t h at p oin t, t h e c o n ic t s e em s u n res olv ab le— an d i t w ill b e if w e don’t co n nec t w it h th e oth er p er so n by rst off erin g em path y w it h ou t fo cu sin g o n o u r o w n n eed s. Su m mary  e use of N VC to re so lv e co n ic t diff er s fr o m tr a d it io n al m ed ia tio n m eth od s; in ste a d of deli b era tin g over is su es, str a te g ies , an d m ean s of co m pro m is e , w e co n ce n tr a te fo rem ost o n id en tif y in g th e need s o f b oth p artie s, a n d o n ly t h en s e ek s tr a teg ies t o f u l ll t h ose need s. W e s ta rt b y f o rg in g a h u m an c o n nec tio n b et ween t h e parties i n c o n ic t.  en w e e n su re t h at b oth p artie s h av e th e op p ortu n it y t o f u lly e x p res s t h ei r need s, t h at t h ey c a re fu lly li s te n t o t h e o th er p ers o n’s n eed s, a n d t h at o n ce t h e n eed s h av e b een h eard , th ey cle arly ex p res s d oab le actio n step s to m eet th ose n eed s. W e a v o id ju dgin g o r a n aly zin g t h e co n ic t a n d in ste a d r em ain f o cu se d o n n eed s. W hen o n e p arty is in to o m uch p ain to h ear t h e need s o f t h e oth er , w e ex te n d e m path y, t a k in g a s l o n g a s n ece ss a ry t o en su re th at t h e per so n k n ow s th eir p ain is h eard . W e d o n ot h ear “n o” a s a rej ectio n b u t ra th er a s a n ex p re ss io n o f th e n eed th at is k eep in g th e per so n fr o m s a y in g “ y es .” O nly a  er a ll n eed s h av e b een m utu ally h eard , d o w e pro gres s to th e so lu tio n s sta g e: m ak in g d oab le r e q u ests u sin g p osit iv e, a ctio n l a n gu ag e. W hen w e a ssu m e th e ro le o f m ed ia tin g a c o n ic t b et ween tw o o th er partie s, th e sa m e p rin cip le s ap p ly . In ad dit io n , w e keep ca ref ul tr a ck o f p ro gre ss , e x te n d e m path y w here n eed ed , k eep th e co n ver sa tio n fo cu se d o n th e p re se n t, m ovin g it fo rw ard , a n d in ter ru ptin g w her e neces sa ry to r et urn to t h e p ro ce ss . W it h th ese to ols a n d u n dersta n din g, w e ca n p ra ctic e a n d h elp o th er s re so lv e e v en l o n g-s ta n din g c o n ic ts t o t h ei r m utu al s a tis fa ctio n . 12  e P ro te ctiv e U se o f F orc e W When t h e U se o f F orc e I s U nav o id ab le h en tw o d is p u tin g p artie s h av e ea ch h ad an o p p ortu n it y to fu lly e x p re ss w hat t h ey a re o b se rv in g, fe eli n g, n eed in g, a n d r e q u es tin g— an d ea ch has em path iz e d w it h th e oth er — a res olu tio n ca n usu ally be re a ch ed th at m eets th e n eed s o f b oth s id es . A t th e ver y le a st, th e tw o c a n a g re e, i n g o od w ill, t o d is a g re e. In s o m e s it u atio n s, h ow ev er, t h e o p p ortu n it y f o r s u ch d ia lo gu e m ay n ot ex is t, a n d th e u se o f fo rc e m ay b e neces sa ry to p ro te ct li f e or in div id u al rig h ts . F or in sta n ce, th e o th er p arty m ay b e unw illi n g to c o m mun ic ate , o r im min en t dan ger m ay not allo w tim e fo r co m mun ic atio n . In th es e sit u atio n s, w e m ay n eed to re so rt to fo rc e. If w e d o, N VC re q u ir es u s to d iff ere n tia te b etw een t h e p ro te c tiv e an d t h e pu n it iv e uses o f f o rc e. e  in kin g B eh in d t h e U se o f F orc e  e in te n tio n b eh in d th e p ro te ctiv e use of fo rc e is to p re v en t in ju ry o r in ju stic e.  e in te n tio n beh in d th e pu n it iv e use of fo rc e is to cau se in div id u als to su ff er fo r th eir p er ce iv ed m is d eed s. W hen w e gra b a c h ild w ho is r u n nin g in to th e s tr e et to p re v en t th e ch ild fr o m b ei ng in ju re d , w e are a p p ly in g p ro te c tiv e fo rc e.  e pu n it iv e use of fo rc e, o n th e oth er h an d, m ig h t i n vo lv e p hysic a l o r p sy ch olo gic a l a tt a ck , s u ch a s s p an kin g t h e ch ild o r sa y in g, “ H ow c o u ld y o u b e s o s tu pid ! Y ou s h ou ld b e ash am ed o f y o u rs e lf !” W hen w e e x erc is e t h e p ro te c tiv e u se of f o rc e, w e a re fo cu sin g o n t h e li f e o r r ig h ts w e w an t t o p ro te c t, w it h ou t p ass in g ju dgm en t o n ei th er t h e per so n or th e b eh av io r. W e a re n ot b la m in g o r c o n dem nin g th e ch ild w ho r u sh es in to th e str e et; o u r th in kin g is s o le ly d ir e cte d to w ard p ro te ctin g th e ch ild f r o m d an ger. (F or a p p li c atio n o f th is k in d o f fo rc e in so cia l a n d p oli t ic a l co n ic ts , s e e R ob ert I r w in ’s b o ok, B uild in g a P ea ce Syste m .)  e a ssu m ptio n b eh in d t h e p ro te c tiv e u se o f f o rc e is t h at p eo p le beh av e in w ay s in ju rio u s t o t h em se lv es an d oth ers du e to so m e fo rm of ig n ora n ce.  e co rre ctiv e p ro ce ss is th ere fo re o n e o f e d u catio n , n ot p u n is h m en t. Ig n ora n ce in clu des (1 ) a l a ck o f a w are n ess o f t h e c o n se q u en ce s o f o u r a ctio n s, ( 2 ) a n i n ab ili t y t o s e e h ow o u r n eed s m ay b e m et w it h ou t in ju ry to o th er s, ( 3 ) th e beli ef th at w e h av e t h e r ig h t t o p u n is h o r h u rt o th er s b ecau se th ey “ d eser ve” it , a n d ( 4 ) d elu sio n al t h in kin g t h at i n vo lv es, f o r ex am ple , h earin g a v o ic e t h at i n str u cts u s t o k ill s o m eo n e.  e in te n tio n b eh in d t h e p ro te ctiv e u se o f f o rc e is o n ly t o p ro te ct, n ot t o p u n is h , b la m e, o r c o n dem n. Pun it iv e actio n , o n th e o th er h an d, is b ase d o n th e assu m ptio n th at p eo p le c o m mit o ff en se s b ecau se th ey a re bad o r e v il, a n d to c o rre ct th e sit u atio n , t h ey n eed to b e m ad e to r ep ent.  eir “ c o rre ctio n” is u n der ta k en th ro u gh p u n it iv e a ctio n d esig n ed t o m ak e th em ( 1 ) s u ff er en ou gh t o s e e th e erro r o f t h eir w ay s, ( 2 ) r e p en t, a n d ( 3 ) c h an ge. I n p ra ctic e, h ow ev er , p u n it iv e actio n , ra th er th an ev o kin g re p en ta n ce an d le arn in g, is ju st as li k ely to gen era te re se n tm en t a n d h ostili t y a n d to rei nfo rc e res is ta n ce to th e ver y beh av io r w e a re s e ek in g. Typ es o f P un it iv e F orc e P hysic a l p u n is h m en t, s u ch a s s p an kin g, is o n e pu n it iv e use of fo rc e. I h av e fo u n d th e su bje c t o f co rp ora l p u n is h m en t to p ro vo ke str o n g sen tim en ts a m on g p are n ts . S o m e a d am an tly d efen d t h e pra ctic e, r ef er rin g t o t h e Bib le: “ S p are th e ro d , sp oil th e ch ild . It’s becau se paren ts don’t sp an k th at d eli n qu en cy is now ra m pan t.”  ey are per su ad ed th at sp an kin g ou r ch ild re n s h ow s t h at w e lo ve t h em b y s e tt in g c le ar b ou n daries . O th er p aren ts a re eq u ally in sis te n t th at sp an kin g is u n lo vin g an d in eff ectiv e becau se it t e a ch es c h ild re n th at, w hen a ll e ls e fa ils , w e c a n a lw ay s res ort to p hysic a l v io le n ce. M y p ers o n al c o n ce rn is t h at c h ild ren ’s f e ar o f c o rp ora l p u n is h m en t m ay o b sc u re t h eir a w are n ess o f t h e c o m pass io n t h at u n der li es p aren ta l d em an ds. P are n ts o  en t e ll m e t h at t h ey “ h av e to ” u se pu n it iv e fo rc e b ecau se th ey s e e n o o th er w ay t o in u en ce t h eir c h ild ren t o d o “ w hat’s g o o d f o r t h em .”  ey su pp ort t h eir o p in io n w it h a n ecd otes o f c h ild ren e x p res sin g a p pre cia tio n f o r “s e ein g t h e li g h t” a  er h av in g b een p u n is h ed . H av in g r a is e d f o u r c h ild ren , I e m path iz e d eep ly w it h p are n ts reg ard in g th e daily c h allen ges th ey fa ce in e d u catin g c h ild re n a n d k eep in g t h em s a fe .  is d oes n ot, h ow ev er , l es sen m y co n ce rn a b ou t t h e u se o f p hysic a l p u n is h m en t. F ea r of co rp ora l pu n is h m en t ob sc u re s ch ild re n ’s a w are n ess o f th e c o m passio n u n derly in g th eir p are n ts ’ d em an ds. F ir st, I w on der w heth er p eo p le who p ro cla im th e su cces ses o f su ch p u n is h m en t are aw are of th e co u ntles s in sta n ce s of ch ild ren w ho tu rn a g ain st w hat m ig h t b e g o od fo r th em s im ply b ecau se th ey c h oose to gh t, r a th er t h an s u cc u m b, t o c o erc io n . S eco n d, t h e ap p aren t s u cces s o f c o rp ora l p u n is h m en t in in u en cin g a ch ild d oes n’t m ean th at o th er m ethod s o f in u en ce w ou ld n’t h av e w ork ed e q u ally w ell. F in ally , I s h are th e co n cer ns o f m an y p are n ts a b ou t t h e s o cia l c o n se q u en ce s o f u sin g p hysic a l p u n is h m en t. W hen p are n ts o p t t o u se f o rc e, w e m ay w in t h e batt le of g ett in g c h ild ren t o do w hat w e w an t, b u t, i n t h e p ro ce ss , a re we not p er pet uatin g a s o cia l n orm th at j u sti es v io le n ce a s a m ean s o f r es olv in g d iff er en ce s? In ad dit io n to th e physic a l, oth er uses of fo rc e als o qu ali f y as p u n is h m en t. O ne is th e u se of bla m e to d is c re d it an oth er p er so n ; fo r ex am ple , a p are n t m ay la b el a ch ild as “w ro n g,” “s e l sh ,” o r “im matu re ” w hen a c h ild d oesn ’t b eh av e i n a c er ta in w ay. A noth er f o rm o f p u n it iv e fo rc e is t h e w it h hold in g o f s o m e m ean s o f g ra ti catio n , s u ch a s p aren ts ’ c u rta ili n g allo w an ce s o r d riv in g p riv ile g es. In th is v ei n, th e wit h dra w al o f c a rin g o r re sp ec t i s o n e o f t h e m ost p ow erfu l t h re ats o f a ll. P un is h m en t a ls o in clu des ju dgm en ta l la b eli n g a n d th e w it h hold in g o f p riv ile g es. e C osts o f P un is h m en t W hen w e su bm it to d oin g so m ethin g so le ly fo r th e pu rp ose of av o id in g pu n is h m en t, o u r a tt e n tio n is d is tr a cte d fr o m th e valu e of th e actio n it s e lf . I n ste a d , w e a re fo cu sin g u p on th e co n se q u en ce s, o n w hat m ig h t h ap p en if w e f a il t o t a k e t h at a ctio n . I f a w ork er ’s p er fo rm an ce is p ro m pte d b y fe ar o f p u n is h m en t, th e jo b gets don e, bu t m ora le su ff ers ; so on er or la ter , pro du ctiv it y w ill d ecre a se . S elf – es te em is als o d im in is h ed w hen p u n it iv e fo rc e is u se d . If ch ild re n b ru sh th ei r te et h b ecau se th ey fe ar sh am e an d rid ic u le , th eir o ra l h ea lt h m ay im pro ve bu t th ei r se lf – r es pect w ill d ev elo p cav it ie s. F u rth erm ore , as w e all k n ow , p u n is h m en t is co stly in ter m s o f go od w ill.  e m ore w e a re s e en a s a g en ts o f p u n is h m en t, t h e hard er it i s f o r o th ers t o r e sp on d c o m pass io n ate ly t o o u r n eed s. W hen w e fe a r p u n is h m en t, w e fo cu s o n c o n se q u en ce s, n ot o n o u r o w n v a lu es. F ea r of pu n is h m en t dim in is h es se lf – e ste em an d go od w ill. I w as v is it in g a fr ie n d, a s c h ool p rin cip al, a t h is o ffi ce when h e notic e d th ro u gh t h e w in dow a b ig c h ild h it t in g a s m aller o n e. “ E xcu se m e,” h e sa id a s h e le ap t u p a n d r u sh ed to th e pla y g ro u n d. G ra b bin g th e la rg er c h ild , h e gav e h im a sw at a n d sc o ld ed , “I’l l te a ch y o u n ot to h it sm aller p eo p le! ” W hen th e p rin cip al r e tu rn ed in sid e, I r em ark ed , “ I d on’t th in k y o u ta u gh t th at ch ild w hat yo u th ou gh t yo u w er e te a ch in g h im . I su sp ect w hat h e le arn ed in ste a d w as n ot to h it p eo p le sm aller th an h e is w hen so m eb o d y big ger— li k e th e p rin cip al— mig h t b e watc h in g! If a n yth in g, it s e em s to m e th at y o u h av e r e in fo rc e d t h e n otio n t h at t h e way t o g et w hat y o u w an t f r o m so m eb o d y e ls e i s t o h it t h em .” I n s u ch s it u atio n s, I r e co m men d rst em path iz in g w it h t h e ch ild w ho is b eh av in g v io le n tly . F or e x am ple , if I sa w a c h ild h it so m eo n e a er b ei ng ca lle d a n am e, I m ig h t e m path iz e, “ I’m se n sin g th at y o u ’r e fe eli n g a n gry b ecau se y o u ’d li k e to b e tr e ate d w it h m ore res pect.” If I g u es se d c o rre ctly , an d th e ch ild ack n ow le d ges th is to b e tr u e, I w ou ld th en co n tin u e by ex p re ss in g m y o w n fe eli n gs, n ee d s, a n d re q u es ts in th e sit u atio n w it h ou t in sin u atin g b la m e: “I’m fe eli n g sa d b ecau se I w an t u s to n d w ay s to g et re sp ec t t h at d on’t t u rn p eo p le i n to en em ies . I ’d li k e yo u t o t e ll m e if y o u ’d b e w illi n g to ex p lo re w it h m e so m e oth er w ay s to get th e res pect yo u ’r e w an tin g.” Tw o Q uestio n s  at R ev ea l t h e L im it a tio n s o f P un is h m en t Tw o q u estio n s h elp u s s e e w hy w e a re un li k ely t o g et w hat w e w an t b y u sin g pu n is h m en t to c h an ge p eo p le ’s b eh av io r.  e rst q u es tio n is : W hat d o I w an t t h is p erso n t o d o t h at’s d iff ere n t f r o m w hat h e or s h e is c u rre n tly d oin g? I f w e a sk o n ly t h is rst q u estio n , p u n is h m en t m ay s e em e ff ectiv e, b ecau se th e th re at o r e x erc is e o f p u n it iv e fo rc e m ay w ell in u en ce s o m eo n e’s b eh av io r. H ow ev er, w it h t h e s e co n d q u estio n , i t b eco m es e v id en t t h at p u n is h m en t i s n ’t l i k ely t o w ork : W hat d o I w an t t h is p erso n’s r e a so n s t o b e fo r d oin g w hat I ’m a sk in g? W e s e ld om a d dre ss t h e la tt e r q u es tio n , b u t w hen w e do, w e so on r e a li z e th at p u n is h m en t an d re w ard in ter fer e wit h p eo p le ’s ab ili t y to d o th in gs m otiv ate d b y t h e r e a so n s w e’d li k e th em t o h av e. I b eli e v e it is c rit ic a l t o b e aw are o f t h e im porta n ce o f p eo p le ’s r e a so n s f o r b eh av in g a s w e r e q u es t. F or ex am ple , b la m in g o r p u n is h in g w ou ld o bvio u sly n ot b e eff ectiv e str a teg ies i f w e w an t c h ild re n to c le an th eir r o om s o u t o f ei th er a d es ir e fo r o rd er o r a d esir e to co n tr ib u te to th eir p aren ts ’ en jo ym en t o f o rd er . O en ch ild ren c le an t h eir r o om s m otiv ate d b y o b ed ien ce to a u th orit y ( “ B ecau se m y M om sa id s o ”), a v o id an ce o f p u n is h m en t, o r f e ar o f u p set tin g o r b ei ng r ej ecte d b y p are n ts . N VC, h ow ev er, fo ste rs a le v el o f m ora l d ev elo p m en t b ase d o n au to n om y a n d in te rd ep en den ce, w her eb y w e a ck n ow le d ge r es pon sib ili t y f o r o u r o w n a ctio n s a n d a re a w are th at o u r o w n w ell- b ei ng a n d th at o f o th er s are o n e a n d t h e s a m e. Q uestio n 1 : W hat d o I w an t t h is p erso n t o do? Q uestio n 2 : W hat d o I w an t t h is p erso n’s r e a so n s t o b e fo r d oin g i t ? e P ro te ctiv e U se o f F orc e i n S ch ools I ’d li k e to d esc rib e h ow s o m e s tu den ts a n d I u se d p ro te ctiv e fo rc e to b rin g ord er in to a ch ao tic sit u atio n at an alt er nativ e sc h ool.  is sc h ool w as d esig n ed fo r stu den ts w ho had dro p p ed ou t or been ex p elle d fr o m co n ven tio n al c la ss ro om s.  e a d m in is tr a tio n a n d I h op ed to d em on str a te t h at a s c h ool b ase d o n th e p rin cip les o f N VC w ou ld b e ab le to r e a ch th es e stu den ts . M y jo b w as to tr a in th e fa cu lt y in N VC a n d s er ve as c o n su lt a n t over th e y ear. W it h o n ly fo u r d ay s to p rep are th e fa cu lt y , I w as u n ab le to s u ffi cie n tly cla rif y th e d iff ere n ce bet ween N VC a n d p er m is s iv en ess. A s a re su lt , s o m e t e a ch ers w ere i g n orin g, r a th er t h an i n ter ven in g i n , s it u atio n s o f co n ic t a n d d is tu rb in g b eh av io r. B es ieg ed b y in cre a sin g p an dem on iu m , t h e ad m in is tr a to rs w ere n early r e a d y t o s h u t d ow n t h e sc h ool. W hen I r e q u este d t o t a lk w it h t h e stu den ts w ho h ad c o n tr ib u te d m ost t o t h e t u rb u le n ce, t h e p rin cip al s e le c te d ei gh t b oys, a g es e le v en t o f o u rte en , t o m eet w it h m e.  e fo llo w in g a re e x ce rp ts f r o m t h e dia lo gu e I h ad w it h t h e stu den ts . M BR : (e x p re ssin g m y f e eli n g a n d n eed s w it h ou t a sk in g p ro b in g q u estio n s) I’m v ery u p se t a b ou t t h e t e a ch ers’ r ep orts t h at t h in gs a re gett in g o u t of h an d i n m an y o f t h e c la ss e s. I w an t v er y m uch f o r t h is s c h ool t o b e s u cce ss fu l. I ’m h op efu l t h at y o u c a n h elp m e un der sta n d w hat th e p ro ble m s a re a n d w hat c a n b e don e a b ou t t h em . Will:  e t e a ch ers i n t h is s c h ool— th ey f o ols , m an ! M BR : A re y o u s a y in g, W ill, t h at y o u a re d is g u ste d w it h t h e te a ch er s a n d yo u w an t t h em t o c h an ge s o m e t h in gs t h ey d o? W ill: N o, m an , t h ey i s f o ols b ecau se t h ey j u st s ta n d a ro u n d a n d d on’t d o n oth in ’. M BR : You m ean y o u ’r e d is g u ste d b ecau se yo u w an t t h em t o d o m ore w hen p ro ble m s h ap p en . (  is i s a s e co n d a tte m pt t o r e ce iv e th e fe eli n gs a n d w an ts .) W ill:  at’s r ig h t, m an . N o m att e r w hat a n yb o d y d o t h ey j u st s ta n d t h er e sm ili n ’ l i k e f o ols . M BR : W ou ld y o u b e w illi n g t o g iv e m e a n ex am ple of h ow t h e te a ch er s d o noth in g? W ill: E asy . J u st t h is m orn in g a d u de w alk s i n w earin ’ a b ott le of W ild T u rk ey o n h is h ip p ock et p la in a s d ay. E ver yb o d y s e en i t ; t h e te a ch er, s h e s e en i t b u t s h e’s l o okin ’ t h e oth er w ay. M BR : It s o u n ds t o m e, t h en , t h at y o u d on’t h av e res pect f o r t h e te a ch er s when t h ey s ta n d a ro u n d d oin g n oth in g. Y ou ’d l i k e t h em t o d o so m eth in g. (  is i s a c o n tin u ed a tte m pt t o f u lly u n dersta n d.) W ill: Y ea h . M BR : I f e el d is a p p oin te d b ecau se I w an t t h em t o b e ab le to w ork t h in gs o u t w it h s tu den ts , b u t i t s o u n ds l i k e I w asn ’t a b le to s h ow t h em w hat I m ean t.  e d is c u ss io n t h en t u rn ed t o o n e partic u la rly p res sin g p ro blem : t h at o f stu den ts w ho d id n’t w an t t o w ork d is tu rb in g t h ose w ho d id . M BR : I’m a n xio u s t o t r y t o s o lv e t h is p ro blem b ecau se th e te a ch er s t e ll m e it ’s t h e o n e t h at b oth ers t h em t h e m ost. I w ou ld a p pre cia te y o u r sh arin g w hate v er i d ea s y o u h av e w it h m e. Jo e:  e t e a ch er g o t t o g et a r a tt a n (a s tic k c o vere d w it h l e a th er t h at w as ca rrie d b y s o m e prin cip als i n S t. L ou is t o a d m in is te r c o rp ora l pu nis h m en t) . M BR : So y o u ’r e s a y in g, J o e, t h at y o u w an t t h e te a ch er s t o h it s tu den ts w hen t h ey b oth er o th ers . Jo e:  at’s t h e o n ly w ay s tu den ts g o n na s to p p la y in g t h e fo ol. M BR : (still t r y in g t o r e ce iv e Jo e’s f e eli n gs) S o y o u d ou bt t h at a n y o th er w ay w ou ld w ork . Jo e: (n od s a gre e m en t) M BR : I’m d is c o u ra g ed i f t h at’s t h e o n ly w ay. I h ate t h at w ay o f s et tli n g th in gs a n d w an t t o l e arn o th er w ay s. E d: W hy? M BR : Sev era l r e a so n s. L ik e i f I g et y o u t o s to p h ors in g a ro u n d i n s c h ool by u sin g t h e r a tt a n , I ’d l i k e y o u t o t e ll m e w hat h ap p en s i f t h re e or fo u r o f y o u t h at I ’v e h it i n c la ss a re ou t b y m y c a r w hen I g o h om e. Ed: (sm ili n g)  en y o u b ett e r h av e a b ig s tic k , m an ! M BR : (F eeli n g c e rta in I u n dersto od E d’s m ess a ge an d c e rta in h e kn ew I u n dersto od , I c o n tin u e w it h ou t p ara ph ra sin g i t .)  at’s w hat I m ean . I’d l i k e y o u t o s e e I ’m b oth ere d a b ou t t h at w ay o f s et tli n g t h in gs. I ’m t o o a b se n tm in ded t o a lw ay s r e m em ber t o c a rr y a b ig s tic k , a n d ev en i f I r e m em bere d , I w ou ld h ate t o h it s o m eo n e w it h i t . E d: You c o u ld k ic k t h e c at o u t o f s c h ool. M BR : You ’r e s u ggestin g, E d, t h at y o u w ou ld l i k e u s t o s u sp en d o r ex pel k id s f r o m t h e s c h ool? E d: Yea h . M BR : I’m d is c o u ra g ed w it h t h at i d ea , t o o. I w an t t o s h ow t h at t h er e are o th er w ay s o f s o lv in g d iff ere n ce s i n s c h ool w it h ou t k ic k in g p eo p le o u t. I ’d f e el l i k e a f a ilu re i f t h at w as t h e bes t w e co u ld d o. W ill: I f a d u de a in ’t d oin ’ n oth in ’, h ow c o m e yo u c a n ’t p u t h im i n a d o- n oth in ’ r o om ? M BR : A re y o u s u ggestin g, W ill, t h at y o u w ou ld l i k e t o h av e a r o om t o s e n d p eo p le t o i f t h ey b oth er o th er s tu den ts ? W ill:  at’s r ig h t. N o u se t h ey b ein ’ i n c la ss i f t h ey a in ’t d oin ’ n oth in ’. M BR : I’m v ery i n te re ste d i n t h at i d ea . I ’d l i k e t o h ear h ow y o u t h in k s u ch a r o om m ig h t w ork . W ill: S o m etim es y o u c o m e t o s c h ool a n d j u st f e el e v il: y o u d on’t w an t t o d o n oth in ’. S o w e j u st h av e a r o om s tu den ts g o t o t ill t h ey f e el l i k e d oin ’ s o m eth in ’. M BR : I u n dersta n d w hat y o u a re s a y in g, b u t I ’m a n tic ip atin g t h at t h e te a ch er w ill b e c o n ce rn ed a b ou t w het her t h e stu den ts w ill g o w illi n gly t o t h e d o-n oth in g r o om . W ill: ( c o n fi den tly )  ey ’l l g o . I s a id I t h ou gh t t h e p la n m ig h t w ork if w e co u ld s h ow t h at t h e pu rp ose w as n ot t o p u n is h , b u t t o p ro vid e a p la ce to g o fo r t h ose who w er en ’t r e a d y to stu dy, a n d sim ult a n eo u sly a c h an ce to stu dy fo r th ose who w an te d to s tu dy. I a ls o su ggeste d th at a d o-n oth in g ro om w ou ld b e more li k ely to s u cce ed if it w as k n ow n to b e a p ro du ct o f stu den t b ra in sto rm in g ra th er th an s ta ff d ecre e. A d o-n oth in g r o om w as s e t u p fo r s tu den ts w ho w er e up set a n d d id n’t f e el li k e d oin g sc h oolw ork o r w hose beh av io r k ep t o th er s fr o m le arn in g. S o m etim es s tu den ts a sk ed to g o ; s o m etim es te a ch er s a sk ed s tu den ts to g o . W e p la ce d t h e t e a ch er w ho h ad b es t m aster ed N VC i n t h e do-n oth in g r o om , where s h e h ad s o m e v ery p ro du ctiv e ta lk s w it h th e ch ild ren w ho c a m e in .  is s e t- u p w as a n i m men se s u cce ss i n r es to rin g o rd er t o t h e sc h ool b ecau se th e s tu den ts w ho d ev is e d it m ad e it s p u rp ose cle ar t o t h ei r p eer s: t o p ro te ct th e r ig h ts o f s tu den ts w ho w an te d to le arn . W e use d th e dia lo gu e wit h th e stu den ts to d em on str a te to th e te a ch er s th at th er e wer e oth er m ean s o f re so lv in g c o n ic ts b esid es w it h dra w al fr o m th e co n ic t o r u sin g p u n it iv e fo rc e. Su m mary In s it u atio n s w here th ere is n o o p p ortu n it y fo r c o m mun ic atio n , s u ch a s in i n sta n ce s o f i m min en t d an ger, w e m ay n eed t o r es ort t o t h e pro te ctiv e use of fo rc e.  e i n te n tio n b eh in d t h e p ro te ctiv e use of f o rc e i s t o p re v en t i n ju ry o r in ju stic e, n ev er t o p u n is h o r t o c au se in div id u als t o s u ff er, r ep ent, o r c h an ge.  e pu n it iv e use of fo rc e te n ds to gen er ate hostili t y an d to rei nfo rc e re sis ta n ce to th e very beh av io r w e are se ek in g. Pun is h m en t dam ag es go od w ill a n d s e lf – e ste em , a n d s h i s o u r a tt en tio n f r o m t h e in tr in sic v alu e of an actio n to ex te rn al co n se q u en ce s. Bla m in g an d pu n is h in g fa il to c o n tr ib u te t o t h e m otiv atio n s w e w ou ld l i k e t o i n sp ir e in o th er s.   Hum an it y h as b ee n s le e p in g — an d s till s le e p s— lu lle d w it h in t h e n arro w ly c o n finin g jo ys o f i t s c lo se d l o ves. — Pie rre T eilh ard d e C hard in , th eo lo gia n a n d s c ie n tis t 13 Lib era tin g O urse lv es a n d C ou n se li n g O th ers W Fre ein g O urse lv es F ro m O ld P ro gra m min g e’v e a ll le arn ed th in gs th at li m it u s a s h u m an b ei ngs, w het her fr o m w ell- in te n tio n ed p are n ts , te a ch ers , cler gy, o r o th er s. P ass e d d ow n th ro u gh gen era tio n s, ev en ce n tu ries , m uch of th is des tr u ctiv e cu lt u ra l le arn in g is s o i n gra in ed i n o u r li v es t h at w e a re no lo n ger c o n sc io u s o f it . I n o n e o f h is ro u tin es, c o m ed ia n B uddy H ack et t, r a is e d o n h is m oth er ’s r ic h c o okin g, c la im ed th at h e n ev er re a li z e d it w as p oss ib le to le av e th e ta b le w it h ou t fe eli n g h eartb u rn u ntil h e was in th e arm y. In th e sa m e way, p ain e n gen dere d b y d am ag in g c u lt u ra l c o n dit io n in g is su ch a n in teg ra l p art o f o u r li v es t h at w e c a n n o lo n ger d is tin gu is h it s p res en ce. I t t a k es t r em endou s en erg y an d aw are n ess to re co gn iz e th is des tr u ctiv e le arn in g an d to t r a n sfo rm it in to t h ou gh ts a n d b eh av io rs t h at a re of v alu e an d o f s er vic e to li f e .  is t r a n sfo rm atio n r e q u ir e s a li t er acy o f n eed s a n d t h e ab ili t y t o g et in t o u ch w it h o u rs e lv es, b oth o f w hic h a re diffi cu lt fo r p eo p le in o u r c u lt u re . N ot on ly h av e w e n ev er b een ed u cate d ab ou t ou r n eed s, w e are o en ex p ose d t o c u lt u ra l t r a in in g t h at a ctiv ely b lo ck s o u r c o n sc io u sn es s o f t h em . As m en tio n ed e arli e r, w e h av e in her it e d a la n gu ag e th at s er ved k in gs a n d pow erfu l eli t e s in dom in atio n so ciet ies .  e mass es , dis c o u ra g ed fr o m d ev elo p in g a w are n ess o f t h eir o w n n eed s, h av e in ste a d b een e d u cate d t o b e d ocile an d su bse rv ie n t to au th orit y . O ur cu lt u re im pli es th at n eed s are n eg ativ e an d d estr u ctiv e; th e w ord need y ap p li e d to a p ers o n su ggests in ad eq u acy o r im matu rit y . W hen p eo p le ex p res s t h ei r n eed s, t h ey a re o en la b ele d s e l sh , a n d th e u se o f th e per so n al p ro n ou n I is a t tim es e q u ate d w it h s e l sh n ess o r n eed in ess . B y en co u ra g in g us to se p ara te ob ser vatio n an d ev alu atio n , to a ck n ow le d ge t h e t h ou gh ts o r n ee d s s h ap in g o u r f e eli n gs, a n d t o ex pres s o u r re q u ests in cle ar actio n la n gu ag e, N VC h ei gh ten s o u r aw aren ess o f th e cu lt u ra l c o n dit io n in g i n u en cin g u s a t a n y g iv en m om en t. A nd d ra w in g t h is c o n dit io n in g i n to t h e l i g h t o f c o n sc io u sn ess i s a k ey s te p i n b re a k in g i t s h old o n u s. W e c a n l i b era te o u rse lv es f r o m c u lt u ra l c o n dit io n in g. Reso lv in g I n te rn al C on fl ic ts W e ca n ap p ly N VC to re so lv e th e in ter nal co n ic ts th at o  en res ult in d ep re ss io n . In his bo ok  e Rev o lu tio n in Psy ch ia tr y, Ern est Beck er att r ib u te s d ep re ss io n to “c o gn it iv ely a rres te d a lt er nativ es .”  is m ean s th at w hen w e h av e a ju dgm en ta l d ia lo gu e go in g o n w it h in , w e beco m e ali en ate d fr o m w hat w e are n eed in g an d ca n not th en act to m eet th ose need s. D ep re ss io n i s i n dic ativ e o f a s ta te o f a li en atio n f r o m o u r o w n n eed s. A w om an s tu dyin g N VC w as s u ff er in g a p ro fo u n d b ou t o f d ep res sio n . Sh e w as ask ed to id en tif y th e v o ic e s w it h in h er w hen sh e fe lt th e most d ep re ss e d a n d to w rit e th em d ow n in d ia lo gu e fo rm a s th ou gh th ey w er e sp ea k in g t o e a ch o th er.  ese w ere th e rst t w o l i n es o f h er d ia lo gu e: V oic e 1 (“c a re er w om an ”): I sh ou ld d o so m eth in g m ore wit h m y li f e . I’m w astin g m y e d u ca tio n a n d t a le n ts . V oic e 2 ( “ re sp on sib le m oth er” ): Y ou ’r e bein g u nre a li s tic . Y ou ’r e a m oth er o f tw o c h ild re n a n d c a n’t h an dle t h at r e sp on sib ili t y , s o h ow c a n y o u h an dle a n yth in g e ls e? N otic e h ow t h ese i n ner m ess a g es a re in fes te d w it h j u dgm en ta l t e rm s a n d ph ra se s s u ch a s sh ou ld , w astin g m y e d u ca tio n a n d ta le n ts , a n d ca n’t h an dle . V aria tio n s o f th is d ia lo gu e h ad b een ru n nin g in th is w om an ’s h ea d fo r m on th s. S h e w as a sk ed t o i m ag in e th e “c a re er w om an ” v o ic e t a k in g a n “ N VC pill” in o rd er t o r e sta te it s m ess a g e in t h e fo llo w in g f o rm : “ W hen a, I f e el b, b ecau se I a m n eed in g c.  ere fo re I n ow w ou ld l i k e d .” S h e su bse q u en tly tr a n sla te d “I sh ou ld d o so m eth in g w it h m y li f e . I’m w astin g m y e d u catio n a n d ta le n ts ” in to : “ W hen I sp en d a s m uch tim e a t h om e w it h th e ch ild re n as I d o w it h ou t p ra ctic in g m y p ro fe ss io n , I fe el d ep re ss e d a n d d is c o u ra g ed beca u se I a m n ee d in g t h e fu l llm en t I o n ce h ad in m y p ro fe ss io n .  ere fo re , I n ow w ou ld li k e to n d p art- tim e w ork in m y pro fe ss io n .”  en it w as th e tu rn o f h er “ re sp on sib le m oth er ” v o ic e to u n der go th e sa m e p ro ce ss o f tr a n sla tio n .  ese li n es , “ Y ou ’r e bei ng u n re a li s tic . Y ou ’r e a m oth er o f t w o c h ild re n a n d c a n ’t h an dle t h at r e sp on sib ili t y , s o h ow c a n y o u h an dle a n yth in g e ls e ?” w ere tr a n sfo rm ed in to : “ W hen I im ag in e g o in g to w ork , I fe el s c a re d beca u se I’m n eed in g r e a ssu ra n ce t h at t h e c h ild re n w ill b e well t a k en c a re o f.  ere fo re , I n ow w ou ld li k e t o p la n h ow t o p ro vid e h ig h – qu ali t y c h ild c a re w hile I w ork a n d h ow t o n d s u ffi cien t t im e to b e w it h t h e ch ild re n w hen I a m n ot t ir e d .”  is w om an f e lt g re at r e li e f a s s o on a s s h e tr a n sla te d h er i n ner m essa g es in to N VC. S h e w as ab le to g et b en eath th e ali en atin g m essa g es sh e was re p eatin g to h ers e lf an d o ff er h er se lf em path y. A lt h ou gh sh e still fa ce d p ra ctic a l c h alle n ges, s u ch a s s e c u rin g q u ali t y c h ild c a re an d h er h u sb an d’s s u pp ort, s h e w as n o lo n ger s u bje c t t o t h e ju dgm en ta l in ter nal d ia lo gu e th at k ep t h er f r o m b ein g a w are o f h er o w n n eed s.  e ab ili t y to h ea r o u r o w n fe eli n gs an d n eed s an d em path iz e w it h t h em c a n f r e e u s f r o m d ep re ssio n . Carin g f o r O ur I n ner E nvir o n m en t W hen w e a re e n ta n gle d in c rit ic a l, b la m in g, o r a n gry t h ou gh ts , it is d iffi cu lt t o esta b li s h a h ea lt h y in te rn al en vir o n m en t fo r o u rs e lv es . N VC h elp s u s cre ate a m ore p ea ce fu l s ta te o f m in d b y en co u ra g in g u s t o f o cu s o n w hat w e are t r u ly w an tin g r a th er t h an o n w hat i s w ro n g w it h o th er s o r o u rs e lv es . A p artic ip an t o n ce r e p orte d a p ro fo u n d p er so n al b re a k th ro u gh d u rin g a t h re e-d ay t r a in in g. O ne o f h er g o als f o r t h e w ork sh op w as t o t a k e bet ter c a re o f h ers e lf , bu t sh e w oke at d aw n th e se co n d m orn in g w it h th e worst h ea d ach e in re ce n t m em ory. “ N orm ally , th e rst th in g I’d d o w ou ld b e to a n aly ze w hat I h ad d on e w ro n g. D id I e at t h e wro n g fo od ? D id I let m yse lf g et str e ss e d -o u t? D id I d o th is ; d id I n ot d o th at? B ut, sin ce I h ad b een w ork in g o n u sin g N VC t o t a k e b et ter c a re of m yse lf , I a sk ed in ste a d , ‘W hat d o I n eed t o d o f o r m yse lf r ig h t n ow w it h t h is h ea d ach e? ’ Focu s o n w hat w e w an t to d o ra th er th an w hat w en t w ro n g. “I s a t u p a n d d id a lo t o f r e a lly s lo w n eck r o lls , t h en g o t u p a n d w alk ed a ro u n d, a n d d id o th er th in gs to ta k e ca re of m yse lf rig h t th en in ste a d o f b eatin g u p o n m yse lf . M y h ea d ach e re la x ed t o t h e poin t w her e I w as a b le to g o th ro u gh th e d ay ’s w ork sh op.  is w as a m ajo r, m ajo r b re a k th ro u gh fo r m e. W hat I u n dersto od , w hen I em path iz e d w it h th e hea d ach e, w as th at I h ad n’t g iv en m yse lf e n ou gh a tt e n tio n t h e day b ef ore , a n d t h e hea d ach e w as a w ay to s a y to m yse lf , ‘I n eed m ore att en tio n .’ I en ded u p g iv in g m yse lf th e att e n tio n I n eed ed a n d w as t h en a b le to m ak e it t h ro u gh t h e work sh op. I ’v e h ad h ea d ach es a ll m y li f e , a n d t h is w as a v er y r em ark ab le tu rn in g p oin t fo r m e.” A t a n oth er w ork sh op a p artic ip an t a sk ed h ow N VC m ig h t b e use d to f r e e u s f r o m a n ger- p ro vo kin g m essa g es w hen w e a re driv in g o n t h e fr e e w ay.  is w as a f a m ili a r t o p ic f o r m e! F or y ears m y w ork i n vo lv ed t r a v eli n g b y c a r a cro ss t h e c o u ntr y, a n d I w as w orn a n d fr a zzle d b y t h e vio len ce- pro vo kin g m ess a g es ra cin g th ro u gh m y b ra in . E ver yb o d y w ho w asn ’t d riv in g b y m y sta n dard s w as a n a rc h en em y, a v illa in .  ou gh ts s p ew ed th ro u gh m y h ea d : “W hat t h e h ell i s t h e m att e r w it h t h at g u y!? D oes n’t h e ev en w atc h w her e he’s d riv in g?” I n t h at s ta te o f m in d, a ll I w an te d w as t o p u n is h t h e oth er d riv er s, a n d s in ce I c o u ld n’t d o th at, th e an ger lo d ged in m y b o d y a n d ex acte d it s to ll. E ven tu ally I le arn ed to tr a n sla te m y ju dgm en ts in to fe eli n gs a n d n eed s an d t o g iv e m yse lf e m path y: “ B oy, I a m p et ri ed w hen p eo p le d riv e l i k e t h at; I r e a lly w is h th ey w ou ld s e e th e d an ger in w hat th ey a re doin g!” W hew ! I w as a m aze d h ow I c o u ld c re ate a le ss s tr es sfu l s it u atio n f o r m yse lf b y s im ply b eco m in g aw are o f w hat I w as fe eli n g an d n eed in g ra th er th an b la m in g oth ers . D efu se s tr e ss b y h ea rin g o u r o w n f e eli n gs a n d n eed s. L ate r I decid ed to pra ctic e em path y to w ard oth er driv er s an d w as re w ard ed w it h a g ra tif y in g rst ex per ien ce. I w as s tu ck b eh in d a c a r g o in g fa r b elo w th e s p eed li m it a n d s lo w in g d ow n a t e v er y in ter se ctio n . F u m in g an d g ru m bli n g, “  at’s n o w ay to d riv e,” I n otic e d th e str es s I w as c au sin g m yse lf a n d s h i ed m y th in kin g in ste a d to w hat th e oth er d riv er m ig h t b e fe eli n g a n d n eed in g. I s e n se d t h at t h e per so n w as lo st, f e eli n g c o n fu se d , a n d w is h in g fo r so m e p atie n ce fr o m th ose of u s fo llo w in g. W hen th e ro ad w id en ed e n ou gh fo r m e to p ass , I sa w th at th e driv er w as a w om an w ho lo oked to b e in h er e ig h tie s w it h a n ex pres sio n o f ter ro r o n h er fa ce. I w as p le a se d t h at m y a tt e m pt a t e m path y h ad k ep t m e fr o m h on kin g t h e horn o r en gag in g in m y c u sto m ary ta ctic s o f d is p la y in g d is p le a su re to w ard p eo p le w hose d riv in g b oth ere d m e. D efu se s tr e ss b y e m path iz in g w it h o th ers. Rep la cin g D ia g n osis W it h N VC M an y years ag o , a er h av in g ju st in ves te d n in e years o f m y li f e in th e tr a in in g an d d ip lo m as n ece ss a ry to q u ali f y as a p sy ch oth er ap is t, I ca m e acro ss a d ia lo gu e b etw een th e Is r a eli p h ilo so p h er M artin B uber an d th e A m eric a n psy ch olo gis t C arl R ogers in w hic h B uber qu es tio n s w het her an yo n e c a n d o p sy ch oth era p y in th e ro le of a p sy ch oth er ap is t. B uber w as v is it in g t h e U nit e d S ta te s a t t h e t im e an d h ad b een in vit e d , a lo n g w it h C arl R ogers , to a d is c u ss io n a t a m en ta l h osp it a l in fr o n t o f a g ro u p o f m en ta l h ea lt h p ro fe ss io n als . In th is d ia lo gu e B uber p osit s th at h u m an gro w th o cc u rs th ro u gh a m eetin g b etw een tw o in div id u als w ho ex pres s th em se lv es v u ln er ab ly a n d au th en tic a lly i n w hat h e t e rm ed a n “ I-  ou ” re la tio n sh ip . H e d id n ot b eli e v e th at th is ty p e o f a u th en tic it y w as li k ely to ex is t w hen p eo p le m eet in th e ro le s o f p sy ch oth era p is t a n d c li en t. R ogers a g re ed th at a u th en tic it y w as a p re re q u is it e to gro w th . He main ta in ed , how ev er , th at en li g h ten ed p sy ch oth era p is ts c o u ld c h oose to tr a n sc e n d th ei r o w n ro le an d en co u nter t h eir c li e n ts a u th en tic a lly . B uber w as s k ep tic a l. H e w as o f t h e op in io n t h at e v en i f p sy ch oth er ap is ts w ere c o m mit t e d a n d a b le to r e la te to th ei r c li en ts in a n a u th en tic fa sh io n , su ch e n co u nte rs w ou ld b e im poss ib le as lo n g a s c li en ts c o n tin u ed to v ie w th em se lv es as cli e n ts an d th eir p sy ch oth er ap is ts as p sy ch oth er ap is ts . H e ob se rv ed h ow th e v ery p ro ce ss o f m ak in g a p p oin tm en ts to s e e so m eo n e at th eir o ffi ce, an d p ay in g fe es to b e “ xed ,” d im med th e li k eli h ood o f an au th en tic r e la tio n sh ip d ev elo p in g b et ween t w o p er so n s.  is dia lo gu e cla ri ed m y ow n lo n g-s ta n din g am biv alen ce to w ard c li n ic a l d eta ch m en t— a s a cro sa n ct r u le in t h e psy ch oan aly tic p sy ch oth er ap y I w as t a u gh t. T o b rin g o n e’s o w n fe eli n gs a n d n eed s in to t h e psy ch oth er ap y w as ty p ic a lly v ie w ed a s a sig n o f p ath olo gy o n th e part o f th e th er ap is t. C om pete n t p sy ch oth era p is ts w ere to s ta y o u t o f th e th er ap y p ro ces s a n d to f u n ctio n a s a m ir ro r o n to w hic h c li en ts p ro je cte d t h ei r t r a n sfe ren ces , w hic h w ere t h en w ork ed t h ro u gh w it h t h e psy ch oth er ap is t’s h elp . I u n der sto od t h e th eo ry beh in d keep in g th e psy ch oth er ap is t’s in ner pro ce ss ou t of p sy ch oth era p y an d gu ard in g ag ain st th e dan ger of ad dres sin g in ter nal co n ic ts a t t h e c li e n t’s e x p en se . H ow ev er , I h ad a lw ay s b een u n co m fo rta b le main ta in in g th e r e q u is it e e m otio n al d is ta n ce, a n d fu rth er m ore beli e v ed in t h e a d van ta g es o f b rin gin g m yse lf i n to t h e pro ce ss . I th u s b eg an to ex p erim en t by rep la cin g cli n ic a l la n gu ag e w it h th e la n gu ag e o f N VC. I n ste a d o f i n te rp ret in g w hat m y c li en ts w er e sa y in g i n l i n e w it h th e p ers o n ali t y th eo rie s I h ad s tu die d , I m ad e m yse lf p res en t to th ei r word s an d li s te n ed em path ic a lly . In ste a d o f d ia g n osin g th em , I re v ea le d w hat w as g o in g o n w it h in m yse lf . A t rst, th is w as fr ig h ten in g. I w orrie d a b ou t h ow co lle a g u es w ou ld re a ct to th e au th en tic it y w it h w hic h I w as en te rin g i n to d ia lo gu e w it h c li e n ts . H ow ev er , t h e re su lt s w ere s o g ra tif y in g t o b oth m y cli e n ts an d m yse lf th at I so on o ver ca m e an y h es it a tio n . T o d ay, th ir ty – ve y ears la te r, th e c o n ce p t o f b rin gin g o n es elf fu lly in to th e cli en t- t h era p is t r e la tio n sh ip i s n o l o n ger h er etic a l, b u t w hen I b eg an p ra ctic in g t h is w ay, I w as o  en in vit e d to s p ea k to g ro u p s o f p sy ch oth er ap is ts w ho w ou ld c h alle n ge m e t o d em on str a te t h is n ew r o le . I e m path iz ed w it h c li e n ts i ns te a d o f i n te rp re tin g t h em ; I r e v ea le d m yse lf i n ste a d o f d ia g n os in g t h em . Once I w as a sk ed , b y a l a rg e g ath erin g o f m en ta l h ea lt h p ro fe ss io n als a t a s ta te m en ta l hosp it a l, to sh ow how N VC m ig h t ser ve in co u n se li n g dis tr e ss e d peo p le . A er m y on e- hou r pres en ta tio n , I w as re q u es te d to in te rv ie w a p atie n t in o rd er t o p ro du ce a n e v alu atio n a n d r e co m men datio n fo r tr e atm en t. I ta lk ed w it h th e tw en ty -n in e- year- o ld m oth er of th re e ch ild re n f o r a b ou t h alf a n h ou r. A er s h e le  t h e ro om , t h e sta ff r es pon sib le f o r h er c a re p ose d th eir q u estio n s. “ D r. R osen ber g,” h er p sy ch ia tr is t b eg an , “p le a se m ak e a diff ere n tia l dia g n osis . In yo u r op in io n , is th is w om an m an if e stin g a sc h iz o p h re n ic re a ctio n or is th is a ca se of d ru g-in du ce d p sy ch osis ? ” I sa id th at I w as u n co m fo rta b le w it h su ch qu es tio n s. E ven w hen I w ork ed in a m en ta l h osp it a l d u rin g m y t r a in in g, I w as n ev er s u re how t o t p eo p le in to th e d ia g n ostic cla ss i catio n s. S in ce th en I h ad re a d res earc h in dic atin g a la ck of ag re em en t am on g psy ch ia tr is ts an d psy ch olo gis ts r e g ard in g th ese te rm s.  e r e p orts c o n clu ded th at d ia g n oses o f p atien ts in m en ta l hosp it a ls dep en ded m ore up on th e sc h ool th e psy ch ia tr is t had att e n ded t h an t h e c h ara cte ris tic s o f t h e patien ts t h em se lv es . I w ou ld b e r e lu cta n t, I c o n tin u ed , t o a p p ly t h es e ter m s e v en i f c o n sis ten t usa g e d id ex is t, b ecau se I fa ile d to se e how th ey b en ete d p atien ts . In p hysic a l m ed ic in e, p in p oin tin g th e dis e a se pro ce ss th at h as cre ate d th e illn ess o  en g iv es c le ar d ir e c tio n t o it s t r e atm en t, b u t I d id n ot p er cei ve th is r e la tio n sh ip in th e eld w e c a ll m en ta l illn es s. In m y ex per ien ce of c a se c o n fe re n ce s a t h osp it a ls , t h e s ta ff w ou ld s p en d m ost o f it s t im e deli b er atin g over a d ia g n osis . A s t h e a llo tt e d h ou r t h re ate n ed t o r u n o u t, t h e psy ch ia tr is t in c h arg e o f th e c a se m ig h t a p p ea l to th e oth er s fo r h elp in set tin g u p a tr e atm en t p la n . O en th is r e q u es t w ou ld b e ig n ore d in fa v o r o f c o n tin u ed w ra n gli n g o ver t h e d ia g n osis . I ex p la in ed to th e p sy ch ia tr is t th at N VC u rg es m e to a sk m yse lf th e fo llo w in g q u estio n s ra th er th an th in k in ter m s o f w hat is w ro n g w it h a p atie n t: “ W hat is t h is p ers o n f e eli n g? W hat is s h e or h e need in g? H ow a m I f e eli n g in r e sp on se to th is p ers o n , a n d w hat n eed s o f m in e are beh in d m y fe eli n gs? W hat a ctio n o r d ecis io n w ou ld I r e q u es t t h is p er so n t o t a k e in t h e beli e f th at it w ou ld en ab le th em to li v e more hap pily ?” B ecau se ou r re sp on se s to th ese q u estio n s w ou ld re v ea l a lo t ab ou t o u rs e lv es an d o u r valu es, w e w ou ld f e el f a r m ore v u ln er ab le th an i f w e w er e to s im ply d ia g n ose th e o th er p ers o n . O n a n oth er o cc a sio n , I w as c a lle d to d em on str a te h ow N VC c o u ld b e ta u gh t to p eo p le d ia g n ose d a s c h ro n ic sc h iz o p h ren ic s. W it h a b ou t ei gh ty p sy ch olo gis ts , p sy ch ia tr is ts , so cia l w ork er s, an d n u rs es w atc h in g,  een p atie n ts w ho h ad b een t h u s d ia g n ose d w er e ass em ble d o n t h e sta g e fo r m e. A s I in tr o du ce d m yse lf an d ex p la in ed th e pu rp ose of N VC, o n e of th e patie n ts e x p re ss e d a re a ctio n th at s e em ed ir re le v an t to w hat I w as s a y in g. A w are t h at h e’d b een d ia g n ose d a s a c h ro n ic s c h iz o p h ren ic , I s u cc u m bed t o c li n ic a l t h in kin g b y a ssu m in g t h at m y f a ilu re to u n der sta n d h im w as d u e to h is co n fu sio n . “Y ou se em to h av e tr o u ble fo llo w in g w hat I’m sa y in g,” I re m ark ed . A t t h is , a n oth er p atie n t in te rje c te d , “ I u n dersta n d w hat h e’s s a y in g,” a n d pro ce ed ed t o e x p la in t h e r e le v an ce of t h e rst p atien t’s w ord s in t h e co n tex t of m y in tr o du ctio n . R eco gn iz in g t h at t h e m an w as n ot c o n fu se d , b u t t h at I h ad sim ply not gra sp ed th e co n nectio n bet ween ou r th ou gh ts , I w as d is m ay ed b y th e ea se w it h w hic h I h ad att r ib u te d res pon sib ili t y fo r th e bre a k d ow n i n c o m mun ic atio n t o h im . I w ou ld h av e li k ed t o h av e ow ned m y ow n fe eli n gs by sa y in g, fo r ex am ple , “I’m co n fu se d . I’d li k e to se e th e co n nec tio n b etw een w hat I s a id a n d y o u r r es pon se , b u t I d on’t . W ou ld y o u b e w illi n g t o e x p la in h ow y o u r w ord s r e la te t o w hat I s a id ?” W it h th e ex ce p tio n o f th is b rie f d ep artu re in to cli n ic a l th in kin g, th e se ss io n w it h th e p atie n ts w en t su cce ss fu lly .  e sta ff , im pres se d w it h th e patie n ts ’ r e sp on se s, w on dere d w het her I c o n sid er ed t h em t o b e an u nusu ally c o op era tiv e g ro u p o f p atie n ts . I a n sw ere d th at w hen I a v o id ed d ia g n osin g peo p le a n d in ste a d sta y ed c o n necte d to th e li f e go in g o n in th em a n d in m yse lf , p eo p le u su ally r e sp on ded p osit iv ely . A sta ff m em ber th en re q u este d a sim ila r ses sio n b e co n du cte d , as a le arn in g ex p erie n ce, w it h so m e o f th e psy ch olo gis ts an d p sy ch ia tr is ts as p artic ip an ts . A t th is , th e p atie n ts w ho h ad b een o n sta g e ex ch an ged se ats w it h s e v era l v o lu nte ers in th e a u dien ce. In w ork in g w it h th e sta ff , I h ad a d iffi cu lt tim e cla rif y in g to on e psy ch ia tr is t th e diff er en ce bet ween in te lle c tu al u n dersta n din g a n d t h e em path y o f N VC. W hen ev er s o m eo n e in t h e gro u p ex p re ss e d fe eli n gs, he wou ld off er his un dersta n din g of th e psy ch olo gic a l d yn am ic s b eh in d t h ei r f e eli n gs r a th er t h an e m path iz e w it h t h e fe eli n gs. W hen th is h ap p en ed fo r th e th ir d tim e, o n e o f th e patien ts in th e au die n ce b u rst o u t, “ C an ’t y o u s e e yo u ’r e doin g it a g ain ? Y ou ’r e in ter pret in g w hat s h e’s s a y in g r a th er t h an e m path iz in g w it h h er f e eli n gs!” B y a d op tin g t h e s k ills a n d c o n sc io u sn ess o f N VC, w e c a n c o u n se l o th er s in en co u nte rs th at are g en u in e, o p en , an d m utu al, ra th er th an res ort to p ro fe ss io n al re la tio n sh ip s ch ara cter iz e d b y em otio n al d is ta n ce, d ia g n osis , a n d h ie ra rc h y. Su m mary N VC en han ce s in ner co m mun ic atio n by help in g us tr a n sla te neg ativ e in te rn al m ess a g es i n to f e eli n gs a n d n eed s. O ur a b ili t y t o d is tin gu is h o u r o w n fe eli n gs a n d n eed s a n d t o e m path iz e w it h t h em c a n f r e e us f r o m d ep res sio n . B y s h ow in g u s h ow to fo cu s o n w hat w e tr u ly w an t r a th er th an o n w hat is w ro n g w it h o th ers o r o u rs e lv es, N VC g iv es u s t h e to ols a n d u n der sta n din g to c re ate a m ore p ea ce fu l sta te o f m in d. P ro fe ss io n als in c o u n se li n g a n d psy ch oth era p y m ay als o use N VC to en gen der m utu al an d au th en tic r e la tio n sh ip s w it h t h eir c li e n ts . N VC i n A ctio n D ea li n g W it h R ese n tm en t a n d S elf – Ju dgm en t A s tu den t o f N on vio le n t C om munic a tio n s h are s t h e fo llo w in g s to ry. I h ad ju st re tu rn ed fr o m m y rst res id en tia l tr a in in g in N VC. A fr ie n d w hom I h ad n’t s e en f o r t w o y ears w as w ait in g f o r m e a t h om e. I rst m et Ir is , w ho h ad b een a sc h ool li b ra ria n fo r tw en ty – ve years , d u rin g an in te n se tw o-w eek h eartw ork an d w ild er nes s jo u rn ey th at c u lm in ate d i n a t h re e-d ay s o lo f a st i n t h e Rock ies . A er s h e li s ten ed t o m y en th u sia stic d esc rip tio n o f N VC, Ir is re v ea le d th at sh e was still h u rtin g f r o m w hat o n e o f t h e w ild ern es s le a d ers in C olo ra d o h ad s a id t o h er six y ears b efo re . I h ad a c le ar m em ory o f th at p er so n : w ild – w om an L eav, h er p alm s, go u ged w it h ro p e cu ts , h old in g ste a d y a b ela y ed b o d y d an gli n g ag ain st th e mou nta in fa ce; sh e re a d an im al d ro p pin gs, h ow le d in th e d ark , d an ce d h er jo y, c rie d h er tr u th , a n d m oon ed o u r b u s a s w e w av ed g o od -b ye f o r t h e la st t im e. W hat I r is h ad h eard L eav s a y d u rin g o n e o f t h e p er so n al f e ed back s es sio n s w as t h is : “ Ir is , I c a n ’t s ta n d p eo p le li k e y o u , a lw ay s a n d e v er yw her e bei ng s o d am n n ic e a n d s w eet, c o n sta n tly t h e m eek li t t le li b ra ria n t h at y o u a re . W hy d on’t y o u j u st d ro p i t a n d g et o n w it h i t ? ” F or s ix y ears I r is h ad b een li s te n in g t o L eav ’s v o ic e in h er h ea d , a n d fo r six y ears sh e’d b een a n sw erin g L eav in h er h ea d . W e w ere both ea g er to e x p lo re h ow a c o n sc io u sn ess o f N VC c o u ld h av e aff ecte d th e sit u atio n . I r o le -p la y ed L eav a n d r ep eate d h er s ta te m en t t o I r is . Ir is : (fo rg ettin g a b ou t N VC a n d h ea rin g c rit ic is m a n d p u t- d ow n) Y ou h av e n o r ig h t t o s a y t h at t o m e. Y ou d on’t k n ow w ho I a m , o r w hat k in d o f l i b ra ria n I a m ! I t a k e m y p ro fe ss io n s er io u sly , a n d fo r y o u r i n fo rm atio n , I c o n sid er m yse lf t o b e a n e d u cato r, j u st li k e a n y t e a ch er … M e: (w it h N VC c o n sc io u sn ess , l i s te n in g e m path ic a lly , a s i f I w ere L ea v) I t s o u n ds t o m e l i k e y o u ’r e a n gry b ecau se yo u w an t m e to k n ow a n d r e co gn iz e w ho y o u r e a lly a re bef ore crit ic iz in g y o u . Is t h at s o ? Ir is :  at’s r ig h t! Y ou h av e s im ply n o i d ea h ow m uch i t t o ok f o r m e to e v en s ig n u p f o r t h is t r e k . L ook! H er e I a m : I n is h ed , d id n’t I ? I t o ok o n a ll t h e c h alle n ges t h ese fo u rte en d ay s a n d overc a m e t h em a ll! M e: A m I h earin g t h at y o u f e el h u rt a n d w ou ld h av e li k ed s o m e re co gn it io n a n d a p pre cia tio n f o r a ll y o u r c o u ra g e a n d h ard w ork ? A fe w m ore e x ch an ges fo llo w ed , w her eu pon Ir is sh ow ed a sh i ; th ese s h i s, w hen a p ers o n fe els “ h eard ” t o h is o r h er s a tis fa ctio n , c a n o  en b e o b se rv ed b o d ily . F or in sta n ce, a p er so n m ay r e la x a n d ta k e a deep er bre ath .  is o en in dic ates th at th e per so n has re cei ved a d eq u ate e m path y a n d i s n ow a b le to s h i a tt en tio n t o s o m eth in g o th er th an t h e p ain t h ey h av e b een e x p res sin g. S o m etim es t h ey a re re a d y t o h ear a n oth er p ers o n’s f e eli n gs a n d n eed s. O r s o m etim es a n oth er r o u n d of e m path y i s n eed ed t o a tt e n d t o a n oth er a re a o f p ain . I n t h is s it u atio n w it h Ir is , I c o u ld se e th at a n oth er p ie ce n eed ed a tt en tio n b ef ore sh e w ou ld b e a b le to h ear L eav.  is is b ecau se Ir is h ad h ad s ix y ears o f o p p ortu n it ie s to pu t hers e lf dow n fo r not hav in g pro du ce d an h on ora b le co m eb ack on th e sp ot. Aer th e su btle sh i , sh e im med ia te ly w en t o n : Ir is : D arn , I s h ou ld h av e s a id a ll t h is s tu ff t o h er s ix y ears a g o ! Me: (a s m yse lf , a n e m path ic f r ie n d) Y ou ’r e f r u str a te d b ecau se y o u w is h y o u c o u ld h av e a rtic u la te d y o u rs e lf b et ter a t t h e tim e? Ir is : I f e el l i k e s u ch a n i d io t! I k n ew I w asn ’t a “ m eek l i t t le li b ra ria n ,” b u t w hy d id n’t I s a y t h at t o h er? M e: S o y o u w is h y o u h ad b een e n ou gh i n t o u ch w it h y o u rs e lf t o s a y th at? I r is : Y es. A nd I ’m a ls o m ad a t m yse lf ! I w is h I h ad n’t l et h er p u sh m e a ro u n d. M e: Y ou ’d l i k e t o h av e b een m ore a ss e rtiv e th an y o u w er e? Ir is : E xactly . I n eed t o r e m em ber I h av e a r ig h t t o s ta n d u p f o r w ho I a m . Ir is w as q u ie t fo r a fe w se co n ds. S h e ex pres se d re a d in es s to p ra ctic e N VC a n d h ear w hat L eav s a id t o h er i n a d iff er en t w ay. M e: (a s L ea v) I r is , I c a n ’t s ta n d p eo p le l i k e y o u , a lw ay s s o n ic e a n d sw eet, b ein g f o re v er t h e m eek l i t t le li b ra ria n . W hy d on’t y o u ju st d ro p i t a n d g et o n w it h i t ? I r is : (li s te n in g f o r L ea v’s f e eli n gs, n eed s, a n d r e q u ests ) O h, L eav, i t s o u n ds t o m e l i k e y o u ’r e r e a lly f r u str a te d … f r u str a te d b ecau se … b ecau se I … H ere I r is c atc h es h ers e lf a t a c o m mon m is ta k e. B y u sin g t h e w ord I , s h e att r ib u te s L eav ’s fe eli n g to Ir is h ers e lf , r a th er th an to s o m e d es ir e on L eav ’s ow n part th at gen era te s th e fe eli n g.  at is , not “Y ou ’r e fr u str a te d b ecau se I a m a c e rta in w ay,” b u t “ Y ou ’r e fr u str a te d b ecau se y o u w an te d s o m eth in g d iff ere n t f r o m m e.” I r is : (tr y in g a ga in ) O kay, L eav, i t s o u n ds l i k e y o u ’r e r e a lly f r u str a te d b ecau se y o u a re w an tin g … u m … y o u ’r e w an tin g … A s I t r ie d i n m y r o le -p la y t o e arn es tly i d en tif y w it h L eav, I f e lt a s u dden ash o f a w are n ess o f w hat I (a s L ea v) w as y earn in g f o r: M e: (a s L ea v) C on nec tio n ! …  at’s w hat I a m w an tin g! I w an t t o fe el c o n nec te d … w it h y o u , I r is ! A nd I a m s o f r u str a te d w it h a ll t h e s w eetn ess a n d n ic e n ess t h at s ta n d i n t h e w ay t h at I j u st w an t t o t e ar i t a ll d ow n s o I c a n t r u ly t o u ch y o u ! W e b oth s a t a b it s tu n ned a  er th is o u tb u rst, a n d th en Ir is s a id , “ If I h ad k n ow n t h at’s w hat s h e h ad w an te d , i f s h e co u ld h av e to ld m e th at i t w as g en u in e c o n nec tio n w it h m e sh e was a  er … G osh , I m ean , th at fe els a lm ost l o vin g.” W hile s h e n ev er d id n d t h e re a l L eav t o v er if y t h e in sig h t, a  er th is p ra ctic e se ss io n in N VC, Ir is a ch ie v ed a n in ter nal re so lu tio n a b ou t t h is n ag gin g c o n ic t a n d f o u n d i t e a sier t o h ear w it h a n ew a w are n ess w hen p eo p le a ro u n d h er sa id th in gs to h er th at sh e m ig h t p re v io u sly h av e i n te rp re te d a s “ p u t- d ow ns.”   … th e m ore yo u b eco m e a co n n ois s e u r o f g ra tit u de, th e le ss y o u a re a vic tim o f re se n tm en t, d ep re ssio n , a n d d esp air . G ra tit u de will a ct a s a n eli x ir t h at w ill g ra d u ally d is s o lv e th e hard s h ell o f y o u r e g o — yo u r n eed t o p oss e ss a n d c o n tr o l— an d t r a n sfo rm y o u in to a g en ero u s b ein g.  e se n se o f g ra tit u de pro d u ce s tr u e sp ir it u al a lc h em y, m akes u s m agn an im ou s— la rg e so u le d . — Sam K een , p h ilo so p h er 14 Exp re ssin g A pp re cia tio n i n N on vio le n t C om munic a tio n S e I n te n tio n B eh in d t h e A ppre cia tio n “Y ou d id a g o od j o b o n t h at r e p ort.” “ Y ou a re a v ery s e n sit iv e p ers o n .” “ It w as k in d o f y o u t o o ff er m e a r id e hom e l a st e v en in g.” u ch sta te m en ts a re ty p ic a lly u tt er ed a s ex pres sio n s o f ap pre cia tio n in li f e -a li e n atin g c o m mun ic atio n . P er hap s y o u a re su rp ris e d th at I r eg ard p ra is e an d co m pli m en ts to be li f e- ali en atin g. Notic e, how ev er , th at a p pre cia tio n e x p re ss e d in th is fo rm r e v ea ls li t t le of w hat’s g o in g o n in th e sp ea k er; i t e sta b li s h es t h e s p ea k er a s s o m eo n e w ho s it s i n ju dgm en t. I d e ne ju dgm en ts — both p osit iv e a n d n eg ativ e— as l i f e- ali en atin g c o m mun ic atio n . C om pli m en ts a re o  en j u dgm en ts — how ev er p osit iv e-o f o th ers. In co rp ora te tr a in in gs, I o en en co u nter m an ag er s w ho d ef en d th e pra ctic e of pra is in g an d co m pli m en tin g by cla im in g th at “it w ork s.” “ R ese arc h sh ow s,” th ey a ss e rt, “th at if a m an ag er c o m pli m en ts em plo yees , th ey w ork h ard er. A nd t h e s a m e g o es f o r s c h ools : i f t e a ch er s p ra is e stu den ts , th ey stu dy h ard er.” I h av e re v ie w ed th is res earc h , an d m y b eli ef is th at re cip ie n ts o f s u ch p ra is e d o w ork h ard er , b u t o n ly in it ia lly . O nce th ey s en se th e m an ip u la tio n b eh in d t h e a p pre cia tio n , t h ei r p ro du ctiv it y d ro p s. W hat is m ost d is tu rb in g f o r m e, h ow ev er, i s t h at t h e beau ty o f a p pre cia tio n i s s p oile d w hen p eo p le b eg in t o n otic e t h e l u rk in g i n ten t t o g et s o m eth in g o u t o f t h em . Fu rth erm ore , w hen w e u se p osit iv e fe ed back a s a m ean s to in u en ce o th ers , it m ay n ot b e c le ar h ow th ey a re re ce iv in g th e m essa g e.  ere is a c a rto on w here o n e N ativ e A m eric a n rem ark s to a n oth er , “W atc h m e use m od ern p sy ch olo gy o n m y h ors e! ” H e th en le a d s h is fr ien d to w her e th e h ors e c a n o verh ear t h eir c o n vers a tio n a n d ex cla im s, “ I h av e th e fa stes t, m ost c o u ra g eo u s h ors e in a ll th e W est!”  e hors e lo oks sa d a n d sa y s to it s e lf , “ H ow d o y o u l i k e t h at? H e’s g o n e an d b ou gh t h im se lf a n oth er h ors e .” W hen w e u se N VC t o e x p re ss a p pre cia tio n , it is p u re ly t o c ele b ra te , n ot to g et s o m eth in g in r e tu rn . O ur s o le in ten tio n is to c ele b ra te th e way o u r li v es h av e b een e n ric h ed b y o th ers . Exp re ss a p pre cia tio n t o c e le b ra te , n ot t o m an ip u la te . e  re e C om pon en ts o f A ppre cia tio n N VC cle arly dis tin gu is h es th re e co m pon en ts in th e expres sio n of ap pre cia tio n : 1. t h e a ctio n s t h at h av e c o n tr ib u te d t o o u r w ell- b ei ng 2. t h e p artic u la r n eed s o f o u rs t h at h av e been f u l lle d 3. t h e p le a su re fu l f e eli n gs e n gen dere d b y t h e fu l llm en t o f t h ose need s  e s e q u en ce o f t h ese in gre d ie n ts m ay v ary ; s o m etim es a ll t h re e ca n b e co n vey ed b y a s m ile o r a s im ple “  an k y o u .” H ow ev er , i f w e w an t t o en su re th at o u r a p pre cia tio n h as b een fu lly re ce iv ed , it is v alu ab le to d ev elo p th e elo qu en ce to e x p re ss a ll t h re e c o m pon en ts v er bally .  e fo llo w in g d ia lo gu e illu str a te s how pra is e m ay be tr a n sfo rm ed in to an ap pre cia tio n th at e m bra ce s a ll t h re e c o m pon en ts . S ay in g “ th an k y o u ” in N VC : “  is is w hat y o u d id ; t h is is w hat I f e el; t h is i s t h e n eed o f m in e t h at w as m et.” P artic ip an t: ( a ppro a ch in g m e a er a w ork sh op ) M arsh all, y o u ’r e b rilli a n t! M BR : I’m n ot a b le t o g et a s m uch o u t o f y o u r a p pre cia tio n a s I w ou ld l i k e. P artic ip an t: W hy, w hat d o y o u m ean ? M BR : In m y l i f e tim e I ’v e b een c a lle d a m ult it u de of n am es, y et I c a n ’t r e ca ll s e rio u sly l e arn in g a n yth in g b y b ei ng t o ld w hat I a m . I ’d l i k e t o l e arn f r o m y o u r a p pre cia tio n a n d en jo y i t , b u t I w ou ld n eed m ore i n fo rm atio n . Partic ip an t: L ik e w hat? M BR : Fir st, I ’d l i k e t o k n ow w hat I s a id o r d id t h at m ad e li f e m ore w on derfu l f o r y o u . P artic ip an t: W ell, y o u ’r e s o i n te lli g en t. M BR : I’m a fr a id y o u ’v e j u st g iv en m e a n oth er j u dgm en t t h at still l e av es m e w on derin g w hat I d id t h at m ad e li f e m ore w on derfu l f o r y o u . P artic ip an t: ( th in ks f o r a w hile , t h en p oin ts t o n ote s s h e had t a ken d u rin g t h e w ork sh op ) L ook a t t h ese t w o p la ce s. I t w as th ese t w o t h in gs y o u s a id . M BR : A h, s o i t ’s m y s a y in g t h ose t w o t h in gs t h at y o u ap pre cia te . P artic ip an t: Y es. M BR : N ex t, I ’d l i k e t o k n ow h ow y o u f e el i n c o n ju n ctio n t o m y hav in g s a id t h ose t w o t h in gs. P artic ip an t: H op efu l a n d r e li e v ed . M BR : A nd n ow I ’d l i k e t o k n ow w hat n eed s o f y o u rs w er e fu l lle d b y m y s a y in g t h ose t w o t h in gs. P artic ip an t: I h av e t h is e ig h te en -y ear- o ld s o n w hom I h av en ’t b een a b le t o c o m mun ic ate w it h . I ’d b een d es per ate ly s e arc h in g f o r s o m e d ir e c tio n t h at m ig h t h elp m e to r e la te w it h h im i n a m ore l o vin g m an ner , a n d t h ose tw o th in gs y o u s a id p ro vid e t h e d ir e c tio n I w as l o okin g f o r. H earin g a ll th re e p ie ce s o f in fo rm atio n — what I d id , h ow s h e fe lt , a n d w hat n eed s o f h ers w ere fu l lle d — I c o u ld th en c ele b ra te th e ap pre cia tio n w it h h er. H ad s h e i n it ia lly e x p re ss e d h er a p pre cia tio n i n N VC, it m ig h t h av e so u n ded li k e th is : “ M arsh all, w hen y o u s a id th es e tw o th in gs ( s h ow in g m e her n ote s), I f e lt v ery h op efu l a n d r e li e v ed , b ecau se I’v e been s e arc h in g f o r a w ay to m ak e a c o n nec tio n w it h m y s o n , a n d th es e gav e m e th e dir e ctio n I w as l o okin g f o r.” Rece iv in g A ppre cia tio n For m an y o f u s, it is d iffi cu lt t o r e ce iv e ap pre cia tio n g ra cef ully . W e fr et o ver w heth er w e d ese rv e it . W e w orr y ab ou t w hat’s b ei ng ex pecte d of u s— e sp ecia lly if w e h av e t e a ch ers o r m an ag er s w ho u se ap pre cia tio n a s a m ean s to s p u r p ro du ctiv it y . O r w e’r e n er vo u s a b ou t li v in g u p to th e ap pre cia tio n . A cc u sto m ed to a cu lt u re w here bu yin g, earn in g, an d d es er vin g are th e sta n dard m od es o f in te rc h an ge, w e are o en u n co m fo rta b le wit h sim ple g iv in g a n d r e ce iv in g. N VC en co u ra g es u s to re ce iv e ap pre cia tio n w it h th e sa m e qu ali t y o f em path y w e e x p re ss w hen li s te n in g to o th er m essa g es . W e h ear w hat w e hav e d on e t h at h as c o n tr ib u te d to o th er s’ w ell- b ei ng; w e h ear t h ei r fe eli n gs an d t h e n eed s t h at w ere f u l lle d . W e ta k e in to o u r h earts t h e jo yo u s r e a li t y t h at w e c a n e a ch e n han ce t h e q u ali t y o f o th er s’ l i v es . I w as ta u gh t to re ce iv e ap pre cia tio n w it h g ra ce by m y fr ien d N afe z A ss a ile y. H e w as a m em ber o f a P ales tin ia n te am w hom I h ad in vit e d to S w it z e rla n d fo r t r a in in g in N VC a t a t im e when s e cu rit y p re cau tio n s m ad e tr a in in g o f m ix ed g ro u p s o f P ale stin ia n s a n d I s r a eli s im poss ib le in ei th er o f th eir o w n c o u ntr ie s. A t t h e e n d o f t h e w ork sh op, N afe z c a m e up t o m e. “  is t r a in in g w ill b e v ery v alu ab le f o r u s i n w ork in g f o r p ea ce in o u r c o u ntr y,” h e ack n ow le d ged . “ I w ou ld li k e t o t h an k y o u in a w ay t h at w e Su M usli m s d o w hen w e w an t to e x p re ss s p ecia l a p pre cia tio n fo r s o m eth in g.” L ock in g h is t h u m b o n to m in e, h e lo oked m e in t h e ey e a n d s a id , “ I k is s t h e G od in y o u th at a llo w s y o u t o g iv e u s w hat y o u d id .” H e th en k is s e d m y h an d. N afe z’s ex p re ss io n o f g ra tit u de sh ow ed m e a d iff er en t w ay to re cei ve ap pre cia tio n . U su ally it is r e ce iv ed fr o m o n e of t w o p ola r p osit io n s. A t o n e en d is eg o tis m , beli e v in g ou rs e lv es to be su p er io r becau se we’v e been ap pre cia te d . A t t h e o th er e x tr e m e is fa ls e hu m ili t y , d en yin g t h e im porta n ce o f th e a p pre cia tio n b y s h ru ggin g it o ff : “ O h, it w as n oth in g.” N afe z s h ow ed m e t h at I c o u ld r e ce iv e a p pre cia tio n jo yfu lly , in t h e aw aren ess t h at G od h as g iv en e v ery o n e t h e p ow er t o e n ric h t h e li v es o f o th er s. I f I a m a w are th at i t i s t h is p ow er o f G od w ork in g th ro u gh m e th at g iv es m e th e pow er to en ric h li f e f o r o th ers , t h en I m ay a v o id b oth t h e eg o t r a p a n d t h e fa ls e hu m ili t y . O Rece iv e a p pre cia tio n w it h ou t fe eli n gs o f s u p erio rit y o r fa ls e h u m ili t y . G old a M eir , w hen s h e w as t h e I s r a eli p rim e m in is ter , o n ce ch id ed o n e of h er m in is te rs : “D on’t b e so h u m ble , y o u ’r e not th at g re at.”  e fo llo w in g li n es, att r ib u te d to co n te m pora ry w rit er M aria n ne W illi a m so n , ser ve as an oth er r e m in der f o r m e t o a v o id t h e pit fa ll o f f a ls e hu m ili t y : u r d eep est f e ar is n ot t h at w e a re in ad eq u ate . O ur d eep est f e ar is t h at w e a re p ow erfu l b ey o n d m ea su re . It is o u r li g h t, n ot o u r d ark n ess , t h at f r ig h ten s u s. Y ou a re a c h ild o f G od . Y ou r p la y in g s m all d oesn ’t s er ve th e w orld .  ere ’s n oth in g en li g h te n ed ab ou t sh rin kin g so th at o th er p eo p le w on’t f e el i n se c u re a ro u n d y o u . W e w ere b orn to m ak e m an if e st th e glo ry o f G od th at is w it h in u s. It’s n ot j u st i n s o m e o f u s, i t i s i n e v er yo n e. A nd as w e le t o u r o w n li g h t sh in e, w e u n co n sc io u sly g iv e oth er p eo p le p erm is s io n t o d o t h e s a m e. A s w e are li b era te d fr o m ou r fe ar, ou r pres en ce au to m atic a lly l i b era te s o th ers . e H un ger f o r A ppre cia tio n Para d oxic a lly , d esp it e o u r u n ea se i n r e ce iv in g a p pre cia tio n , m ost o f u s y earn to b e g en u in ely r e co gn iz e d a n d a p pre cia te d . D urin g a s u rp ris e party f o r m e, a tw elv e-y ear- o ld fr ie n d o f m in e su gges te d a p arty g am e to h elp in tr o du ce th e g u ests t o e a ch o th er. W e w ere to w rit e dow n a q u es tio n , d ro p i t i n a b ox, an d t h en t a k e t u rn s, e a ch p ers o n d ra w in g o u t a q u es tio n a n d r es pon din g t o it o u t l o u d. H av in g re ce n tly co n su lt e d w it h vario u s so cia l ser vic e ag en cies an d in du str ia l o rg an iz atio n s, I w as f e eli n g s tr u ck b y h ow o  en p eo p le ex pres se d a h u n ger fo r a p pre cia tio n o n t h e jo b. “ N o m att er h ow h ard y o u w ork ,” t h ey w ou ld sig h , “y o u n ev er h ear a go od w ord fr o m an yo n e. B ut m ak e on e m is ta k e a n d t h ere ’s a lw ay s s o m eo n e ju m pin g a ll o ver y o u .” S o f o r t h e gam e, I w ro te t h is q u estio n : “ W hat a p pre cia tio n m ig h t s o m eo n e giv e yo u t h at w ou ld le av e y o u j u m pin g f o r j o y?” A w om an d re w t h at q u estio n o u t o f t h e box, r e a d it , a n d s ta rte d to c ry. A s di re c to r o f a sh elt e r fo r b att e re d w om en , sh e wou ld p u t c o n sid er ab le e n erg y e a ch m on th in to c re atin g a sc h ed u le to p le a se as m an y p eo p le as p oss ib le . Y et ea ch tim e th e sc h ed u le was p res en te d , at le a st a co u ple of in div id u als wou ld co m pla in . Sh e co u ld n’t rem ember ev er re cei vin g ap pre cia tio n fo r h er e ff orts to d esig n a fa ir sc h ed u le . A ll th is h ad ash ed th ro u gh h er m in d a s s h e r e a d m y q u es tio n , a n d t h e hu n ger f o r a p pre cia tio n bro u gh t t e ars t o h er e y es. U pon h earin g th e w om an ’s sto ry, a n oth er fr ien d o f m in e sa id th at h e, to o, w ou ld li k e t o a n sw er t h e q u es tio n . E ver yo n e els e th en r e q u es te d a t u rn ; as t h ey r e sp on ded t o t h e q u estio n , s e v er al p eo p le w ep t. W hile th e cra v in g fo r ap pre cia tio n — as op p ose d to m an ip u la tiv e “s tr o kes” — is p artic u la rly e v id en t in th e work p la ce, it a ff ects fa m ily li f e as w ell. O ne e v en in g w hen I p oin te d o u t h is f a ilu re to p er fo rm a h ou se ch ore , m y s o n B re tt r e to rte d , “ D ad , a re yo u a w are how o  en y o u b rin g u p w hat’s g o n e w ro n g b u t a lm ost n ev er b rin g u p w hat’s g o n e r ig h t? ” H is o b ser vatio n sta y ed wit h me. I re a li z e d how I was co n tin u ally se arc h in g fo r im pro vem en ts , w hile b are ly sto p pin g to cele b ra te th in gs th at w er e go in g w ell. I had ju st co m ple te d a w ork sh op w it h m ore th an a hu n dre d p artic ip an ts , a ll o f w hom h ad e v alu ate d it v er y h ig h ly , w it h t h e ex cep tio n o f on e p ers o n . H ow ev er, w hat li n gere d in m y m in d w as th at o n e per so n’s d is s a tis fa ctio n . W e t e n d t o n otic e w hat’s w ro n g r a th er t h an w hat’s r ig h t.  at e v en in g I w ro te a s o n g t h at b eg an l i k e t h is : If I ’m n in ety -e ig h t p erc e n t p erfe ct in a n yth in g I d o, it ’s t h e tw o p erc e n t I ’v e m ess e d u p I’l l r e m em ber w hen I ’m t h ro u gh . It o cc u rre d to m e th at I h ad a c h oic e to a d op t in ste a d th e ou tlo ok o f a te a ch er I k n ew . O ne o f h er s tu den ts , h av in g n eg le cte d t o s tu dy f o r a n ex am , had r e sig n ed h im se lf to tu rn in g in a b la n k p ie ce o f p ap er w it h h is n am e at th e to p. H e w as su rp ris e d w hen sh e la te r ret urn ed th e tes t to h im w it h a g ra d e o f 1 4 p erc e n t. “ W hat d id I g et 1 4 p er ce n t f o r? ” h e ask ed i n cre d u lo u sly . “N eatn ess ,” s h e r e p li e d . E ver s in ce h earin g m y s o n B ret t’s w ak e- up c a ll, I ’v e tr ie d t o b e m ore a w are o f w hat o th er s a ro u n d m e a re doin g t h at en ric h es m y li f e , a n d t o h on e m y s k ills i n e x p res sin g t h is a p pre cia tio n . Overc o m in g t h e R elu cta n ce t o E xp re ss A ppre cia tio n I w as d eep ly t o u ch ed b y a p ass a g e in J o h n P ow ell’s b o ok  e Secre t o f S ta yin g in L ove, in w hic h P ow ell d esc rib es h is sa d n ess o ver h av in g b een u n ab le , d u rin g h is fa th er’s li f e tim e, to e x p res s t h e ap pre cia tio n h e fe lt fo r h is fa th er to his fa th er. H ow grie v o u s it se em ed to m e to m is s th e ch an ce of ap pre cia tin g th e p eo p le w ho h av e been th e gre ate st p osit iv e in u en ces in o u r l i v es! Im med ia te ly a n u n cle o f m in e, J u li u s F ox, c a m e to m in d. W hen I w as a b oy, h e c a m e d aily t o o ff er n u rs in g c a re to m y g ra n dm oth er , w ho w as t o ta lly p ara ly ze d . W hile h e c a re d fo r m y g ra n dm oth er , h e alw ay s h ad a w arm a n d lo vin g sm ile o n h is fa ce. N o m att er h ow u nple a sa n t th e ta sk m ay h av e ap p eare d to m y b oyis h e y es, h e tr e ate d h er a s if sh e wer e doin g h im th e gre ate st fa v o r in th e w orld b y le tt in g h im ca re fo r h er .  is p ro vid ed a w on derfu l m od el o f m asc u li n e s tr en gth fo r m e— on e th at I’v e o en c a lle d u p on i n t h e y ears s in ce. I r e a li z e d t h at I h ad n ev er e x p re ss e d m y a p pre cia tio n f o r m y u n cle , w ho h im se lf w as n ow ill a n d n ear d eath . I c o n sid er ed d oin g s o , b u t s en se d m y ow n re sis ta n ce : “ I’m s u re h e a lr e a d y k n ow s h ow m uch h e m ean s to m e, I d on’t n ee d t o e x p re ss it o u t lo u d; b es id es , it m ig h t e m barra ss h im if I p u t it i n to w ord s.” A s s o on a s t h ese t h ou gh ts e n ter ed m y h ea d , I a lr e a d y k n ew t h ey w ere n ’t t r u e. T o o o  en I h ad a ss u m ed t h at o th er s k n ew t h e in ten sit y o f m y ap pre cia tio n fo r th em , o n ly to d is c o ver o th er wis e . A nd e v en w hen p eo p le w ere e m barra ss e d , t h ey s till w an te d t o h ear a p pre cia tio n v er bali z e d . Still h esit a n t, I t o ld m yse lf t h at w ord s c o u ld n’t d o ju stic e t o t h e dep th o f w hat I w is h ed t o c o m mun ic ate . I q u ic k ly s a w t h ro u gh t h at o n e, t h ou gh : y es , word s m ay b e p oor v eh ic le s i n c o n vey in g o u r h eartfe lt r e a li t ies , b u t a s I h av e le arn ed , “ A nyth in g t h at i s w orth d oin g i s w orth d oin g p oorly !” A s it h ap p en ed , I so on fo u n d m yse lf se ate d n ex t to U ncle Ju li u s a t a fa m ily g ath erin g, a n d t h e w ord s s im ply ow ed o u t o f m e. H e to ok t h em in jo yfu lly , w it h ou t em barra ss m en t. B rim min g o ver w it h fe eli n gs fr o m th e ev en in g, I w en t h om e, c o m pose d a p oem a n d s en t it t o h im . I w as la ter t o ld t h at e a ch d ay u ntil h e d ie d th re e week s la ter , m y u n cle had a sk ed th at th e p oem b e r e a d t o h im . Su m mary C on ven tio n al co m pli m en ts o en ta k e th e fo rm of ju dgm en ts , how ev er p osit iv e, a n d a re s o m etim es in te n ded to m an ip u la te t h e beh av io r o f o th er s. N VC e n co u ra g es th e e x p re ss io n o f a p pre cia tio n s o le ly fo r c ele b ra tio n . W e sta te ( 1 ) t h e a ctio n t h at h as c o n tr ib u te d t o o u r w ell- b ei ng, ( 2 ) t h e partic u la r n eed of ou rs th at has been fu l lle d , an d (3 ) th e fe eli n gs of ple a su re e n gen dere d a s a r e su lt . W hen w e re ce iv e ap pre cia tio n ex p res se d in th is w ay, w e ca n d o so w it h ou t a n y f e eli n g o f s u p erio rit y o r f a ls e hu m ili t y — in ste a d w e ca n c ele b ra te a lo n g w it h t h e p ers o n w ho i s o ff erin g t h e ap pre cia tio n . I Epilo gu e on ce a sk ed m y u n cle Ju li u s h ow h e had d ev elo p ed su ch a rem ark ab le c ap acit y to g iv e c o m pass io n ate ly . H e se em ed h on ore d b y m y q u es tio n , w hic h h e p on dere d b efo re r e p ly in g, “ I’v e been b les se d w it h g o od te a ch er s.” W hen I a sk ed w ho t h ese w ere , h e re ca lle d , “ Y ou r g ra n dm oth er w as t h e bes t te a ch er I h ad . Y ou li v ed w it h h er w hen sh e was a lr e a d y ill, so y o u d id n’t k n ow w hat s h e w as r e a lly li k e. F or ex am ple , d id y o u r m oth er e v er te ll y o u ab ou t th e tim e d u rin g th e D ep res sio n w hen y o u r g ra n dm oth er b ro u gh t a ta ilo r a n d h is w if e a n d t w o c h ild ren t o li v e wit h h er f o r t h re e years , a  er h e lo st h is h ou se a n d b u sin ess ? ” I r em ember ed t h e sto ry w ell. I t h ad le a d eep im pre ss io n w hen m y m oth er rst t o ld it t o m e becau se I c o u ld n ev er gu re o u t w here g ra n dm oth er h ad f o u n d s p ace f o r t h e ta ilo r’s f a m ily w hen s h e w as ra is in g n in e c h ild re n o f h er o w n i n a m od es t- s iz e d h ou se! U ncle Ju li u s re co lle c te d m y g ra n dm oth er ’s c o m pass io n in a fe w m ore a n ecd ote s, a ll o f w hic h I h ad h eard a s a c h ild .  en h e ask ed , “ S u re ly y o u r m oth er t o ld y o u a b ou t J e su s.” “ A bou t w ho?” “Je su s.” “ N o, s h e n ev er t o ld m e a b ou t J e su s.”  e s to ry a b ou t J e su s w as t h e n al p re cio u s g i I r e ce iv ed f r o m m y u n cle b efo re he die d . It’s a tr u e sto ry of a tim e when a m an ca m e to m y gra n dm oth er’s back door ask in g fo r so m e fo od .  is w asn ’t unusu al. A lt h ou gh g ra n dm oth er w as v ery p oor, th e en tir e nei gh borh ood k n ew th at sh e w ou ld fe ed a n yo n e w ho s h ow ed u p a t h er d oor.  is m an h ad a b eard a n d w ild , s c ra g g ly b la ck h air ; h is c lo th es w ere ra g ged , a n d h e wore a c ro ss a ro u n d h is n eck f a sh io n ed o u t o f b ra n ch es t ie d w it h r o p e. M y g ra n dm oth er in vit e d h im in to h er k it c h en fo r so m e fo od , a n d w hile h e was e atin g sh e ask ed h is n am e. “M y n am e i s J e su s,” h e r e p li e d . “D o y o u h av e a l a st n am e?” s h e i n qu ir e d . “I am Je su s th e L ord .” (M y gra n dm oth er ’s E ngli s h w asn ’t to o go od . A noth er u n cle , I s id or, la te r t o ld m e h e had c o m e in to t h e kit c h en w hile th e m an w as s till e atin g, a n d g ra n dm oth er h ad in tr o du ce d th e str a n ger a s M r.  elo rd .) A s th e m an c o n tin u ed to e at, m y g ra n dm oth er a sk ed w her e he li v ed . “I d on’t h av e a h om e.” “ W ell, w here a re y o u g o in g t o s ta y t o n ig h t? I t’s c o ld .” “ I d on’t k n ow .” “ W ou ld y o u l i k e t o s ta y h ere ?” s h e o ff ere d . H e s ta y ed s e v en y ears . W hen it c a m e to c o m mun ic atin g n on vio len tly , m y g ra n dm oth er w as a n atu ra l. S h e d id n’t th in k o f w hat th is m an “ w as.” If s h e had , s h e pro b ab ly w ou ld h av e ju dged h im a s c ra zy a n d g o tt en r id o f h im . N o, s h e th ou gh t in t e rm s o f w hat p eo p le fe el a n d w hat t h ey n eed . I f t h ey ’r e hu n gry, fe ed t h em . If t h ey ’r e w it h ou t a r o of o ver t h eir h ea d , g iv e th em a p la ce to s le ep . My g ra n dm oth er lo ved t o d an ce, a n d m y m oth er r em ember s h er s a y in g o en , “ N ev er w alk w hen y o u c a n d an ce.” A nd th u s I e n d th is b o ok o n a la n gu ag e o f c o m pass io n w it h a s o n g a b ou t m y g ra n dm oth er , w ho s p oke an d li v ed t h e l a n gu ag e o f N on vio le n t C om mun ic atio n . O ne day a m an n am ed J e su s ca m e aro u n d t o m y g ra n dm oth er’s d oor. H e ask ed f o r a l i t tle fo od , sh e ga ve him m ore . H e sa id h e w as J e su s t h e Lord ; sh e did n’t c h eck h im o u t w it h R om e. H e sta yed f o r s e v era l y ea rs, a s d id m an y w it h ou t a h om e. It w as i n h er J e w is h w ay, sh e ta u gh t m e w hat J e su s h ad t o s a y. In t h at p re cio u s w ay, sh e ta u gh t m e w hat J e su s h ad t o s a y. A nd t h at’s : “ F eed t h e hu ngry, h ea l t h e sic k , th en t a ke a r e st. Nev er w alk w hen y o u c a n d an ce; m ake yo u r h om e a c o zy n est.” I t w as i n h er J e w is h w ay, sh e ta u gh t m e w hat J e su s h ad t o s a y. In h er p re cio u s w ay, sh e ta u gh t m e w hat J e su s h ad t o s a y. — “G ra n dm a a n d J e su s” b y M arsh all B . R ose n berg Bib li o gra ph y Ali n sk y, S au l D . R ule s fo r R ad ic a ls : A P ra gm atic P rim er fo r R ea li s tic R ad ic a ls . N ew Y ork : R an dom H ou se , 1 971. A re n dt, H an nah . E ic h m an n in Je ru sa le m : A R ep ort o n th e B an ali t y o f E vil. N ew Y ork : V ik in g P re ss , 1 963. B eck er, E rn est.  e B ir th a n d D ea th o f M ea n in g: A n In te rd is c ip li n ary P ersp ectiv e o n th e P ro b le m o f M an . N ew Y ork : F re e P re ss , 1 971. — ——.  e R ev o lu tio n i n P sy ch ia tr y :  e N ew U ndersta n din g o f M an . N ew Y ork : F re e P re ss , 1 964. B en ed ic t, R uth . “ S y n erg y— Patt e rn s o f t h e G ood C ult u re .” P sy ch olo gy T od ay 4 ( Ju n e 1 970): 5 3– 77. B ose ru p, A nders , a n d A ndre w M ack . W ar W it h ou t W ea p on s: N on -V io le n ce in N atio n al D efe n ce . N ew Y ork : S ch ock en B ooks, 1 975. B ow le s, S am uel, a n d H erb ert G in tis . S ch ooli n g in C apit a li s t A m eric a : E du ca tio n al R efo rm a n d th e C on tr a d ic tio n s o f E co n om ic L if e . N ew Y ork : B asic B ooks, 1 976. B uber, M artin . I a n d  ou . T ra n sla te d b y R on ald G re g o r S m it h . N ew Y ork : S crib n er, 1 958. C ra ig , J a m es, a n d M arg u erit e C ra ig . S y n erg ic P ow er B ey o n d D om in atio n a n d P erm is siv en ess . B erk ele y, C A : P ro activ e P re ss , 1 974. D ass , R am .  e O nly D an ce  ere I s . N ew Y ork : J a so n A ro n so n , 1 985. D ass , R am , a n d M ir a b ai B ush . C om pa ssio n in A ctio n : S ettin g O ut o n th e P ath o f S erv ic e . N ew Y ork : B ell T ow er, 1 992. D ass , R am , a n d P au l G orm an . H ow C an I H elp ? S to rie s a n d R efl ectio n s o n S erv ic e . N ew Y ork : K nop f, 1 985. D om hoff , W illi a m G .  e H ig h er C ir c le s:  e G overn in g C la ss in A m eric a . N ew Y ork : V in ta g e B ooks, 1 971. E lli s , A lb ert, a n d R ob ert A . H arp er. A G uid e t o R atio n al L iv in g. E ngle w ood C li ff s, N J: P re n tic e -H all, 1 961. F re ir e , P au lo . P ed ago gy o f t h e O ppre ss e d . T ra n sla te d b y M yra B erg m an R am os. N ew Y ork : H erd er a n d H erd er, 1 970. F ro m m, E ric h . E sc a p e f r o m F re ed om . N ew Y ork : F arra r & R in eh art, I n c., 1 941. F ro m m, E ric h .  e A rt o f L ov in g. N ew Y ork : H arp er & R ow , 1 956. G ard n er, H erb . A  ou sa n d C lo w ns, i n  e C olle cte d P la ys. N ew Y ork : A pp la u se B ooks, 2 000. G en dli n , E ugen e. F ocu sin g. N ew Y ork : E vere st H ou se , 1 978. G le n n, M ic h ael, a n d R ic h ard K un nes. R ep re ssio n o r R ev o lu tio n ?  era py in th e U nit e d S ta te s T od ay. N ew Y ork : H arp er a n d R ow , 1 973. G re en bu rg , D an , a n d M arc ia Ja co b s. H ow to M ake Y ou rse lf M is e ra b le fo r th e R est o f th e C en tu ry : A noth er V it a l T ra in in g M an u al. N ew Y ork : V in ta g e B ooks, 1 987. H arv ey, O .J . C on ce p tu al S yste m s a n d P erso n ali t y O rg a n iz a tio n . N ew Y ork : W ile y, 1 961. Hille su m , E tt y . E tt y : A D ia ry, 1 941– 1943. In tr o du ce d b y J. G . G aarla n dt; tr a n sla te d b y A rn old J. P om era n s. L on don : J o n ath an C ap e, 1 983 H olt , J o h n . H ow C hild re n F ail. N ew Y ork : P it m an , 1 964. H um ph re y s, C hris tm as.  e W ay of A ctio n : A W ork in g P hilo so p h y fo r W este rn L if e . N ew York : M acM illa n , 1 960. Ir w in , R ob ert. B uild in g a P ea ce S yste m : E xp lo ra to ry P ro je ct o n th e C on dit io n s o f P ea ce . E xp ro P re ss , 1 989. Jo h n so n , W en dell. L iv in g w it h C han ge:  e S em an tic s o f C op in g. N ew Y ork : H arp er a n d R ow , 1 972. K atz , M ic h ael B . C la ss , B ure a u cra cy a n d S ch ools :  e I llu sio n o f E du ca tio n al C han ge in A m eric a . N ew Y ork : F re d eric k A . P ra eg er, I n c., 1 975. K atz , M ic h ael B ., e d . S ch ool R efo rm : P ast a n d P re se n t. B osto n : L it t le , B ro w n & C o., 1 971. K au fm an n, W alt e r. W it h ou t G uilt an d Ju stic e : F ro m D ecid op h ob ia to A uto n om y. N ew Y ork : P.H . W yd en , 1 973. K een , S am . H ym ns to a n U nkn ow n G od : A w aken in g th e S p ir it in E very d ay L if e . N ew Y ork : B an ta m B ooks, 1 994. — ——. T o a D an cin g G od . N ew Y ork : H arp er a n d R ow , 1 970. K elly , G eo rg e A .  e P sy ch olo gy o f P erso n al C on str u cts . 2 v o ls . N ew Y ork : N orto n , 1 955. K orn eld , Ja ck . A P ath w it h H ea rt: A G uid e  ro u gh th e P erils a n d P ro m is e s o f S p ir it u al L if e . N ew Y ork : B an ta m B ooks, 1 993. K ozo l, J o n ath an .  e N ig h t I s D ark a n d I A m F ar f r o m H om e. B osto n : H ou gh to n -M iffl in C o., 1 975. K urtz , E rn est, a n d K ath erin e K etc h am .  e S p ir it u ali t y o f I m perfe ctio n : M od ern W is d om fr o m C la ssic S to rie s. N ew Y ork : B an ta m B ooks, 1 992. L yo n s, G ra cie . C on str u ctiv e C rit ic is m : A H an dbook . O ak la n d, C A : I R T P re ss , 1 976. M ag er, R ob ert. P re p arin g I n str u ctio n al O bje ctiv es. B elm on t, C A : F earo n -P it m an P ub., 1 975. M aslo w , A bra h am . E upsy ch ia n M an agem en t. H om ew ood , I L : R ic h ard D . I r w in , 1 965. — ——. T ow ard a P sy ch olo gy o f B ein g. P rin ce to n , N J: V an N ostr a n d, 1 962. M cL au gh li n , C orin ne, a n d G ord on D av id so n . S p ir it u al Poli t ic s: C han gin g th e W orld fr o m th e In sid e O ut. N ew York : B alla n tin e B ooks, 1 994. M ilg ra m , S ta n le y. O bed ie n ce t o A uth orit y : A n E xp erim en ta l V ie w . N ew Y ork : H arp er a n d R ow , 1 974. P ostm an , N eil, a n d C harle s W ein gartn er.  e S o R ev o lu tio n : A S tu den t H an dbook f o r T urn in g S ch ools A ro u n d. N ew Y ork : D ela co rte P re ss , 1 971. — ——. T ea ch in g a s a S u bversiv e A ctiv it y . N ew Y ork : D ela co rte P re ss , 1 969. P ow ell, J o h n .  e S ecre t o f S ta yin g i n L ove. N ile s, I L : A rg u s C om mun ic atio n s, 1 974. — ——. W hy A m I A fr a id t o T ell Y ou W ho I A m ? C hic a g o : A rg u s C om mun ic atio n s, 1 969. P utn ey, S n ell.  e C on qu est o f S ocie ty : S ocio lo gic a l O bse rv a tio n s f o r t h e A uto n om ou s R ev o lt a ga in st t h e A uto sy ste m s W hic h T urn H um an it y i n to S erv o -M en . B elm on t, C A : W ad sw orth , 1 972. R obb en , J o h n . C om in g t o M y S en se s. N ew Y ork :  om as C ro w ell, 1 973. R ogers , C arl. A W ay o f B ein g. N ew Y ork : H ou gh to n M iffl in B ooks, 1 980, p . 1 2. — ——. C arl R ogers o n P erso n al P ow er. N ew Y ork : D ela co rte P re ss , 1 977. — ——. F re ed om to L ea rn : A V ie w o f W hat E du ca tio n M ig h t B eco m e. C olu m bu s, O H : C harle s E . M errill, 1 969. — ——. “S o m e E le m en ts o f E ffectiv e In te rp ers o n al C om mun ic atio n .” M im eo gra p h ed p ap er fr o m sp eech g iv en a t C ali f o rn ia I n stit u te o f T ech n olo gy, P asa d en a, C A , N ov. 9 , 1 964. A W ay o f B ein g. N ew Y ork : H ou gh to n M iffl in B ooks, 1 980, p . 1 2. Rose n berg , M arsh all. M utu al E du ca tio n : T ow ard A uto n om y an d In te rd ep en den ce . Seatt le : Sp ecia l C hild P ubli c atio n s, 1 972. R yan , W illi a m . B la m in g t h e V ic tim . N ew Y ork : V in ta g e B ooks, 1 976. S ch eff ,  om as J ., e d . L ab eli n g M ad n ess . E ngle w ood C li ff s, N J: P re n tic e -H all, 1 975. S ch m ook le r, A ndre w B ard . O ut o f W ea kn ess : H ea li n g th e W ou n ds  at D riv e U s to W ar. N ew Y ork : B an ta m B ooks, 1 988. Sh arp , G en e. S ocia l P ow er a n d P oli t ic a l F re ed om . B osto n : P orte r S arg en t, 1 980. Ste in er, C la u de. S crip ts P eo p le L iv e: T ra n sa ctio n al A naly sis o f L if e S crip ts . N ew Y ork : G ro ve P re ss , 1 974. Sza sz ,  om as S . I d eo lo gy a n d I n sa n it y : E ss a ys o n t h e P sy ch ia tr ic D eh u m an iz a tio n o f M an . N ew Y ork : M . B oyars , 1 983. T ag o re , R ab in dra n ath . S a d h an a:  e R ea li z a tio n o f L if e . T u cso n : O m en P re ss , 1 972. e F ou r-P art N on vio le n t C om mun ic a tio n P ro ce ss C le arly e x p re ss in g how I a m w it h ou t b la m in g or c rit ic iz in g E m path ic a lly r e ce iv in g how yo u a re w it h ou t h earin g bla m e o r c rit ic is m O BSE R VA T IO NS 1. W hat I o b se rv e (s e e , h ea r, r e m em ber, im agin e, fr e e fr o m m y ev a lu atio n s) th at d oes or does not co n tr ib u te to my well- b ein g: “ W hen I (s e e , h ea r) … ” 1 . What yo u ob se rv e (s e e , hea r, r e m em ber, im agin e, fr e e fr o m yo u r ev a lu atio n s) th at does or does not co n tr ib u te to y o u r w ell- b ein g: “ W hen y o u se e/ hea r … ” (S om etim es u n sp ok en w hen o ff erin g e m path y) F E ELIN GS 2. How I fe el ( e m otio n or se n sa tio n ra th er th an th ou gh t) in r e la tio n t o w hat I o b se rv e: “ I fe el … ” 2 . How yo u fe el ( e m otio n or se n sa tio n ra th er th an th ou gh t) in r e la tio n to what yo u ob se rv e: “Y ou f e el … ” N EED S 3. W hat I n eed o r v alu e (r a th er th an a p re fe re n ce , o r a sp ecifi c actio n ) t h at c au se s m y fe eli n gs: “ … b eca u se I n eed /v a lu e … ” 3 . W hat y o u n eed o r v alu e (r a th er th an a pre fe re n ce , or a sp ecifi c actio n ) th at c au se s y o u r fe eli n gs: “ … b eca u se yo u n eed /v a lu e … ” Cle arly r e q u estin g t h at w hic h w ou ld e n ric h m y l i f e w it h ou t d em an din g E m path ic a lly r e ce iv in g t h at w hic h w ou ld e n ric h yo u r l i f e w it h ou t h earin g a n y d em an d REQ UEST S 4.  e co n cre te actio n s I w ou ld li k e ta k en : “W ou ld y o u b e w illi n g t o … ? ” 4 .  e co n cre te actio n s yo u w ou ld li k e ta k en : “ W ou ld y o u li k e … ? ” ( S om etim es u n sp ok en w hen o ff erin g e m path y) © M arsh all B . R ose n berg . F or m ore i n fo rm atio n a b ou t M arsh all B . R ose n berg o r t h e C en te r f o r N on vio le n t C om mun ic atio n , p le a se v is it w ww.C N VC.o rg . Som e B asic F eeli n gs W e A ll H av e F eeli n gs w hen n eed s a re f u lfi lle d A m aze d C om fo rta b le C on den t E ag er E nerg etic F u l lle d G la d H op efu l In sp ir e d In tr ig u ed Jo yo u s M oved O ptim is tic P ro u d R eli e v ed S tim ula te d S u rp ris e d  an kfu l Tou ch ed T ru stfu l F eeli n gs w hen n eed s a re n ot f u lfi lle d A ngry A nnoyed C on ce rn ed C on fu se d D is a p p oin te d D is c o u ra g ed D is tr e ss e d E m barra ss e d F ru str a te d Help le ss H op ele ss Im patie n t Ir rit a te d L on ely N erv o u s O verw helm ed P uzzle d R elu cta n t Sad U nco m fo rta b le S om e B asic N eed s W e A ll H av e A uto n om y Choosin g d re am s/g o als /v alu es C hoosin g p la n s f o r f u l lli n g o n e’s d re am s, g o als , v alu es C ele b ra tio n C ele b ra tin g t h e c re atio n o f l i f e a n d d re am s f u l lle d C ele b ra tin g l o ss e s: l o ved o n es, d re am s, et c. ( m ou rn in g) In te g rit y A uth en tic it y C re ativ it y M ean in g Self – w orth I n te rd ep en den ce A cce p ta n ce A ppre cia tio n C lo se n ess C om mun it y Con sid era tio n C on tr ib u tio n t o t h e e n ric h m en t o f l i f e E m otio n al S afe ty E m path y H on esty (th e e m pow erin g h on esty th at en ab les u s to le arn fr o m o u r li m it a tio n s) L ove R ea ssu ra n ce R esp ec t S u pp ort T ru st U ndersta n din g P hysic a l N urtu ra n ce A ir F o od M ovem en t, e x erc is e P ro te c tio n f r o m li f e -th re ate n in g f o rm s o f li f e: v ir u ses , b acter ia , in se cts , p re d ato ry a n im als R est S ex u al E xp re ss io n Sh elt e r T ou ch W ate r P la y F u n L au gh te r S p ir it u al C om mun io n B eau ty H arm on y In sp ir a tio n O rd er P ea ce © CN VC. P le a se v is it w ww.C N VC.o rg t o l e arn m ore . Abou t N on vio le n t C om mun ic a tio n N on vio le n t C om mun ic atio n has ou ris h ed fo r m ore th an fo u r deca d es a cro ss s ix ty c o u ntr ie s s e lli n g m ore th an 1 ,0 00,0 00 b o oks i n o ver t h ir ty l a n gu ag es f o r o n e sim ple re a so n : i t w ork s. Fro m th e bed ro om to th e board ro om , fr o m th e cla ss ro om to th e war zo n e, N on vio le n t C om mun ic atio n ( N VC) i s c h an gin g li v es e v ery d ay. N VC p ro vid es a n e a sy -to -g ra sp , e ff ec tiv e m eth od to g et t o t h e r o ot o f v io le n ce a n d p ain p ea ce fu lly . B y e x am in in g t h e u n m et n eed s b eh in d w hat w e d o an d s a y, N VC h elp s r e d u ce h ostili t y , h ea l p ain , a n d s tr e n gth en p ro fe ss io n al a n d p ers o n al r e la tio n sh ip s. N VC i s n ow b ein g t a u gh t i n c o rp ora tio n s, c la ss ro om s, p ris o n s, a n d m ed ia tio n c e n te rs w orld w id e. A nd it is aff ectin g cu lt u ra l sh i s as in stit u tio n s, co rp ora tio n s, an d go vern m en ts in te g ra te N VC co n sc io u sn ess i n to t h eir o rg an iz atio n al s tr u ctu re s a n d t h eir a p pro ach t o l e a d ersh ip . M ost o f u s a re h u n gry fo r s k ills th at c a n im pro ve th e q u ali t y o f o u r r e la tio n sh ip s, to d eep en o u r se n se o f p ers o n al e m pow erm en t o r s im ply h elp u s c o m mun ic ate m ore e ff ectiv ely . U nfo rtu n ate ly , m ost o f u s h av e b een ed u cate d fr o m bir th to co m pete , ju dge, d em an d, an d d ia g n ose ; to th in k an d co m mun ic ate i n t e rm s o f w hat i s “ r ig h t” a n d “ w ro n g” w it h p eo p le . A t b est, t h e h ab it u al w ay s w e t h in k an d s p ea k h in der c o m mun ic atio n a n d c re ate m is u n dersta n din g o r fr u str a tio n . A nd s till w ors e , th ey ca n c au se a n ger a n d p ain , a n d m ay le a d t o v io le n ce. W it h ou t w an tin g t o , e v en p eo p le w it h t h e b est o f in te n tio n s g en era te n eed le ss c o n ic t. N VC h elp s u s r e a ch b en eath t h e s u rfa ce a n d d is c o ver w hat i s a li v e a n d v it a l w it h in u s, a n d h ow a ll o f o u r actio n s are b ase d o n h u m an n eed s th at w e are se ek in g to m eet. W e le arn to d ev elo p a vo ca b u la ry o f f e eli n gs a n d n eed s t h at h elp s u s m ore c le arly e x p re ss w hat i s g o in g o n i n u s a t a n y g iv en m om en t. W hen w e u n dersta n d a n d a ck n ow le d ge o u r n eed s, w e d ev elo p a s h are d f o u n datio n f o r m uch m ore sa tis fy in g re la tio n sh ip s. Jo in th e th ou sa n ds o f p eo p le w orld w id e w ho h av e im pro ved th eir r e la tio n sh ip s a n d t h eir l i v es w it h t h is s im ple y et r e v o lu tio n ary p ro ce ss . Abou t P udd le D an ce r P re ss P udd le D an ce r Pre ss (P D P) is th e prem ier pu bli s h er of Non vio len t Com mun ic atio n ™ re la te d w ork s. It s m is s io n is to pro vid e hig h -q u ali t y m ate ria ls to help peo p le cre ate a w orld in w hic h all need s are met co m pass io n ate ly . B y w ork in g in p artn ersh ip w it h t h e Cen ter f o r N on vio len t Com mun ic atio n a n d N VC tr a in er s, te am s, a n d lo ca l su pp orte rs , P D P h as cre ate d a c o m pre h en siv e p ro m otio n e ff ort th at h as h elp ed b rin g N VC to t h ou sa n ds o f n ew p eo p le e a ch y ear. S in ce 1998 PD P has don ate d m ore th an 60,0 00 N VC bo oks to o rg an iz atio n s, d ecis io n -m ak ers , a n d i n div id u als i n n eed a ro u n d t h e w orld . V is it t h e P D P w eb sit e a t w ww.N on vio le n tC om mun ic atio n .c o m t o n d t h e fo llo w in g r e so u rc e s: S h op N VC — Con tin u e y o u r le arn in g. P urc h ase ou r N VC tit les o n li n e sa fe ly , aff ord ab ly , an d co n ven ien tly . Fin d ev er yd ay dis c o u nts on in div id u al t it le s, m ult ip le -c o p ie s, a n d b o ok p ack ag es. L earn m ore ab ou t ou r au th ors an d re a d en dors e m en ts o f N VC fr o m w orld -r en ow ned co m mun ic atio n ex p erts an d pea cem ak er s. w ww.N on vio le n tC om mun ic atio n .c o m /s to re/ N VC Q uic k C on nect e-N ew sle tt e r — Sig n up to d ay to re ce iv e ou r m on th ly e-N ew sle tt e r, lle d w it h ex per t artic les , u p co m in g tr a in in g op p ortu n it ie s w it h o u r a u th ors , a n d ex clu siv e sp ecia ls o n N VC l e arn in g m ate ria ls . A rc h iv ed e -N ew sle tt e rs a re als o a v aila b le A bou t N VC — Learn m ore a b ou t th ese li f e -c h an gin g co m mun ic atio n an d co n ic t re so lu tio n sk ills in clu din g an over vie w of th e NVC pro ce ss , k ey f a cts a b ou t N VC, a n d m ore . A bou t M arsh all R ose n berg — Acce ss p re ss m ate ria ls , b io gra p hy, a n d m ore ab ou t th is w orld -r e n ow ned p ea cem ak er , ed u cato r, bes ts e lli n g au th or, a n d f o u n der o f t h e C en te r f o r N on vio len t C om mun ic atio n . Fre e R eso u rc e s f o r L ea rn in g N VC — Fin d f r e e w eek ly t ip s s e rie s, N VC artic le a rc h iv e, a n d o th er g re at r es ou rc e s to m ak e le arn in g th es e vit a l co m mun ic atio n s k ills j u st a l i t t le ea sier . For m ore i n fo rm atio n , p le a se c o n ta ct P udd le D an ce r P re ss a t: 2 240 E ncin it a s B lv d ., S te . D -9 11 • E ncin it a s, C A 9 2024 P hon e: 7 60-6 52-5 754 • F ax : 7 60-2 74-6 400 Abou t t h e C en te r f o r N on vio le n t C om mun ic a tio n  e C en te r fo r N on vio le n t C om mun ic atio n (C N VC) is an in ter natio n al n on pro t pea ce m ak in g org an iz atio n whose vis io n is a world wher e ev ery o n e’s n eed s a re m et p ea ce fu lly . C N VC is d ev o te d to su pp ortin g th e sp re a d o f N on vio le n t C om mun ic atio n ( N VC) a ro u n d t h e w orld . Fou n ded in 1984 by D r. M arsh all B. R osen ber g, C N VC has been co n tr ib u tin g t o a v ast s o cia l t r a n sfo rm atio n i n t h in kin g, s p ea k in g a n d a ctin g — sh ow in g peo p le how to co n nect in w ay s th at in sp ir e co m pass io n ate r e su lt s . N VC i s n ow b ein g t a u gh t a ro u n d t h e glo b e in c o m mun it ies , s c h ools , p ris o n s, m ed ia tio n c e n te rs , c h u rc h es , b u sin es ses , p ro fe ss io n al c o n fer en ces , an d m ore . H un dre d s o f ce rti ed tr a in er s a n d h u n dre d s m ore su pp orter s te a ch N VC to te n s o f th ou sa n ds o f p eo p le ea ch year in m ore th an 60 co u ntr ie s. C N VC b eli e v es t h at N VC t r a in in g is a c ru cia l s tep t o c o n tin u e bu ild in g a c o m pass io n ate , p ea ce fu l so cie ty . You r ta x -d ed u ctib le don atio n w ill h elp C N VC co n tin u e to p ro vid e tr a in in g in so m e o f th e most im pover is h ed , vio le n t co rn ers o f th e w orld . It w ill als o su pp ort th e dev elo p m en t an d co n tin u atio n o f o rg an iz e d p ro je c ts a im ed a t b rin gin g N VC t r a in in g t o h ig h – n eed g eo gra p h ic r e g io n s a n d p op u la tio n s. T o m ak e a ta x -d ed u ctib le d on atio n o r to le arn m ore ab ou t th e valu ab le r e so u rc e s d esc rib ed b elo w , v is it t h e C N VC w eb sit e a t w ww.C N VC.o rg : T ra in in g an d C ertifi ca tio n — Fin d lo ca l, n atio n al, an d in ter natio n al tr a in in g o p p ortu n it ie s, a cce ss t r a in er c er ti catio n i n fo rm atio n , c o n nect to l o ca l N VC c o m mun it ie s, t r a in er s, a n d m ore . C N VC B ooksto re — Fin d m ail or ph on e ord er in fo rm atio n fo r a co m ple te s e le c tio n o f N VC b o oks, b o ok let s, a u dio , a n d v id eo m ater ia ls a t t h e C N VC w eb sit e . C N VC P ro je cts — Partic ip ate in o n e o f t h e s e v era l r eg io n al a n d t h em e- base d p ro je c ts t h at p ro vid e f o cu s a n d le a d ersh ip f o r t e a ch in g N VC i n a p artic u la r a p p li c atio n o r g eo gra p h ic r eg io n . E -G ro u ps a n d L is t S er v s — Jo in o n e o f s e v era l m od era te d , t o p ic -b ase d N VC e -g ro u p s a n d li s t s e rv s d ev elo p ed to s u pp ort in div id u al le arn in g an d t h e c o n tin u ed g ro w th o f N VC w orld w id e. F or m ore i n fo rm atio n , p le a se c o n ta ct C N VC a t: 9 301 I n dia n S ch ool R d., N E, S u it e 2 04, A lb u qu erq u e, N M 8 7112-2 861 P h: 5 05-2 44-4 041 • U S O nly : 8 00-2 55-7 696 • F ax : 5 05-2 47-0 414 E m ail: c n [email protected] CN VC.o rg • W eb sit e : w ww.C N VC.o rg Non vio le n t C om mun ic a tio n C om pan io n W ork b ook, 2n d E dit io n A P ra ctic a l G uid e f o r I n div id u al, G ro u p, o r C la ssr o om S tu dy by L u cy L eu T ra d e P ap er 7 x1 0, 2 40p p IS B N : 9 78-1 -8 92005-2 9-8 L earn in g N on vio le n t C om mun ic atio n h as o  en b een e q u ate d w it h le arn in g a w hole n ew la n gu ag e.  e N VC C om pan io n W ork b ook h elp s y o u p u t t h ese p ow erfu l, eff ec tiv e sk ills in to pra ctic e w it h ch ap ter -b y-c h ap ter stu dy of M arsh all R ose n berg ’s c o rn ersto n e tex t, N VC: A L an gu age of L if e . C re ate a sa fe , su pp ortiv e g ro u p le arn in g o r p ra ctic e en vir o n m en t th at n u rtu res th e n eed s of ea ch partic ip an t. Fin d a w ea lt h of activ it ies , ex er cis es , an d fa cili t a to r s u ggestio n s to re n e a n d p ra ctic e th is p ow er fu l c o m mun ic atio n p ro ce ss . N on vio le n t C om mun ic a tio n h as fl ou ris he d fo r m ore tha n fo u r d eca d es a cro ss six ty c o u n tr ie s se lli n g m ore th an 1, 000, 000 books fo r a sim ple r e a so n : i t w ork s. S A V E a n e x tr a 1 0% a t N on vio le n tC om mun ic atio n .c o m w it h c o d e: b ook ad s Sp ea k P ea ce i n a W orld o f C on fl ic t W hat Y ou S ay N ex t W ill C han ge You r W orld b y M arsh all B . R ose n berg , P hD Tra d e P ap er 5 -3 /8 x8 -3 /8 , 2 08p p IS B N : 9 78-1 -8 92005-1 7-5 In te rn atio n al p ea ce m ak er, m ed ia to r, a n d h ea ler , M arsh all R osen ber g s h ow s yo u h ow th e la n gu ag e y o u u se is th e key to en ric h in g li f e . S p ea k P ea ce is lle d w it h in sp ir in g s to rie s, le ss o n s, a n d id ea s d ra w n f r o m m ore th an fo rty y ears o f m ed ia tin g c o n ic ts a n d h ea li n g r e la tio n sh ip s in s o m e o f th e m ost w ar- to rn , im poveris h ed , an d vio len t co rn er s o f th e world . F in d in sig h t, p ra ctic a l sk ills , an d pow erfu l to ols th at w ill pro fo u n dly ch an ge yo u r re la tio n sh ip s a n d t h e c o u rs e o f y o u r l i f e fo r t h e bet ter . D is c o ver h ow y o u c a n c re ate a n in ter nal c o n sc io u sn ess o f p ea ce as t h e rst ste p to w ard eff ec tiv e pers o n al, pro fe ss io n al, an d so cia l ch an ge. Fin d co m ple te c h ap te rs o n t h e m ech an ic s o f S p ea k in g P ea ce, c o n ic t r es olu tio n , tr a n sfo rm in g bu sin ess cu lt u re , tr a n sfo rm in g en em y im ag es , ad dres sin g te rro ris m , tr a n sfo rm in g a u th orit a ria n str u ctu res , ex pres sin g a n d re cei vin g gra tit u de, a n d s o cia l c h an ge. N on vio le n t C om mun ic a tio n h as fl ou ris he d fo r m ore tha n fo u r d eca d es a cro ss six ty c o u n tr ie s se lli n g m ore th an 1, 000, 000 books fo r a sim ple r e a so n : i t w ork s. Availa b le fr o m P udd le D an ce r P re ss, th e C en te r fo r N on vio le n t C om mun ic a tio n , all m ajo r b ooksto re s, a n d A m azo n .c o m . D is tr ib u te d b y I n dep en den t P ubli s h er’s G ro u p: 8 00-8 88-4 741. Con nectin g A cro ss D iff ere n ce s, 2n d E dit io n Fin din g C om m on G ro u n d W it h A nyo n e, A nyw here , A nytim e by J a n e M ara n tz C on nor, P hD a n d D ia n K illi a n , P hD Tra d e P ap er 6 x9 , 4 16p p IS B N : 9 78-1 -8 92005-2 4-3 P ro fo u n d C on nectio n I s J u st a C on versa tio n A w ay ! In th is fu lly r e v is e d s e co n d e d it io n , D r. D ia n K illi a n a n d D r. Ja n e M ara n tz C on nor o ff er a n a cce ss ib le g u id e fo r e x p lo rin g th e co n cep ts , a p p li c atio n s, a n d tr a n sfo rm ativ e pow er of th e Non vio len t C om mun ic atio n pro ces s. D is c o ver sim ple , yet tr a n sfo rm ativ e sk ills to cre ate a li f e of ab u n dan ce, b u ild in g th e p ers o n al, p ro fe ss io n al, a n d c o m mun it y c o n nectio n s y o u lo n g fo r. N ow w it h a n e x p an ded s e le c tio n o f b ro ad ly a p p li c a b le ex ercis es , r o le- pla y s, a n d activ it ie s. D eta ile d an d co m pre h en siv e, th is co m bin ed bo ok an d w ork b o ok e n han ce s c o m mun ic atio n sk ills b y in tr o du cin g th e basic N VC m od el, a s w ell a s m ore a d van ce d N VC p ra ctic e s. SA V E a n e x tr a 1 0% a t N on vio le n tC om mun ic atio n .c o m w it h c o d e: b ook ad s Resp ectfu l P are n ts , R esp ectfu l K id s 7 K ey s t o T urn F am ily C on flic t I n to C o-o p era tio n b y S u ra H art a n d V ic to ria K in dle H od so n T ra d e P ap er 7 .5 x9 .2 5, 2 56p p IS B N : 9 78-1 -8 92005-2 2-9 S to p th e S tr u gg le — Fin d th e C o- op era tio n a n d M utu al R esp ect Y ou W an t! D o m ore th an s im ply c o rre c t b ad b eh av io r— n ally u n lo ck y o u r p aren tin g pote n tia l. U se th is h an dbo ok to m ove bey o n d ty p ic a l d is c ip li n e te ch n iq u es an d b eg in cre atin g an en vir o n m en t b ase d o n m utu al res pect, em otio n al sa fe ty , a n d p osit iv e, o p en c o m mun ic atio n . R esp ectfu l P are n ts , R esp ectfu l K id s o ff ers 7 S im ple K ey s to d is c o ver th e m utu al re sp ect an d n u rtu rin g re la tio n sh ip s y o u ’v e b een l o okin g f o r. U se t h ese 7 K ey s t o : Set rm l i m it s w it h ou t u sin g d em an ds o r c o er cio n A ch ie v e m utu al r e sp ec t w it h ou t b ei ng s u bm is s iv e S u cce ss fu lly p re v en t, r e d u ce, a n d r es olv e co n ic ts E m pow er yo u r kid s to op en up, co -o p er ate , an d re a li z e th ei r fu ll p ote n tia l M ak e y o u r h om e a N o-F au lt Z on e w here t r u st t h riv es A vaila b le fr o m P udd le D an ce r P re ss, th e C en te r fo r N on vio le n t C om mun ic a tio n , all m ajo r b ooksto re s, a n d A m azo n .c o m . D is tr ib u te d b y I n dep en den t P ubli s h er’s G ro u p: 8 00-8 88-4 741. e E m path y F acto r You r C om petit iv e A dva n ta ge fo r P erso n al, T ea m , a n d B usin ess S u cc e ss b y M arie R . M iy a sh ir o , A .P .R . Tra d e P ap er 6 x9 , 2 56p p IS B N : 9 78-1 -8 92005-2 5-0 “ B re a k th ro u gh th in kin g fr o m co ver to co ver.  e Em path y F acto r w ill h elp th ou gh tfu l b u sin ess p eo p le a d d s u bsta n ce a n d dim en sio n t o r e la tio n sh ip s w it h in t h e w ork fo rc e — co lle a g u es a n d cu sto m ers.” — JA M ES B . H AY ES , F orm er P ubli s h er, F O RT U N E M ag azin e In th is gro u n dbre a k in g bo ok, aw ard -w in nin g co m mun ic atio n an d org an iz atio n al str a te g is t M arie Miy ash ir o ex p lo res th e mis s in g elem ent le a d ers m ust e m plo y t o b u ild p ro ts a n d p ro du ctiv it y i n t h e new e co n om y— E m path y.  e Em path y Facto r ta k es D r. M arsh all Rose n berg ’s w ork dev elo p in g C om pass io n ate Com mun ic atio n in to th e bu sin es s co m mun it y by in tr o du cin g In te g ra te d C la rit y ®— a p ow erfu l fr a m ew ork yo u ca n u se to u n dersta n d an d eff ec tiv ely m eet th e crit ic a l n eed s of yo u r org an iz a tio n w it h ou t c o m pro m is in g t h ose o f y o u r em plo yees o r c u sto m ers . SA V E a n e x tr a 1 0% a t N on vio le n tC om mun ic atio n .c o m w it h c o d e: b ook ad s Word s  at W ork I n B usin ess A P ra ctic a l G uid e to E ffectiv e C om m unic a tio n i n t h e W ork p la ce b y I k e L asa te r w it h J u li e S tile s T ra d e P ap er 5 -3 /8 x8 -3 /8 , 1 44p p IS B N : 9 78-1 -8 92005-0 1-4 D o Y ou W an t t o B e H ap pie r, M ore E ff ectiv e, a n d E xp erie n ce L ess S tr e ss a t W ork ? D o y o u w is h f o r m ore r e sp ec tfu l w ork r e la tio n sh ip s? T o m ove bey o n d g o ss ip a n d p ow er str u gg le s, to im pro ved tr u st an d p ro du ctiv it y ? If yo u ’v e ev er w on dere d if ju st o n e p ers o n ca n p osit iv ely a ff ect w ork re la tio n sh ip s a n d co m pan y c u lt u re , r e g ard le ss o f y o u r p osit io n , t h is b o ok o ff ers a r es ou n din g “y es.”  e k ey i s s h i in g h ow w e th in k a n d t a lk . F orm er att o rn ey -tu rn ed -m ed ia to r, Ik e Lasa ter , off er s pra ctic a l co m mun ic atio n sk ills m atc h ed w it h re co gn iz a b le work sc e n ario s to h elp a n yo n e a d dre ss t h e m ost c o m mon w ork p la ce re la tio n sh ip c h allen ges . L earn p ro ven co m mun ic atio n sk ills to : E njo y yo u r w ork d ay m ore; eff ectiv ely h an dle d iffi cu lt c o n vers a tio n s; r e d u ce w ork p la ce co n ic t a n d s tr es s; i m pro ve in div id u al a n d te am p ro du ctiv it y ; b e m ore eff ectiv e at m eet in gs; a n d g iv e an d r e ce iv e m ean in gfu l f e ed back . Availa b le fr o m P udd le D an ce r P re ss, th e C en te r fo r N on vio le n t C om mun ic a tio n , all m ajo r b ooksto re s, a n d A m azo n .c o m . D is tr ib u te d b y I n dep en den t P ubli s h er’s G ro u p: 8 00-8 88-4 741. Bein g G en uin e Sto p B ein g N ic e , S ta rt B ein g R ea l b y  om as d ’A nse m bou rg T ra d e P ap er 5 -3 /8 x8 -3 /8 , 2 80p p IS B N : 9 78-1 -8 92005-2 1-2 B ein g G en u in e b rin gs  om as d ’A nse m bou rg ’s b lo ck b u ster F ren ch tit le to t h e E ngli s h m ark et. H is w ork o ff er s y o u a fr es h n ew p er sp ectiv e on th e pro ven s k ills o ff ere d in th e b ests e lli n g b o ok, N on vio le n t C om munic a tio n : A L an gu age of L if e . D ra w in g o n h is o w n r e a l- li f e e x am ples a n d s to ries ,  om as d ’A nse m bou rg p ro vid es p ra ctic a l s k ills a n d c o n cret e ste p s th at a llo w u s to s a fe ly re m ove th e m ask s w e w ear, w hic h pre v en t th e in tim acy an d sa tis fa ctio n w e d esir e w it h o u r in tim ate partn ers , c h ild ren , p aren ts , f r ien ds, fa m ily , a n d c o lle a g u es. “  ro u gh th is bo ok, w e ca n fe el N on vio len t C om mun ic atio n n ot as a fo rm ula bu t as a ric h , m ean in gfu l w ay of li f e , both in te lle ctu ally an d em otio n ally .” — Vic k i R ob in , c o -fo u n der, C on vers a tio n C afe s, c o au th or, Y ou r M on ey o r Y ou r L if e B ase d o n M arsh all R ose n berg ’s N on vio le n t C om mun ic a tio n p ro ce ss SA V E a n e x tr a 1 0% a t N on vio le n tC om mun ic atio n .c o m w it h c o d e: b ook ad s Pea ce fu l L iv in g D aily M ed it a tio n s f o r L iv in g W it h L ove, H ea li n g, a n d C om pa ssio n b y M ary M ack en zie T ra d e P ap er 5 x7 .5 , 4 48p p IS B N : 9 78-1 -8 92005-1 9-9 In th is gath erin g of w is d om , M ary M ack en zie em pow er s yo u w it h an in tim ate li f e m ap th at w ill li t e ra lly c h an ge th e co u rs e of y o u r li f e fo r th e bett e r. E ach o f th e 3 66 m ed it a tio n s in clu des an in sp ir a tio n al q u ote an d co n cre te , p ra ctic a l tip s fo r in te g ra tin g th e daily m ess a g e in to y o u r li f e .  e le arn ed b eh av io rs o f c y n ic is m , res en tm en t, a n d g ett in g e v en a re rep la ce d w it h th e sk ills o f N on vio le n t C om mun ic atio n , in clu din g re co gn iz in g o n e’s n eed s a n d v alu es a n d m ak in g c h oic e s i n a li g n m en t w it h t h em . Pea ce fu l L iv in g go es b ey o n d d aily affi rm atio n s, p ro vid in g th e sk ills an d co n sc io u sn ess y o u n eed to tr a n sfo rm r e la tio n sh ip s, h ea l p ain , a n d d is c o ver th e li f e -e n ric h in g m ean in g b eh in d e v en th e most tr y in g sit u atio n s. B eg in e a ch d ay c e n te re d a n d c o n nec te d to y o u rs e lf a n d y o u r v alu es . D ir e ct th e co u rs e o f y o u r l i f e t o w ard y o u r d eep es t h op es a n d n eed s. G ro u n d y o u rs e lf i n t h e p ow er o f c o m pass io n ate , c o n sc io u s l i v in g. A vaila b le fr o m P udd le D an ce r P re ss, th e C en te r fo r N on vio le n t C om mun ic a tio n , all m ajo r b ooksto re s, a n d A m azo n .c o m . D is tr ib u te d b y I n dep en den t P ubli s h er’s G ro u p: 8 00-8 88-4 741. e N o-F au lt C la ssr o om Tools t o R eso lv e C on flic t & F oste r R ela tio n sh ip I n te lli g en ce b y S u ra H art a n d V ic to ria K in dle H od so n T ra d e P ap er 8 .5 x1 1, 2 56p p IS B N : 9 78-1 -8 92005-1 8-2 S tu den ts C an R eso lv e  eir O wn C on fl ic ts ! O fferin g f a r m ore t h an d is c ip li n e t e ch n iq u es t h at m ove ag gres siv e beh av io r o u t o f t h e c la ss ro om t o t h e p la y g ro u n d o r s id ew alk ,  e No-F au lt C la ssr o om le a d s stu den ts ag es 7 – 12 to d ev elo p sk ills in p ro blem so lv in g, em path ic li s te n in g, a n d c o n ic t r e so lu tio n t h at w ill l a st a l i f et im e.  e b o ok’s 2 1 in te ra ctiv e a n d step -b y-s tep les so n s, c o n str u ctio n m ater ia ls , a n d a d ap ta b le s c rip ts g iv e e d u cato rs t h e to ols t h ey n eed t o r et urn o rd er a n d co op era tio n to th e cla ss ro om a n d ju m psta rt en gag ed le arn in g— fr o m th e ru ra l sc h ool to th e in ner cit y , th e ch arter sc h ool, to th e hom e sc h ool cla ss ro om . C urric u la r T ie- in s g u id e te a ch ers to u se th e c o n ic t res olu tio n to ols t h ey ’v e d ev elo p ed t o m eet s ta te l e arn in g r e q u ir em ents i n s o cia l s tu dies , la n gu ag e a rts , h is to ry, r e a d in g, a n d s c ien ce. S A V E a n e x tr a 1 0% a t N on vio le n tC om mun ic atio n .c o m w it h c o d e: b ook ad s e C om passio n ate C la ssr o om R ela tio n sh ip B ase d T ea ch in g a n d L ea rn in g b y S u ra H art a n d V ic to ria K in dle H od so n T ra d e P ap er 7 .5 x9 .2 5, 2 08p p IS B N : 9 78-1 -8 92005-0 6-9 W hen C om passio n  riv es, S o D oes L ea rn in g Learn p ow erfu l sk ills to c re ate a n em otio n ally sa fe le arn in g en vir o n m en t where a ca d em ic e x celle n ce t h riv es. B uild t r u st, r e d u ce c o n ic t, im pro ve co – op era tio n , an d m ax im iz e th e poten tia l of ea ch stu den t as yo u cre ate r e la tio n sh ip -c e n te re d cla ss ro om s.  is h ow -to gu id e off er s cu sto m iz a b le e x erc is e s, a ctiv it ie s, c h arts , a n d c u to u ts th at m ak e it e a sy fo r e d u cato rs to c re ate l e ss o n p la n s f o r a d ay, a w eek , o r a n en tir e sc h ool y ear. A n ex cep tio n al re so u rc e fo r ed u cato rs , hom esc h ool paren ts , ch ild -c a re pro vid er s, an d m en to rs . “ E du catio n is n ot s im ply a b ou t t e a ch er s c o ver in g a c u rric u lu m ; it is a d an ce o f re la tio n sh ip s.  e Com pa ssio n ate Cla ssr o om p re se n ts b oth th e c a se fo r te a ch in g c o m pass io n ate ly a n d a w id e ra n ge o f p ra ctic a l to ols to m ax im iz e stu den t p ote n tia l.” — Tim S eld in , p re sid en t,  e M on te ss o ri F ou n datio n A vaila b le f r o m P udd le D an ce r P re ss, t h e C en te r f o r N on vio le n t C om mun ic a tio n , a ll m ajo r b ooksto re s, a n d A m azo n .c o m . D is tr ib u te d b y I n dep en den t P ubli s h er’s G ro u p: 8 00-8 88-4 741. Lif e -E nric h in g E du ca tio n N on vio le n t C om munic a tio n H elp s Sch ools Im pro ve Perfo rm an ce , Red u ce C on flic t, a n d E nhan ce Rela tio n sh ip s b y M arsh all B . R ose n berg , P hD Tra d e P ap er 6 x9 , 1 92p p IS B N : 9 78-1 -8 92005-0 5-2 F ille d w it h in sig h t, ad ap ta b le ex ercis es , an d ro le- pla y s, L if e- Enric h in g E du ca tio n g iv es ed u cato rs p ra ctic a l sk ills to g en er ate m utu ally res pectfu l cla ss ro om re la tio n sh ip s. D is c o ver h ow ou r la n gu ag e an d org an iz atio n al str u ctu re s d ir e c tly im pact s tu den t p oten tia l, tr u st, s e lf – es te em , a n d s tu den t en jo ym en t in th eir le arn in g. R ed is c o ver th e jo y o f te a ch in g in a c la ss ro om w here e a ch p ers o n’s n eed s a re r es pecte d ! N VC W ill E m pow er Y ou t o : G et t o t h e h eart o f c la ss ro om c o n ic ts q u ic k ly L is te n s o s tu den ts a re r e a lly h eard M ax im iz e t h e i n div id u al p ote n tia l o f a ll s tu den ts S tr e n gth en stu den t in te re st, ret en tio n , an d co n nectio n to th ei r sc h oolw ork Im pro ve t r u st a n d c o n nec tio n i n y o u r c la ss ro om c o m mun it y L et g o o f u n hea lt h y, c o erc iv e t e a ch in g s ty les I m pro ve c la ss ro om t e am work , e ffi cien cy, a n d c o -o p er atio n SA V E a n e x tr a 1 0% a t N on vio le n tC om mun ic atio n .c o m w it h c o d e: b ook ad s Eat b y C hoic e , N ot b y H ab it P ra ctic a l S kill s f o r C re a tin g a H ea lt h y R ela tio n sh ip W it h Y ou r B od y a n d F ood b y S ylv ia H ask vit z 5 -3 /8 x8 -3 /8 , 1 28p p IS B N : 9 78-1 -8 92005-2 0-5 “ F ace Y ou r S tu ff , o r S tu ff Y ou r F ace” — an on ym ou s E atin g is a b asic h u m an n eed . B ut w hat i f y o u a re cau gh t u p i n t h e cy cles o f overc o n su m ptio n o r e m otio n al e atin g? U sin g t h e c o n sc io u sn ess o f N on vio len t C om mun ic atio n , E at b y C hoic e h elp s yo u d ig d eep er in to t h e e m otio n al c o n sc io u sn ess t h at u n der li es y o u r e atin g patt e rn s. M uch m ore th an a p res crip tiv e fa d d iet , yo u ’l l le arn p ra ctic a l str a te g ie s to d ev elo p a h ea lt h ie r r e la tio n sh ip w it h fo od . L earn to en jo y th e ta ste s, s m ells , a n d s e n sa tio n s o f h ea lt h fu l e atin g o n ce ag ain . Availa b le fr o m P udd le D an ce r P re ss, th e C en te r fo r N on vio le n t C om mun ic a tio n , all m ajo r b ooksto re s, a n d A m azo n .c o m . D is tr ib u te d b y I n dep en den t P ubli s h er’s G ro u p: 8 00-8 88-4 741. Tra d e B ook le ts F ro m P udd le D an ce r P re ss B ein g M e, L ovin g Y ou : A P ra ctic a l G uid e t o E xtr a ord in ary R ela tio n sh ip s b y M arsh all B . R ose n berg , P hD • W atc h y o u r re la tio n sh ip s str e n gth en a s y o u le arn to th in k o f lo ve a s so m eth in g y o u “d o,” s o m eth in g y o u g iv e f r e ely f r o m t h e h eart. 8 0p p, I S B N : 9 78-1 -8 92005-1 6-8 Gett in g P ast t h e P ain B etw een U s: H ea li n g a n d R eco n cili a tio n W it h ou t C om pro m is e b y M arsh all B . R ose n berg , P hD • L earn s im ple s te p s t o c re ate t h e h eartfe lt p re se n ce n ece ss a ry f o r la stin g h ea li n g t o o cc u r— gre at f o r m ed ia to rs , c o u n se lo rs , f a m ili e s, a n d c o u ple s. 4 8p p, I S B N : 9 78-1 -8 92005-0 7-6 Gra d u atin g F ro m G uilt : S ix S te p s t o O verc o m e G uilt a n d R ecla im Y ou r L if e b y H olly M ic h elle E ck ert •  e b u rd en o f g u ilt le av es u s s tu ck , s tr e ss e d , a n d fe eli n g li k e w e c a n n ev er m ea su re u p.  ro u gh a p ro ven s ix -s te p p ro ce ss , t h is b o ok h elp s l i b era te y o u f r o m t h e t o xic g u ilt , b la m e, a n d s h am e y o u c a rr y. 9 6p p, I S B N : 9 78-1 -8 92005-2 3-6 e H ea rt o f S o cia l C han ge: H ow to M ake a D iff ere n ce in Y ou r W orld b y M arsh all B . R ose n berg , P hD • L earn h ow c re atin g a n in te rn al c o n sc io u sn ess o f c o m pass io n c a n im pact y o u r s o cia l c h an ge eff orts . 4 8p p, I S B N : 9 78-1 -8 92005-1 0-6 Hum an iz in g H ea lt h C are : C re a tin g C ult u re s of C om pa ssio n W it h N on vio le n t C om m unic a tio n b y M ela n ie S ea rs, R N , M BA • L ev era g in g m ore t h an 2 5 y ears n u rs in g e x p erie n ce, M ela n ie d em on str a te s th e p ro fo u n d e ff ectiv en ess o f N VC to c re ate la stin g, p osit iv e im pro vem en ts to p atie n t c a re a n d th e h ea lt h c a re w ork p la ce. 1 12p p, I S B N : 9 78-1 -8 92005-2 6-7 Pare n tin g F ro m Y ou r H ea rt: S h arin g th e G i s o f C om pa ssio n , C on n ectio n , a n d C hoic e b y In bal K ash ta n • F ille d w it h i n sig h t a n d p ra ctic a l s k ills , t h is b o ok le t w ill h elp y o u t r a n sfo rm y o u r p are n tin g to a d dre ss e v ery d ay c h alle n ges. 4 8p p, I S B N : 9 78-1 -8 92005-0 8-3 Pra ctic a l S p ir it u ali t y : R efl ectio n s o n t h e S p ir it u al B asis o f N on vio le n t C om m unic a tio n b y M arsh all B . R ose n berg , P hD • M arsh all’s v ie w s o n th e sp ir it u al o rig in s a n d u n derp in nin gs o f N VC, a n d h ow p ra ctic in g t h e p ro ce ss h elp s h im c o n nect t o t h e D iv in e. 4 8p p, I S B N : 9 78-1 -8 92005-1 4-4 Rais in g C hild re n C om passio n ate ly : P are n tin g th e N on vio le n t C om munic a tio n W ay b y M arsh all B . R ose n berg , P hD • L earn to cre ate a m utu ally re sp ectfu l, en ric h in g fa m ily d yn am ic lle d w it h h eartfe lt c o m mun ic atio n . 32p p, I S B N : 9 78-1 -8 92005-0 9-0 e S u rp ris in g P urp ose o f A nger : B ey o n d A nger M an agem en t: F in din g th e G i b y M arsh all B . R ose n berg , P hD • M arsh all s h ow s y o u h ow t o u se a n ger t o d is c o ver w hat y o u n eed , a n d t h en h ow t o m eet y o u r n eed s i n m ore c o n str u ctiv e, h ea lt h y w ay s. 4 8p p, I S B N : 9 78-1 -8 92005-1 5-1 Tea ch in g C hild re n C om passio n ate ly : H ow Stu den ts an d Tea ch ers C an Su cce ed W it h M utu al U ndersta n din g b y M arsh all B . R ose n berg , P hD • In th is n atio n al k ey n ote a d dre ss to M on te ss o ri e d u cato rs , M arsh all desc rib es his pro gre ss iv e, ra d ic a l ap pro ach to te a ch in g th at ce n te rs on co m pass io n ate c o n nectio n . 48p p, I S B N : 9 78-1 -8 92005-1 1-3 We C an W ork I t O ut: R eso lv in g C on flic ts P ea ce fu lly a n d P ow erfu lly b y M arsh all B . R ose n berg , P hD • P ra ctic a l su ggestio n s fo r fo ste rin g em path ic co n nectio n , gen u in e co -o p era tio n , an d sa tis fy in g re so lu tio n s i n e v en t h e m ost d iffi cu lt s it u atio n s. 3 2p p, I S B N : 9 78-1 -8 92005-1 2-0 What’s M ak in g Y ou A ngry ? 1 0 S te p s to T ra n sfo rm in g A nger S o E very o n e W in s by S h ari K le in a n d N eill G ib so n • A p ow erfu l, ste p -b y-s te p ap pro ach to tr a n sfo rm an ger to n d h ea lt h y, m utu ally s a tis fy in g o u tc o m es. 3 2p p, I S B N : 9 78-1 -8 92005-1 3-7 A vaila b le fr o m P udd le D an ce r P re ss, th e C en te r fo r N on vio le n t C om mun ic a tio n , all m ajo r b ooksto re s, a n d A m azo n .c o m . D is tr ib u te d b y I P G : 8 00-8 8 8-4 7 41. F or m ore in fo rm atio n a b ou t th ese b ook le ts o r t o o rd er o n li n e, v is it w ww.N on vio le n tC om mun ic a tio n .c o m S A V E a n e x tr a 1 0% a t N on vio le n tC om mun ic atio n .c o m w it h c o d e: b ook ad s Abou t t h e A uth or M arsh all B . R ose n berg , P hD ( 1 934 – 2015) f o u n ded a n d w as f o r m an y y ears th e D ir e c to r of Edu catio n al Ser vic e s fo r th e Cen ter fo r N on vio len t Com mun ic atio n , a n i n te rn atio n al p ea cem ak in g o rg an iz atio n . D urin g his li f e he au th ore d  een bo oks, in clu din g th e bes ts e lli n g N on vio le n t C om munic a tio n : A L an gu age of L if e ( P udd le D an ce r P re ss ), w hic h h as s o ld m ore th an o n e m illi o n c o p ies w orld w id e an d h as b een tr a n sla te d in to m ore t h an 3 0 l a n gu ag es, w it h m ore tr a n sla tio n s i n t h e w ork s. P hoto b y B eth B an nin g D r. R ose n berg h as re ce iv ed a n um ber o f aw ard s fo r h is N on vio le n t C om mun ic a tio n w ork i n clu din g: 2014: C ham pio n o f F org iv en ess A w ard fr o m th e World w id e Forg iv en ess Alli a n ce 2 006: Brid ge of Pea ce N on vio len ce Aw ard fr o m th e Glo b al Villa g e F ou n datio n 2005: L ig h t o f G od E xp re ss in g in S o ciet y A w ard fr o m th e Ass o cia tio n o f U nit y C hu rc h es 2004: Reli g io u s Scie n ce In te rn atio n al Gold en W ork s A w ard 2004: In te rn atio n al P ea ce P ra y er D ay M an o f P ea ce Aw ard b y th e Hea lt h y, H ap py H oly ( 3 H O) O rg an iz atio n 2002: P rin ce ss A nne o f E ngla n d an d C hief o f P oli c e R es to ra tiv e Ju stic e A ppre cia tio n A w ard 2 000: I n te rn atio n al L is te n in g A ss o cia tio n L is ten er o f t h e Year A w ard D r. R ose n berg rst u se d th e N VC p ro ce ss in fe d er ally fu n ded sc h ool in te g ra tio n p ro je c ts t o p ro vid e m ed ia tio n a n d c o m mun ic atio n s k ills t r a in in g du rin g th e 1 960s.  e C en te r fo r N on vio len t C om mun ic atio n , w hic h h e fo u n ded in 1984, now has hu n dre d s of ce rti ed N VC tr a in er s an d su pp orte rs t e a ch in g N VC i n m ore th an s ix ty c o u ntr ies a ro u n d t h e glo b e. A s o u gh t- a  er p re se n te r, p ea ce m ak er a n d v is io n ary l e a d er, D r. R osen ber g le d N VC w ork sh op s an d in te rn atio n al in ten siv e tr a in in gs fo r ten s of th ou sa n ds o f p eo p le in o ver 6 0 c o u ntr ies a cro ss th e world a n d p ro vid ed tr a in in g an d in it ia te d p ea ce p ro gra m s in m an y w ar- to rn are a s in clu din g N ig eria , Sie rra L eo n e, an d th e M id d le East. H e work ed tir e les sly w it h e d u cato rs , m an ag ers , hea lt h ca re pro vid er s, la w yer s, m ili t a ry offi cer s, p ris o n ers , p oli c e a n d p ris o n o ffi cia ls , g o ver nm en t o ffi cia ls , a n d in div id u al fa m ili e s. W it h g u it a r a n d p u pp ets i n h an d a n d a s p ir it u al en ergy t h at lle d a r o om , M arsh all sh ow ed u s h ow to c re ate a m ore pea cef ul a n d sa tis fy in g w orld .