As students complete the required Major Case Analysis, they are also responsible for completing a PowerPoint or Prezi presentation (or presentation that uses another appropriate technology) highlighting their findings.
rubric attached
The recommended length of the presentation is 8-10 slides with audio commentary included. The presentation must be appropriate to college-level work, demonstrate critical analysis of the case, and be free of spelling and grammar errors.
The presentation should outline the Major Case Analysis submitted in Module 7 and contain the major topics that discuss the Major Case Analysis. It should also contain the critical-thinking topics contained in this course: making claims, use of evidence, recognizing and validating assumptions, causal claims, and being persuasive. Students are free to choose any company for the case; however, they are strongly encouraged to choose a publicly held company that is listed on a major stock exchange in the U.S. so adequate information may be obtained for the case analysis.
Major Case Presentation Rubric – GBA-398 – Saint Leo University
https://saintleo.brightspace.com/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=78559&rubricId=56382&originTool=quicklinks 1/4
GBA 398 Major Case Presentation Rubric
Criteria Level 4
4 points
Level 3
3 points
Level 2
2 points
Level 1
1 point
No Submission
0 points
Analyze
businesses
from an
integrated
perspective,
using the
appropriate
CBK content.
• Central theme
clearly developed
that shows depth
and understanding
of appropriate CBK
content.
• Clearly identifies
problem(s) in case.
• Accurately
supports analysis
with appropriate
CBK content.
• Well-developed
insights combining
multiple CBK
perspectives into
a well-integrated
approach.
• Presentation is
• Central theme
developed, referring
to examples or
theories from prior
CBK courses but
lacks specificity.
• Clearly identifies
problem(s) in case.
• Supports analysis
with appropriate
CBK perspectives,
but lacks specificity.
• Presentation
develops insights
but does not have as
a well-
integrated approach.
• Presentation is
organized,
information is
• Central theme not
well developed.
• Alludes to
examples or
theories from prior
CBK courses but
lacks specificity.
• Identifies some
issues, but fails to
clearly identify key
problem(s).
• Supports analysis
with CBK
perspectives, but in
a cursory
manner and not
well-integrated.
• Presentation is
organized,
• Does not refer to
examples or
theories from prior
CBK courses.
• Fails to identify
the central problem
in the case.
• Does not support
posts with CBK
perspectives.
• Presentation is
disorganized,
information is not
logically
sequenced, and key
points not
obvious.
No Assignment
Submitted
10/3/2019 Preview Rubric: Major Case Presentation Rubric – GBA-398 Delivery Master – Saint Leo University
https://saintleo.brightspace.com/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=78559&rubricId=56382&originTool=quicklinks 2/4
Integrate the
various
components
of a business
and apply
them to
complex
business
decisions.
Apply critical
thinking
techniques
to solve
integrated
business
scenarios.
well organized,
information is
logically sequenced,
and key points are
obvious.
logically sequenced,
but key points not
obvious.
information mostly
sequenced in a
logical manner, and
key points not
obvious.
• Central theme
clearly developed
that shows depth
and understanding
of the business
decision.
• Supports decisions
and
recommendations
with specific
examples and uses
multiple
components of a
business.
• Central theme
developed, referring
to examples or
theories from prior
CBK courses but
lacks specificity.
• Supports decisions
and
recommendations
with examples and
multiple
components of a
business, but lacks
specificity.
• Alludes to a
central theme, but
not clearly
developed.
• Lacks specificity in
decisions or
recommendations.
• Supports decisions
and
recommendations
with brief examples.
• Fails to
incorporate multiple
components of a
business, and lacks
specificity.
• Central theme not
present.
• Decisions not
supported.
• Fails to
incorporate multiple
components of a
business, and
lacks specificity.
No Assignment
Submitted.
• Supports analysis
with specific critical
thinking examples
and theories.
• Superior use of
claims, evidence,
and persuasive
techniques.
• Clearly identifies
and discusses
underlying
assumptions.
• Supports analysis
with some
critical thinking
concepts, but lacks
specificity.
• Adequate use of
claims, evidence, and
persuasive
techniques.
• Identifies and
discusses some
underlying
assumptions.
• Alludes to
readings, but lacks
specificity in
decisions or
recommendations.
• Some use of
claims, evidence,
and persuasive
techniques.
• Underlying
assumptions
present, but not
clearly stated or
• Does not refer to
examples or
theories from prior
CBK courses.
• Does not use
claims, evidence,
and persuasive
techniques.
• Fails to identify
and discusses
underlying
assumptions.
No Assignment
Submitted
10/3/2019 Preview Rubric: Major Case Presentation Rubric – GBA-398 Delivery Master – Saint Leo University
https://saintleo.brightspace.com/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=78559&rubricId=56382&originTool=quicklinks 3/4
Demonstrate
the core
value of
excellence
through the
application
of critical
thinking and
an integrated
view of the
organization.
Presentation
and
Presentation
Slides
• Applies critical
thinking concepts in
an accurate and
insightful manner.
• Applies critical
thinking concepts in
an accurate manner,
but lacks insight.
presented.
• Applies critical
thinking concepts in
a cursory manner.
• Does not apply
specific critical
thinking concepts.
• CBK and critical
thinking
components well
integrated and
applied correctly to
address key issues in
case.
• Supports decisions
and
recommendations
with specific
examples and
multiple
components of a
business.
• CBK and critical
thinking
components applied
correctly, but not
well integrated.
• Supports decisions
and
recommendations
with specific
examples and
multiple
components of a
business, but lacks
specificity.
• CBK and critical
thinking
components applied
in a cursory manner
and not well
integrated.
• Alludes to
readings, but lacks
specificity in CBK
content area.
• Does not refer to
examples or
theories from prior
CBK courses and
does not apply
critical thinking
components.
No Assignment
Submitted.
• One or two minor
errors in
grammar,
punctuation, etc.
(e.g.
typos, missing
punctuation).
• Presentation is
well-rehearsed
captures the paper’s
essence.
• PowerPoint slides
are professional in
style and adhere to
APA citation
guidelines.
• Three or four
minor errors in
grammar,
punctuation, etc.
• Presentation
seems adequately
rehearsed and
captures paper’s
essence.
• PowerPoint slides
are adequate but
lack innovation and
professional style.
• One major error in
grammar,
punctuation, etc.
• Presentation is
inadequately
rehearsed and does
not flow well.
• PowerPoint slides
lack professional
style and do not
adhere to APA
citation guidelines.
• Grammar,
punctuation, etc. has
multiple repeated
errors.
• Not presented
(submitted slides
only).
• Presentation lacks
a professional,
cohesive design.
• Slides are more of
a
“read along” with
too much text.
No Assignment
Submitted
Preview Rubric: Major Case Presentation Rubric – GBA-398 Delivery Master – Saint Leo University
4/4
Total / 20
Overall Score
Level 4
18 points minimum
Level 3
16 points minimum
Level 2
14 points minimum
Level 1
12 points minimum
No Submission
0 points minimum
All papers you get at efficientpapers.com are meant for research purposes only. The papers are not supposed to be submitted for academic credit.
